Effect of inducing accessory corpus luteum formation with gonadotropin-releasing hormone or human chorionic gonadotropin on the day of embryo transfer on fertility of recipient dairy heifers and lactating cows.

The objective was to determine the effect of inducing an accessory corpus luteum (CL) using GnRH or human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) on the day of in vitro-produced (IVP) embryo transfer (ET) on pregnancy per ET (P/ET) and calving/ET in dairy heifers and lactating cows. Dairy heifers (11-15 mo of age; n = 1,547) and lactating cows (n = 1,480) detected in estrus by tail chalk (d 0) were used as recipients. Before ET, the presence of a CL was evaluated by transrectal palpation from d 6 to 9 of the estrous cycle. Animals with a CL were randomly assigned to receive 1 of 3 treatments immediately before ET: control (no treatment; n = 1,009), GnRH (86 µg of GnRH; n = 1,085) and hCG (2,500 IU; n = 1,069). Embryos were implanted in the uterine horn ipsilateral to the ovary with a CL (fresh IVP embryos, n = 2,544; vitrified IVP embryos n = 545; slow-freezing IVP embryos, n = 74). Pregnancy diagnosis was performed on d 37 ± 3 of gestation by transrectal palpation. Pregnancy loss data and calving records were collected from the dairy farm management software. Treatment did not affect P/ET, calving/ET, or pregnancy loss either overall or within parity. When treatments inducing CL formation were combined (GnRH + hCG), heifers tended to have greater P/ET than controls (67.7 vs. 63.5%, respectively). Yet, calving/ET were similar. Response variables were also analyzed within embryo type and parity. For heifers receiving stage 6 (blastocyst) fresh IVP embryos, hCG had greater P/ET than controls (74.5 vs. 51.1%, respectively). In addition, GnRH tended to have greater P/ET than controls (67.8 vs. 51.2%, respectively). However, calving/ET in heifers receiving blastocyst fresh IVP embryos was similar among treatments. When only stage 7 (expanded blastocyst) fresh IVP embryos were considered, primiparous GnRH cows had greater P/ET (59.3 vs. 47.1%) and calving/ET (48.6 vs. 38.1%) than hCG. Moreover, hCG showed decreased calving/ET compared with controls in primiparous cows transferred with expanded blastocyst fresh IVP embryos. In summary, the effects of hCG or GnRH at ET on P/ET and calving/ET were inconsistent according to different embryo characteristics (e.g., embryo stage) and parity of recipients. Furthermore, treatment did not improve the overall fertility outcomes for recipient animals receiving IVP embryos.

Effects of human chorionic gonadotropin on the last day of a 5-day CIDR Synch protocol and 5 days later on circulating progesterone concentrations and luteal area in Holstein heifers.

The objective was to determine the effect of replacing GnRH with human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) on the last day of a 5-d CIDR Synch protocol (d 0) and inducing accessory corpus luteum (CL) formation with hCG 5 d later (d 5) on serum progesterone (P4) concentrations and luteal dynamics in dairy heifers. Holstein heifers (n = 207) were synchronized with a 5-d controlled internal drug release (CIDR) Synch protocol (d -8: used CIDR inserted; d -3: CIDR removed and PGF2α). Heifers were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 treatments on d 0: control (G; n = 55), H (n = 50), GH (n = 53), and HH (n = 49). Heifers in G were treated with 100 µg of GnRH on d 0, while H heifers received hCG (3,300 IU) on d 0. Heifers enrolled in GH were treated with GnRH on d 0 and hCG on d 5, while HH received hCG on d 0 and 5. Ovaries were scanned by ultrasound on d 0, 5, and 12, and blood was collected on d 0, 5, 7, and 12. Heifers that ovulated before or after the hCG or GnRH d 0 treatment and had P4 ≤ 0.50 ng/mL on d 0 were considered as synchronized. Overall protocol synchronization response was 93.8%, with no differences among treatments. Only synchronized heifers (n = 193) were included in the analyses of luteal dynamics after d 0. Serum P4 concentration and original CL luteal area on d 5 in heifers treated with hCG on d 0 (H + HH) were greater than in heifers treated with GnRH on d 0 (G + GH). Almost all heifers treated with hCG on d 5 had ≥2 CL on d 12 (98.6%). Ovulatory response for d 5 hCG treatment did not differ for GH versus HH (97.2 vs. 94.7%). Heifers in HH had the highest serum P4 on d 7, and G had the lowest serum P4 on d 7 and 12. In contrast, serum P4 on d 7 did not differ for H versus GH. On d 12, serum P4 and total luteal area were not different for GH versus HH. In summary, heifers that received hCG on d 0 had a larger total luteal area and greater serum P4 concentration on d 5 than heifers treated with GnRH on d 0. Moreover, hCG on d 5 promoted a greater proportion of heifers with ≥2 CL on d 12 and a larger luteal area of the original CL, which resulted in a larger total luteal area on d 12. The HH treatment successfully increased serum P4 concentrations in heifers on d 7 compared with the other treatments.