Eczema apps conformance with clinical guidelines: a systematic assessment of functions, tools and content.

BACKGROUND: Eczema is a prevalent complex skin condition requiring active disease monitoring and personalized education. No studies have assessed the quality of apps that aim to support eczema self-management. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the quality and comprehensiveness of English, Chinese and Spanish self-management eczema smartphone apps for patients and/or their caregivers. METHODS: A systematic assessment of eczema apps from July 2018 to November 2018. The assessment criteria were based on conformance with international eczema guidelines. The following domains were assessed: consistency and comprehensiveness of eczema-specific educational information; quality and comprehensiveness of eczema-specific tracking functions; compliance with health information best practice principles. RESULTS: In total, 98 apps were assessed: 82 (84%) provided educational information; 38 (39%) tracking functions; and 13 (13%) both. We found that 34% (28/82) of apps provided misleading information, particularly regarding aspects of treatment and disease progression of eczema. Only 15% (12/82) provided international guideline supported information on pharmacological therapies and 16% (13/82) on nonpharmacological therapies. Among 38 apps with a tracking function, 82% (31/38) measured specific symptoms, disease severity or current skin condition and 89% (34/38) helped users to record medication usage including application of topicals. Environmental or dietary allergens were recorded by 34% (13/38). None of the included apps complied with all criteria for educational information, tracking functions or health information principles. CONCLUSIONS: Eczema apps have not yet reached their potential. The large variance in quality of eczema apps highlights the need for quality assurance mechanisms for health apps and guidance for clinicians that would enable them to make personalized recommendations for patients and caregivers. What's already known about this topic? There is limited information about the quality of eczema self-management smartphone apps on the global market. What does this study add? This systematic assessment evaluated all English, Chinese and Spanish language apps that support eczema self-management. The majority did not conform with information in guidelines and insufficiently support evidence-based self-management. The large variance in the quality of eczema apps highlights the need for mechanisms to ensure app quality and to guide personalized app selection for patients, caregivers and doctors.

Perspectives on the preventability of emergency department visits by older patients.

BACKGROUND: Older people increasingly demand emergency department (ED) care. ED visits have a profound impact on older patients, including high risk of adverse outcomes and loss of independency. In this study, we evaluated the opinions of patients, caregivers, general practitioners, and ED physicians on the preventability of ED visits. METHODS: Prospective, mixed-method observational and qualitative study of 200 patients aged ≥ 70 years visiting a teaching hospital ED in the Netherlands. Semi-structured interviews were performed with patients, caregivers, and general practitioners. ED physicians were provided with written surveys. Patient data were extracted to determine vulnerability. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 79.6 years; 49.5% were male. Ninety-five percent lived independently before the ED visit. Most patients reported domiciliary care (23%), a caregiver (21.5%), or both (29.5%). Patients considered 12.2% of visits potentially preventable, caregivers 9%, general practitioners 20.7%, and ED physicians 31.2%. Consensus on preventability was poor, especially among patients and professionals. While patients most frequently blamed themselves, healthcare providers predominantly mentioned lack of communication and organisational issues as contributing factors. CONCLUSION: Patients and caregivers consider an ED visit preventable less frequently than professionals do. Little consensus was found among patients and healthcare providers, and the perspectives on contributing factors to a preventable visit differ between groups. To help improve geriatric emergency care, future studies should focus on why these perspectives are so different and aim to align them.

Telehealth requires expansion of physicians' communication competencies training.

We are in the midst of transformation of health systems where remote consulting (via video, telephone, email, and mobile messaging) is soon to become the dominant mode of consultation. Most of the literature on telehealth omits mentioning the need for telehealth communication competencies. Yet evidence base has been growing about how critical this training is - whether from clinical communication research or litigation claims analysis. In this article, we are calling for an urgent expansion of communication skills curricula to encompass these new telehealth domains from medical schools, specialty trainings to CMEs.

Changes in vital signs post discharge as a potential target for intervention to avoid readmission.

Readmissions are treated as adverse events in many healthcare systems. Causes can be physiological deterioration or breakdown of social support systems. We investigated data from a European multi-centre study of readmissions for changes in vital signs between index admission and readmission. Data sets were graded according to the National Early Warning Score (NEWS). Of 487 patients in whom NEWS could be calculated on discharge and again on re-admission, 39.6% had worse vital signs with a NEWS score difference ≥ 2 points while only 7.6% had improved by ≤ 2 points. Changes in individual vital signs of 20% or more were most common in respiratory rate and heart rate. Monitoring of respiratory rate and pulse rate post-discharge might predict some deteriorations.

Hospital standardised mortality ratio: A reliable indicator of quality of care?

BACKGROUND: This study investigates (1) whether the hospital standardised mortality ratio (HSMR) model underestimates or overestimates disease severity and (2) the completeness of the data collected by administrators to calculate HSMR in a cohort of deceased patients with the diagnosis of pneumonia. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI) and Abbreviated Mortality in Emergency Department Sepsis (abbMEDS) scores and associated mortality probabilities were obtained from 32 deceased pneumonia patients over the year 2014 in the VU University Medical Centre. These were compared with mortality probabilities of the Central Bureau for Statistics (CBS) calculated for every patient using the HSMR model. Clinical charts were examined to extract relevant comorbidities to determine the reliability of data sent to the national registration of hospital care. RESULTS: Risk categories determined by using the PSI and the abbMEDS were significantly higher compared with the risk categories according to HSMR (p = 0.001, respectively p = 0.000). The mean difference between the number of comorbidities in our registration and the coders' registration was 1.97 (p = 0.00). The mean difference was 0.97 (p = 0.000) for the number of comorbidities of influence on the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and 1.25 (p = 0.001) for the calculated CCI. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that the mortality probabilities as calculated by the CBS are an underestimation of the risk of dying for each patient. Our study also showed that the registration of data sent to the CBS underestimated the actual comorbidities of the patient, and could possibly influence the HSMR.

Improving care for older patients in the acute setting: a qualitative study with healthcare providers.

BACKGROUND: The proportion of older people needing acute care is rapidly growing, thereby posing an increased burden on the acute care chain. The aim of this study is to gain more insight into the obstacles and potential improvement opportunities of the acute care process for older patients arriving at the hospital. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted to determine the experiences of 18 different primary (i.e. general practitioner, community nurse) and secondary healthcare professionals (i.e. emergency department (ED) nurse, ED physician, geriatric physician, geriatric nurse, ambulance nurse, acute medical unit nurse), and three experts (2 researchers, 1 older adult advisor). RESULTS: Four core themes emerged from the interviews: 1) The concept of frailty, awareness concerning frail older patients, and identification of frailty, 2) Barriers in the care process of older patients within the acute care chain, 3) Optimising the discharge process of older patients, and 4) Improvement opportunities suggested by the respondents. Early identification of frailty, improving the continuity of care by means of structured information exchange between care providers in the acute care chain, and a more generalist approach were considered important by the respondents in order to deliver appropriate care to older patients. CONCLUSION: This explorative study identified several barriers and improvement opportunities which are important to improve the quality, efficacy and appropriateness of the acute care of older patients. More seems needed in the future in order to share experiences, expertise and develop potential improvement strategies for the acute care of older patients.

Long-term health related quality of life in patients with sepsis after intensive care stay: A systematic review.

Sepsis is a major health care issue and sepsis survivors are often confronted with long-term complications after admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) which may negatively influence their health related quality of life (HRQOL). This study aimed to systematically evaluate the outcome in terms of HRQOL in patients with sepsis after ICU discharge. A literature search was conducted in the bibliographic databases PubMed, EMBASE, and CINAHL, including reference lists of published guidelines, reviews and associated articles. Sixteen studies were included, thirteen (81.3%) reported that sepsis survivors suffer from impaired HRQOL in physical and mental domains which persist from months to years after a sepsis episode. More focus on improving long-term outcomes for patients surviving sepsis and the ICU is needed.

Acute medical units: The way to go? A literature review.

BACKGROUND: Acute healthcare chains in the Netherlands are increasingly under pressure because of rising emergency department (ED) admissions, relative bed shortages and government policy changes. In order to improve acute patient flow and quality of care through hospitals, an acute medical unit (AMU) might be a solution, as demonstrated in the UK. However, limited information is available concerning AMUs in the Netherlands. Therefore, the aims of this study were to METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed searching 3 electronic databases: PubMed, Cochrane and EMBASE. All 106 hospitals in the Netherlands were contacted, inquiring about the status of an ED, the AMU or future plans to start one. RESULTS: The literature search resulted in 31 studies that met inclusion criteria. In general, these studies reported significant benefits on number of admissions, hospital length of stay (LOS), mortality, other wards and readmissions. Among the Dutch hospitals with an ED, 33 out of 93 implemented an AMU or similar ward, these are however organized heterogeneously. Following current trends, more AMUs are expected to be realized in the future. CONCLUSION: In order to improve the current strain on the Dutch acute healthcare system, an AMU could potentially provide benefits. However, uniform guideline is warranted to optimize and compare quality of care throughout the Netherlands.

Physician consensus on preventability and predictability of readmissions based on standard case scenarios.

BACKGROUND: Policy makers struggle with unplanned readmissions as a quality indicator since integrating preventability in such indicators is difficult. Most studies on the preventability of readmissions questioned physicians whether they consider a given readmission to be preventable, from which conclusions on factors predicting preventable readmissions were derived. There is no literature on the interobserver agreement of physician judgement. AIM: To assess the degree of agreement among physicians regarding predictability and preventability of medical readmissions. DESIGN: An online survey based on eight real-life case scenarios was distributed to European physicians. METHODS: Physicians were requested to rate from the first four (index admission) scenarios whether they expected these patients to be readmitted within 30 days (the predictability). The remaining four cases, describing a readmission, were used to assess the preventability. The main outcome was the degree of agreement among physicians determined using the intra class correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: 526 European medical physicians completed the survey. Most physicians had internal medicine as primary specialism. The median years of clinical experience was 11. ICC for predictability of readmission was 0.67 (moderate to good) and ICC for preventability of readmission was 0.13 (poor). CONCLUSION: There was moderate to good agreement among physicians on the predictability of readmissions while agreement on preventability was poor. This study indicates that assessing preventability of readmissions based solely on the judgement of physicians is far from perfect. Current literature on the preventability of readmissions and conclusions derived on the basis of physician opinion should be interpreted with caution.

Exploring the preventable causes of unplanned readmissions using root cause analysis: Coordination of care is the weakest link.

IMPORTANCE: Unplanned readmissions within 30days are a common phenomenon in everyday practice and lead to increasing costs. Although many studies aiming to analyze the probable causes leading to unplanned readmissions have been performed, an in depth-study analyzing the human (healthcare worker)-, organizational-, technical-, disease- and patient-related causes leading to readmission is still missing. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to identify human-, organizational-, technical-, disease- and patient-related causes which contribute to acute readmission within 30days after discharge using a Root-Cause Analysis Tool called PRISMA-medical. The secondary objective was to evaluate how many of these readmissions were deemed potentially preventable, and to assess which factors contributed to these preventable readmissions in comparison to non-preventable readmissions. DESIGN: Cross-sectional retrospective record study. SETTING: An academic medical center in Amsterdam, The Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty patients aged 18years and older discharged from an internal medicine department and acutely readmitted within 30days after discharge. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Root causes of preventable and unpreventable readmissions. RESULTS: Most root causes for readmission were disease-related (46%), followed by human (healthcare worker)- (33%) and patient- (15%) related root causes. Half of the readmissions studied were considered to be potentially preventable. Preventable readmissions predominantly had human-related (coordination) failures. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Our study suggests that improving human-related (coordinating) factors contributing to a readmission can potentially decrease the number of preventable readmissions.