Required distal mesorectal resection margin in partial mesorectal excision: a systematic review on distal mesorectal spread.

BACKGROUND: The required distal margin in partial mesorectal excision (PME) is controversial. The aim of this systematic review was to determine incidence and distance of distal mesorectal spread (DMS). METHODS: A systematic search was performed using PubMed, Embase and Google Scholar databases. Articles eligible for inclusion were studies reporting on the presence of distal mesorectal spread in patients with rectal cancer who underwent radical resection. RESULTS: Out of 2493 articles, 22 studies with a total of 1921 patients were included, of whom 340 underwent long-course neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT). DMS was reported in 207 of 1921 (10.8%) specimens (1.2% in CRT group and 12.8% in non-CRT group), with specified distance of DMS relative to the tumor in 84 (40.6%) of the cases. Mean and median DMS were 20.2 and 20.0 mm, respectively. Distal margins of 40 mm and 30 mm would result in 10% and 32% residual tumor, respectively, which translates into 1% and 4% overall residual cancer risk given 11% incidence of DMS. The maximum reported DMS was 50 mm in 1 of 84 cases. In subgroup analysis, for T3, the mean DMS was 18.8 mm (range 8-40 mm) and 27.2 mm (range 10-40 mm) for T4 rectal cancer. CONCLUSIONS: DMS occurred in 11% of cases, with a maximum of 50 mm in less than 1% of the DMS cases. For PME, substantial overtreatment is present if a distal margin of 5 cm is routinely utilized. Prospective studies evaluating more limited margins based on high-quality preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and pathological assessment are required.

Local recurrence at the site of the Lone Star device through implantation of exfoliated cells during local excision for early rectal cancer: A case report.

INTRODUCTION: Invasive procedures for colorectal cancer can cause iatrogenic tumor cell seeding. Implantation of these exfoliated cells in the surrounding tissue can result in locoregional cancer recurrence. This has been described in endoscopic procedures and major surgical resections, however recurrence in iatrogenic lesions of the anal canal during minimal invasive rectal surgery has not been shown in literature yet. This is the first reported case of recurrent rectal cancer that developed into an anal metastasis at the site where hooks of the Lone Star Retractor disrupted the epithelial lining of the anal canal during a local excision of early rectal cancer using TAMIS. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A 57 year old male was diagnosed with a high risk early stage rectal adenocarcinoma. He was treated with transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) with the use of a Lone Star retractor and he received subsequent chemo-radiotherapy. 23 months later the patient developed a bleeding mass bulging out of the anus. A true cut and incision biopsy was performed and the pathology report revealed localization of adenocarcinoma at the anal canal which was similar to the earlier diagnosed rectal carcinoma. The patient underwent an abdominal perineal resection and left-sided lymph node dissection. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: This shows that local recurrence through implantation of exfoliated tumor cells can occur in iatrogenic lesions of the anal canal not only in major but also in minimal invasive rectal surgery. Careful tissue handling and rectal washout may reduce the chance of this implantation metastasis.