French practice of emergency resuscitative thoracotomy. A study based on the Traumabase Registry.

AIM OF THE STUDY: Emergency resuscitative thoracotomy (ERT) has been described as a potentially life-saving procedure for trauma patients who have been admitted in refractory shock or with recent loss of sign of life (SOL). This nationwide registry analysis aimed to describe the French practice of ERT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 2015 to 2021, all severe trauma patients who underwent ERT were extracted from the TraumaBase→ registry. Demographic data, prehospital management and in-hospital outcomes were recorded to evaluate predictors of success-to rescue after ERT at 24-hour and 28-day. RESULTS: Only 10/26 Trauma centers have an effective practice of ERT, three of them perform more than 1 ERT/year. Sixty-six patients (74% male, 49/66) with a median age of 37 y/o [26-51], mostly with blunt trauma (52%, 35/66) were managed with ERT. The median pre-hospital time was 64mins [45-89]. At admission, the median injury severity score was 35 [25-48], and 51% (16/30) of patients have lost SOL. ERT was associated with a massive transfusion protocol including 8 RBCs [6-13], 6 FFPs [4-10], and 0 PCs [0-1] in the first 6h. The overall success-to-rescue after ERT at 24-h and 28-d were 27% and 15%, respectively. In case of refractory shock after penetrating trauma, survival was 64% at 24-hours and 47% at 28-days. CONCLUSIONS: ERT integrated into the trauma protocol remains a life-saving procedure that appears to be underutilized in France, despite significant success-to-rescue observed by trained teams for selected patients.

EuroTrauma, delays in access to bleeding control. A comparison between a conventional and a hybrid trauma center, both European military trauma centers.

PURPOSE: Comparison of access times to CT and surgical/radiological bleeding control between two European military trauma centers. METHODS: Retrospective and observational study conducted in two military level 1 trauma centers in Toulon (France) and Koblenz (Germany) between 2013 and 2018. Inclusion of severe trauma patients with ISS > 15 with clinical and biological criteria of bleeding. RESULTS: Inclusion of 607 patients (318 in Toulon and 289 in Koblenz). Mean ISS 30. Median access time to CT significantly lower for Koblenz, 14 vs. 30 min; p < 0.001. Median access time to the emergency bleeding control lower in Toulon 84 min vs. 92 (p = 0.114). No impact on mortality at 24 h 9% in Koblenz and 11% in Toulon. Mortality at 28 days identical 17%. CONCLUSION: The organizational innovation at the military hospital in Koblenz saves time in the injury assessment. However, it has no impact on the access time to the scanner and on the mortality at 24 and 28 days. This fight against hemorrhage is a management bundle including delays, transfusion, and team training. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: 2,002,878 v 0.

Independent factors of preventable death in a mature trauma center: a propensity-score analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The rate of potentially preventable deaths (PPD) and preventable deaths (PD) can reach more than 20% of overall trauma mortality. Bleeding is the leading cause of preventable mortality. The aim of our study is to define the independent factors of preventable or potentially preventable mortality in our mature trauma system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a single-center retrospective study in the Sainte Anne Military Teaching Hospital, Toulon, France, including all severe trauma patients admitted to our trauma center and discharged alive as well as all severe trauma patients who died with a death considered preventable or potentially preventable from January 2013 to December 2020. We matched the two groups using a propensity score and searched for independent factors using a generalized linear model. RESULTS: 846 patients were included and analyzed. After matching, our cohort consisted of 245 patients in the survivor group and 49 patients in the preventable deaths group. Pre-hospital delays (73 min vs 54 min P = 0.003) as well as delays before incision in the operating room (80 min vs 52 min P < 0.001) were significantly longer in the PD group. These delays were independent factors of preventable mortality OR 10.35 (95% CI [3.44-31.11] P < 0.001) and OR 37.53 (95% CI [8.51-165.46] P < 0.001) as well as pelvic trauma OR 6.20 (95% CI [1.53-25.20] P = 0.011). CONCLUSION: Delays in pre-hospital care, delays in access to the operating room from arrival at the trauma center, and pelvic injuries are independent factors associated with an increased risk of preventable mortality in trauma.

ABO blood type and functional neurological outcome in patients with severe traumatic brain injury.

BACKGROUND: The ABO blood system has been involved in the pathogenesis of several diseases, including coagulopathy and bleeding complications. In trauma patients, blood type A has been associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome, and recently, blood type O has been associated with all-cause mortality. The purpose of this study was to assess the association between ABO blood types and long-term functional outcomes in critically ill patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). METHODS: We conducted a single-center, retrospective, observational study including all patients admitted to the intensive care unit with severe TBI (defined as a Glasgow Coma Scale score of ≤8) between January 2007 and December 2018. Patient characteristics and outcomes were extracted from a prospective registry of all intubated patients admitted to the intensive care unit for TBI. ABO blood types were retrospectively retrieved from patient medical records. The association between ABO blood type (A, B, AB, and O) and unfavorable functional outcome (defined by a Glasgow Outcome Scale score between 1 and 3) 6 months after injury was assessed in univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: A total of 333 patients meeting the inclusion criteria were included. There were 151 type O (46%), 131 type A (39%), 37 type B (11%), and 12 type AB patients (4%). No significant differences in baseline demographic, clinical, or biological characteristics were observed between blood types. The prevalence of unfavorable outcome was significantly different between the four groups. After adjustment for confounders, blood type O was significantly associated with unfavorable outcome at 6 months (odds ratio, 1.97; confidence interval [1.03-3.80]; p = 0.042). The prevalence of coagulopathy or progressive hemorrhagic injury was not statistically different between blood types ( p = 0.575 and p = 0.813, respectively). CONCLUSION: Blood type O appears to be associated with unfavorable long-term functional outcome in critically ill patients with severe TBI. Further studies are needed to detail the mechanism underlying this relationship. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level IV.

Emergency department thoracotomy in a physician-staffed trauma system: the experience of a French Military level-1 trauma center.

PURPOSE: To investigate survival after emergency department thoracotomy (EDT) in a physician-staffed emergency medicine system. METHODS: This single-center retrospective study included all in extremis trauma patients who underwent EDT between 2013 and 2021 in a military level 1 trauma center. CPR time exceeding 15 minutes for penetrating trauma of 10 minutes for blunt trauma, and identified head injury were the exclusion criteria. RESULTS: Thirty patients (73% male, 22/30) with a median age of 42 y/o [27-64], who presented mostly with polytrauma (60%, 18/30), blunt trauma (60%, 18/30), and severe chest trauma with a median AIS of 4 3-5 underwent EDT. Mean prehospital time was 58 min (4-73). On admission, the mean ISS was 41 29-50, and 53% (16/30) of patients had lost all signs of life (SOL) before EDT. On initial work-up, Hb was 9.6 g/dL [7.0-11.1], INR was 2.5 [1.7-3.2], pH was 7.0 [6.8-7.1], and lactate level was 11.1 [7.0-13.1] mmol/L. Survival rates at 24 h and 90 days after penetrating versus blunt trauma were 58 and 41% versus 16 and 6%, respectively. If SOL were present initially, these values were 100 and 80% versus 22 and 11%. CONCLUSION: Among in extremis patients supported in a physician-staffed emergency medicine system, implementation of a trauma protocol with EDT resulted in overall survival rates of 33% at 24 h and 20% at 90 days. Best survival was observed for penetrating trauma or in the presence of SOL on admission.