KinCor, a national registry for paediatric patients with congenital and other types of heart disease in the Netherlands: aims, design and interim results.

OBJECTIVE: Studies in children with heart disease have been hampered by a lack of easily identifiable patient groups. Currently, there are few prospective population-based registries covering the entire spectrum of heart disease in children. KinCor is a Dutch national registry for children with heart diseases. This paper presents the aims, design and interim results of the KinCor project. METHODS: All children presenting at a Dutch university medical centre with a diagnosis of heart disease from 2012 onwards were eligible for registration in the KinCor database. Data entry is through a web-based portal. Entry codes have been synchronised with the European Paediatric Cardiac Coding system, allowing coupling with similar databases for adults, such as CONCOR. RESULTS: Between June 2012 and July 2015, 8421 patients were registered (76 % of those eligible). Median age of the patients was 9.8 years, 44.7 % were female; 6782 patients had morphological congenital heart disease. The most prevalent morphological congenital heart defects were ventricular septal defects (18 %), Tetralogy of Fallot (10 %) and transposition of great arteries (9 %). For 42 % of the patients additional diagnoses were registered. Sixty percent of patients had undergone at least one intervention (catheter intervention or surgery). CONCLUSION: The KinCor database has developed into a large registry of data of children with all types of heart disease and continues to grow. This database will provide the opportunity for epidemiological research projects on congenital and other types of heart disease in children. Entry codes are shared with the CONCOR database, which may provide a unique dataset.

Evaluation of the diagnostic work-up in children with myocarditis and idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy.

The underlying etiology of dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) in children varies, 14-22% is secondary to myocarditis, and the majority remains idiopathic. Etiology has prognostic value; however, 'a clinical diagnosis of myocarditis' has been frequently used because the gold standard [endomyocardial biopsy (EMB)] is often not performed. Therefore, a consistent diagnostic approach and interpretation is needed. In this multicenter study, we evaluated the diagnostic approach and interpretation of the viral results in children with myocarditis and idiopathic DCM. We included 150 children with DCM, of whom 103 were assigned the diagnosis myocarditis (n = 21) or idiopathic DCM (n = 82) by the attending physician. Viral tests were performed in 97/103 patients, in only 34% (n = 35) some of the tests were positive. Of those patients, we evaluated the probability of the assigned diagnosis using the viral test results. We classified viral test results as reflecting definite or probable myocarditis in 14 children and possible or unlikely myocarditis in 21 children. Based on this classification, 23% of patients were misclassified. We found that in children with DCM, the diagnostic approach varied and the interpretation was mainly based on viral results. Since a 'clinical diagnosis of myocarditis' has been frequently used in daily practice because of the lack of EMB results, a uniform protocol is needed. We propose to use viral test results in several steps (blood PCR, serology, PCR and/or cultures of the gastro-intestinal and respiratory tract, and EMB results) to estimate the probability of myocarditis.