Comparing exercises with and without electromyographic biofeedback in subacromial pain syndrome: A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Deficits in movement and muscle activation of scapulohumeral joint are related to Subacromial Pain Syndrome. Electromyography biofeedback during exercise may enhance muscle activation and coordination, and consequently improve pain and shoulder function. METHODS: This study compared the effects of an exercise protocol with and without using electromyographic biofeedback on pain, function and movement of the shoulder complex in subjects with Subacromial Pain Syndrome. A total of 24 patients with subacromial pain (mean age = 46.2 + 8.1;18 women) were randomized to either therapeutic exercise or exercise plus biofeedback to the trapezius and serratus muscles. Pain and shoulder function were evaluated as the primary outcome and range of motion, muscle strength, electromyographic activity and scapulohumeral kinematics as secondary outcomes. The subjects underwent eight weeks of intervention and comparisons were made between groups in baseline, at 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and at 4 weeks post intervention. FINDINGS: There were differences between groups for pain [mean difference = 1.5 (CI 0.3, 3.2) p = 0.01] at 8 weeks in the Exercise group and scapular upward rotation at 60° of arm elevation [mean difference = 13.9 (CI 0.9, 9.3), p = 0.006] in the Biofeedback group. There was no difference for the other variables of scapular kinematics as well as for shoulder function (DASH), muscle strength, range of motion and electromyographic variables. INTERPRETATION: The addition of Biofeedback to the exercise protocol increased upward rotation of the scapula. However, the volunteers who performed only the Exercises had a better response in reducing pain.

Motor alterations in the kinetic chain in individuals with chronic shoulder pain.

BACKGROUND: Shoulder pain may be related to biomechanical dysfunctions in the kinetic chain. OBJECTIVE: To compare the mobility and muscular endurance of thoracolumbar spine and hip, and the neuromuscular control of the lower extremity of individuals with and without shoulder pain and to determine the discriminative capacity between groups of these variables. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study. METHOD: One hundred and two individuals with and without shoulder pain were evaluated to range of motion (ROM) of the thoracolumbar spine and hips, the muscular endurance time of the thoracolumbar spine and hips muscles, and the neuromuscular control of the lower extremity, by the Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT). RESULTS: Individuals with shoulder pain presented lower ROM and muscular endurance time in all tests evaluated (p < 0.01-p = 0.03), greater perception of pain during all ROM and muscle endurance (p < 0.01-p = 0.04) evaluations, and less neuromuscular control of the lower extremity in the compound reach (p < 0.01-p = 0.01), anterior and posteromedial (p < 0.01-p = 0.04) directions of the SEBT on both sides. The anterior reach direction of the SEBT of the contralateral limb to the shoulder pain (AUC=0.80, cut-off point=47.7%) presented excellent capacity to discriminate individuals with shoulder pain, while the other variables showed between acceptable and small capacity (AUC=0.58-0.76). CONCLUSION: Individuals with chronic shoulder pain presented alterations in joint mobility, muscular endurance time of the thoracolumbar spine and hips and neuromuscular control of the lower extremity. The anterior reach of the SEBT of the contralateral limb showed excellent discriminative capacity.

Reliability and concurrent validity of a mobile application to measure thoracolumbar range of motion in low back pain patients.

BACKGROUND: Smartphone devices have been used to measure range of motion (ROM) in different joints. OBJECTIVE: To verify the concurrent validity of thoracolumbar ROM using a mobile application and a digital inclinometer, as well as the intrarater reliability of individuals with and without back pain. METHODS: One investigator was responsible for measuring the ROM during the evaluations performed on 20 asymptomatic subjects and 20 symptomatic subjects in two consecutive days. RESULTS: Regarding to the concurrent validity, the Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC) were classified as very good for all analyzed movements. For intrarater reliability, the mobile application had ICC varying between good and very good for the symptomatic subjects and very good for asymptomatic subjects. CONCLUSIONS: The mobile application may be considered a valid and reliable tool to assess thoracolumbar ROM for both asymptomatic and chronic low back pain subjects.