Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
PLoS One ; 11(4): e0153460, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27077904

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Whether vascular multiplicity should be considered as contraindication and therefore 'extended donor criterion' is still under debate. METHODS: Data from all live kidney donors from 2006-2013 (n = 951) was retrospectively reviewed. Vascular anatomy as imaged by MRA, CTA or other modalities was compared with intraoperative findings. Furthermore, the influence of vascular multiplicity on outcome of donors and recipients was studied. RESULTS: In 237 out of 951 donors (25%), vascular multiplicity was present. CTA had the highest accuracy levels regarding vascular anatomy assessment. Regarding outcome of donors with vascular multiplicity, warm ischemia time (WIT) and skin-to-skin time were significantly longer if arterial multiplicity (AM) was present (5.1 vs. 4.0 mins and 202 vs. 178 mins). Skin-to-skin time was significantly longer, and complication rates were higher in donors with venous multiplicity (203 vs. 180 mins and 17.2% vs. 8.4%). Outcome of renal transplant recipients showed a significantly increased WIT (30 vs. 26.7 minutes), higher rate of DGF (13.9% vs. 6.9%) and lower rate of BPAR (6.9% vs. 13.9%) in patients receiving a kidney with AM compared to kidneys with singular anatomy. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that vascular multiplicity should not be a contra-indication, since it has little impact on clinical outcome in the donor as well as in renal transplant recipients.


Assuntos
Transplante de Rim , Doadores Vivos , Veias Renais/anatomia & histologia , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Rim/irrigação sanguínea , Angiografia por Ressonância Magnética , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Artéria Renal/anatomia & histologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Isquemia Quente
2.
Chemosphere ; 150: 311-319, 2016 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26921584

RESUMO

Home produced eggs from 62 addresses in the Netherlands were investigated for the levels of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins, dibenzofurans (PCDD/Fs) and biphenyls (PCBs), both dioxin-like (dl) and non-dioxin-like (ndl). Compared to commercial eggs, levels were relatively high with a median of 4.6 pg TEQ g(-1) fat for the sum of PCDD/Fs and dl-PCBs, and a highest level of 18.9 pg TEQ g(-1) fat. A number of samples showed clearly elevated ndl-PCB levels with a median of 13 ng g(-1) fat and a highest level of 80 ng g(-1) fat. There were no clear regional differences, even though part of the samples were derived from the rather industrial Rotterdam/Rijnmond area. Based on the congener patterns, former backyard burning of waste seems the most likely source for most eggs, with two exceptions where other sources contributed to the contamination. Similar is true for the ndl-PCBs. The study shows that average levels are about ten-fold higher than commercial eggs and may substantially contribute to the intake of PCDD/Fs and dl-PCBs by consumers. Intervention measures to reduce the intake of these contaminants by laying hens are advised.


Assuntos
Galinhas/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Dibenzofuranos Policlorados/análise , Ovos/análise , Contaminação de Alimentos/análise , Bifenilos Policlorados/análise , Dibenzodioxinas Policloradas/análise , Animais , Feminino , Humanos , Países Baixos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA