RESUMO
PURPOSE: Blue-collar workers generally have less healthy lifestyles, poorer health, and a lower life expectancy than white-collar workers. At least in part this may be attributed to their work and working conditions. Employers increasingly provide interventions to improve health and wellbeing and prevent musculoskeletal disorders. However, they often do not reach blue-collar workers. The aim of this scoping review was to identify the facilitators for and barriers to implementing such interventions among blue-collar workers. METHODS: A scoping review in which the study population of the selected studies consists of blue-collar workers (≥ 18 years old) in paid employment. Furthermore, included studies should report facilitators and barriers to implementing interventions to prevent musculoskeletal disorders. The literature search was conducted in six databases. The resulting studies were extracted with the help of the updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. RESULTS: 15 articles were included; these were reviews, intervention studies, qualitative studies and process evaluations. A main facilitator was a participatory approach, which involves the blue-collar worker in the entire process of defining, developing, and implementing a multidimensional preventive intervention. The main barriers on the worker level were unfavorable worker characteristics and unsupportive behavior/attitudes. The main barriers on the organization level were a culture with a high production standard, a hierarchical culture, inflexible work, and an unsupportive attitude from the employer. CONCLUSION: This review showed the multifaceted nature of implementation. A tailored implementation plan that involves the stakeholders (including workers) is important.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases (RMDs) substantially impact the lives of patients, with complex associations between disease severity and self-perceived health status. In this regard, the Coping with Rheumatic Stressors (CORS) questionnaire was developed to measure how patients with RMDs cope with stressors such as pain, limitations or dependency. The CORS is not currently available in Spanish, and therefore the adaptation of this instrument is needed. OBJECTIVE: First, to cross-culturally adapt the CORS into Spanish for Spain. Secondly, to test the conceptual equivalence of the translated version in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). METHODS: A translation of the CORS into Spanish was performed adhering to the forward-backward procedure described by Beaton. Two translators produced independent forward translations of the item content, response options, and instructions of the CORS into Spanish. Both versions were harmonized in a consensual version. Another translator back-translated the synthesized version into Dutch. A scientific committee including all the translators, one methodologist and a rheumatologist, held a meeting and reached consensus on discrepancies to develop a final draft version of the Spanish CORS. Then, a field test with cognitive debriefing was conducted, involving a sample of 10 patients with axSpA. RESULTS: The translation process of the CORS was completed after the discussion of some discrepancies throughout the process. The first translation was done without major complications. Back-translation presented some discrepancies. These led to minor modifications in the wording in one response option and 15 questionnaire items. The scientific committee agreed upon a final version of the questionnaire. Cognitive debriefing, led to minor modifications; for example, three respondents indicated that one of the statements in the instructions was syntactically complex ("indique cuán a menudo usted ha llevado a cabo dicho comportamiento") which led to its adjustment. The process indicated that the final CORS Spanish questionnaire was clear and understandable to all patients. CONCLUSIONS: The Spanish version of the CORS showed good cross-cultural validity and good face validity according to the field test. Before the Spanish CORS is implemented, further validation is in progress to test the psychometric properties of the instrument in patients with axSpA.
Assuntos
Comparação Transcultural , Qualidade de Vida , Humanos , Qualidade de Vida/psicologia , Traduções , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adaptação PsicológicaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Research shows that health professionals should adapt their communication when addressing patients with limited health literacy (HL). However, the extent to which physiotherapists apply recommended communication techniques is unclear. METHODS: We conducted a two phase mixed-method study, first holding focus group interviews among patients and experts on communication to explore the need for adjusted communication in physiotherapist-patient interaction. Second, we manually coded audio recordings of primary care physiotherapy consultations to investigate the extent to which physiotherapists applied these recommended communication techniques, and adjusted their communication towards patients with lower education. RESULTS: Focus group interviews identified four categories of communication elements: the teach-back method, medical jargon explanation, summarizing patient's narratives, and checking patient's understanding. In 50 audio recordings we identified 2670 clauses. We report limited use of the recommended communication techniques; the teach-back method was used in 2% of consultations (95%CI: 0.4%-10.5%) while medical jargon explanation was used in 84% (95%CI: 71.5%-91.7%). Mixed effects logistic regression models showed no association between lower education and communication techniques. CONCLUSION: Although physiotherapists need to adjust their communication to patients with lower education, they rarely apply the recommended communication techniques. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Knowledge about limited HL among physiotherapists needs to be increased.
Assuntos
Letramento em Saúde , Fisioterapeutas , Humanos , Letramento em Saúde/métodos , Comunicação , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Atenção Primária à SaúdeRESUMO
RATIONALE: Adherence rates to guidelines show room for improvement, and increase in adherence to guidelines may potentially lead to better outcomes and reduced costs of treatment. To improve adherence, it is essential to understand the considerations of physiotherapists regarding the assessment and management of low back pain (LBP). The purpose of this study is to gain insight in the considerations of Dutch physiotherapists on adherence to the national physiotherapy guideline in the treatment of patients with LBP. METHODS: This is a qualitative study, using an interpretive approach of semi-structured interviews with 14 physiotherapists who regularly treat patients with LBP. Thematic analysis was conducted with open coding using an existing framework. This framework distinguishes five components to adherence based on patient factors, provider factors, guideline characteristics, institutional factors and the implementation process. RESULTS: Participating physiotherapists mentioned that the guideline should provide more information about psychosocial prognostic factors and psychosocial treatment options. The participants experienced difficulties in addressing patient expectations that conflict with guideline recommendations. The implementation process of the guideline was considered insufficient. Physiotherapists might rely too much on their experience, and knowledge of evidence-based treatment might be improved. In general, the interviewed physiotherapists thought they were mainly non-adherent to the guidelines. However, when comparing their considerations with the actual guideline recommendations they were mainly adherent. CONCLUSION: To improve adherence, the guideline should provide more information about addressing psychosocial prognostic factors, and Dutch physiotherapists might be trained in communication skills to better address patient expectations. A more extensive implementation process is warranted for the next guideline to increase the physiotherapists' knowledge of evidence-based treatment.
Assuntos
Dor Lombar , Fisioterapeutas , Humanos , Fisioterapeutas/psicologia , Dor Lombar/terapia , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Modalidades de FisioterapiaRESUMO
Understanding motivation for exercise can be helpful in improving levels of physical activity. The Physical Activity and Leisure Motivation Scale (PALMS) measures distinct goal-oriented motivations. In this study selected measurement properties of the Dutch version (PALMS-D) are determined. Forward-backward translation was used for cross-cultural adaptation. Construct validity of the PALMS-D was assessed in five subsamples completing the PALMS-D and the Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire (BREQ-3). The study population consisted of five samples recruited from different populations; samples consisted of runners, hockey players, soccer players, participants in medical fitness, and a sedentary group of young adults with low activity. A total of 733 participants completed the questionnaire: 562 athletes and 171 non-athletes. Exploratory for Analysis confirmed the original eight factors. Internal consistency of the subscales was high, except for Others' expectations. The a priori determined hypotheses related to differences between athletes participating in different sports were confirmed, as well as the hypothesis related to differences between amateur athletes, patients in medical fitness, and non-active participants. It was concluded that the Dutch version of the PALMS is an acceptable questionnaire with which to evaluate the individual motivation of athletes in the Netherlands, and discriminates between different leisure athletes, patients in medical fitness, and non-active youths.
Assuntos
Motivação , Esportes , Adolescente , Exercício Físico , Humanos , Atividades de Lazer , Países Baixos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto JovemRESUMO
It is widely accepted that psychosocial prognostic factors should be addressed by clinicians in their assessment and management of patient suffering from low back pain (LBP). On the other hand, an overview is missing how these factors are addressed in clinical LBP guidelines. Therefore, our objective was to summarize and compare recommendations regarding the assessment and management of psychosocial prognostic factors for LBP chronicity, as reported in clinical LBP guidelines. We performed a systematic search of clinical LBP guidelines (PROSPERO registration number 154730). This search consisted of a combination of previously published systematic review articles and a new systematic search in medical or guideline-related databases. From the included guidelines, we extracted recommendations regarding the assessment and management of LBP which addressed psychosocial prognostic factors (ie, psychological factors ["yellow flags"], perceptions about the relationship between work and health, ["blue flags"], system or contextual obstacles ["black flags") and psychiatric symptoms ["orange flags"]). In addition, we evaluated the level or quality of evidence of these recommendations. In total, we included 15 guidelines. Psychosocial prognostic factors were addressed in 13 of 15 guidelines regarding their assessment and in 14 of 15 guidelines regarding their management. Recommendations addressing psychosocial factors almost exclusively concerned "yellow" or "black flags," and varied widely across guidelines. The supporting evidence was generally of very low quality. We conclude that in general, clinical LBP guidelines do not provide clinicians with clear instructions about how to incorporate psychosocial factors in LBP care and should be optimized in this respect. More specifically, clinical guidelines vary widely in whether and how they address psychosocial factors, and recommendations regarding these factors generally require better evidence support. This emphasizes a need for a stronger evidence-base underlying the role of psychosocial risk factors within LBP care, and a need for uniformity in methodology and terminology across guidelines. PERSPECTIVE: This systematic review summarized clinical guidelines on low back pain (LBP) on how they addressed the identification and management of psychosocial factors. This review revealed a large amount of variety across guidelines in whether and how psychosocial factors were addressed. Moreover, recommendations generally lacked details and were based on low quality evidence.
Assuntos
Consenso , Dor Lombar , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Funcionamento Psicossocial , Humanos , Dor Lombar/diagnóstico , Dor Lombar/terapiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Self-efficacy is related to outcome after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears. The Knee Self Efficacy Scale (K-SES) available in Swedish and English, was developed to measure self-efficacy in present (K-SESpresent) and future (K-SESfuture) functioning. The objective of this study was to determine measurement properties of the K-SES in Dutch patients. METHODS: The K-SES was translated and structural validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and measurement error were assessed in three patient samples: one group completed the questionnaire and additional measures pre-surgery (N = 200), and one group post-surgery (N = 58). The third group (post-surgery) completed the K-SES twice (N = 50). RESULTS: Exploratory factor analysis distinguished two underlying important factors: K-SESpresent and K-SESfuture. However, the distinction was not confirmed in Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). Internal consistency for both subscales was excellent (Cronbach's alpha > .80). Test-retest reliability absolute agreement was 0.95. A-priori formulated hypotheses on the relation between Knee Self Efficacy Scale Dutch (K-SES-D) and related constructs were confirmed. Moderate to high correlations (r > 0.50) were reported with Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) before reconstruction. High negative correlation was found with fear of movement and pain catastrophizing (r < - 0.60), and low correlation (r < 0.50) with locus of control and measures of distress. CONCLUSION: Acceptability, internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the K-SES-D subscales are satisfactory. Construct validity of both subscales was confirmed by exploratory factor analysis and hypothesis testing. However, construct validity was not confirmed in CFA. Further research is needed to test responsiveness.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: There is a concern that traditional instruction based methods of learning do not adequately prepare students for the challenges of physical therapy practice. Self-directed learning is considered to be the most appropriate educational approach to enhance life-long learning as it enhances self-efficacy. This study compares outcomes in two educational approaches: self-directed learning (SDL), and traditional instruction based learning (IBL). METHODS: In this non-randomized experimental study two groups of second year physiotherapy students were compared using pre-post-test assessments. Study results (both knowledge and physiotherapy performance), and self-reported self-efficacy were used as outcome variables. Study results from the end of year 1 and the end of year two were retrieved form the student information system. Self-reported variables including general and physical therapy self-efficacy were assessed using an online questionnaire which was completed at the start and the end of year two. Changes in self-efficacy were analysed using a repeated measures multivariate ANOVA. RESULTS: A total of 174 students were enrolled in the second year, of which 108 (62%) agreed to participate in the online questionnaire. The online questionnaire at baseline (September 2015) was completed by 27 students in the SDL condition compared to 81 students in the IBL condition. There were no statistical differences at baseline between both educational approaches on any of the variables in the study. At the end of year two, there was no difference between both conditions in indicators of study results: knowledge and performance. Perceived self-efficacy in functioning as a physical therapist increased between both assessments. However, this increase was observed in both condition, and the difference between both conditions was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Self-directed learning and traditional instruction based learning result in equal study outcome and self-efficacy at the end of year two. More research is needed to determine the long term outcome that is most relevant for lifelong learning, and which students will benefit most from this approach. Nonetheless, self-directed learning might be an important alternative for instruction-based l education.
Assuntos
Competência Clínica/normas , Educação de Graduação em Medicina/métodos , Fisioterapeutas/educação , Especialidade de Fisioterapia/educação , Aprendizagem Baseada em Problemas/normas , Estudantes de Medicina , Educação de Graduação em Medicina/normas , Avaliação Educacional , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Motivação , Países Baixos , Autoeficácia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Apart from skills, and knowledge, self-efficacy is an important factor in the students' preparation for clinical work. The Physiotherapist Self-Efficacy (PSE) questionnaire was developed to measure physical therapy (TP) students' self-efficacy in the cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, and neurological clinical areas. The aim of this study was to establish the measurement properties of the Dutch PSE questionnaire, and to explore whether self-efficacy beliefs in students are clinical area specific. METHODS: Methodological quality of the PSE was studied using COSMIN guidelines. Item analysis, structural validity, and internal consistency of the PSE were determined in 207 students. Test-retest reliability was established in another sample of 60 students completing the PSE twice. Responsiveness of the scales was determined in 80 students completing the PSE at the start and the end of the second year. Hypothesis testing was used to determine construct validity of the PSE. RESULTS: Exploratory factor analysis resulted in three meaningful components explaining similar proportions of variance (25%, 21%, and 20%), reflecting the three clinical areas. Internal consistency of each of the three subscales was excellent (Cronbach's alpha > .90). Intra Class Correlation Coefficient was good (.80). Hypothesis testing confirmed construct validity of the PSE. CONCLUSION: The PSE shows excellent measurement properties. The component structure of the PSE suggests that self-efficacy about physiotherapy in PT students is not generic, but specific for a clinical area. As self-efficacy is considered a predictor of performance in clinical settings, enhancing self-efficacy is an explicit goal of educational interventions. Further research is needed to determine if the scale is specific enough to assess the effect of educational interventions on student self-efficacy.
Assuntos
Fisioterapeutas/educação , Autoeficácia , Estudantes , Inquéritos e Questionários , Competência Clínica , Estudos Transversais , Avaliação Educacional , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Países Baixos , Fisioterapeutas/psicologia , Projetos Piloto , Psicometria , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estudantes/psicologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Fear of harm (FoH) after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (ACLR) should be addressed in physical therapy as it hampers return to sports. However, there are no instruments assessing FoH specific for ACLR. The objective of this study is to describe the development and measurement properties of the Photograph Series of Sports Activities for ACLR (PHOSA-ACLR) measuring ACL injury related FoH. METHODS: Based on literature and opinion of physical therapists with extensive experience in ACLR treatment, photographs depicting FoH inducing situations in ACL injury were considered for inclusion in the instrument. For each photograph the patients is asked to report perceived harmfulness. The set of photographs was completed by two samples of patients with ACLR: 1 cross-sectional sample (n = 55), and 1 test-retest reliability sample (n = 58). Internal consistency and structural validity were assessed in 109 patients. In 58 patients criterion validity was assessed by calculating pearson correlations with the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK). Correlations with self-reported knee function (KOOS and Lysholm score), and Knee Self-efficacy Scale (K-SES) were computed for hypothesis testing. Test-retest reliability was determined in a group of 55 patients, assessed twice with 1 week between assessments. RESULTS: Twelve photographs depicting sports related movements that are likely to invoke FoH after ACLR were selected. Two items were deleted because of lack of discrimination. The remaining 10 items were included in the PHOSA-ACLR, and the scale showed excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's Alpha is .95). Items reflected one dimension, and was strongly correlated with TSK (r = .59). A priori formulated hypotheses are confirmed and test-retest correlation was excellent (ICC = .86). CONCLUSION: The PHOSA-ACLR showed acceptable measurement properties. The PHOSA-ACLR gives specific information about fear invoking sports situations that are not measured by other kinesophobia measures. Therefore, the PHOSA-ACLR might be a valuable additional tool in rehabilitation of ACLR patients. Additional research is needed to determine responsiveness to change.
Assuntos
Lesões do Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/psicologia , Reconstrução do Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/psicologia , Ansiedade/psicologia , Traumatismos em Atletas/psicologia , Fotografação , Adolescente , Adulto , Lesões do Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/epidemiologia , Lesões do Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/cirurgia , Reconstrução do Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/tendências , Ansiedade/diagnóstico , Ansiedade/epidemiologia , Traumatismos em Atletas/epidemiologia , Traumatismos em Atletas/cirurgia , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Escore de Lysholm para Joelho/normas , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estimulação Luminosa/métodos , Fotografação/métodos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Autorrelato/normas , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To examine the change in multidimensional fatigue in people with spinal cord injury during post-acute rehabilitation, and to compare these scores with those of healthy adults. Furthermore, to examine correlations between different dimensions of fatigue at discharge and demographics, injury-related variables and indices of psychological adjustment. DESIGN: Longitudinal cohort study. SUBJECTS: From 86 patients admitted for spinal cord injury rehabilitation, between June 2011 and January 2013, 78 met the inclusion criteria, and 70 (90%) agreed to participate. METHODS: Self-reported questionnaires were completed at admission and in the week before discharge. Questionnaires used assessed demographics, injury-related variables, multidimensional fatigue, and psychological adjustment. RESULTS: At admission, fatigue scores were very high and decreased significantly during rehabilitation. At discharge, fatigue scores were still significantly higher than those of healthy adults. The fatigue total score at discharge was weakly associated with demographic variables and injury-related variables. Psychological adjustment variables explained the largest proportion of variance of the fatigue total score and each of the subscales. CONCLUSION: Fatigue is an important consequence in people with recently acquired spinal cord injury. Associations between fatigue and psychological adjustment suggest that psychological interventions might be useful to diminish fatigue.
Assuntos
Fadiga/etiologia , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/psicologia , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/reabilitação , Adaptação Psicológica , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Fadiga/psicologia , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Alta do Paciente , Fatores Sexuais , Apoio Social , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/complicações , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto JovemRESUMO
People living with chronic illness often report uncertainty about the future, fear of disease progression, fear of becoming physically disabled, and a reduced life expectancy as important sources of stress. However, little is known about psychological interventions targeting these concerns. The aim of this study is to illustrate an intervention to reduce emotional distress and concerns about the future in a patient with systemic sclerosis (SSc), a rare chronic rheumatic disease with serious consequences for most patients, and to present a preliminary report on its effectiveness using a single-case study design. Because of the complexity of symptoms and complaints due to SSc, the psychological intervention was embedded in an interdisciplinary care program also consisting of physical therapy, occupational therapy, and specialized nurse care.
Assuntos
Atitude Frente a Saúde , Terapia Cognitivo-Comportamental/métodos , Progressão da Doença , Medo/psicologia , Escleroderma Sistêmico/psicologia , Estresse Psicológico/terapia , Adaptação Psicológica , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Escleroderma Sistêmico/complicações , Estresse Psicológico/etiologia , Estresse Psicológico/psicologia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of a group-based intervention on the balance between necessity beliefs and concern beliefs about medication and on medication non-adherence in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Non-adherent RA patients using disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) were randomized to an intervention or control arm. The intervention consisted, amongst others, of two motivational interviewing-guided group sessions led by the same pharmacist. Control patients received brochures about their DMARDs. Questionnaires were completed up to 12 months follow-up. RESULTS: 123 patients (mean age: 60 years, female: 69%) were randomized. No differences in necessity beliefs and concern beliefs about medication and in medication non-adherence were detected between the intervention and control arm, except at 12 months' follow-up: participants in the intervention arm had less strong necessity beliefs about medication than participants in the control arm (b: -1.0 (95% CI: -2.0, -0.1)). CONCLUSION: This trial did not demonstrate superiority of our intervention over the control arm in changing beliefs about medication or in improving medication adherence over time. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Absent intervention effects might have been due to, amongst others, selection bias and a suboptimal treatment integrity level. Hence, targeting beliefs about medication in clinical practice should not yet be ruled out.
Assuntos
Antirreumáticos/uso terapêutico , Artrite Reumatoide/tratamento farmacológico , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Adesão à Medicação , Adulto , Idoso , Artrite Reumatoide/psicologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Entrevista Motivacional , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Farmacêuticos , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
PURPOSE: The aim of this longitudinal study is to determine the factors which predict a successful 1-year outcome from an intensive combined physical and psychological (CPP) programme in chronic low back pain (CLBP) patients. METHODS: A prospective cohort of 524 selected consecutive CLBP patients was followed. Potential predictive factors included demographic characteristics, disability, pain and cognitive behavioural factors as measured at pre-treatment assessment. The primary outcome measure was the oswestry disability index (ODI). A successful 1-year follow-up outcome was defined as a functional status equivalent to 'normal' and healthy populations (ODI ≤22). The 2-week residential programme fulfills the recommendations in international guidelines. For statistical analysis we divided the database into two equal samples. A random sample was used to develop a prediction model with multivariate logistic regression. The remaining cases were used to validate this model. RESULTS: The final predictive model suggested being 'in employment' at pre-treatment [OR 3.61 (95 % CI 1.80-7.26)] and an initial 'disability score' [OR 0.94 (95 % CI 0.92-0.97)] as significant predictive factors for a successful 1-year outcome (R (2) = 22 %; 67 % correctly classified). There was no predictive value from measures of psychological distress. CONCLUSION: CLBP patients who are in work and mild to moderately disabled at the start of a CPP programme are most likely to benefit from it and to have a successful treatment outcome. In these patients, the disability score falls to values seen in healthy populations. This small set of factors is easily identified, allowing selection for programme entry and triage to alternative treatment regimes.
Assuntos
Dor Crônica/psicologia , Dor Crônica/terapia , Dor Lombar/psicologia , Dor Lombar/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Pessoas com Deficiência , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição da Dor , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To examine the potential effectiveness of a multimodal rehabilitation program including an acceptance-oriented cognitive-behavioral therapy for highly distressed patients with rheumatic diseases. METHODS: An observational study employing a one-group pre-post test design (N=25). The primary outcome was psychological distress. Secondary outcomes were quality of life, illness acceptance, and coping flexibility. Group pre-to-post and pre-to-12 months follow-up treatment changes were evaluated by paired-samples t-tests and Cohen's effect sizes (d). Individual changes were evaluated by the reliable change index (RCI) and clinically significant change (CSC) parameters. RESULTS: Significant effects were found post-treatment and maintained at 12 months in psychological distress (d>0.80), illness acceptance (d=1.48) and the SF-36 subscales role physical, vitality, and mental health (d ≥ 0.65). No significant effects were found for coping flexibility and the SF-36 subscales physical functioning, bodily pain, social functioning, and role emotional. Both a reliable (RCI) and clinically significant (CSC) improvement was observed for almost half of the highly distressed patients. CONCLUSION: The patients enrolled in the multimodal rehabilitation program showed improved psychological health status from pre to post-treatment. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: A randomized clinical trial is needed to confirm or refute the added value of an acceptance-oriented cognitive-behavioral therapy for highly distressed patients in rehabilitation.
Assuntos
Adaptação Psicológica , Terapia Cognitivo-Comportamental , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/psicologia , Doenças Reumáticas/psicologia , Estresse Psicológico/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Resiliência Psicológica , Doenças Reumáticas/reabilitação , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Increasingly, medical research involves patients who complete outcomes in different languages. This occurs in countries with more than one common language, such as Canada (French/English) or the United States (Spanish/English), as well as in international multi-centre collaborations, which are utilized frequently in rare diseases such as systemic sclerosis (SSc). In order to pool or compare outcomes, instruments should be measurement equivalent (invariant) across cultural or linguistic groups. This study provides an example of how to assess cross-language measurement equivalence by comparing the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D) scale between English-speaking Canadian and Dutch SSc patients. METHODS: The CES-D was completed by 922 English-speaking Canadian and 213 Dutch SSc patients. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to assess the factor structure in both samples. The Multiple-Indicator Multiple-Cause (MIMIC) model was utilized to assess the amount of differential item functioning (DIF). RESULTS: A two-factor model (positive and negative affect) showed excellent fit in both samples. Statistically significant, but small-magnitude, DIF was found for 3 of 20 items on the CES-D. The English-speaking Canadian sample endorsed more feeling-related symptoms, whereas the Dutch sample endorsed more somatic/retarded activity symptoms. The overall estimate in depression scores between English and Dutch was not influenced substantively by DIF. CONCLUSIONS: CES-D scores from English-speaking Canadian and Dutch SSc patients can be compared and pooled without concern that measurement differences may substantively influence results. The importance of assessing cross-language measurement equivalence in rheumatology studies prior to pooling outcomes obtained in different languages should be emphasized.
Assuntos
Idioma , Escalas de Graduação Psiquiátrica , Escleroderma Sistêmico/fisiopatologia , Adulto , Idoso , Canadá/epidemiologia , Estudos Epidemiológicos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , Escleroderma Sistêmico/diagnóstico , Escleroderma Sistêmico/epidemiologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , População BrancaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To describe the systematic development and content of a short intervention to improve medication adherence to disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs in non-adherent patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: The intervention mapping (IM) framework was used to develop the intervention. The following IM steps were conducted: (1) a needs assessment; (2) formulation of specific intervention objectives; (3) inventory of methods and techniques needed to design the intervention and (4) production and piloting of the intervention. RESULTS: The intervention (consisting of two group sessions led by a pharmacist, a homework assignment, and a follow-up call) aims to improve the balance between necessity and concern beliefs about medication, and to resolve practical barriers in medication taking. The central communication method used is motivational interviewing. CONCLUSION: By applying the IM framework, we were able to create a feasible, time-efficient and promising intervention to improve medication adherence in non-adherent RA patients. Intervention effects are currently being assessed in a randomized controlled trial. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: This paper could serve as a guideline for other health care professionals when developing similar interventions. If the RCT demonstrates sufficient effectiveness of this intervention in reducing medication non-adherence in RA patients, the intervention could be embedded in clinical practice.
Assuntos
Antirreumáticos/uso terapêutico , Artrite Reumatoide/tratamento farmacológico , Artrite Reumatoide/psicologia , Comunicação , Adesão à Medicação/psicologia , Entrevista Motivacional , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Grupos Focais , Seguimentos , Processos Grupais , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação das Necessidades , Países Baixos , Satisfação do Paciente , Farmacêuticos , Desenvolvimento de Programas , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como AssuntoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The prevalence of depressive symptoms is high in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc, scleroderma). This study was conducted to determine which disease-related and psychosocial factors are associated with depressive symptoms, independent of sociodemographic factors. METHODS: In total, 215 patients with SSc completed questionnaires on sociodemographics, physical functioning (HAQ-DI), pain (VAS), fatigue (CIS), psychosocial characteristics (CISS, ICQ, PRQ, ASE, FoP-Q-SF) and depressive symptoms (CES-D). Disease characteristics (disease duration, disease subtype, modified Rodnan Skin Score) were collected. Hierarchical linear regression analyses were conducted to assess associations with depressive symptoms. RESULTS: The mean CES-D score was 12.9 (SD=9.7) and the prevalence of patients scoring>= 16 and>=19 were 32.1% and 25.1%, respectively. The variance explained by sociodemographics and disease characteristics was negligible (R(2)≤.09). Fatigue and pain were independently associated with depressive symptoms (R(2) change=.35). After adding psychological factors (R(2) change=.21), satisfaction with social support, emotion-focused coping and helplessness were also significantly associated with depressive symptoms. Higher fear of progression was associated with more depressive symptoms (P≤.01), and appearance self-esteem showed a marginally significant association (P=.08). CONCLUSION: Depressive symptoms were common in the present sample of patients with SSc and were independently associated with pain, fatigue, social support, emotion-focused coping, helplessness and fear of progression. Results suggest that, in addition to assessment of disease characteristics, attention should be given also to psychosocial factors found to be associated with depressive symptoms. For the development and trialling of psychological interventions, fear of progression could be an important target.
Assuntos
Depressão , Progressão da Doença , Medo/fisiologia , Escleroderma Sistêmico , Autoimagem , Adaptação Psicológica , Adulto , Idoso , Demografia , Depressão/epidemiologia , Depressão/etiologia , Depressão/fisiopatologia , Fadiga/etiologia , Fadiga/psicologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Dor/etiologia , Dor/psicologia , Prevalência , Psicologia , Psicofisiologia , Escleroderma Sistêmico/complicações , Escleroderma Sistêmico/epidemiologia , Escleroderma Sistêmico/psicologia , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Apoio Social , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To validate the Dutch translation of the Fear of Progression Questionnaire-Short Form (FoP-Q-SF) for patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). Although concerns about the future are often expressed by patients with SSc, there is no valid quantitative measure available to assess the extent to which patients with SSc are troubled by those concerns. METHODS: Measurement properties of the FoP-Q-SF were assessed using a cross-sectional design that included 215 patients with SSc. Patients completed the FoP-Q-SF as well as questionnaires on physical and psychological functioning. Psychometric properties of the FoP-Q-SF were assessed using the Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Status Measurement Instruments checklist. RESULTS: The mean ± SD FoP-Q-SF score in patients with SSc was 30.05 ± 8.97. There were no indications of floor or ceiling effects. Confirmatory factor analysis supported the single-factor structure of the questionnaire (χ(2) [52] = 96.84, P < 0.001, root mean square error of approximation = 0.064, chi-square/df ratio = 1.86). Cronbach's alpha was 0.86 for the questionnaire. Most of our a priori hypotheses (11 of 12) were confirmed, supporting the construct validity of the questionnaire. CONCLUSION: A valid measure is now available to assess fear of disease progression in patients with SSc, which is significant since fear of progression is one of the most important stressors in this patient population.