Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Midwifery ; 66: 36-48, 2018 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30121477

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: to determine the usability of a recently developed set of 30 structure and process birth centre quality indicators. DESIGN: an explorative study using mixed-methods including literature, a survey, interviews and observations. The study is part of the Dutch Birth Centre Study. We first determined the measurability of birth centre quality indicators by describing them in detail. Next, we assessed the birth centres in the Netherlands according to these indicators using data derived from the Dutch Birth Centre General Questionnaire, the Dutch Birth Centre Integration Questionnaire, interviews, and policy documents. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: representatives of 23 birth centres in the Netherlands. MEASUREMENTS AND FINDINGS: 28 of the 30 quality indicators could be used to assess birth centres in the Netherlands, one had no optimal value defined, another could not be scored because the information was not available. Each quality indicator could be scored 0 or 1. Differences between birth centres were shown: the scores ranged from 7 to 22. Some of the quality indicators can be combined or made more specific so that they are easier to assess. Some quality indicators need adaptation because they are only applicable for some birth centres (e.g. only for freestanding or alongside birth centres). KEY CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: 28 of the 30 quality indicators are usable to assess structure and process quality of birth centres. With the findings of this study the set of structure and process quality indicators for birth centres in the Netherlands can be reduced to 22 indicators. This set of quality indicators can contribute to the development of a quality system for birth centres. Further research is necessary to formulate standards or minimum quality requirements for birth centres and to improve the set of birth centre quality indicators.


Assuntos
Centros de Assistência à Gravidez e ao Parto/normas , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde/métodos , Centros de Assistência à Gravidez e ao Parto/organização & administração , Feminino , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/normas , Humanos , Países Baixos , Gravidez , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde/tendências , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/normas , Inquéritos e Questionários
2.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 17(1): 259, 2017 Aug 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28768487

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Birth centres are described as settings where women with uncomplicated pregnancies can give birth in a home-like environment assisted by midwives and maternity care assistants. If complications arise or threaten, the woman is referred to a maternity unit of a hospital where an obstetrician will take over responsibility. In the last decade, a number of new birth centres have been established in the Netherlands, based on the assumption that birth centres provide better quality of care since they offer a better opportunity for more integrated care than the existing system with independent primary and secondary care providers. At present, there is no evidence for this assumption. The Dutch Birth Centre Study is designed to present evidence-based recommendations for organization and functioning of future birth centres in the Netherlands. A necessary first step in this evaluation is the development of indicators for measuring the quality of the care delivered in birth centres in the Netherlands. The aim of this study is to identify a comprehensive set of structure and process indicators to assess quality of birth centre care. METHODS: We used mixed methods to develop a set of structure and process quality indicators for evaluating birth centre care. Beginning with a literature review, we developed an exhaustive list of determinants. We then used a Delphi study to narrow this list, calling on experts to rate the determinants for relevance and feasibility. A multidisciplinary expert panel of 63 experts, directly or indirectly involved with birth centre care, was invited to participate. RESULTS: A panel of 42 experts completed two Delphi rounds rating determinants of the quality of birth centre care based on their relevance (to the setting) and feasibility (of use). A set of 30 determinants for structure and process quality indicators was identified to assess the quality of birth centre care in the Netherlands. CONCLUSIONS: We identified 30 determinants for structure and process quality indicators concerning birth centre care. This set will be validated during the evaluation of birth centres in the Dutch Birth Centre Study.


Assuntos
Centros de Assistência à Gravidez e ao Parto/normas , Serviços de Saúde Materna/normas , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/normas , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/métodos , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde/normas , Técnica Delphi , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Humanos , Países Baixos , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/métodos , Gravidez
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA