A rare case report of catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia with an uncommon CALM2 mutation.

Background: Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT) is a primary arrhythmia disorder characterized by syncope or sudden cardiac death and typically caused by a gain-of-function of the Ryanodine Receptor Type 2 (RyR2) mutation. Calmodulin is a calcium-binding protein responsible for many intracellular signalling pathways and disruptions in function or regulation may lead to potentially fatal arrhythmias. We present a case of a young patient with CPVT found to have an unusual, potentially causative, Calmodulin 2-a protein coding gene (CALM2) mutation. Case summary: A 21-year-old female with autism was brought to the ED following cardiac arrest. Bidirectional ventricular tachycardia was captured on electrocardiogram. Propranolol was initiated, and patient had no further episodes of ventricular arrhythmia. A subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) was implanted, and further genetics testing was done. Rapid Whole Genome Sequencing (PGnome®-RAPID) resulted heterozygous variant of uncertain significance in CALM2 gene NM_001743.5 for variant c.136G>A. Discussion: To the authors' knowledge, this is the third known record of such mutation in accordance with the International Calmodulin Registry (n = 74). Identification of CALM mutations can help advance the understanding of genetic underpinnings of arrhythmias and underscore necessity of genetic screening and personalized treatment strategies. Subcutaneous ICDs offer a promising therapeutic option while minimizing risks associated with traditional transvenous ICDs.

Low-Intensity vs. High-Intensity Antithrombotic Therapy After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Background: The optimal antithrombotic therapy after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is controversial. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing high-intensity vs. low-intensity antithrombotic therapy after TAVR in the absence of an established indication for anticoagulation. Methods: The primary efficacy and safety endpoints were a composite of death or thromboembolic events and Valve Academic Research Consortium 2-defined significant bleeding, respectively. All analyses were by intention to treat. Risk ratios (RRs) were calculated using the inverse variance random-effects model. Results: Four studies comprising 3358 patients (mean age 81 years, mean Society of Thoracic Surgery score 3.3%) were identified. Two studies compared anticoagulation vs. antiplatelet therapy after TAVR; the other 2 trials compared dual-antiplatelet therapy vs. mono-antiplatelet therapy after TAVR. The incidence of death or thromboembolic events (RR 0.66 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.55-0.80], p < 0.0001, I2 = 0%), death (RR 0.68 [95% CI 0.51-0.92], I2 = 11%, p = 0.01), and Valve Academic Research Consortium 2-defined major bleeding (RR 0.69 [95% CI 0.48 - 1.00], p = 0.003, I2 = 44%) was significantly lower in patients on low-intensity antithrombotic therapy than in those on high-intensity antithrombotic therapy. Conclusions: In an elderly patient population undergoing TAVR, routine initiation of a high-intensity antithrombotic therapy in the absence of a clinical indication for anticoagulation was associated with increased risk of death or thromboembolic complications, increased risk of death, and increased risk of significant bleeding. Routine initiation of an anticoagulation therapy or dual-antiplatelet therapy after TAVR in the absence of an established indication for anticoagulation may not be advisable.

Comparing echocardiographic characteristics in genotype positive-phenotype positive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy.

AIMS: There is little information about hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) with pathologic genetic mutations and concurrent hypertension (HTN). Hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) does not exclude an underlying genetic aetiology. METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a single-centre case-control study of 39 adults with pathologic HCM mutations, confirmed by genetic testing, compared to 39 age- and gender-matched patients with hypertensive LVH. The gene-positive HCM cohort was further stratified by the coexisting presence or absence of HTN. Clinical and echocardiographic characteristics were compared. Of 39 gene-positive HCM, 43.6% (17/39) had concurrent HTN. The gene-positive HCM cohort had larger left atrial (LA) area (22.1 cm2 vs. 18.9 cm2, P = 0.002), more diastolic predominant pulmonary vein flow (38.5% vs. 7.7%, P = 0.001), and more moderate diastolic dysfunction (33.3% vs. 12.8%, P = 0.032) when compared with the hypertensive LVH cohort. Greater left ventricular (LV) mass (277.7 g vs. 207.7 g, P = 0.025), increased frequency of severe LVH (58.8% vs. 27.3%, P = 0.047), and more abnormal global longitudinal strain (GLS) (-14.1% vs. -16.9%, P = 0.049) was observed in the gene-positive HCM cohort with concurrent HTN. CONCLUSION: Gene-positive HCM, compared to hypertensive LVH, is characterized by more advanced diastolic dysfunction and larger LA size. Gene-positive HCM patients with concomitant HTN had greater LV mass, more severe LVH, and more abnormal GLS, suggesting HTN may negatively affect the progression of myocardial dysfunction in genetic HCM. LVH out-of-proportion to pressure burden in HTN patients should raise suspicion of underlying genetic HCM.

Advanced heart failure and heart transplantation in adult congenital heart disease in the current era.

BACKGROUND: Adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD) may undergo heart transplantation (HTx) despite increased risk of poor short-term outcomes due to factors including surgical complexity and antibody sensitization. We assessed the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with ACHD in the current era referred for HTx at a single high-volume transplant center. METHODS: From 2010 to 2020, 37 ACHD patients were evaluated for HTx. ACHD HTx recipients were compared to non-ACHD HTx recipients matched for age, sex, listing status, and prior cardiac surgery. RESULTS: Of the 37 patients with ACHD, eight (21.6%) were declined for HTx. Of 29 ACHD patients listed, 19 (65.5%) underwent HTx. Compared with non-ACHD HTx controls, the ACHD HTx recipients had more treated cellular (21.1% vs. 15.8%, P = .010) and antibody-mediated (15.8% vs. 10.5%, P = .033) rejection. There was no difference in hospital readmission or allograft vasculopathy at 1 year. There was a nonsignificant higher 1-year mortality in ACHD HTx recipients (21.1% vs. 7.9%, P = .21). CONCLUSION: At a high-volume transplant center, ACHD patients undergoing HTx appear to have a marginally higher risk of rejection, but no significant increase in 1-year mortality. With careful selection and management, HTx for patients with ACHD may be feasible in the current era.

The impact of depression on heart transplant outcomes: A retrospective single-center cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Depression is prevalent in patients with heart failure and after heart transplant. We identified the prevalence of pre- and post-transplant depression and its association with clinical characteristics and post-transplant outcomes. METHODS: We reviewed 114 adults transplanted 1/1/2015 to 12/31/2015 and identified patients with pre- and post-transplant depression. Clinical characteristics and outcomes were compared. RESULTS: Of 114 patients, 35.1% had pre-transplant depression and 26.3% had post-transplant depression. Patients with post-transplant depression within the first year were significantly more likely to have acute rejection (10% vs 0%), longer intensive care unit (11.7 days vs 7.8 days) and hospital stay (31.7 days vs 16.3 days), and discharge to inpatient rehabilitation (26.7% vs 8.3%). Patients with post-transplant depression within the first year had significantly higher 5-year mortality (30% vs 9.5%, p = .009). However, after adjustment for total artificial heart/biventricular assist device, acute rejection, intensive care unit, and hospital length of stay, this relationship was no longer significant (HR 2.11; 95% CI 0.18-25.27; p = .556). CONCLUSIONS: Depression is common among heart transplant candidates and recipients. While pre-transplant depression did not impact outcomes, patients with post-transplant depression were more likely to have had a complicated course, suggesting the need for increased vigilance regarding depression in such patients.

Anticoagulation Therapy After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: We review the prevalence; natural history; impact of subclinical clinical thrombosis on valve hemodynamics, clinical outcomes, and valve durability; and the role of anticoagulation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). RECENT FINDINGS: Subclinical leaflet thrombosis is a dynamic finding present in both transcatheter and surgical bioprosthetic aortic valves. This finding is less prevalent in patients on anticoagulation and resolves following initiation of anticoagulation. Routine anticoagulation after TAVR in high-surgical-risk patients was associated with increased mortality and thromboembolic complications. In the absence of a clinical indication for anticoagulation, there is no reason to initiate anticoagulation after TAVR for the prevention of subclinical leaflet thrombosis. In patients with an established indication for anticoagulation, for instance, atrial fibrillation, clinical or symptomatic valve thrombosis, or a clinical event related to valve thrombosis, anticoagulation should be initiated or continued after TAVR to treat the clinical indication.

Absence of electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy in patients undergoing Transcatheter aortic valve replacement is associated with increased mortality.

BACKGROUND: We examined the association between the absence ECG LVH and all-cause mortality in patients with severe AS undergoing TAVR. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective single center study on 399 TAVR patients from 2012 to 2016. ECGs were reviewed for LVH diagnosed by Sokolow-Lyon's voltage criteria. All patients met echocardiographic criteria for LVH. Logistic regression was used to examine the association between ECG LVH and covariates. Survival analysis was performed using Cox regression analysis and Kaplan Meier curves. RESULTS: Patients without ECG LVH were younger (81.0 ± 8.4 vs. 84.0 ± 7.7 years, p = 0.001) with a higher BMI (29.3 ± 7.0 vs. 27.1 ± 5.6 kg/m2, p = 0.006) and lower FEV1 (65.6 ± 22.8 vs. 74.1 ± 21.6%, p = 0.002). In multivariable analysis, increased BMI and decreased FEV1 remained predictive of the absence of ECG LVH. Over a mean follow-up time of 32 (± 17.0) months, the 5-year cumulative survival was 79% in the ECG LVH group and 58% in the group without ECG LVH (p = 0.039). Absence of ECG LVH remained predictive of all-cause mortality (HR 1.56, 95% CI 1.01-2.59, p = 0.045) in multivariable Cox regression analysis. When patients were grouped by comorbidities, patients with the highest mortality were those with increased BMI or decreased FEV1. CONCLUSIONS: Absence of LVH by ECG criteria in patients with severe AS undergoing TAVR was associated with increased all-cause mortality. Routinely performed, noninvasive and inexpensive ECG may aid in identification of high-risk patients that may not benefit from TAVR and warrant further evaluation of underlying comorbidities.

Uniqueness of laryngeal nerve injury following heart transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury (RLNI) after heart transplantation has not been well studied. This can manifest as vocal cord dysfunction causing dysphonia. Previous research is limited to aortic, coronary bypass, and valvular surgery. Identifying RLNI after heart transplantation is important in order to more accurately detail complications associated with this major surgery. METHODS: This is a retrospective study assessing 972 adult patients who underwent orthotopic heart transplantation between 2010-2019. Primary outcome was incidence of RLNI. Secondary outcomes were 1-year mortality and length of stay. Cardiology and otolaryngology notes were examined. Key word searches were used to identify possible RLNI in patients' health care record. RESULTS: 2.9% (29/972) of patients developed new RLNI confirmed by laryngoscopy during hospitalization. Patients with RLNI had a significantly increased risk of 1-year mortality (P = .015) and length of stay (P = .006) compared to those without RLNI. 68.9% (20/29) of RLNI was left-sided (68.9%). CONCLUSIONS: Recurrent laryngeal nerve injury is a recognizable adverse outcome following heart transplantation. This study supports that RLNI is associated with increased 1-year mortality and length of stay. Early otolaryngology evaluation may be warranted to evaluate vocal cord mobility and address potential management.