Evidence of an estrogen receptor form devoid of estrogen binding ability in MCF-7 cells.

In MCF-7 breast cancer cells, hydroxytamoxifen (OH-Tam) up-regulates the estrogen receptor (ER) in a form unable to bind [(3)H]estradiol (E(2)). We show here that this property is not restricted to this antiestrogen. [(3)H]E(2) binding assays (whole cell assays, DCC assays on cell extracts) and enzyme immunoassays (Abbott) performed in parallel, establish the permanent presence of such unusual ERs in the absence of any exposure of the cells to a ligand. E(2) and the pure antiestrogen RU 58 668, which down-regulate ER, also decrease [(3)H]E(2) binding. In control cells, these ERs represent about the half of the whole receptor population; they also display a tendency to stabilize within the cell nucleus. Loss of E(2) binding ability appears irreversible, since we failed to label receptor accumulated under OH-Tam with [(3)H]E(2) or [(3)H]tamoxifen aziridine (TAZ). Cycloheximide (CHX), which blocks E(2)-induced down regulation of ER, failed to stabilize [(3)H]E(2) binding (whole cell assay) after an [(3)H]E(2) pulse (1 h), confirming that regulation of E(2) binding and peptide level are related to different regulatory mechanisms. Loss of binding ability could not be ascribed to any ER cleavage as demonstrated by Western blotting with a panel of ER antibodies raised against its various domains (67 kDa ER solely detected). We propose that loss of E(2) binding ability is related to the aging process of the receptor, i.e. it is progressively converted to a form devoted to degradation after it has accomplished its physiological role. Ligands may favor (E(2), RU 58 668) or impede (OH-Tam) this elimination process.

Implication of proteasome in estrogen receptor degradation.

In MCF-7 breast cancer cells, estradiol (E2) and pure antiestrogen RU 58668 down-regulate the estrogen receptor (ER). Interestingly, the protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide (CHX) abrogated solely the effect of E2 suggesting a selective difference in the degradation of the receptor induced by estrogenic and antiestrogenic stimulations. A panel of lysosome inhibitors (i.e. bafilomycin, chloroquine, NH4Cl, and monensin), calpain inhibitors (calpastatin and PD 150606) and proteasome inhibitors (lactacystin and proteasome inhibitor I) were tested to assess this hypothesis. Among all inhibitors tested, lactacystin and proteasome inhibitor I were the sole inhibitors to abrogate the elimination of the receptor induced by both E2 and RU 58668; this selective effect was also recorded in cells prelabeled with [3H]tamoxifen aziridine before exposure to these ligands. Hence, differential sensitivity to CHX seems to be linked to the different mechanisms which target proteins for proteasome-mediated destruction. Moreover, the two tested proteasome inhibitors produced a slight increase of ER concentration in cells not exposed to any ligand, suggesting also the involvement of proteasome in receptor turnover.

Estrogenic and anti-estrogenic regulation of estrogen receptor in MCF-7 breast-cancer cells: comparison of immunocytochemical data with biochemical measurements.

Data from immunocytochemical assessment of estrogen receptor (ER) regulation in MCF-7 cells under estrogenic and anti-estrogenic stimulation were compared with those obtained by enzyme immunoassay (Abbott ER-EIA). Similar trends were observed, although ER level variations were less marked when assessed immunocytochemically. We confirmed reports of ER disappearance in the presence of estrogens (Es; E2 and DES) and pure anti-estrogens (AEs; RU 58,668 and ICI 164,384) as well as its increase with partial AEs (4-OH-TAM and RU 39,119). E2-induced ER down-regulation was partly blocked by actinomycin D (AMD), okadaic acid (OK) and cycloheximide (CHX) when assessed by these 2 methods. Down-regulation by pure AEs was not impeded by CHX, indicating that they operate differently from Es (i.e., transformation of ER to a form sensitive to constitutive degradation activity). In situ pre-labeling of the cells with [3H]TAZ indicated that all investigated ligands eliminate pre-existing ER through binding to newly synthetized receptors, since [3H]TAZ co-valently associates with ER; E2 and RU 58,668 were more effective than 4-OH-TAM in this regard. CHX blocked ER disappearance even in the presence of pure AEs, which is in contrast to the data established with cells not pre-exposed to [3H]TAZ. Nuclear location of [3H]TAZ-ER complexes may explain this discrepancy, since pure AE-ER complexes were reported to be incapable of nuclear translocation.

Exchange of bound estrogens and antiestrogens in MCF-7 cells: evidence for ligand-induced stable configurations of the estrogen receptor.

Estrogens and antiestrogens promote specific conformations of the estrogen receptor (ER). To analyze the influence of such configurations on the stability of the ligand-ER complexes, MCF-7 breast cancer cells were exposed for 1 h to either [3H]E2 or an unlabeled estrogen or antiestrogen (E2, DES, E1, BP; OH-Tam, RU 39,411, ICI 164,384, RU 58,668); mutual exchange rates of bound compounds (i.e., [3H]E2-->ligand; ligand-->[3H]E2) were then analyzed in cell extracts by measuring [3H]E2. Addition of cycloheximide (CHX) to the incubation medium eliminated the potential interference of E2-induced ER loss. Extracts from control untreated cells were labeled with [3H]E2 or one of these various ligands and similarly submitted to exchange. Displacement of bound compounds occurred at moderate temperature (18 degrees C) but not at 4 degrees C. Remarkably, exchange proceeded at a lower rate in extracts from cells preincubated with [3H]E2 or a ligand. Antiestrogens RU 39,411 and RU 58,668 appeared especially refractory to displacement. Such low exchange rates were also recorded in experiments conducted on whole cells although to a higher extent than in extracts from preincubated cells. Enzyme immunoassays demonstrated that absence of major exchange could not be attributed to ER loss. Moreover, displacement of bound ligands appeared independent of their binding affinity for the receptor. These data suggest that estrogen and antiestrogen binding is stabilized by at least one factor (coactivators or corepressors) thus fixing the receptor molecules in a configuration that is relatively resistant to subsequent exchange. FPLC and PgR induction revealed that a significant proportion of ER maintained in a sufficiently flexible status was still able to exchange and transduce the transcriptional message of the displacer ligand.

Protein synthesis is not implicated in the ligand-dependent activation of the estrogen receptor in MCF-7 cells.

In MCF-7 cells, estrogen receptor (ER) elimination occurs rapidly under stimulation with estradiol (E2) at 1 nM ('ER processing'); cycloheximide (CHX) at 50 microM impedes this phenomenon. ER processing is also observed when E2 is removed after the first hour of incubation, indicating that the role of the hormone would be limited to the initiation of this process. When CHX is removed at the same time, receptor processing and, later, the induction of progesterone receptor (PgR) both proceed. The initial estrogenic signal which activates ER is therefore not influenced by CHX. In support of this conclusion, no effect of the drug on E2 binding affinity of residual ER was detected. A similar result was recorded for a series of estrogens and antiestrogens, indicating that CHX exerts no influence on the potential agonistic/antagonistic potency of any ligand. Size-exclusion chromatography (FPLC) revealed that [3H]E2-induced ER activation leads to the cleavage of the native receptor (67 kDa) into low molecular weight isoforms which subsequently become less detectable over time (proteolysis). In the presence of CHX, such ER isoforms persist, confirming the absence of interference of the drug with the activation step. When the cells were prelabelled with [3H]tamoxifen aziridine ([3H]TAZ) before their exposure to E2, ER cleavage could not be detected due to the lack of activation potency of the antiestrogenic ligand. However, the [3H]TAZ-ER complexes were subjected to E2-induced processing; CHX blocked this phenomenon, which is associated with the maintenance of ER synthesis and activation.

Estrogenic and antiestrogenic regulation of the half-life of covalently labeled estrogen receptor in MCF-7 breast cancer cells.

Effect of estrogens and antiestrogens (AEs) on estrogen receptor (ER) half-life was analyzed in MCF-7 cells by assessing its progressive disappearance after covalent labeling in situ with [3H]tamoxifen aziridine ([3H]TAZ). Cells were incubated for 1 h with 20 nM [3H]TAZ either in the absence or presence of a 500-fold excess of unlabeled estradiol (E2) (non-specific binding). The entire ER population was labeled by this method as established by subsequent incubation of the cells with [125I]E2. [3H]TAZ labeled cells were maintained in culture for additional 5 h in the absence (control) or presence of increasing amounts (0.1 nM - 1 microM) of either a given estrogen (E2, estrone, diethylstilbestrol, bisphenol), a pure AE (RU 58 668, ICI 164 384) or an AE with residual estrogenic activity (RU 39 411, 4-hydroxytamoxifen, keoxifene). The progressive disappearance of nuclear and cytosolic [3H]TAZ-ER complex during 5 h incubation were assessed by their immunoprecipitation with anti-ER monoclonal antibody (H 222) followed by scintillation counting or SDS-PAGE and fluorography. Fading of labeled receptors was extremely slow (approximately 10% loss after 6 h) in absence of any hormone/antihormone indicating a long half-life of the [3H]TAZ-ER complex. Addition of estrogens as well as pure AEs led to a dramatic reduction of the half-life while AEs with residual estrogenic activity were extremely less efficient in this regard providing an explanation for the ability of latter compounds to up-regulate the receptor since they do not affect ER mRNA synthesis and stability. Receptor disappearance induced by estrogens was closely related to their binding affinity for ER. Newly synthesized ER emerged during the treatment with hormones or antihormones seems to be implicated in the phenomenon since [3H]TAZ was covalently bound and could, therefore, not be displaced by these compounds. Induction of synthesis of a short half-life peptide(s) with degradative activity was demonstrated by addition of cycloheximide or puromycine (both at 50 microM) which completely blocked ER disappearance. The fact that no cleavage products of ER were detected by SDS-PAGE suggested a lysosomial hydrolysis. Hence, hormonal modulation of only a part of ERs may down-regulate their total population until it reaches the steady-state level.

Estradiol-induced down-regulation of estrogen receptor. Effect of various modulators of protein synthesis and expression.

Incubation of MCF-7 cells with estradiol (E2) down-regulates estrogen receptor (ER) resulting in a progressive reduction of the capacity of cells to concentrate selectively [3H]E2. Scatchard plot analysis failed to detect any transformation of residual receptors into peptides of lower binding affinity. [3H]Estrone gave an identical ER disappearance pattern with an ER half-life comprised between 2 and 3 h. A similar value was established by incubating the cells with [3H]tamoxifenaziridine ([3H]TAZ) for 1 h before the addition of excessive unlabeled E2 which induced ER-down regulation and impeded any further labeling of the residual receptors. Submission of the [3H]TAZ labeled cell extracts to SDS-PAGE revealed no progressive emergence of low molecular weight cleavage products of the receptor (< 67 kDa). Two inhibitors of protein kinases, H-7 at 40 microM and H-89 at 20 microM, failed to block the E2-induced ER down-regulation. On the contrary, the protein phosphatases 1 and 2A inhibitor, okadaic acid, was effective with concentrations higher than 0.1 microM indicating that a dephosphorylation mechanism was involved in this phenomenon. Cycloheximide (CHX) also significantly reduced the receptor decrease at concentrations higher than 1 microM. G-C specific intercalating agents [actinomycin D (AMD) and chromomycin A3 at 1 microM] also prevented ER disappearance; ethidium bromide (EB) and quinacrine were ineffective. AMD and CHX operated immediately after their addition to the medium indicating an inhibitory action on the synthesis of an RNA and/or a peptide with high turnover rate involved in ER decline. Moreover, AMD produced its suppressive effects under conditions impeding any labeling of newly synthetized receptors (i.e. [3H]TAZ with an excess of unlabeled E2) rejecting the possibility of an increasing ER production which may partially hamper its disappearance. Finally, E2-induced ER mRNA down-regulation was similarly abolished by AMD while EB and CHX were devoid of effect.