SARS-CoV-2 Neutralization in Convalescent Plasma and Commercial Lots of Plasma-Derived Immunoglobulin.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with primary or secondary immunodeficiency (PID or SID) face increased insecurity and discomfort in the light of the COVID-19 pandemic, not knowing if and to what extent their comorbidities may impact the course of a potential SARS-CoV-2 infection. Furthermore, recently available vaccination options might not be amenable or effective for all patients in this heterogeneous population. Therefore, these patients often rely on passive immunization with plasma-derived, intravenous or subcutaneous immunoglobulin (IVIG/SCIG). Whether the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and/or the progress in vaccination programs lead to increased and potentially protective titers in plasma-derived immunoglobulins (Ig) indicated (e.g., for humoral immunodeficiency) remains a pressing question for this patient population. PURPOSE: We investigated SARS-CoV-2 reactivity of US plasma-derived IVIG/SCIG products from the end of 2020 until June 2021 as well as in convalescent plasma (CP) from May 2020 to August 2020 to determine whether potentially neutralizing antibody titers may be present. METHODS: Final containers of IVIG/SCIG and CP donations were analyzed by commercial ELISA for anti-SARS-CoV-2 S1-receptor binding domain (RBD) IgG as well as microneutralization assay using a patient-derived SARS-CoV-2 (D614G) isolate. Neutralization capacities of 313 single plasma donations and 119 plasma-derived IVIG/SCIG lots were determined. Results obtained from both analytical methods were normalized against the WHO International Standard. Finally, based on dense pharmacokinetic profiles of an IVIG preparation from previously published investigations, possible steady-state plasma levels of SARS-CoV-2 neutralization capacities were approximated based on currently measured anti-SARS-CoV-2 potencies in IVIG/SCIG preparations. RESULTS: CP donations presented with high variability with regards to anti-SARS-CoV-2 reactivity in ELISA as well as in neutralization testing. While approximately 50% of convalescent donations were not/low neutralizing, approximately 10% were at or above 600 IU/mL. IVIG/SCIG lots derived from pre-pandemic plasma donations did not show neutralizing capacities for SARS-CoV-2. Lots produced between December 2020 and June 2021 entailing plasma donations after the emergence of SARS-CoV-2 showed a rapid and constant increase in anti-SARS-CoV-2 reactivity and neutralization capacity over time. While lot-to-lot variability was substantial, neutralization capacity increased from a mean of 21 IU/mL in December 2020 to 506 IU/mL in June 2021 with a maximum of 864 IU/mL for the most recent lots. Pharmacokinetic extrapolations, based on non-compartmental superposition principles using steady-state reference profiles from previously published pharmacokinetic investigations on IVIG in PID, yielded potential steady-state trough plasma levels of 16 IU/mL of neutralizing SARS-CoV-2 IgG based on the average final container concentration from May 2021 of 216 IU/mL. Maximum extrapolated trough levels could reach 64 IU/mL based on the latest maximal final container potency tested in June 2021. CONCLUSIONS: SARS-CoV-2 reactivity and neutralization capacity in IVIG/SCIG produced from US plasma rapidly and in part exponentially increased in the first half of 2021. The observed increase of final container potencies is likely trailing the serological status of the US donor population in terms of COVID-19 convalescence and vaccination by at least 5 months due to production lead times and should in principle continue at least until Fall 2021. In summary, the data support rapidly increasing levels of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in IVIG/SCIG products, implicating that a certain level of protection could be possible against COVID-19 for regularly substituted PID/SID patients. Nevertheless, more research is still needed to confirm which plasma levels are needed to provide protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection in immune-compromised patients.

People with deficiencies in their immune system often have an insufficient antibody response to antigens such as bacteria, viruses, or vaccines. These patients therefore often receive antibodies from healthy people to replace the missing antibodies and build a first line of defense against infections. These antibodies (also called immunoglobulins [Ig]) are prepared from plasma, the liquid fraction of the blood without cells, of healthy donors. This plasma is then split up during pharmaceutical production into its protein components. One of these is immunoglobulin G (IgG), which is the protein family that neutralizes/inactivates infectious agents as well as marks these infectious agents so they can be recognized by other parts of the immune system. With the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and the severe to fatal outcomes for certain patient groups, especially people with impaired immunity, these patients and their physicians are interested in whether their antibody replacement therapy also confers protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection. We analyzed the capability of plasma-derived Ig lots to (i) recognize SARS-CoV-2 protein by ELISA method as well as (ii) neutralize SARS-CoV-2 by neutralization studies using the actual virus under biosafety level 3 (BSL-3) conditions. Here we show increasing anti-SARS-CoV-2 activity over time of manufactured Ig lots produced between December 2020 and June 2021. The most recent lots had a neutralizing activity of up to 864 IU/mL. Considering that the US represents Octapharma's main plasma source, the progress in vaccination levels together with the evolution of the COVID-19 pandemic in this country suggests that the intravenous or subcutaneous immunoglobulin (IVIG/SCIG) neutralization capacities against SARS-CoV-2 might still increase and could potentially reach a level where antibody plasma concentrations in the patient confer immune protection.

Ocular safety of propiverine hydrochloride in elderly patients with primary open- and narrow-angle glaucoma
.

BACKGROUND: Propiverine hydrochloride (P4) is an antimuscarinic drug used in overactive bladder syndrome. METHODS: Two studies were performed: one in 24 patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) treated with topical ß-blockers, one in 24 patients with narrow-angle glaucoma (NAG) treated with pilocarpine ± topical ß-blockers. Patients were treated in randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind parallel-group fashion (15 : 9 attribution to P4 vs. placebo (PL)). TREATMENTS: Single-blind PL dose in the morning of day 1 for baseline; double-blind 15 mg P4 or matched placebo t.i.d. from the afternoon of day 1 until the morning of day 7. RESULTS: In the morning of day 7, trough mean serum P4 concentrations were 169.4 ng/mL (CV (coefficient of variation): 0.55) and 140.7 ng/mL (CV: 0.56) in OAG and NAG; at 3:15 hours after dosing: 237.4 ng/mL (CV: 0.47) and 212.4 ng/mL P4 (CV: 0.38), respectively. P4-treatment led to a prompt (OAG) or more gradient (NAG) increase in pupil diameter (PUD), with a maximum difference from PL of 0.97 mm (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.67 - 1.27) and 0.87 mm (95% CI: 0.36 - 1.39) in OAG and NAG, respectively. However, there was no average increase in intraocular pressure (IOP) or increase in noteworthy safety-relevant individual IOP values (or changes thereof). There was no effect on visual acuity or accommodation. CONCLUSIONS: 1-week treatment with P4 appeared to be safe 1) in OAG patients treated with topical ß-blockers and 2) in NAG patients treated with topical pilocarpine ± ß-blockers, irrespective of whether the eyes had previously been treated with glaucoma surgery or laser therapy.
.

Effects of renal insufficiency on the elimination of fluorescein lisicol (NRL972), an investigational marker of hepatic transporter function.

BACKGROUND: NRL972 (Fluorescein Lisicol), a fluorescent-labelled bile salt, is an investigational marker of hepatic biliary transporter function. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the pharmacokinetics (PK) of NRL972 in patients with severe (SRI: creatinine clearance (CLCr)<30 mL/min per 1.73 m2 body surface area (BSA)) and mild-to-moderate renal insufficiency (MRI: 30≤CLCr<80 mL/min) relative to matched controls (CON: CLCr≥90 mL/min). METHODS: The plasma and urinary PK of NRL972 were determined after single 2-mg doses of NRL972 administered by 15-second intravenous (IV) injection. The PK were derived noncompartmentally using all data points up to 6 hours after dosing or only using the concentrations at 10 and 30 minutes after injection. RESULTS: 17, 22, and 16 subjects were enrolled in the SRI, MRI, and CON group, respectively. NRL972 was hardly quantifiable in urine in any of the subjects groups. The plasma concentrations of NRL972 declined rapidly after dosing in mostly monoexponential fashion. The decline tended to be faster in patients with renal insufficiency: in SRI patients, the point and 95% confidence interval (CI) estimates of the group ratios (SRI/CON) were 0.691 (CI: 0.517 to 0.925) for the C(30):C(10) concentration ratio, 0.785 (CI: 0.634 to 0.970) for t1/2, and 1.344 (CI: 1.028 to 1.757) for bodyweight normalized clearance (CL/BW); in MRI patients, the effect was slightly less. CONCLUSION: Renal insufficiency does not impair the elimination of NRL972; instead, there is a trend of enhanced NRL972 disposition in patients with compromised renal function. Concomitant renal impairment is unlikely to have confounding effects on the evaluation of hepatic function by NRL972 testing.

Effects of advanced age and renal dysfunction on the single- and repeated-dose pharmacokinetics of modified-release flupirtine.

BACKGROUND: Flupirtine is a nonopioid, central analgesic without antipyretic or antiphlogistic properties. Flupirtine-MR is an oral modified-release formulation with a 100 mg fast-input and a 300 mg portion with slow protracted release. METHODS: Single- (D01) and repeated-dose (D03-D09) pharmacokinetics of 400 mg flupirtine-MR were investigated in patients with severe renal dysfunction (REN: N: 12; 21 50 years of age; creatinine clearance (CLCr)≤30 mL/min per 1.73 m2 body surface area (BSA)) and healthy older subjects (EN1: N: 8; 60-69 years; CLCr≥80 mL/min and EN2: N: 8; ≥70 years, CLCr≥60 mL/min) vs. young healthy control subjects (YN: N: 12; 21-40 years; CLCr≥90 mL/min). RESULTS: Renal dysfunction led to a relatively small average increase in systemic exposure to flupirtine: on D09, the REN : YN-ratios were 1.37 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.03-1.82), 1.21 (CI: 1.01-1.45), and 1.34 (CI: 1.09-1.64) for Css,0, Css,max, and Css,av, respectively. A similar increase in exposure was observed in older subjects: the respective EN1:YN-ratios were 1.30 (CI: 0.95-1.79), 1.23 (CI: 1.01-1.49), and 1.23 (CI: 0.98-1.54); the EN2:YN-ratios were 1.50 (CI: 1.10-2.04), 1.16 (CI: 0.85-1.41), and 1.41 (CI: 1.12-1.79), respectively. Neither age nor renal function was a predominant factor of pharmacokinetic variability. Single and repeated doses of flupirtine-MR were very well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: The average renal and age effects were small, but the use of a lower starting dose (1/2 tablet) is recommended since some of these subjects might have relatively high exposure levels.

No relevant cardiac, pharmacokinetic or safety interactions between roflumilast and inhaled formoterol in healthy subjects: an open-label, randomised, actively controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Roflumilast is an oral, selective phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor with anti-inflammatory effects in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The addition of roflumilast to long-acting bronchodilators improves lung function in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD. The present study investigated drug-drug interaction effects between inhaled formoterol and oral roflumilast. METHODS: This was a single-centre (investigational clinic), open, randomised, multiple-dose, parallel-group study. In Regimen A, healthy men were treated with roflumilast (500 µg tablet once daily; Day 2-18) and concomitant formoterol (24 µg twice daily; Day 12-18). In Regimen B, healthy men were treated with formoterol (24 µg twice daily; Day 2-18) and concomitant roflumilast (500 µg once daily; Day 9-18). Steady-state plasma pharmacokinetics of roflumilast, roflumilast N-oxide and/or formoterol (Cmax and AUC0-τ) as well as pharmacodynamics - blood pressure, transthoracic impedance cardiography (ZCG), 12-lead digital electrocardiography, peripheral blood eosinophils, and serum glucose and potassium concentrations - were evaluated through Day 1 (baseline), Day 8 (Regimen B: formoterol alone) or Day 11 (Regimen A: roflumilast alone), and Day 18 (Regimen A and B: roflumilast plus formoterol). Blood and urine samples were taken for safety assessment at screening, pharmacokinetic profiling days and Day 19. Adverse events were monitored throughout the study. RESULTS: Of the 27 subjects enrolled, 24 were evaluable (12 in each regimen). No relevant pharmacokinetic interactions occurred. Neither roflumilast nor formoterol were associated with significant changes in cardiovascular parameters as measured by ZCG, and these parameters were not affected during concomitant administration. Formoterol was associated with a slight increase in heart rate and a corresponding shortening of the QT interval, without changes in the heart rate-corrected QTc interval. There were small effects on the other pharmacodynamic assessments when roflumilast and formoterol were administered individually, but no interactions or safety concerns were seen after concomitant administration. No severe or serious adverse events were reported, and no adverse events led to premature study discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS: No clinically relevant pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic interactions were found when oral roflumilast was administered concomitantly with inhaled formoterol, including no effect on cardiac repolarisation. Roflumilast was well tolerated.

Effects of hepatic dysfunction on the single-dose pharmacokinetics of fesoterodine.

Fesoterodine, a new antimuscarinic for the treatment of overactive bladder, is rapidly and extensively hydrolyzed by nonspecific esterases to its principal active moiety, 5-hydroxymethyl tolterodine (5-HMT). The elimination of 5-HMT involves metabolism and renal excretion. The plasma and urinary pharmacokinetics of 5-HMT and its inactive carboxy (SPM 5509), N-desisopropyl (SPM 7789), and carboxy-N-desisopropyl (SPM 7790) metabolites were investigated after a single oral dose of 8 mg of fesoterodine in 8 male subjects with moderate hepatic cirrhosis (Child-Turcotte-Pugh class B) and 8 matched healthy controls. The estimated mean ratios (95% confidence interval) of the area under the curve extrapolated to infinity after dosing (AUC(0-∞)), cumulative urinary excretion up to 48 hours after dosing (Ae(0-48)), maximum observed concentration (C(max)), and apparent terminal disposition half-life (t(1/2)) of 5-HMT for cirrhotic and healthy subjects were 2.2 (1.5-3.1), 2.5 (1.7-3.8), 1.4 (1.0-1.9), and 1.1 (0.8-1.3), respectively. In subjects with hepatic cirrhosis, AUC(0-∞) and Ae(0-48) of 5-HMT increased approximately 2-fold; the increase in C(max) was smaller, and t(1/2) was unaffected. AUC and C(max) of the inactive carboxy metabolites, SPM 5509 and SPM 7790, were reduced reciprocally by about 50%, whereas exposure to the dealkylated metabolite, SPM 7789, increased about 2-fold. Fesoterodine 8 mg was equally well tolerated in both groups. The results indicate that moderate hepatic cirrhosis reduces 5-HMT clearance, with an apparent effect on the carboxylation pathway and not on dealkylation.

Efficacy and safety of ambroxol lozenges in the treatment of acute uncomplicated sore throat. EBM-based clinical documentation.

Sore throat is the hallmark of acute pharyngitis. Although usually caused by viral infections, it is frequently treated with antibiotics. Such inappropriate use of antibiotics might best be challenged by offering efficacious and safe symptomatic pain relief instead. However, there is need for robust evidence to support such alternatives. Presently, the evidence from randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trials (RCT) with the local anaesthetic ambroxol (CAS 23828-92-4) in the treatment of sore throat is being reviewed. This relates to five RCT in 1,772 patients; 1,713 were evaluable with regard to efficacy. Treatment with ambroxol lozenges was statistically significantly superior to placebo in reducing sore throat pain intensity with a high level of consistency of the estimated effect across the different studies. The effect had an early onset and lasted up to at least 3 h after a single first lozenge. The pain relief was associated with a statistically superior regression of pharyngeal redness and inflammation; with ambroxol, the overall efficacy was more frequently rated as at least "good". Treatment with the ambroxol lozenges was well tolerated. There was heterogeneity in reporting adverse events: in one later study with less severe baseline pain intensity there was more frequent reporting of hypoaesthesia of the oral cavity and tongue as an untoward phenomenon. In patients with more severe baseline pain this reflection of the medication's pharmacological action was only rarely reported as untoward. It is concluded that lozenges containing 20 mg ambroxol are a safe and efficacious treatment for acute uncomplicated sore throat of recent onset in adult patients.

Steady-state pharmacokinetics of roflumilast and roflumilast N-oxide in patients with mild and moderate liver cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND: Roflumilast and its primary N-oxide metabolite are targeted phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) inhibitors with similar in vivo potency. Roflumilast is being developed for the treatment of inflammatory airway diseases such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of mild and moderate liver cirrhosis on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of roflumilast and roflumilast N-oxide. METHODS: Patients with mild (n = 8, Child-Pugh A) and moderate (n = 8, Child-Pugh B) liver cirrhosis and healthy subjects (n = 8) matched with patients with cirrhosis with regard to sex, age and bodyweight received oral roflumilast 250 microg once daily for 14 days. Blood samples were collected for 24 hours after the last dose on day 14. Steady-state plasma concentrations of roflumilast and roflumilast N-oxide were determined using a validated high-performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry assay. The pharmacokinetics were compared between groups using ANOVA. RESULTS: In patients with liver cirrhosis, the average total exposure (area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 hours [AUC(24)]) of roflumilast was approximately 51% (Child-Pugh A) and 92% (Child-Pugh B) higher than in healthy subjects. In contrast, roflumilast maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) was unaltered in Child-Pugh A patients and was increased by 27% in Child-Pugh B patients. Changes in the AUC(24) of roflumilast N-oxide were less distinct, with 24% and 41% increases and corresponding C(max) increases of 26% and 40% in Child-Pugh A and B patients, respectively, compared with healthy subjects. Overall, changes in average potency-corrected exposure to the sum of the free fractions of both compounds were estimated to result in approximately 26% and 46% increases in total PDE4 inhibitory capacity (tPDE4i) in Child-Pugh A and B patients, respectively, relative to healthy subjects. Roflumilast was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Mild and moderate liver cirrhosis resulted in distinct alterations of exposure to roflumilast but only in modest alterations of exposure to roflumilast N-oxide. The integrated exposure-weighted assessment of the observed pharmacokinetic changes of roflumilast and roflumilast N-oxide (tPDE4i) indicates modest average exposure increases to the sum of both compounds. These findings and the favourable tolerability profile suggest that roflumilast can be safely used in patients with mild and moderate liver cirrhosis without special precautions or dose adjustment.

Bioequivalence of a novel oral metronidazole formulation.

The plasma pharmacokinetics of metronidazole (CAS 443-48-1) and its active OH-metabolite (CAS 4812-40-2) were investigated in 16 healthy volunteers after the oral administration of single oral doses of 500 mg metronidazole by means of a novel (test, T) and reference formulation (reference, R). The trial was conducted according to a randomised, controlled, open, within-subject cross-over design with two periods one week apart for wash-out. A single oral dose of 500 mg metronidazole by means of the test formulation T (Vagimid Dragees) resulted in a geometric mean C(max) of 10649 ng/ mL (CV: 0.21) for metronidazole after a median t(max) of 70 min (range: 40 to 120); the geometric mean of the AUC(0-t(z)) and AUC(0-infinity) were 107406 (CV: 0.25) and 109056 ng x h/mL (CV: 0.26); the arithmetic mean of the half-life (t1/2) and the mean residence time (MRT) were 7.28 h (CV: 0.12) and 11.62 h (CV: 0.10). For the OH-metabolite, the geometric mean C(max) was 1941 ng/mL (CV: 0.22) after a median t(max) of 480 min (range: 360 to 600) with a geometric mean AUC(0-tz) and AUC(0-infinity) of 48653 (CV: 0.21) and 52417 ng x h/mL (CV: 0.22), respectively; the arithmetic mean t1/2 and MRT were 10.60 h (CV: 0.21) and 21.14 h (CV: 0.13), respectively. The test formulation was bioequivalent with the reference formulation for both metronidazole (90% CI of the treatment ratio of 1.02 to 1.15 and 1.02 to 1.12 for C(max) and AUC) and its metabolite (90% CI of 0.92 to 1.05 and 0.98 to 1.06, respectively). The treatments were very well tolerated and there were no limiting safety-relevant findings.

Bioequivalence of a novel high-dose oral formulation of alpha-dihydroergocryptine.

The plasma pharmacokinetics of alpha-dihydroergocryptine (DHEC, CAS 14271-05-7) were investigated in 24 patients with Parkinson disease after the administration of repeated oral doses of 40 mg DHEC twice daily by means of a novel 40 mg DHEC tablet (Almirid 40 mg test T) and an established 20 mg DHEC tablet (Almirid 20 mg - reference R). The trial was conducted according to a randomised, controlled, open, within-subject cross-over design; steady-state was established by means of a stepwise up-titration from 5 to 40 mg b.i.d. from day D01 to D19; investigational treatments (40 mg DHEC b.i.d. by means of formulation R and T) were administered on day D20 and D21 according to a randomised, period-balanced within-subject cross-over; treatment with DHEC was down-titrated in stepwise fashion from day D22 to D34. Morning doses of 2 x 20 mg DHEC (reference) yielded a fast and relatively short lasting peak with a geometric mean Cmax of 2157 pg/mL (CV: 0.978) after a median tmax of 1.00 h. Cmin throughout the first 12 h was on average 189 pg/mL (CV: 0.908). There was a quite distinct diurnal effect: evening doses of 2 x 20 mg DHEC (treatment R), yielded a relatively lower exposure with geometric mean Cmax, Cav- and Cmin-values of 800 pg/mL (CV: 0.870), 389 pg/mL (0.813) and 177 pg/mL (CV: 0.942). In contrast, there was relatively little within-subject distinction between the two formulations: for the day profile after the morning dose, the estimated ratios of the true means (Pr:R) for Cmax Cmin and Cav were 1.18 (90% CI: 0.96 to 1.43 - CVm: 0.394), 0.96 (90% CI: 0.86 to 1.09 - CVm: 0.230) and 1.06 (90% CI: 0.93 to 1.21 - CVm: 0.254); for the night profile after the evening dose, the estimated ratio of the true means (muT:muR) for Cmax, Cmin and Cav were 1.11 (90% CI: 0.91 to 1.35 - CVm: 0.395), 1.07 (90% CI: 0.95 to 1.20 - CVm: 0.232) and 1.07 (90% CI: 0.95 to 1.20 - CVm: 0.220). In view of important medical-ethical constraints not to expose an unreasonably high number of subjects, these findings could be accepted as a sufficient demonstration of bioequivalence.

Single dose pharmacokinetics of alpha-dihydroergocryptine in patients with moderate to severe renal insufficiency.

AIM: This study was carried out to evaluate the pharmacokinetic profile of alpha-dihydroergocryptine (CAS 14271-05-7, DHEC, Almirid) in plasma and urine in patients with moderately to severely impaired renal function (creatinine clearance < 30 ml.min-1.1.73 m-2), following administration of single oral doses. METHODS: This was an open, nonrandomized trial. Seven patients with chronic renal disease and six healthy subjects received a single dose of 20 mg DHEC. Blood and urine samples were taken at specified intervals up to 72 h after dosing. Concentrations of unchanged DHEC were determined by radio-immunoassay (RIA) and concentrations of unchanged DHEC plus pooled metabolites by enzyme-immunoassay (EIA), respectively. RESULTS: In patients with impaired renal function, the mean Cmax and AUC(0-infinity) values for unchanged DHEC were 2.1 (95% confidence interval CI: 0.99 to 4.42) and 1.85 (95% CI: 0.72 to 4.77) times larger than in controls. The 24-h urinary excretion was only 0.3 (95% CI: 0.12 to 0.71) times that in healthy subjects. Similar findings were recorded for total DHEC plus metabolites. CONCLUSIONS: As treatment with DHEC is in general uptitrated starting with doses as low as 5 mg DHEC, which are then increased while accounting for individual effects both in terms of efficacy and tolerability, the observed range of effects of impaired renal function on DHEC's pharmacokinetics does not suggest the need to revise this policy, although lower end-doses are likely to be achieved.

Efficacy and tolerability of ambroxol hydrochloride lozenges in sore throat. Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials regarding the local anaesthetic properties.

UNLABELLED: Two confirmatory clinical trials were performed to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of ambroxol lozenges at doses of 20 mg and 30 mg relative to placebo in relieving the symptoms of sore throat of at least moderately severe intensity in patients suffering from oro-pharyngeal catarrh accompanied by pain on swallowing, feeling of scratchiness, burning and urge to cough. OBJECTIVE: Description and comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of lozenges containing 20 mg or 30 mg ambroxol hydrochloride (trans-4-[(2-amino-3,5-dibrom-benzyl)amino]cyclohexano hydrochloride, CAS 18683-91-5) in relieving acute sore throat, in comparison to placebo. DESIGN: Two similar, multi-centre, prospective, placebo-controlled, randomised, double-blind trials involving three days of treatment with up to 6 lozenges containing 20 or 30 mg ambroxol hydrochloride per day. SUBJECTS: There were enrolled three-hundred-thirty-one (331, study I) and three-hundred-eighty-three (383, study II) outpatients with acute uncomplicated sore throat of at least moderately severe intensity which is not suspected to be due to bacterial pharyngitis. TREATMENTS: Double-blind treatment with up to six lozenges per day containing either 20 mg or 30 mg ambroxol hydrochloride or placebo (a lozenge with a distinct minty flavour). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The time-weighted average pain relief over the first 3 h after the first lozenge as a ratio of the baseline pain intensity of sore throat (SPIDnorm) and the patients' evaluation of efficacy and tolerability at the end of each day of the three days treatment. RESULTS: All treatments led to a reduction of pain intensity; the means (+/- SD) SPIDnorm after the 1st lozenge were 0.53 +/- 0.28 or 0.50 +/- 0.30 or 0.38 +/- 0.28 with 20 mg or 30 mg ambroxol hydrochloride or placebo respectively in study I, and 0.53 +/- 0.30 or 0.60 +/- 0.28 or 0.39 +/- 0.31 in study II; the effect of treatment was statistically significant (p: 0.0002 or p: 0.0033 in study I and p: 0.0005 or p: 0.0001 in study II, respectively, for the comparison of 20 mg or 30 mg ambroxol hydrochloride vs. placebo). The improvement with the active treatments was greater than with placebo (95% confidence interval (CI) estimates of the mean treatment differences vs. placebo were 0.08 to 0.23 or 0.05 to 0.20 for lozenges with 20 mg or 30 mg ambroxol hydrochloride, respectively, in study I, and 0.06 to 0.21 or 0.13 to 0.28 in study II). At the end of each subsequent ambulatory treatment day with up to six lozenges per day, a statistically significantly higher proportion of patients scored a higher level of efficacy for the active treatments with ambroxol hydrochloride compared to placebo. The treatments investigated were equally well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Sucking lozenges containing 20 mg or 30 mg ambroxol hydrochloride has a beneficial pain-relieving effect in patients with acute sore throat, superior to that achieved by sucking a placebo lozenge. While both strengths were equally well tolerated, the higher strength of 30 mg ambroxol hydrochloride did not prove more effective. The findings confirm that the previously discovered local anaesthetic properties of ambroxol hydrochloride do have beneficial clinical implications.

Local anaesthetic properties of ambroxol hydrochloride lozenges in view of sore throat. Clinical proof of concept.

UNLABELLED: Acute oro-pharyngeal catarrh is characterised by mild to severe sore throat, such as pain on swallowing, feeling of scratchiness, burning and urge to cough. The present study was conducted to explore whether the test compound is going to show clinical relevance and is a suitable medication for the relief of these symptoms. OBJECTIVE: Description and comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of lozenges containing 20 mg ambroxol hydrochloride (trans-4-[(2-amino-3,5-dibrombenzyl)amino]cyclohexano hydrochloride, CAS 18683-91-5) in relieving acute sore throat, in comparison to placebo. DESIGN: Multi-centre, prospective, placebo-controlled, randomised, double-blind trial involving two days of treatment with up to 6 lozenges containing 20 mg ambroxol hydrochloride per day. SUBJECTS: Two-hundred-eighteen (218) patients were enrolled (97 males, 121 females, average age: 39.4 +/- 15 years, range: 17-81 years); 215 were treated: 107 with 20 mg ambroxol and 108 with placebo; 26 discontinued prematurely (13 in each treatment group). 208 patients constituted the intent-to-treat (ITT) dataset (105 and 103 for treatment with ambroxol and placebo, respectively); 196 patients constituted the perprotocol (PP) dataset (97 and 99, respectively); all treated patients were part of the dataset for safety analysis. TREATMENTS: Double-blind treatment with up to 6 lozenges per day containing 20 mg ambroxol hydrochloride or placebo (a lozenge with a distinct minty flavour). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The time-weighted average pain relief over the first 3 h after the first lozenge as a ratio of the baseline pain intensity of sore throat (SPIDnorm) and the patients' evaluation of efficacy and tolerability at the end of each day of treatment. RESULTS: Both treatments led to a reduction of pain intensity; the mean (+/- SD) SPIDnorm after the 1st lozenge were 0.39 +/- 0.27 and 0.28 +/- 0.25 for 20 mg ambroxol hydrochloride and placebo, respectively; the treatment effect of ambroxol was statistically significantly superior compared to placebo (p: 0.0029; 95% confidence interval estimate of the mean treatment difference for ambroxol minus placebo: 0.04 to 0.18). At the end of each subsequent ambulatory treatment day with up to 6 lozenges per day, a statistically significantly higher proportion of patients scored a higher level of efficacy for the active treatments with ambroxol hydrochloride compared to placebo. The investigational treatments were equally well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Sucking lozenges containing 20 mg ambroxol hydrochloride has a beneficial pain relieving effect in patients with acute sore throat, superior to that which otherwise can be achieved by sucking a placebo lozenge. This finding confirms that the preclinical local anaesthetic properties of ambroxol hydrochloride may have beneficial clinical implications.