Intra-arterial peptide-receptor radionuclide therapy for neuro-endocrine tumour liver metastases: an in-patient randomised controlled trial (LUTIA).

PURPOSE: Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) using [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE has been shown to effectively prolong progression free survival in grade 1-2 gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP-NET), but is less efficacious in patients with extensive liver metastases. The aim was to investigate whether tumour uptake in liver metastases can be enhanced by intra-arterial administration of [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE into the hepatic artery, in order to improve tumour response without increasing toxicity. METHODS: Twenty-seven patients with grade 1-2 GEP-NET, and bi-lobar liver metastases were randomized to receive intra-arterial PRRT in the left or right liver lobe for four consecutive cycles. The contralateral liver lobe and extrahepatic disease were treated via a "second-pass" effect and the contralateral lobe was used as the control lobe. Up to three metastases (> 3 cm) per liver lobe were identified as target lesions at baseline on contrast-enhanced CT. The primary endpoint was the tumour-to-non-tumour (T/N) uptake ratio on the 24 h post-treatment [177Lu]Lu-SPECT/CT after the first cycle. This was calculated for each target lesion in both lobes using the mean uptake. T/N ratios in both lobes were compared using paired-samples t-test. FINDINGS: After the first cycle, a non-significant difference in T/N uptake ratio was observed: T/NIA = 17·4 vs. T/Ncontrol = 16·2 (p = 0·299). The mean increase in T/N was 17% (1·17; 95% CI [1·00; 1·37]). Of all patients, 67% (18/27) showed any increase in T/N ratio after the first cycle. CONCLUSION: Intra-arterial [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE is safe, but does not lead to a clinically significant increase in tumour uptake.

The cycle effect quantified: reduced tumour uptake in subsequent cycles of [177Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE during peptide receptor radionuclide therapy.

BACKGROUND: Clear evidence regarding the effect of reduced tumour accumulation in later peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) cycles is lacking. Therefore, we aimed to quantify potential cycle effects for patients treated with [177Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE using a population pharmacokinetic (PK) modelling approach. METHODS: A population PK model was developed using imaging data from 48 patients who received multiple cycles of [177Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE. The five-compartment model included a central, kidney, spleen, tumour and lumped rest compartment. Tumour volume and continued use of long-acting somatostatin analogues (SSAs) were tested as covariates in the model. In addition, the presence of a cycle effect was evaluated by relating the uptake rate in a specific cycle as a fraction of the (tumour or organ) uptake rate in the first cycle. RESULTS: The final PK model adequately captured observed radioactivity accumulation in kidney, spleen and tumour. A higher tumour volume was identified to increase the tumour uptake rate, where a twofold increase in tumour volume resulted in a 2.3-fold higher uptake rate. Also, continued use of long-acting SSAs significantly reduced the spleen uptake rate (68.4% uptake compared to SSA withdrawal (10.5% RSE)). Lastly, a cycle effect was significantly identified, where tumour uptake rate decreased to 86.9% (5.3% RSE) in the second cycle and even further to 79.7% (5.6% RSE) and 77.6% (6.2% RSE) in the third and fourth cycle, respectively, compared to cycle one. CONCLUSIONS: Using a population PK modelling approach, the cycle effect of reduced tumour uptake in subsequent PRRT cycles was quantified. Our findings implied that downregulation of target receptors is probably not the major cause of the cycle effect, due to a plateau in the decrease of tumour uptake in the fourth cycle.