PCR diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis in asymptomatic dogs using conjunctival swab samples.

The efficacy of conjunctival swab (CS) as a sampling method for visceral leishmaniasis (VL) diagnosis by PCR of asymptomatic dogs was evaluated. The CS was compared to blood samples (B) and skin biopsies (SB), two less invasive samples potentially useful for massive screening of dogs. Thirty asymptomatic dogs, with serological and parasitological positive tests, were used. The samples were analyzed by two PCR methods: kDNA PCR-hybridization and ITS-1 nPCR. The DNA sample volume used was of 1.0 microL and 10.0 microL respectively. Using CS samples the kDNA PCR-hybridization was able to detected parasite DNA in 24/30 dogs (80%) using the right conjunctiva (RC) and 23/30 dogs (76.6%) with the left conjunctiva (LC), 17/30 dogs (56.7%) by means of SB and 4/30 dogs (13.3%) with B. The CS positivity obtained combining RC and LC results was of 90% (27/30 dogs). The assay of CS samples by ITS-1 nPCR revealed that 25/30 dogs (83.3%) were positive when using RC and 20/30 dogs (66.6%) were positive when using LC. Via the same method 15/30 dogs (50.0%) were positive by SB and 17/30 dogs (56.7%) with B. The CS positivity obtained by ITS-1 nPCR combining RC and LC was of 83.3%. The CS positivities for RC and LC were significantly higher (p<0.05) than SB and B for kDNA PCR-hybridization method. Statistical difference in relation to SB and B was verified by ITS-1 nPCR only for RC. The kDNA PCR-hybridization and ITS-1 nPCR methods showed similar sensitivities for CS and SB samples. On the other hand, for blood samples, the positivity of ITS-1 nPCR was significantly higher than the one obtained by the kDNA PCR-hybridization, indicating that sensitivity of PCR methods can vary according to the biological sample examined. Our results showed that CS was suitable to detect Leishmania DNA in asymptomatic animals when comparing to other low-invasive samples. The CS sensitivities obtained in this study were similar to the ones observed in other studies for VL diagnosis in symptomatic dogs. We concluded that the use of CS for regular screenings of dogs by PCR should be considered.

Comparison of PCR methods for diagnosis of canine visceral leishmaniasis in conjunctival swab samples.

Four PCR assays for detection of Leishmania DNA in conjunctival swab samples were compared. All methods had two steps: a first amplification followed by hybridization or by a new amplification (nested or seminested). Two methods (kDNA PCR-hybridization and kDNA snPCR) used primers targeted to the minicircles of kinetoplast DNA (kDNA) and the other two methods to the coding (LnPCR) and intergenic noncoding regions (ITS-1 nPCR) of ribosomal rRNA genes. kDNA PCR-hybridization was positive for 22/23 dogs (95.6%) and for 40/46 samples (86.9%), considering the right and the left conjunctivas. kDNA snPCR was positive for 21/23 dogs (91.3%) and for 40/46 samples (86.9%). The ITS-1 nPCR and LnPCR were both able to detect the parasites in 17/23 dogs (73.9%) and 29/46 (63%) and 30/46 (65.2%) samples, respectively. The positivities of the kDNA based methods were significantly higher; however the choice of the best method will depend on the kind of information required with the diagnosis.

Evaluation of the conjunctival swab for canine visceral leishmaniasis diagnosis by PCR-hybridization in Minas Gerais State, Brazil.

The visceral leishmaniasis (VL) in Brazil is caused by Leishmania chagasi (L. infantum) and dogs are considered to be the main domestic reservoir. The epidemiological control involves the elimination of infected dogs. Therefore, the correct diagnosis is very important in order to avoid the disease transmission or unnecessary culling of dogs. Recently, an antileishmanial vaccine for dogs was licensed and commercialized in Brazil. Vaccinated dogs test positive in the conventional serological tests, rendering these assays useless for control programs involving vaccinated animals. The Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) is an attractive alternative to the diagnosis in this context; but non-invasive samplings have great importance because they are simpler, painless and less resisted by dog-owners. This study aimed at evaluating the conjunctival swab (CS) for canine VL diagnosis by the PCR-hybridization procedure. Two groups of 23 seropositive dogs were used. CS samples were obtained from both eyes of each animal. The DNA extraction from CS was performed by the phenol chloroform method in group 1 and by boiling in group 2. In addition, blood was collected from each animal so that 30 microl was spotted onto filter paper (FP) and 1.0 ml was treated to obtain the buffy coat (BC). The DNA extraction from the BC and FP was accomplished by identical procedures in both groups using commercial kits. The PCR positivities for both groups 1 and 2 were, respectively: 73.9% and 52.2% (CS), 13% and 30.4% (BC), 8.7% and 17.4% (FP). The hybridization step increased the positivities for: 91.3% and 65.2% (CS), 21.7% and 34.8% (BC), 30.4% and 43.5% (FP), respectively. The highest frequency of positivity was obtained by the association between CS and DNA extraction by phenol chloroform. This approach can be very useful for diagnosis of canine leishmaniasis and could be applied to the follow-up and regular screening of vaccinated dogs.

An alternative immunohistochemical method for detecting Leishmania amastigotes in paraffin-embedded canine tissues.

Canine visceral leishmaniasis (CVL) is a zoonosis and a chronic systemic disease of the dog caused by a protozoan by the species Leishmania infantum in the Old World and Leishmania chagasi in the New World. Several methods are currently employed for the diagnosis of CVL including microscopic detection of the parasite in bone marrow and lymph node aspirates, demonstration of specific antibodies anti-Leishmania in sera from infected animals, and isolation of the parasite by in vitro culture or by inoculation of laboratory animals. However, a definitive diagnosis is based on the actual detection of the parasite, which is conventionally achieved by examining Giemsa-stained smears or histopathological sections stained with hematoxylin and eosin. These methods have a low sensitivity, and therefore, they are often inconclusive. This is particularly true in canine organs that have a low level of parasitism such as kidneys, lungs, central nervous system, and testis, or, in some cases, the skin. The technique for immunohistochemical detection of leishmanial amastigotes in canine tissues has been reported previously and has proved to be undoubtedly efficient for the diagnosis. In this paper, we describe a straightforward and inexpensive immunohistochemical approach for Leishmania detection in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded canine tissues. Amastigote forms of Leishmania were easily observed within macrophages in several organs from naturally infected dogs using the streptavidin-biotin immunohistochemical method with canine hyperimmune serum as the primary antibody. In addition, the secondary antibody used was not specific to canine immunoglobulin, characterizing a cross-immune reaction. Our results indicate that this technique could be a useful tool for epidemiological, clinical, and histopathological studies.

Canine visceral leishmaniasis: a histopathological study of lymph nodes.

Canine visceral leishmaniasis (CVL) is a zoonosis and a chronic systemic disease of the dog caused by a protozoan of the genus Leishmania. In the New World, the disease is caused by the species Leishmania (Leishmania) chagasi. There are only a few studies on the histopathology of lymph nodes in canine leishmaniasis. In the present paper, we report a histopathological description of lymph nodes considering animals with a defined clinical status and the parasite burden of lymph node tissues. Forty-eight mongrel dogs naturally infected with L. chagasi, were obtained from two endemic areas of Brazil. Cervical, axillary and popliteal lymph nodes were analyzed. The parasite burden, expressed as "Leishman-Donovan units", was variable among the defined types of clinical condition. Asymptomatic dogs can show higher parasitism than oligosymptomatic or symptomatic animals. Grossly, a generalized lymphadenopathy was found, but it was mainly observed in cervical and popliteal nodes. Histologically, the increased number and size of lymphoid follicles, and the marked hypertrophy and hyperplasia of medullary macrophages (cords and sinus) explained the lymphadenopathy. In addition, the clinical status or the tissue parasitism load might not be directly related to the intensity of the lesions.