Combination of sunitinib and 177Lu-labeled antibody cG250 targeted radioimmunotherapy: A promising new therapeutic strategy for patients with advanced renal cell cancer.

Sunitinib is an effective treatment for patients with metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC) but ultimately resistance occurs. The aim of this study was to investigate sunitinib resistance in RCCs and to develop therapeutic combination strategies with targeted radioimmunotherapy (RIT). We studied two RCC models, analyzed Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and its receptor (VEGFR) and AXL/MET expression and performed therapy studies in Balb/cnu/nu mice combining sunitinib and [177Lu]Lu-cG250 RIT (6.5 MBq/10 µg), specifically targeting RCC cells. pAXL and pMET were expressed in sunitinib-resistant SK-RC-52 and absent in sunitinib-sensitive NU12. NGS evaluation showed that expression of VEGFA, VEGFB, VEGFD, PGF and VEGFR1,2,3 was higher and expression of VEGFC and PDGFA was lower in NU12 than in SK-RC-52. Therapy studies combining sunitinib with [177Lu]Lu-cG250 RIT showed that the best response in mice with "resistant" SK-RC-52 tumors was observed with two cycles of Sunitinib and [177Lu]Lu-cG250 RIT, probably due to increased vascular permeability by sunitinib treatment. In the "sensitive" NU12 model, two cycles of [177Lu]Lu-cG250 RIT and two cycles of combination treatment were equally effective. Enhanced therapeutic efficacy was achieved when two agents ([177Lu]Lu-cG250 RIT and sunitinib) that on their own did not induce satisfactory response levels, are combined. Our findings provide a promising new therapeutic strategy for patients with advanced RCC.

Successful combination of sunitinib and girentuximab in two renal cell carcinoma animal models: a rationale for combination treatment of patients with advanced RCC.

Anti-angiogenic treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) has lead to an impressive increase in progression-free survival for patients with metastatic RCC (mRCC), but mRCC remains largely incurable. We combined sunitinib, targeting the endothelial cells with Girentuximab (monoclonal antibody cG250, recognizing carbonic anhydrase IX (CAIX) targeting the tumor cells to study the effect of sunitinib on the biodistribution of Girentuximab because combination of modalities targeting tumor vasculature and tumor cells might result in improved effect. Nude mice with human RCC xenografts (NU12, SK-RC-52) were treated orally with 0.8 mg/day sunitinib, or vehicle for 7 to 14 days. Three days before start or cessation of treatment mice were injected i.v. with 0.4 MBq/5 µg (111)In-Girentuximab followed by biodistribution studies. Immunohistochemical analyses were performed to study the tumor vasculature and CAIX expression and to confirm Girentuximab uptake. NU12 appeared to represent a sunitinib sensitive tumor: sunitinib treatment resulted in extensive necrosis and decreased microvessel density (MVD). Accumulation of Girentuximab was significantly decreased when sunitinib treatment preceded the antibody injection but remained unchanged when sunitinib followed Girentuximab injection. Cessation of therapy led to a rapid neovascularization, reminiscent of a tumor flare. SK-RC-52 appeared to represent a sunitinib-resistant tumor: (central) tumor necrosis was minimal and MVD was not affected. Sunitinib treatment resulted in increased Girentuximab uptake, regardless of the sequence of treatment. These data indicate that sunitinib can be combined with Girentuximab. Since these two modalities have different modes of action, this combination might lead to enhanced therapeutic efficacy.

Urinary cytokines in patients treated with intravesical mitomycin-C with and without hyperthermia.

OBJECTIVES: To explore whether urinary cytokine and chemokine (CK) levels differed between cold mitomycin-C (cold-MMC)-treated patients and chemohyperthermia (C-HT)-treated patients, to shed light on the possible molecular mechanisms that might explain the superior outcome of C-HT. Furthermore, CK-differences were explored between C-HT responders and C-HT non-responders. METHODS: Twelve NMIBC patients were included. Nine received six-weekly C-HT, and three received four-weekly cold-MMC instillations. Urine was collected on 8-12 time points before and after every treatment. MDC, IL-2, IL-6, IL-8, IP-10, MCP-1 and RANTES were determined by Luminex(®)-analysis. RESULTS: Elevated urinary CK levels were observed in both groups after treatment. In general, CK-peaks were lower in the cold-MMC group in comparison with levels in the C-HT group. Significant higher MCP-1 and IL-6 levels were observed in C-HT-treated patients. Additionally, significant cumulative effects were observed for IP-10 and IL-2. However, IP-10 and IL-2 levels did not significantly differ between treatments. MDC levels after the first week of treatment were significantly higher in the C-HT responders compared with the non-responders. CONCLUSION: MMC treatment leads to elevated urinary CK levels with significantly higher MCP-1 and IL-6 levels in C-HT-treated patients. Increased MDC levels after the first C-HT instillation appear to be related to good clinical outcome and might be of additional value to personalize treatment. Studies involving more patients and longer follow-up are needed to substantiate this observation.

Tyrosine kinase inhibitor sorafenib decreases 111In-girentuximab uptake in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

UNLABELLED: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have revolutionized the treatment of metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Although TKIs have demonstrated good clinical efficacy, the lack of complete responses, the chronic nature of the treatment, and the side effects are clear disadvantages. An interesting new approach in the treatment of clear cell RCC is antibody-mediated therapy with the chimeric anti-carbonic anhydrase IX (CAIX) antibody girentuximab (cG250). As the results of several girentuximab trials become available, the question arises of whether TKI treatment can be combined with girentuximab-based therapy. In this study, we assessed the effect of the widely used TKI sorafenib on the tumor-targeting potential of (111)In-labeled girentuximab. METHODS: (111)In-girentuximab imaging was performed on 15 patients suspected of having a renal malignancy, with surgery being part of their treatment plan. Of these, 10 patients were treated in a neoadjuvant setting with sorafenib (400 mg orally twice daily). Five patients received treatment during 1 wk, and 5 patients received treatment during 4 wk. In both sorafenib-treated groups, baseline and posttreatment tumor targeting of (111)In-girentuximab were compared. Surgery was performed 3 d after the last image acquisition. Five additional patients were included as a control group and had only a single (111)In-girentuximab injection and scintigraphy without any treatment. Distribution of (111)In-girentuximab was determined scintigraphically ex vivo in a 1-cm lamella of the resected tumorous kidney. Expression of CAIX and of the vascular marker CD31 was determined immunohistochemically on specimens of both tumor and normal kidney tissue. RESULTS: Treatment with sorafenib resulted in a marked decrease of (111)In-girentuximab uptake in the tumor in clear cell RCC patients, especially in the group treated for 4 wk (mean change in both sorafenib-treated groups, -38.4%; range, +9.1% to -79.4%). Immunohistochemical analysis showed markedly reduced CD31 expression and vessel density in the sorafenib-treated groups but no differences in CAIX expression between the sorafenib-treated groups and the nontreated patients. CONCLUSION: Treatment with sorafenib resulted in a treatment duration-dependent significantly decreased uptake of (111)In-girentumab in clear cell RCC lesions. These results indicate that the efficacy of antibody-mediated treatment or diagnosis modalities is hampered by TKI treatment.