Does the experience level of the radiologist, assessment in consensus, or the addition of the abduction and external rotation view improve the diagnostic reproducibility and accuracy of MRA of the shoulder?

AIM: To prospectively evaluate the influence of observer experience, consensus assessment, and abduction and external rotation (ABER) view on the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA) in patients with traumatic anterior-shoulder instability (TASI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-eight MRA examinations (of which 51 had additional ABER views) were assessed by six radiologists (R1-R6) and three teams (T1-T3) with different experience levels, using a seven-lesion standardized scoring form. Forty-five out of 58 MRA examination findings were surgically confirmed. Kappa coefficients, sensitivity, specificity, and differences in percent agreement or correct diagnosis (p-value, McNemar's test) were calculated per lesion and overall per seven lesion types to assess diagnostic reproducibility and accuracy. RESULTS: Overall kappa ranged from poor (k = 0.17) to moderate (k = 0.53), sensitivity from 30.6-63.5%, and specificity from 73.6-89.9%. Overall, the most experienced radiologists (R1-R2) and teams (T2-T3) agreed significantly more than the lesser experienced radiologists (R3-R4: p = 0.014, R5-R6; p = 0.018) and teams (T2-T3: p = 0.007). The most experienced radiologist (R1, R2, R3) and teams (T1, T2) were also consistently more accurate than the lesser experienced radiologists (R4, R5, R6) and team (T3). Significant differences were found between R1-R4 (p = 0.012), R3-R4 (p = 0.03), and T2-T3 (p = 0.014). The overall performance of consensus assessment was systematically higher than individual assessment. Significant differences were established between T1-T2 and radiologists R3-R4 (p<0.001, p = 0.001) and between T2 and R3 (p<0.001/p = 0.001) or R4 (p = 0.050). No overall significant differences were found between the radiologists' assessments with and without ABER. CONCLUSION: The addition of ABER does not significantly improve overall diagnostic performance. The radiologist's experience level and consensus assessment do contribute to higher reproducibility and accuracy.

Stent remodeling contributes to femoropopliteal artery restenosis: an intravascular ultrasound study.

This case report describes the status of femoropopliteal artery stents after intervention documented with intravascular ultrasound compared with the changes seen at follow-up. To treat an extensive dissection after balloon angioplasty, a 57-year-old man underwent placement of seven adjacent Palmaz stents. At 5-month follow-up, an angiographic and intravascular ultrasound examination revealed four distinct stenotic lesions (> or = 50%) at stent junctions. Intravascular ultrasound images obtained during the initial stent placement were compared with the corresponding images obtained at follow-up. A distinction was made between changes seen at stent junctions and stent edges (n = 8), those seen within each stent (n = 7), and those in the nonstented sections proximally and distally (n = 3). Intravascular ultrasound examination established that both intimal hyperplasia and stent area reduction (stent remodeling) resulted in lumen area reduction. The extent of the changes seen at the stent junctions were greater than that of changes seen within the stents: lumen area reduction, 67% versus 23%; stent area reduction, 26% versus 11%; and intimal hyperplasia, 10.8 versus 3.3 mm2; respectively. Changes in the nonstented sections were minimal (< 2%). The stent edge seen at the adductor canal showed elliptical deformation. Thus there is a higher risk of restenosis at the stent junctions. In addition to intimal hyperplasia, stent remodeling contributes to restenosis.

Recanalization of femoropopliteal occlusive lesions: a comparison of long-term clinical, color duplex US, and arteriographic follow-up.

PURPOSE: To assess the merits of clinical examination, color-flow duplex ultrasound (US), and arteriography in the follow-up of patients who have undergone femoropopliteal artery recanalization for occlusive disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Recanalization of the occluded femoropopliteal artery was attempted in 62 patients. Follow- up included clinical examination, ankle-brachial blood pressure measurement, and duplex US scanning at 4-month intervals during the first year, at 6-month intervals during the second year, and one a year thereafter. Failure of recanalization included substantial restenosis or reocclusion of the treated segment. Arteriography was performed at the end of the first year or earlier if recurrence was suspected. Agreement of clinical findings with those of duplex US and those of arteriography was determined with kappa statistics; a kappa value of greater than 0.75 represented excellent agreement. RESULTS: Recanalization was technically successful in 51 patients (82%). Clinical patency was 63% (standard error [SE], 6%) after 1 year, 56% (SE, 7%) after 2 years, and 46% (SE, 9%) after 3 years. When technical failures were included, the patency rate at duplex US was 58% (SE, 6%) after 1 year, 40% (SE, 7%) after 2 years, and 33% (SE, 8%) after 3 years. The patency rate at arteriography was 53% (SE, 7%) after 1 year, 33% (SE, 7%) after 2 years, and 30% (SE, 8%) after 3 years. When arteriographic examination was considered the standard of reference, diagnostic accuracy in the identification of recurrent lesions was 94% at duplex US (kappa = 0.88) and 74% at clinical examination (kappa = 0.51). CONCLUSION: Rates of restenosis or occlusion detected at follow-up with duplex US and arteriography were comparable. However, clinical examination alone helped detect fewer cases of recurrent disease.

Preparation of the colon for single- and double-contrast barium enema examination: a simplified method.

A commercially available prepackaged liquid diet was prescribed to 112 patients to use in combination with laxatives in a 1-day preparation regimen before single- and double-contrast barium enema examination. Cleansing enemas were not performed before the examination. Colon radiographs were evaluated with regard to amount of residual stool, mucosal detail, coating, and overall quality. Results were excellent in 92% (103 of 112) of patients and fair in 5% (six of 112). Cleansing enemas can be avoided through use of this preparation protocol.