Validity of the modified Rankin Scale in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a randomized study.

PURPOSE: The modified Rankin Scale (mRS), a clinician-reported outcome measure of global disability, has never been validated in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). The aims of this study are to assess: (1) convergent validity of the mRS; (2) responsiveness of the mRS; and (3) the distribution of mRS scores across patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). METHODS: This is a prospective randomized multicenter study. The mRS was scored by a physician for all patients, and subsequently by structured interview for half of the patients and by self-assessment for the other half. All patients completed EuroQoL 5D-5L, RAND-36, Stroke Specific Quality of Life scale (SS-QoL) and Global Perceived Effect (GPE) questionnaires. Convergent validity and responsiveness were assessed by testing hypotheses. RESULTS: In total, 149 patients with aSAH were included for analysis. The correlation of the mRS with EQ-5D-5L was r = - 0.546, while with RAND-36 physical and mental component scores the correlation was r = - 0.439and r = - 0.574 respectively, and with SS-QoL it was r = - 0.671. Three out of four hypotheses for convergent validity were met. The mRS assessed through structured interviews was more highly correlated with the mental component score than with the physical component score of RAND-36. Improvement in terms of GPE was indicated by 83% of patients; the mean change score of these patients on the mRS was - 0.08 (SD 0.915). None of the hypotheses for responsiveness were met. CONCLUSION: The results show that the mRS generally correlates with other instruments, as expected, but it lacks responsiveness. A structured interview of the mRS is best for detecting disabling neuropsychological complaints. REGISTRATION: URL: https://trialsearch.who.int ; Unique identifier: NL7859, Date of first administration: 08-07-2019.

Inter-method reliability of the modified Rankin Scale in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) is one of the most frequently used outcome measures in trials in patients with an aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). The assessment method of the mRS is often not clearly described in trials, while the method used might influence the mRS score. The aim of this study is to evaluate the inter-method reliability of different assessment methods of the mRS. METHODS: This is a prospective, randomized, multicenter study with follow-up at 6 weeks and 6 months. Patients aged ≥ 18 years with aSAH were randomized to either a structured interview or a self-assessment of the mRS. Patients were seen by a physician who assigned an mRS score, followed by either the structured interview or the self-assessment. Inter-method reliability was assessed with the quadratic weighted kappa score and percentage of agreement. Assessment of feasibility of the self-assessment was done by a feasibility questionnaire. RESULTS: The quadratic weighted kappa was 0.60 between the assessment of the physician and structured interview and 0.56 between assessment of the physician and self-assessment. Percentage agreement was, respectively, 50.8 and 19.6%. The assessment of the mRS through a structured interview and by self-assessment resulted in systematically higher mRS scores than the mRS scored by the physician. Self-assessment of the mRS was proven feasible. DISCUSSION: The mRS scores obtained with different assessment methods differ significantly. The agreement between the scores is low, although the reliability between the assessment methods is good. This should be considered when using the mRS in clinical trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.trialregister.nl ; Unique identifier: NL7859.

[Cerebral amyloid angiopathy: an easily missed diagnosis in patients with transient neurological deficits]. / Cerebrale amyloïdangiopathie.

Cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) is a degenerative neurovascular disease in which the protein amyloid-beta accumulates in the vessel wall of cortical and leptomeningeal arteries. This may lead to acute lobar cerebral haemorrhage, which in case of CAA is fatal in 10-30% of cases. CAA may also present with transient focal neurological episodes (TFNE), the symptoms of which may mimic a transient ischaemic attack (TIA). Distinction between the two has important implications for therapy, as antithrombotics are relatively contra-indicated in CAA, but indicated after a TIA. We describe a patient with transient focal neurological deficits who was initially treated with antithrombotic therapy for a suspected TIA. Eventually, the diagnosis CAA was made and antithrombotic treatment was ceased. This case stresses the importance of considering the diagnosis CAA with TFNE in patients presenting with transient neurological deficits, in order to avoid an unnecessarily increased risk of symptomatic and possibly fatal cerebral haemorrhage.

[Rhombencephalitis due to Listeria monocytogenes]. / Rombencefalitis door Listeria monocytogenes.

A 37-year-old man presented with acute dizziness, nausea, headache and fever. Later on, he developed diplopia, swallowing difficulties, numbness and ataxia. MRI on day 6 showed hypo-intense, contrast-enhancing lesions on TI-weighted scans in the brainstem and cerebellum. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) findings on day 6 included pleiocytosis, a mildly-elevated protein level and mildly-decreased glucose level. CSF and blood cultures were initially negative for both bacteria and viruses. Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM) was suspected and dexamethasone therapy was started. On day 26, a blood culture was positive for Listeria monocytogenes. The diagnosis 'Listeria rhombencephalitis' was made and the patient was treated with amoxicillin. This resulted in good recovery. In patients with a subacute onset of progressive cranial nerve dysfunction, ataxia, CSF pleiocytosis, and MRI lesions in the brainstem and cerebellum, Listeria rhombencephalitis should be considered. Early diagnosis and treatment improve the prognosis.