Palliative Care Interventions for Peripheral Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis.

Background: Peripheral artery disease (PAD) encompasses conditions with poor outcome and severe suffering, both mentally and physically, yet utilization and research into palliative care interventions remain sparse. Objective: The purpose of this study is to identify existing evidence on palliative care intervention for chronic limb threatening ischaemia (CLTI) and abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Design: We conducted a PROSPERO-registered systematic review of studies published between 1991 and 2020 in which people with PAD received palliative care interventions and at least one patient outcome was recorded. For the purpose of this study, a palliative care intervention was defined as one which aims primarily to reduce negative impact of PAD on patients' and/or caregivers' physical, emotional, psychological, social, or spiritual condition. Results: A total of 8 studies involving 87,024 patients met the inclusion criteria (4 cohort studies and 4 cross-sectional studies). Methodological quality ranged from low to moderate. The small number of studies and study heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis. Regarding our primary outcomes, only two articles recorded patient-reported outcomes. Five articles found an association between palliative care and reduction in health care utilization, a secondary outcome of the study. Most of the studies reported that palliative care was likely underused. Only two of the studies included non-hospital patients. Conclusion: Despite high mortality and morbidity associated with PAD, evidence of the effectiveness of palliative care in this group of patients is lacking. There are only a handful of articles on palliative care for people with PAD, and the majority are small, methodologically flawed and lack meaningful patient-reported outcomes. High-quality research of palliative care interventions in patients with PAD is urgently needed to better understand the impact of palliative care on quality of end of life and to develop and evaluate service-level interventions.

Use of Omniflow® II in Infected Vascular Grafts with Femoral Anastomotic Dehiscence.

BACKGROUND: Vascular graft infection with anastomotic dehiscence requires immediate surgical intervention to preserve life and limb. We present our experience of using the Omniflow® II biosynthetic vascular prosthesis (LeMaitre Vascular) in the emergency repair of vascular graft dehiscence at the femoral anastomosis. METHODS: A retrospective review of consecutive patients presenting with femoral anastomotic dehiscence in a single centre was conducted. All patients were revascularized using an in situ Omniflow II graft. Patient demographics, affected graft type, microbiology, and antibiotic regimes were documented. Primary outcome measures were limb salvage, patency rates, and mortality. RESULTS: Five patients presented with acute femoral false aneurysm and four of five with significant hemorrhage. Infected grafts included one aortobifemoral, two femoral crossover, one axillobifemoral, and one infrainguinal reversed vein graft. All were revascularized with an in situ Omniflow II graft following the excision of the infected graft material. The median followup was 50 months. Limb salvage was achieved in 8 of 9 threatened limbs, and none required further intervention for re-infection. One graft occluded at 5 months. Two of five patients died during followup (one at 12 months, one at 50 months). CONCLUSIONS: Omniflow II provides a useful "off-the-shelf" conduit for the urgent revascularization of infected femoral dehiscence.