Recommendations for the successful control of a large outbreak of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium in a non-endemic hospital setting.

BACKGROUND: A large outbreak of three epidemic vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VRE) clones affected the study hospital for almost two years. AIM: To describe the strategy to successfully control this outbreak and eradicate VRE from the study hospital. METHODS: Infection control interventions started after detection of VRE in three patients. Hospital-wide surveillance was started after ongoing transmission despite isolation precautions, cleaning and contact tracing. Hygiene education and discipline were enhanced. Despite these interventions, additional measures were required to control the outbreak, such as ward disinfection with hydrogen peroxide vapour and the introduction of a VRE quarantine ward. Ultimately, ciprofloxacin prophylaxis for haematological patients on chemotherapy was abandoned. FINDINGS: Over a 22-month period, 242 VRE carriers were identified. Of these, 128 (53%) patients were detected by hospital-wide surveillance alone. Three epidemic clones were detected: ST494-vanA (N = 160), ST78-vanA (N = 23) and ST117-vanB (N = 32). In total, 5614 possible contacts were identified. VRE transmission occurred on 13 out of 23 wards. VRE was cultured from clinical specimens in 22 patients (seven with bacteraemia). Since January 2014, no further transmission of these VRE clones has been observed. CONCLUSION: Infection control measures according to international guidelines were insufficient to expose the outbreak to its full extent and control it. Its full extent only became apparent after sustained hospital-wide screening. Successful control of this hospital-wide VRE outbreak was feasible, but required great effort. Final containment and eradication of the epidemic clones was achieved by environmental decontamination with hydrogen peroxide vapour, strict isolation precautions, a VRE quarantine ward and antimicrobial stewardship.

Pneumococcal conjugate vaccination response in patients after community-acquired pneumonia, differences in patients with S. pneumoniae versus other pathogens.

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study is to investigate the immune response to the 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) in former pneumococcal CAP patients. We hypothesize that an impaired or suboptimal humoral immune response against (specific) pneumococcal serotypes might explain the vulnerability for pneumococcal disease. METHODS: Hospitalised adult CAP patients who participated in two trials (2004-2006 (n=201) and, 2007-2009 (n=304)) were screened. Patients eligible for inclusion had CAP caused by either S. pneumoniae (pneuCAP) or due to another well-defined pathogen (otherCAP). Serotype-specific pneumococcal antibody concentrations (total IgG and IgG2/IgG1) before and 3-4weeks after PCV13 administration were measured (Luminex) and compared between pneuCAP and otherCAP patients. RESULTS: We vaccinated 60 patients:i.e. 34 pneuCAP and 26 otherCAP patients. In the pneuCAP group, 74% of patients were categorized as good responders (≥9/13 serotypes with concentration≥1300ng/ml), versus 77% in the otherCAP group. Significantly fewer full responders (i.e. 13/13 serotypes with a concentration≥1300ng/mL) were identified in the pneuCAP group (15% vs 42% respectively, p=0.02). For serotype 1, total IgG and IgG2/IgG1 subset post-vaccination concentrations were significantly lower among pneuCAP patients. Our additional case-series showed that of 16 pneuCAP patients who were infected by a serotype included in PCV13 three patients did not respond against the serotype originally responsible for their CAP episode, including one former bacteraemic pneumococcal CAP patient who also failed to show a response against the serotype responsible for CAP during infection. Thirteen patients did respond to the previously infecting serotype following PCV13 including three patients who had bacteraemic pneumococcal pneumonia and did not show a response during infection against the serotype responsible for CAP. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm the immunogenic properties of PCV13 in former pneumococcal CAP patients including patients previously regarded as potential hyporesponders. A slightly diminished overall humoral response to polysaccharides characterizes the former pneumococcal CAP patients. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02141009.

Functionality of the pneumococcal antibody response in Down syndrome subjects.

We investigated the anti-polysaccharide antibody responses in subjects with Down syndrome (DS) because DS subjects show decreased peripheral B-lymphocyte numbers in all age groups, and a clinical picture of recurrent respiratory tract infections and increased incidence of autoimmune diseases which is reminiscent of common variable immunodeficiency disorders (CVID)-like disease. We determined titers and opsonophagocytosis in response to conjugated and unconjugated pneumococcal serotypes in 18 DS subjects aged 6-24 years. The results show adequate serotype-specific antibody titers in response to all conjugated and almost all unconjugated serotypes used. Opsonophagocytosis activity as measured against pneumococcal serotypes 9N, 19F and 23F was also found to be intact. We conclude that DS subjects do not have a clear defect in their anti-polysaccharide antibody response.

Acute-phase responsiveness of mannose-binding lectin in community-acquired pneumonia is highly dependent upon MBL2 genotypes.

Mannose-binding lectin (MBL) is a pattern recognition receptor of the complement system and plays an important role in innate immunity. Whether or not MBL acts as an acute-phase response protein in infection has been an issue of extensive debate, because MBL responses have shown a high degree of heterogeneity. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the promoter (wild-type Y versus X) and exon 1 (A versus 0) of the MBL2 gene can lead to MBL deficiency. This study investigated the influence of SNPs in the promoter and exon 1 of the MBL2 gene on the acute-phase responsiveness of MBL in 143 patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Acute-phase reactivity was observed only in MBL-sufficient genotypes (YA/YA, XA/YA, XA/XA and YA/0). In patients with wild-type exon 1 genotype A/A, positive acute-phase responses were associated with the presence of the YA haplotype and negative responses with its absence. Genotypes YA/0 and XA/XA produced equal levels of MBL in convalescence. In the acute phase, however, patients with genotype XA/XA displayed negative acute-phase responses more often than those with genotype YA/0. Correlation of MBL and C-reactive protein levels in the acute phase of pneumonia also depended upon the MBL2 genotype. In conclusion, acute-phase responsiveness of MBL was highly dependent upon the MBL2 genotype. These data suggest that heterogeneity in protein responses in the acute phase of disease should always be viewed in the light of possible influences of genetic differences in both structural and regulatory parts of the gene.