Efficiency of glaucoma drug regulation in 5 European countries: a 1995-2006 longitudinal prescription analysis.

PURPOSE: To compare the evolution of prostaglandin analog (PGA) and ß-blocker (BB) prescriptions across 5 European countries. METHODS: Data were extracted from various sources: (1) IMS data for France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom, (2) glaucoma-treated patients from the United Kingdom General Practice Research Database (UK-GPRD), (3) prescriptions delivered by the territorial pharmaceutical service of Monselice of the Padova region (Italy). Drugs were grouped into 3 classes: PGAs, BBs, and other drugs. Yearly market shares were calculated. Treatment persistence survival curves were estimated for Italian and UK data, and the 3 drug groups were compared using the Cochran Mantel Haenszel test. RESULTS: According to Padova data, BBs decreased in market share, whereas PGAs increased. A linear extrapolation of these market shares, based on 1998 to 2003 data, predicted that the 2 curves should cross in 2005, a prediction reinforced by the European Medicines Agency authorization (2002) of PGAs as first-line glaucoma treatments. That this did not occur may be explained by Italy's refusal to reimburse PGAs as first-line therapy. IMS data identified Italy and Germany as 2 countries in which BBs are still more frequently prescribed than PGAs. Treatment persistence with PGAs as monotherapy, in PGA-naive patients, was longer than for BBs according to both Padova and UK-GPRD data. This held true for both first-line and second-line PGA prescriptions (UK-GPRD); the persistence of second-line PGA equalled first-line BB treatment. CONCLUSION: Health care regulations impacted upon glaucoma prescribing and may be one of the reasons for different annual evolution rates of PGA and BB prescriptions.

International vision requirements for driver licensing and disability pensions: using a milestone approach in characterization of progressive eye disease.

OBJECTIVE: Low vision that causes forfeiture of driver's licenses and collection of disability pension benefits can lead to negative psychosocial and economic consequences. The purpose of this study was to review the requirements for holding a driver's license and rules for obtaining a disability pension due to low vision. Results highlight the possibility of using a milestone approach to describe progressive eye disease. METHODS: Government and research reports, websites, and journal articles were evaluated to review rules and requirements in Germany, Spain, Italy, France, the UK, and the US. RESULTS: Visual acuity limits are present in all driver's license regulations. In most countries, the visual acuity limit is 0.5. Visual field limits are included in some driver's license regulations. In Europe, binocular visual field requirements typically follow the European Union standard of ≥120°. In the US, the visual field requirements are typically between 110° and 140°. Some countries distinguish between being partially sighted and blind in the definition of legal blindness, and in others there is only one limit. CONCLUSIONS: Loss of driving privileges could be used as a milestone to monitor progressive eye disease. Forfeiture could be standardized as a best-corrected visual acuity of <0.5 or visual field of <120°, which is consistent in most countries. However, requirements to receive disability pensions were too variable to standardize as milestones in progressive eye disease. Implementation of the World Health Organization criteria for low vision and blindness would help to establish better comparability between countries.

Cost effectiveness of travoprost versus a fixed combination of latanoprost/timolol in patients with ocular hypertension or glaucoma: analysis based on the UK general practitioner research database.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the cost effectiveness of travoprost versus a fixed combination of latanoprost/timolol as first-line therapies for ocular hypertension or glaucoma. METHODS: Patient charts were extracted from the UK General Practitioner Research Database. Patients with ocular hypertension or glaucoma who received first-line treatment with either travoprost or latanoprost/timolol and were followed up for >6 months were included. Treatment failure was defined as a treatment change or a glaucoma intervention (laser therapy or surgery). Time to treatment failure was compared using a Cox model and adjusted by the propensity score method. RESULTS: Eligible patients received either travoprost (n=639) or latanoprost/timolol (n=176). Their mean age was 70 years at diagnosis and 48.2% of patients were male. Patient characteristics did not differ significantly between treatment groups. Treatment failure rates at 1 year were 31.3% (travoprost) and 39.4% (latanoprost/timolol) and yielded a hazard ratio for failure in favour of travoprost (0.75; p<0.04) after adjusting for age, sex, co-morbidities and duration of follow-up. Adjusted annual costs of glaucoma management were significantly (p<0.001) less with travoprost (pound215.86) than with latanoprost/timolol (pound327.83). CONCLUSIONS: In everyday practice, travoprost was maintained longer than latanoprost/timolol as first-line therapy for glaucoma. The mean daily costs of travoprost were 50.8% less per patient than those of latanoprost/timolol. Despite adjustments, these results might be confounded, at least partially, by disease severity.

How prostaglandins have changed the medical approach to glaucoma and its costs: an observational study of 2228 patients treated with glaucoma medications.

PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to investigate how the medical treatment of glaucoma changed between 1997 and 2002, since the advent of prostaglandin derivatives, with regard to drug prescriptions and pharmaceutical costs. METHODS: A study was made of medical prescriptions for 2228 patients with glaucoma and/or ocular hypertension, in order to investigate the following: (i) the antiglaucoma drugs most commonly prescribed in 1997 and 2002, and any differences between the drugs prescribed in these 2 years; (ii) the number of drugs used per patient in 1997 and 2002, respectively, and (iii) any increase in the prescribing of antiglaucoma drugs and their relative costs from 1997 to 2002. RESULTS: From 1997 to 2002 there was a sharp drop in the prescribing of beta-blockers (79% in 1997 and 55% in 2002). A marked increase in the use of prostaglandin derivatives (0% in 1997 and 18% in 2002) was registered and a marked increase in the prescribing of carbonic anhydrase inhibitors (5% in 1997 and 14% in 2002) was also noted. From 1997 to 2002 there was a trend towards drug addition rather than substitution, so that the number of drugs used per patient increased. The number of patients treated increased enormously (by 98%) from 1997 to 2002. The cost of medical therapy from 1997 to 2002 rose dramatically, with an increase of 148.9% per patient. CONCLUSION: The availability of prostaglandin derivatives has strongly influenced the medical approach to glaucoma. This class of drugs will soon become the type most commonly prescribed for patients with glaucoma and/or ocular hypertension. The increased number of treatments also suggests that the approach of ophthalmologists towards these diseases has changed. Ocular hypertension, as well as glaucoma, is now treated more aggressively. Given the increase in the prescription of prostaglandin derivatives, the pharmaceutical cost of treatment has risen dramatically.