Expert Statement: Pneumothorax Associated with One-Way Valve Therapy for Emphysema: 2020 Update.

For selected patients with advanced emphysema, bronchoscopic lung volume reduction with one-way valves can lead to clinically relevant improvements of airflow obstruction, hyperinflation, exercise capacity, and quality of life. The most common complication of this procedure is pneumothorax with a prevalence of up to ±34% of the treated patients. Patients who develop a pneumothorax also experience meaningful clinical benefits once the pneumothorax is resolved. Timely resolution of a post-valve treatment pneumothorax requires skilled and adequate pneumothorax management. This expert panel statement is an updated recommendation of the 2014 statement developed to help guide pneumothorax management after valve placement. Additionally, mechanisms for pneumothorax development, risk assessment, prevention of pneumothorax, and outcomes after pneumothorax are addressed. This recommendation is based on a combination of the current scientific literature and expert opinion, which was obtained through a modified Delphi method.

Non-Answered Questions in Patients with Endobronchial Valve Placement for Lung Volume Reduction.

Endoscopic lung volume reduction is a minimally invasive procedure performed to reduce the space occupied by the emphysemas' lobes. This procedure has been demonstrated to be beneficial for patients with advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and severe hyperinflation. The use of endobronchial valves is increasing, as well as the number of reports of adverse events. The most common complications after the procedure are a pneumothorax, bleeding, infections, the need for valve removal, and valve expulsion. We have recently treated a patient who achieved immediate left upper lobe atelectasis but developed a pneumothorax on the 6th day and near-fatal kinking of the left lower lobe bronchus. This patient had asphyctic episodes probably due to a functional left pneumonectomy. We should consider this unusual complication in patients undergoing endoscopic lung volume reduction whose condition worsens after achieving complete lobar atelectasis.

Expert statement: pneumothorax associated with endoscopic valve therapy for emphysema--potential mechanisms, treatment algorithm, and case examples.

The use of endoscopically placed unidirectional valves for the treatment of emphysema is increasing. With better patient selection, there is also an increased likelihood of complications associated with the procedure, such as postprocedural pneumothorax. There is, however, little evidence of pneumothorax management in patients with severe COPD and emphysema. This report describes an expert recommendation that has been developed to outline pneumothorax management after valve placement to inform physicians and patients of the risk-benefit profile and to assist them in decision making. Skilled and aggressive pneumothorax management is necessary in this patient population, and by following these recommendations traumatic scenarios, prolonged drainage, extended hospitalizations, and/or surgery might be avoided in many cases.

Transbronchoscopic pulmonary emphysema treatment: 1-month to 24-month endoscopic follow-up.

OBJECTIVE: Describe the results of a 1- to 24-month follow-up of individuals undergoing transbronchoscopic placement of one-way valves. DESIGN: Longitudinal, noncomparative study. SETTING: University hospital. PATIENTS: Nineteen heterogeneous emphysema patients. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Pulmonary function testing, imaging examination, and videobronchoscopy were performed at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after the insertion of one-way valves. Mean age was 67.63 +/- 8.71 years, mean body mass index (BMI) was 24.02 +/- 2.65, and mean exposure to smoking was 65.32 +/- 27.46 pack-years (+/- SD). Baseline BODE index (BMI, degree of airflow obstruction and dyspnea, exercise capacity as measured by the 6-min walk test [6MWT]) was 7 to 10 in 10 patients (estimated 4-year mortality, 80%) and 5 to 6 in 9 patients (estimated 4-year mortality, 40%). Sixty-four valves were inserted. There was no procedure-related mortality. Nonsustained atelectasis was observed within 48 h in 2 of 12 patients with right upper lobe occlusion. Fifty-six bronchoscopic examinations were performed in 24 months. Granulomas not requiring treatment were the main complication. Mucus clogging the valve, mainly at 1 month, was easily cleaned. Eighteen patients completed the 1- and 3-month follow-ups, 14 patients completed the 6-month follow-up, 11 patients completed the 12-month follow-up, and 5 patients completed the 24-month follow-up. Improvement was observed in the 6MWT after 1 month (p = 0.028) and in the BODE index at 3 months (p = 0.002). FEV1 or FVC improvement > or = 12% or > or = 150 mL was observed, respectively, in 4 of 18 patients and 8 of 18 patients at 1 month, 4 of 18 patients and 7 of 18 patients at 3 months, and in 3 of 14 patients and 5 of 14 patients at 6 months. After 24 months, one of five patients and three of five patients, respectively, retained an FEV1 and FVC change > or = 12% or > or = 150 mL. Significant improvement (decrease > or = 4%) in the St. George Respiratory Questionnaire was observed at 3 months and 6 months in three of four domains. CONCLUSION: Endobronchial valves are safe, but the criteria to measure improvement and to select patients should be refined. Atelectasis should be reconsidered as primary treatment goal.