Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Euro Surveill ; 25(38)2020 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32975188

RESUMO

The World Health Organization (WHO) issued an updated position paper on rabies in 2018, mainly focusing on simplification of vaccination schedules and use of rabies immunoglobulin (RIG). The maximum amount of RIG anatomically feasible should be infiltrated exclusively in and around the wound and will no longer be calculated solely based on body weight. We describe the practical guideline implementing the revised RIG policy in the Netherlands on how to determine the amount of RIG for local administration. We calculated savings achieved through the revised WHO policy. We used information from a national database including rabies consultations in the Netherlands and clinical information from a public health service, clinical practitioners and national data on the amount of distributed RIG. Between 2008 and 2019, 5,164 consultations were registered. The most frequently affected anatomical location was hand or leg (43%). Around 80% concerned minor injuries (< 2 cm). From January 2016 to end December 2019, 7,361 mL RIG were distributed for 1,042 possible rabies exposures (EUR 1.4 million). Since implementing the revised policy, the amount of RIG distributed per order has sharply decreased (59%). Infiltrating RIG only locally saved large quantities of human RIG (EUR 1.1 million during 4 years) in the Netherlands.


Assuntos
Profilaxia Pós-Exposição/métodos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Vacina Antirrábica/administração & dosagem , Vacina Antirrábica/economia , Raiva/prevenção & controle , Administração Tópica , Animais , Análise Custo-Benefício , Política de Saúde , Humanos , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , Raiva/epidemiologia , Organização Mundial da Saúde
2.
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd ; 1632019 05 20.
Artigo em Holandês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31120216

RESUMO

Revision of the rabies policy in the Netherlands The WHO aims to eliminate dog-transmitted rabies deaths in humans by 2030 ('zero by 30'). The Dutch rabies policy advisory board has revised its national rabies guidelines on the basis of the WHO guidelines revised in 2018. In the revised Dutch guidelines, there is increased focus on the importance of instant wound care after potential exposure to the rabies virus. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is limited to two vaccines given on days 0 and 7, rather than the previous regime of three vaccines. Post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) no longer consists of five vaccines for unvaccinated individuals; instead it is four vaccines on days 0, 3, 7, and 14-28. For type III wounds, when indicated, rabies immunoglobulin (RIG) is only injected into and around the wound bed; residual volumes are no longer administered intramuscularly. RIG no longer needs to be administered in cases of potential mucosal contact exposure to the rabies virus where there is no injury. The vaccination scheme for PrEP (3) and PEP (5) does not change for immunocompromised patients, and RIG is administered regardless of the vaccination status of the affected individual.


Assuntos
Política de Saúde , Raiva/terapia , Humanos , Fatores Imunológicos/uso terapêutico , Países Baixos , Profilaxia Pós-Exposição/métodos , Profilaxia Pós-Exposição/normas , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Profilaxia Pré-Exposição/métodos , Profilaxia Pré-Exposição/normas , Vacina Antirrábica/administração & dosagem , Organização Mundial da Saúde , Técnicas de Fechamento de Ferimentos
3.
J Med Microbiol ; 55(Pt 11): 1571-1575, 2006 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17030918

RESUMO

An outbreak of psittacosis in a veterinary teaching hospital was recognized in December 2004. Outbreak management was instituted to evaluate the extent of the outbreak and to determine the avian source. Real-time PCR, serologic testing and sequencing of the ompA gene of Chlamydophila psittaci were performed. Sputum samples from patients, throat-swab samples from exposed students and staff, and faecal specimens from parrots and pigeons were tested. In this outbreak, 34 % (10/29) of the tested individuals were infected. The clinical features of the infection ranged from none to sepsis with multi-organ failure requiring intensive-care-unit admission. C. psittaci genotype A was identified as the outbreak strain. Parrots, recently exposed to a group of cockatiels coming from outside the teaching facility, which were used in a practical class, appeared to be the source of the outbreak. One of the tested pigeons harboured an unrelated C. psittaci genotype B strain. The microbiological diagnosis by real-time PCR on clinical specimens allowed for rapid outbreak management; subsequent genotyping of the isolates identified the avian source. Recommendations are made to reduce the incidence and extent of future outbreaks.


Assuntos
Chlamydophila psittaci/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Surtos de Doenças , Psitacose/epidemiologia , Zoonoses/microbiologia , Adulto , Amazona , Animais , Anticorpos Antibacterianos/sangue , Proteínas da Membrana Bacteriana Externa/química , Proteínas da Membrana Bacteriana Externa/genética , Sequência de Bases , Doenças das Aves/microbiologia , Chlamydophila psittaci/genética , Testes de Fixação de Complemento , DNA Bacteriano/química , DNA Bacteriano/genética , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Dados de Sequência Molecular , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase , Psitacose/microbiologia , Zoonoses/epidemiologia , Zoonoses/transmissão
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...