CD16⁺ monocytes with smooth muscle cell characteristics are reduced in human renal chronic transplant dysfunction.

In chronic transplant dysfunction (CTD), persistent (allo)immune-mediated inflammation eventually leads to tissue remodeling including neointima formation in intragraft arteries. We previously showed that recipient-derived neointimal α-SMA(+) smooth muscle-like cells are present in human renal allografts with CTD. Human PBMC contain myeloid cells capable of differentiating into α-SMA(+) cells in vitro; the phenotype of the ancestral subset is as yet unknown. This study aimed to investigate whether monocyte subsets contain cells with smooth muscle-like cell differentiation capacity and whether CTD in renal transplant recipients is associated with a shift in these monocyte subsets. To accomplish this goal, monocyte subsets from healthy controls were sorted based on CD14 and CD16 expression to investigate gene expression levels of mesenchymal markers α-SMA and SM22α. CD14(+)/CD16(++) monocytes displayed increased α-SMA and SM22α mRNA expression compared with CD14(++)/CD16(-) monocytes, suggesting increased differentiation potential toward smooth muscle-like cells. Flow cytometry revealed that in non-CTD transplant recipients the percentage of CD14(+)/CD16(++) monocytes was reduced, with an even further reduction in patients with CTD. To determine a potential correlation between CD14(+)/CD16(++) monocytes and α-SMA(+) cell outgrowth potential in vitro, PBMC of healthy controls and transplant recipients with and without CTD were cultured under fibrotic culture conditions, and indeed a significant correlation (p=0.0002, r=0.62) was observed. Finally, double staining for α-SMA and CD16 revealed presence of α-SMA(+)CD16(+) cells in kidney explants from CTD patients, albeit at very low numbers. Our data represent evidence that, compared to CD14(++)CD16(-) monocytes, CD14(+)CD16(++) monocytes have an increased expression of smooth muscle cell-associated genes. This monocyte subpopulation is reduced in renal transplant patients with CTD, possibly due to selective migration into the allograft.

Characterization of urinary CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells in kidney transplantation patients with polyomavirus BK infection and allograft rejection.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to characterize CD4(+) and CD8(+) T-cell populations in blood and urine of renal transplant patients with BK virus (BKV) infection or allograft rejection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Percentages and absolute numbers of CD4(+) and CD8(+) effector memory T-cell subtype (TEM ) and terminal differentiated T cells (TTD ) in renal transplant patients with BKV infection (n = 14), with an episode of allograft rejection (n = 9), and in uncomplicated renal transplant patients with a stable kidney function (n = 12) were measured and compared using 4-color fluorescence-activated cell sorting. Results were correlated with the number of CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells in renal biopsies. RESULTS: In patients with allograft rejection, the number of urinary CD4(+) TEM and CD8(+) TEM cells was significantly increased compared to patients with BKV infection or patients without complications. Positive correlation was found between the number of CD4(+) and CD8(+) cells in the renal biopsies and the number of CD4(+) and CD8(+) cells in urine. In patients with rejection, after 2 months of immunosuppressive therapy, a reduction in urinary CD8(+) TEM cells was found. CONCLUSIONS: CD4(+) TEM and CD8(+) TEM cells in urine could be a marker to distinguish allograft rejection from BKV-associated nephropathy and to monitor therapy effectiveness in renal transplant patients with allograft rejection.

Complement mediated renal inflammation induced by donor brain death: role of renal C5a-C5aR interaction.

Kidneys retrieved from brain-dead donors have impaired allograft function after transplantation compared to kidneys from living donors. Donor brain death (BD) triggers inflammatory responses, including both systemic and local complement activation. The mechanism by which systemic activated complement contributes to allograft injury remains to be elucidated. The aim of this study was to investigate systemic C5a release after BD in human donors and direct effects of C5a on human renal tissue. C5a levels were measured in plasma from living and brain-dead donors. Renal C5aR gene and protein expression in living and brain-dead donors was investigated in renal pretransplantation biopsies. The direct effect of C5a on human renal tissue was investigated by stimulating human kidney slices with C5a using a newly developed precision-cut method. Elevated C5a levels were found in plasma from brain-dead donors in concert with induced C5aR expression in donor kidney biopsies. Exposure of precision-cut human kidney slices to C5a induced gene expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1 beta, IL-6 and IL-8. In conclusion, these findings suggest that systemic generation of C5a mediates renal inflammation in brain-dead donor grafts via tubular C5a-C5aR interaction. This study also introduces a novel in vitro technique to analyze renal cells in their biological environment.

Expert review remains important in the histopathological diagnosis of cutaneous melanocytic lesions.

AIMS: To assess the type of problems encountered in diagnosing melanocytic lesions and to evaluate the contribution of expert review. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data from 1887 lesions submitted for consultation to one of the expert pathologists of the Dutch Melanoma Working Group Pathology Panel between 1991 and 2004 were analysed. Referring pathologists can voluntarily submit lesions which are difficult to classify to the panel. Most cutaneous melanocytic lesions (n = 1217) were submitted with a presumed diagnosis by the referring pathologists. Relevant underdiagnoses of melanoma (in situ) and overdiagnoses of naevi were prevented in 12% (144/1217) and 15% (178/1217) of cases, respectively. Problematic melanocytic lesions were (i) spitzoid and dysplastic lesions, (ii) lesions with histological features that hampered the diagnosis such as regression, lymphocytic infiltrate, or a combination with other melanocytic lesions, and (iii) lesions with unusual clinical features, e.g. childhood melanoma. Remarkably, the features of the lesions that were submitted and the types of over- and under-diagnosis remained consistent from 1991 to 2004. CONCLUSIONS: A second opinion from an expert pathologist on problem-prone melanocytic lesions improves patient care, in our series in 27% of cases.

Improved resolution by mounting of tissue sections for laser microdissection.

BACKGROUND: Laser microbeam microdissection has greatly facilitated the procurement of specific cell populations from tissue sections. However, the fact that a coverslip is not used means that the morphology of the tissue sections is often poor. AIMS: To develop a mounting method that greatly improves the morphological quality of tissue sections for laser microbeam microdissection purposes so that the identification of target cells can be facilitated. METHODS: Fresh frozen tissue and formalin fixed, paraffin wax embedded tissue specimens were used to test the morphological quality of mounted and unmounted tissue. The mounting solution consisted of an adhesive gum and blue ink diluted in water. Interference of the mounting solution with DNA quality was analysed by the polymerase chain reaction using 10-2000 cells isolated by microdissection from mounted and unmounted tissue. RESULTS: The mounting solution greatly improved the morphology of tissue sections for laser microdissection purposes and had no detrimental effects on the isolation and efficiency of amplification of DNA. One disadvantage was that the mounting solution reduced the cutting efficiency of the ultraviolet laser. To minimise this effect, the mounting solution should be diluted as much as possible. Furthermore, the addition of blue ink to the mounting medium restores the cutting efficiency of the laser. CONCLUSIONS: The mounting solution is easy to prepare and apply and can be combined with various staining methods without compromising the quality of the DNA extracted.