Cetrorelix in an oral contraceptive-pretreated stimulation cycle compared with buserelin in IVF/ICSI patients treated with r-hFSH: a randomized, multicentre, phase IIIb study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the non-inferiority of an oral contraceptive (OC)-pretreated cetrorelix regimen and a buserelin regimen in IVF/ICSI patients treated with r-hFSH in terms of total number of oocytes retrieved. METHODS: Multicentre, randomized study. One hundred and eighty two patients were randomized to receive cetrorelix with OC pretreatment (n = 91) or to receive buserelin (n = 91). The cetrorelix group started with daily OCs on cycle day 5 and continued for 21-28 days. Cetrorelix (0.25 mg) was given daily from stimulation day 6 up to and including the day of r-hCG administration. The buserelin group started with buserelin (500 microg/day) for at least 10 days until down-regulation was achieved, after which the dose was reduced to daily 200 microg up to and including the day of r-hCG administration. r-hFSH was started in both groups on a Friday, in the cetrorelix group 5 days after the last OC pill intake. Both regimens were followed by a standard IVF or ICSI procedure. The primary efficacy endpoint was the number of oocytes retrieved per patient. RESULTS: Number of oocytes, cancellation rates, r-hFSH requirements, number of oocyte retrievals during the weekend or public holiday and number of pregnancies were similar in both groups. Both treatment regimens were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Cetrorelix pretreated with OCs resulted in similar number of oocytes retrieved compared with a long buserelin protocol. Both regimens were well tolerated and allowed scheduling of the oocyte retrieval, with only small number of retrievals falling on a weekend or public holiday.

[Medicinal cannabis for diseases of the nervous system: no convincing evidence of effectiveness]. / Medicinale cannabis voor aandoeningen van het zenuwstelsel: geen overtuigend bewijs voor effectiviteit.

--In 1996, the Netherlands Health Council issued a negative recommendation regarding the use of medication on the basis of cannabis (marihuana). However, interest in medicinal cannabis has certainly not waned since. --The neurological diseases for which cannabis could presently be used therapeutically are: multiple sclerosis, chronic (neuropathic) pain and the syndrome of Gilles de la Tourette. --Since September 2003, the Dutch Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport delivers medicinal cannabis to Dutch pharmacies, so that now for the first time, medicinal cannabis can be given to patients on a prescription basis within the framework of the Opium Law. The result of this is that doctors and patients now assume that this is a medication for which the efficacy and safety have been established. --The question arises whether new scientific data have become available since 1996 that provide scientific support for the current Governmental policy. --In a recent clinical trial that has aroused much discussion, patients with multiple sclerosis and problematic spasticity were treated with oral cannabis or a placebo. There was no significant effect of treatment on the primary outcome measure, i.e. objectively determined spasticity. Nevertheless, it was concluded that the mobility was improved and that the pain was subjectively decreased. --Until now, convincing scientific evidence that cannabinoids are effective in neurological conditions is still lacking. --However, it is also not possible to conclude definitely that cannabinoids are ineffective; still, this is no basis for official stimulation of their use.

[Recognition and treatment of gamma hydroxybutyric acid poisoning]. / Herkenning en behandeling van hydroxyboterzuurintoxicaties.

The number of cases of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid (GHB) poisoning is increasing rapidly. The substance is becoming more and more popular as a party drug, while the users are often unaware of the potential dangers of GHB abuse. If a GHB overdose is treated properly and on time, the patient generally recovers completely within 6 hours. Preventing aspiration and the timely initiation of artificial respiration are particularly important.

Toxicokinetics of nortriptyline and amitriptyline: two case reports.

Two cases are presented of intentional intoxications with the tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) nortriptyline (NT) and amitriptyline (AT). The peak plasma concentrations were 2290 microg/L and 2900 microg/L, respectively. The active metabolites E-10-hydroxynortriptyline (EHNT) and Z-10-hydroxynortriptyline (ZHNT) profiles were quite different as monitored for 5 to 10 days after presumed drug intake. In conclusion, these cases illustrate that (1) metabolite formation and elimination after intake of an overdose dose of NT and AT are stereoselective, and (2) NT and EHNT toxicokinetics and toxicodynamics are quite different. It also shows that a patient with a severe TCA overdose can still survive if he or she receives appropriate and quick supportive care, even if the prognostic markers QRS time, coma grade, and serum TCA levels predict poor outcome.

Safety, tolerability, and efficacy of orally administered cannabinoids in MS.

The authors conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, twofold crossover study in 16 patients with MS who presented with severe spasticity to investigate safety, tolerability, and efficacy of oral Delta(9)-Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and Cannabis sativa plant extract. Both drugs were safe, but adverse events were more common with plant-extract treatment. Compared with placebo, neither THC nor plant-extract treatment reduced spasticity. Both THC and plant-extract treatment worsened the participant's global impression.

Amphotericin B colloidal dispersion (Amphocil) vs fluconazole for the prevention of fungal infections in neutropenic patients: data of a prematurely stopped clinical trial.

We conducted an open label, randomised clinical trial to compare amphotericin B colloidal dispersion (ABCD, Amphocil) 2 mg/kg/day intravenously with fluconazole 200 mg/day orally, for the prevention of fungal disease in neutropenic patients with haematological malignancies. In the event of unresolved fever after 4 days of empirical antibacterial therapy, patients in both treatment groups were to receive ABCD, 4 mg/kg/day. However, the study had to be stopped in an early phase, due to severe side-effects of ABCD. A total of 24 patients were enrolled, 12 patients were randomly assigned to receive prophylactic ABCD, which was administered for a mean of 13.9 days. Fluconazole prophylaxis was given to 12 patients for a mean of 21.2 days. Therapeutic ABCD, 4 mg/kg, was initiated in four patients because of suspected fungal infection, all of whom had initially received fluconazole. A high rate of infusion-related toxicity of ABCD was observed. Chills occurred in 15/16 ABCD recipients (94%), accompanied by a temperature rise of >/=2 degrees C in 4/16 patients and of >/=1 degrees C but <2 degrees C in 10/16 patients. Other ABCD-related adverse events were hypotension (4/16), nausea with vomiting (5/16), tachycardia (7/16), headache (3/16) and dyspnoea (3/16). For premedication patients received: antihistamines (12/16), hydrocortisone (9/16) and/or morphine (6/16). ABCD was discontinued in 8/16 patients (50%) due to side-effects, which ultimately dictated early termination of the study. We conclude that ABCD is not suitable for antifungal prophylaxis in neutropenic patients due to severe infusion-related side-effects. Subject numbers were too low for conclusions on variables of antifungal efficacy.

Fluconazole versus itraconazole for the prevention of fungal infections in haemato-oncology.

AIMS: To compare the efficacy of and tolerance to oral fluconazole and intraconazole in preventing fungal infection in neutropenic patients with haematological malignancies. PATIENTS: 213 consecutive, afebrile adult patients treated with or without autologous stem cell transplantation for haematological malignancies. METHODS: A randomised, double blind, single centre study. Patients were randomly assigned to receive fluconazole 50 mg or itraconazole 100 mg, both twice daily in identical capsules. An intention to treat analysis was performed on 202 patients, 101 in each group. RESULTS: Microbiologically documented systemic fungal infections occurred in four patients in each group. Clinical fungal infection was thought to be present in seven recipients of fluconazole and four of itraconazole. In all 202 patients, 29 proceeded to intravenous amphotericin (amphotericin B), 16 in the fluconazole group and 13 in the itraconazole group. Superficial fungal infection was seen only in three non-compliant patients in the fluconazole group. All these infections were oral. No major differences were noted in the isolates of fungi in mouth washes and fecal samples. Overall mortality was 8.9% (18 deaths; seven in the fluconazole group, 11 in the itraconazole group). Mortality from microbiologically and clinically documented fungal infection was 4.5% (nine deaths; three in the fluconazole group, six in the itraconazole group). Median time to suspected or proven fungal infection was 16 days in both groups. None of these comparisons reached statistical significance (p < 0.05). No major clinical toxicity was noted and compliance was excellent. CONCLUSIONS: In neutropenic patients treated for haematological malignancies with or without autologous stem cell transplantation, fluconazole and itraconazole in low doses result in a similar low frequency of fungal disease. Fluconazole may be the preferable drug because of the smaller number of capsules and lack of need for timing relative to meals.

Continuous infusion of lorazepam versus medazolam in patients in the intensive care unit: sedation with lorazepam is easier to manage and is more cost-effective.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of lorazepam and midazolam for long-term sedation of critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients. DESIGN: Double-blind, randomized, controlled study. SETTING: Medical intensive care unit in a university teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Sixty-four evaluable adult patients admitted to the intensive care department requiring mechanical ventilation for >3 days. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to receive blinded solutions of either lorazepam or midazolam by continuous infusion. The lowest dose that achieved an adequate sedation was infused. The maximum dose allowed for each drug was 60 mg/hr for midazolam and 4 mg/hr for lorazepam. Sedation was assessed initially and at least every 8 hrs thereafter on a seven-point scale if the sedation was adequate and every 2 hrs if it was not. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Measurements included the score on the sedation scale, the time between determination of the desired level of sedation and the achievement of that level, and plasma concentrations. It is significantly easier to reach a desired level of sedation with lorazepam than with midazolam. No difference in recovery was found in the 24 hrs after discontinuation of therapy. The fact that there are many factors influencing midazolam pharmacokinetics may explain the more difficult management of desired sedation levels. The equipotent dose of 10 mg of midazolam proved to be 0.7 mg of lorazepam in long-term sedation. The average cost for therapy with midazolam was approximately ten times more than that with lorazepam. CONCLUSIONS: Lorazepam is a useful alternative to midazolam for the long-term sedation of patients in the medical intensive care unit and provides easier management of the sedation level. Sedation with lorazepam offers a significant cost-savings.

Citrate compared to low molecular weight heparin anticoagulation in chronic hemodialysis patients.

Citrate and nadroparin calcium, a low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), were compared in a randomized cross-over trial in 21 chronic hemodialysis patients regarding anticoagulation, calcium and magnesium kinetics, biocompatibility, dialysis efficiency, and aluminum contamination. Citrate was infused into the arterial line at a minimum rate of 0.68 mmol/min, combined with a calcium and magnesium-free dialysate and intravenous supplementation of calcium and magnesium at rates of 0.22 and 0.10 mmol/min, respectively. Seven patients with a dialysis session of six hours, received 2/3 of the nadroparin dose predialysis, and 1/3 after 2.5 hours (divided dose (DD) group). A single predialysis bolus injection of nadroparin was administered to eight patients not on coumarins [single dose (SD) group] and to six patients on coumarins [single dose + coumarins (SD + C) group], all with a dialysis session of four hours. Nineteen patients received a nadroparin dose of 200 ICU/kg. Two patients with a single dose, one of them on coumarins, received a dose of 150 ICU/kg because of a hematocrit < 0.30. With citrate systemic whole blood activated clotting time (ACT) remained unchanged, indicating efficient regional anticoagulation. After two hours of dialysis with nadroparin, systemic ACT increments, that is, the increase compared to predialysis, of the DD, SD, and SD + C groups were 8.8 +/- 1.5, 18.7 +/- 4.7, and 33.3 +/- 6.1 seconds, respectively (mean +/- SEM). Postdialysis ACT increments in these groups were 1.5 +/- 3.4, 17.7 +/- 6.8, and 30.3 +/- 8.0 seconds. Two hour increments of systemic activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) of the DD, SD, and SD + C groups during nadroparin were 5.0 +/- 1.2, 15.1 +/- 2.7, and 32.2 +/- 5.5 seconds, respectively, and the corresponding postdialysis APTT increments were 2.9 +/- 1.4, 7.8 +/- 2.4, and 15.8 +/- 2.6 seconds. Two-hour anti-Xa increments of the DD, SD, and SD + C groups amounted to 0.34 +/- 0.07, 0.67 +/- 0.07, and 0.80 +/- 0.08 IU/ml. The respective postdialysis anti-Xa increments were 0.21 +/- 0.06, 0.58 +/- 0.06, and 0.71 +/- 0.08 IU/ml (All ACT, APTT and anti-Xa increments were significant; P < 0.05), except for the ACT increments and the postdialysis APTT increment of the DD group). These increments, together with unchanged prothrombin fragments 1 and 2 (PTF1 + 2), indicate systemic anticoagulation with nadroparin. The increments of serum calcium and magnesium during citrate were comparable to the increments observed with a dialysate containing 1.5 mmol/liter calcium and 0.75 mmol/liter magnesium used in combination with nadroparin. Ionized calcium increments during citrate were significant after the end of dialysis, while the dialysate containing 1.5 mmol/liter calcium induced significant increments during and postdialysis. No differences were observed between citrate and nadroparin regarding biocompatibility), (expressed as dialysis-induced leukopenia and thrombocytopenia), and dialysis efficiency [measured as dialyzer urea and creatinine clearance, normalized weekly whole body urea clearance (Kt/Vurea) and time averaged urea concentration (TACurea)]. The citrate solution, if sterilized in glass bottles, contained 2 to 3 micrograms aluminum per mmol citrate, the nadroparin solution 0.009 microgram per 1,000 ICU. Aluminum contamination of the citrate solution was prevented by sterilizing the solution in polypropylene bottles. In conclusion, citrate anticoagulation is regional and is indicated for hemodialysis patients with an active or recently active bleeding focus. However, the citrate solution should be sterilized in polypropylene containers to prevent aluminum contamination. LMWHs induce systemic anticoagulation during hemodialysis, and this effect is enhanced by concomitant coumarin use and mitigated by a divided LMWH dose regimen. For hemodialysis patients not at risk of bleeding, LMWHs provide a simple anticoagulation regimen.

Treatment of acute reflex sympathetic dystrophy with DMSO 50% in a fatty cream.

Acute Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy (acute RSD) was defined using a reproducible classification. Elevated temperature of the affected extremity ("calor"), measured by the dorsal side of the observer's hand and mentioned by the patient, pain ("dolor") measured by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), redness ("rubor"), edema ("tumor") and limited active range of motion ("functio laesa"), all contributed to the classification system. Patients scoring 4 to 5 positive symptoms were considered to have acute RSD. A prospective, randomized and double blind study was performed in 32 patients, all suffering from acute RSD. In all of these patients the primary injury was the result of a previous accident. One patient was taken out of the study because of his surgery. The study involved treatment with a fatty cream with 50% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO, group A), or without DMSO (placebo, group B), both for 2 months. All patients received physiotherapy applied within pain limits. Application of the creams resulted in both groups in an improvement of RSD-scores and VAS-scores after 2 months. However, the improvement of the RSD score in patients of group A (DMSO-group) was significantly (P < 0.01) better compared to group B. The results suggest a certain activity of DMSO 50% cream in patients suffering from RSD and is, therefore, recommendable.

4-Aminopyridine is superior to 3,4-diaminopyridine in the treatment of patients with multiple sclerosis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and toxicity of 4-aminopyridine and 3,4-diaminopyridine in patients with multiple sclerosis. DESIGN: Intervention study with a before-after design and a randomized, double-blind, crossover design. SETTING: University referral center. PATIENTS: Twenty-four patients with definite multiple sclerosis who had been treated in a previous clinical trial with 4-aminopyridine. INTERVENTIONS: Nonresponders to treatment with 4-aminopyridine (14 patients) were treated with 3,4-diaminopyridine in a 4-week, open-label trial with doses up to 1.0 mg/kg of body weight (before-after design). Responders to treatment with 4-aminopyridine (10 patients) participated in a comparative study of 6 weeks' duration with 4-aminopyridine and 3,4-diaminopyridine according to a randomized, double-blind, double-crossover design. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Neurophysiologic variables for nonresponders, neurologic functions and symptoms on a visual analogue scale for responders, and side effects for both groups. RESULTS: Toxicity profiles of 4-aminopyridine and 3,4-diaminopyridine were different, and systemic tolerability was reduced for 3,4-diaminopyridine. 4-Aminopyridine was more effective than 3,4-diaminopyridine, especially for ambulation, fatigue, and overall daily functioning. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that, concerning both efficacy and side effects, 4-aminopyridine is superior to 3,4-diaminopyridine in the treatment of patients with multiple sclerosis.

The effects of 4-aminopyridine on cognitive function in patients with multiple sclerosis: a pilot study.

4-Aminopyridine (4-AP) has a favorable effect on the disability of certain patients with MS. We investigated the effect of 4-AP on neuropsychological performance in 20 MS patients using a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover design. Although there was a trend for improved performance with 4-AP for two of the tests, we could not demonstrate significant effects of 4-AP on cognitive function.

4-aminopyridine in the treatment of patients with multiple sclerosis. Long-term efficacy and safety.

OBJECTIVE: To study the long-term efficacy and safety of 4-aminopyridine in patients with multiple sclerosis. DESIGN: Case series, follow-up varying from 6 to 32 months. SETTING: University referral center. PATIENTS: Thirty-one patients with definite MS, 23 of them being exposed to long-term administration (6 to 32 months) of 4-aminopyridine, since they showed a favorable initial response to the drug. INTERVENTIONS: Long-term oral treatment with 4-aminopyridine in daily doses of up to 0.5 mg/kg of body weight. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Neurologic functions and symptoms as reported by the patients; side effects. RESULTS: Twenty of 23 patients who showed a favorable initial response benefited from long-term administration. Ambulation and fatigue (each in 13 patients) and visual function (in five patients) were most frequently reported to be improved. Three major side effects did occur during a follow-up of 406 patient months: a generalized epileptic seizure in two patients and hepatitis in one. CONCLUSIONS: Although a substantial proportion of patients with multiple sclerosis seem to benefit from long-term administration of 4-aminopyridine, additional studies are needed to clarify the exact value of the drug.

A double-blind randomized crossover study to compare the antiemetic efficacy of 250 mg with 500 mg methylprednisolone succinate (Solu-Medrol) as a single intravenous dose in patients treated with noncisplatin chemotherapy.

A double-blind randomized crossover study was performed in 56 chemotherapy-naive patients, all receiving non-cisplatin-based chemotherapy, to compare the antiemetic effects of 2 doses of a single administration of methylprednisolone succinate (Solu-Medrol): 250 versus 500 mg. Among the 39 patients who satisfactorily completed both parts of the study, complete and major protection from emesis (0 and 1 emetic episode or only retching) was observed in 79% during the first course and in 69% during the second course. Treatment failure (> or = 6 episodes of vomiting) was observed in 18% during the first course and 21% during the second course. There was no significant difference between the two dose levels neither in terms of antiemetic protection nor in terms of the occurrence of side effects nor in patient preference. Most important side effects were facial flushing (45%), headache (22%) and facial edema (18%). It is concluded that, although a comparison with lower dosages cannot be made, within the dose range studied no clear dose-response relationship could be found.

4-Aminopyridine in patients with multiple sclerosis: dosage and serum level related to efficacy and safety.

In a recent randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial, we demonstrated efficacy of 4-aminopyridine (4-AP) in improving disability of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Here we describe the relationship between dosage, serum level, efficacy, and safety of intravenously and orally administered 4-AP in the same group of 70 MS patients. After both intravenous and oral administration there was a significant relationship between serum levels and 4-AP doses used (p < 0.001 and p < 0.01, respectively). The use of 4-AP in oral doses three times a day showed a large variation and fluctuation in serum levels. After 12 weeks of oral treatment (maximum daily dosage 0.5 mg/kg body weight), a statistically significant improvement was found for the smooth pursuit gain of the eye movements (estimated effect 0.14, 95% confidence interval 0.06-0.23, p < 0.001). The amount of improvement was significantly related to 4-AP serum levels (p = 0.0013). Side effects after intravenous 4-AP occurred frequently and were very troublesome (pain in infusion arm, dizziness). Side effects during oral treatment (dizziness, paresthesias) were very mild and occurred 30-45 min after intake of the medication and could be related to high serum levels.