Beyond Animal Testing Index: Benchmarking tool for a world beyond animal testing.

While the original definition of replacement focuses on the replacement of the use of animals in science, a more contemporary definition focuses on accelerating the development and use of predictive and robust models, based on the latest science and technologies, to address scientific questions without the use of animals. The transition to animal free innovation is on the political agenda in and outside the European Union. The Beyond Animal Testing Index (BATI) is a benchmarking instrument designed to provide insight into the activities and contributions of research institutes to the transition to animal free innovation. The BATI allows participating organizations to learn from each other and stimulates continuous improvement. The BATI was modelled after the Access to Medicine Index, which benchmarks pharmaceutical companies on their efforts to make medicines widely available in developing countries. A prototype of the BATI was field-tested with three Dutch aca­demic medical centers and two universities in 2020-2021. The field test demonstrated the usability and effectiveness of the BATI as a benchmarking tool. Analyses were performed across five different domains. The participating institutes concluded that the BATI served as an internal as well as an external stimulus to share, learn, and improve institutional strategies towards the transition to animal free innovation. The BATI also identified gaps in the development and implementation of 3R technologies. Hence, the BATI might be a suitable instrument for monitoring the effectiveness of policies. BATI version 1.0 is ready to be used for benchmarking at a larger scale.

The use of animals for research is being scrutinized by the public. The transition to animal-free methods is on the political agenda in and outside the European Union. This requires accelerating the development and use of useful and reliable animal-free methods. The Beyond Animal Testing Index (BATI) is designed to provide insight into the activities and contributions of research institutes to the transition to animal-free innovation. The BATI allows participating organizations to learn from each other and stimulates continuous improvement. A prototype of the BATI was field-tested with three Dutch academic medical centers and two universities in 2020-2021. The field test showed that the BATI could be used to monitor how effective policies are and to show where more work is needed towards the full replacement of animals in research.

Animal studies for the evaluation of in situ tissue-engineered vascular grafts - a systematic review, evidence map, and meta-analysis.

Vascular in situ tissue engineering (TE) is an approach that uses bioresorbable grafts to induce endogenous regeneration of damaged blood vessels. The evaluation of newly developed in situ TE vascular grafts heavily relies on animal experiments. However, no standard for in vivo models or study design has been defined, hampering inter-study comparisons and translational efficiency. To provide input for formulating such standard, the goal of this study was to map all animal experiments for vascular in situ TE using off-the-shelf available, resorbable synthetic vascular grafts. A literature search (PubMed, Embase) yielded 15,896 studies, of which 182 studies met the inclusion criteria (n = 5,101 animals). The reports displayed a wide variety of study designs, animal models, and biomaterials. Meta-analysis on graft patency with subgroup analysis for species, age, sex, implantation site, and follow-up time demonstrated model-specific variations. This study identifies possibilities for improved design and reporting of animal experiments to increase translational value.

A systematic review and meta-analyses on animal models used in bone adhesive research.

Currently, steel implants are used for osteosynthesis of (comminuted) fractures and intra-articular bone defects. These osteosyntheses can sometimes be complicated procedures and can have several drawbacks including stress shielding of the bone. A bone glue might be a safe and effective alternative to current materials. Despite numerous animal studies on bone adhesives, no such material is clinically applied yet. We have conducted a systematic review to summarize the evidence in experimental animal models used in research on bone adhesive materials for trauma and orthopedic surgery. Additionally, we analysed the efficacy of the different bone adhesives for different experimental designs. A heterogeneity in experimental parameters including animal species, defect types, and control measurements resulted in a wide variety in experimental models. In addition, no standard outcome measurements could be identified. Meta-analysis on bone regeneration between adhesive treatment and nonadhesive treatment showed a high heterogeneity and no statistically significant overall effect (M: -0.71, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -1.63-0.21, p = 0.13). Besides, currently there is not enough evidence to draw conclusions based on the effectiveness of the individual types of adhesives or experimental models. A positive statistically significant effect was found for the adhesive treatment in comparison with conventional osteosynthesis materials (M: 2.49, 95% CI: 1.20-3.79, p = 0.0002). To enhance progression in bone adhesive research and provide valuable evidence for clinical application, more standard experimental parameters and a higher reporting quality in animal studies are needed. Statement of Clinical Significance: Current materials restoring anatomical alignments of bones have several drawbacks. A (biodegradable) adhesive for fixating bone defects can be a treatment breakthrough. Although numerous bone adhesives have been researched, most seemed to fail at the preclinical stage. An overview in this field is missing. This systematic review highlights the relevant parameters for design of experimental bone adhesive studies. It demonstrates evidence regarding benefit of bone adhesives but also that the quality of reporting and the risk of bias in studies need to be improved. The results will aid in designing better quality animal studies for bone adhesive research with higher translational value.

A health-based recommended occupational exposure limit for nitrous oxide using experimental animal data based on a systematic review and dose-response analysis.

BACKGROUND: Nitrous oxide (N2O) is a common inhalation anaesthetic used in medical, paramedical, and veterinary practice. Since the mid 1950's, concerns have been raised regarding occupational exposure to N2O, leading to many epidemiological and experimental animal studies. Previous evaluations resulted in the classification of N2O as a possible risk factor for adverse reproductive health outcomes based on animal data. Human data were deemed inadequate primarily because of simultaneous co-exposures to other risk factors for adverse reproductive and developmental outcomes, including other anaesthetic gases. Since previous evaluations, controversies regarding N2O use remained and new approaches for dose response modelling have been adopted, calling for an update and re-evaluation of the body of evidence. This review aims to assess available animal evidence on N2O reproductive and developmental outcomes to inform a health-based recommended occupational exposure limit (OEL) for N2O with a benchmark dose-response modelling (BMD) approach. METHODS: Comprehensive searches in PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science were performed to retrieve all relevant studies addressing reproductive and developmental outcomes related to inhalation of N2O in animals. The articles retrieved were screened based on title-abstract and full text by two independent reviewers. After data extraction, an overview of all studies was created for the different endpoints, namely foetal outcomes (e.g., resorption), female outcomes (e.g. implantations), and male outcomes (e.g. sperm count). A subset of studies reporting on exposure relevant to workplace settings and with a sufficient number of tested doses were included in dose-response modelling using the BMD approach. RESULTS: In total, 15.816 articles were retrieved, of which 47 articles were finally included while 4 of those were used for the quantitative data synthesis. The overall risk of bias was judged to be probably high (using OHAT risk of bias tool) and unclear (using SYRCLE's risk of bias tool). From eligible rat studies, three studies provided an acceptable result by fitting a Hill model to the dose-response data. The resulting benchmark dose lower bounds (BMDLs) from three studies converged to an average (±sd) exposure level of 925 ± 2 mg/m3 at an additional risk of one standard deviation of implantation losses above those observed in the control group (i.e. reduced number of live foetuses/mother). For extrapolation from rats to humans, an uncertainty factor of 10 was used and an additional factor of 5 was applied to account for interindividual variability within the population of workers. CONCLUSION: With this systematic review, all available evidence for reproductive toxicity and adverse developmental outcomes in animals resulting from inhalation exposure to N2O was used to derive a health-based OEL recommendation of 20 mg/m3 as 8-h time-weighted average.

Welfare Impact of Carbon Dioxide Euthanasia on Laboratory Mice and Rats: A Systematic Review.

Background: There has been increased concern about the suitability of CO2 as a method for euthanasia of laboratory mice and rats, including the potential discomfort, pain or distress that animals may experience prior to loss of consciousness; time to loss of consciousness; best methods for use of CO2; and the availability of better alternatives. These discussions have been useful in providing new information, but have resulted in significant confusion regarding the acceptability of CO2 for rodent euthanasia. In some cases, researchers and veterinarians have become uncertain as to which techniques to recommend or use for euthanasia of laboratory mice and rats. Methods: The International Association of Colleges of Laboratory Animal Medicine (IACLAM) convened a taskforce to examine the evidence for adverse welfare indicators in laboratory rats and mice undergoing CO2 euthanasia using a SYRCLE-registered systematic review protocol. Of 3,772 papers identified through a database search (PubMed, Web of Science, CAB Direct, Agricola, and grey literature) from 1900 to 2017, 37 studies were identified for detailed review (some including more than one species or age group), including 15 in adult mice, 21 in adult rats, and 5 in neonates of both species. Experiments or reports were excluded if they only assessed parameters other than those directly affecting animal welfare during CO2 induction and/or euthanasia. Results: Study design and outcome measures were highly variable and there was an unclear to high risk of bias in many of the published studies. Changes in the outcome measures evaluated were inconsistent or poorly differentiated. It is likely that repeated exposures to carbon dioxide inhalation are aversive to adult rats and mice, based on avoidance behavior studies; however, this effect is largely indistinguishable from aversion induced by repeated exposures to other inhalant anesthetic gasses. Conclusion: There is insufficient evidence to permit an unbiased assessment of the effect of CO2 inhalation during euthanasia on welfare indicators in laboratory mice and rats. Additional well-designed, unbiased, and adequately powered studies are needed to accurately assess the welfare of laboratory mice and rats undergoing euthanasia via CO2 gas.

How Can Systematic Reviews Teach Us More about the Implementation of the 3Rs and Animal Welfare?

This paper describes the introduction of the systematic review methodology in animal-based research and the added value of this methodology in relation to the 3Rs and beyond. The 3Rs refer to Replacement, Reduction, and Refinement of animal studies. A systematic review (SR) is defined as a literature review focused on a single question that tries to identify, appraise, select, and synthesise all high-quality research evidence relevant to that question. Examples are given on how SRs lead to the implementation of the 3Rs and better science. Additionally, a broader context is given regarding societal, political, and scientific developments. Various examples of systematic reviews are given to illustrate the current situation regarding reporting, quality, and translatability of animal-based research. Furthermore, initiatives that have emerged to move further towards more responsible and sustainable research is of benefit for both animals and humans.

Topical Host-Modulating Therapy for Periodontal Regeneration: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Over the past decades, locally delivered host-modulating pharmacological agents have been extensively investigated to treat periodontitis. Although a small category of agents has been tested in clinical trials, most of them were reported in the animal experiments. This systematic review evaluates the efficacy of local application of currently available host-modulating agents, with or without mechanical removal of plaque, in animal models with periodontitis or periodontal defect. Methods: PubMed and Embase were searched on February 11, 2019. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) experiments were performed in healthy animals (all ages, sexes, and species) with periodontitis, and (2) outcome data for the local application of host-modulating approaches were presented for bone quantity, bone loss, and attachment loss and compared with a vehicle control group. Study characteristics and outcome data were extracted and internal validity was assessed. The efficacy of host-modulating agents was analyzed in a meta-analysis. A standardized mean difference (SMD) and its 95% confidence intervals for each individual comparison were calculated to estimate the overall effect. Subgroup analyses were conducted on animal species and different types of agents. Results: Forty-eight articles were included in the review, of which 42 were included in meta-analysis on bone quantity, bone loss, and attachment loss. The results showed that host-modulating therapy significantly increased bone formation (SMD: 2.200 [1.560-2.840], n = 24), and decreased bone loss (SMD: -1.659 [-1.969 to -1.348], n = 51) and attachment loss (SMD: -1.572 [-2.211 to -0.933], n = 17). No significant subgroup effects were identified, indicating that the effects are similar across species and drug types. Conclusions: The current scientific evidence supports the use of local host-modulation therapy in the treatment of periodontitis in experimental animals. Our findings seem robust for various animal models and designs included in this review, which increases our confidence of the translational value of the results to the clinical situation. Impact Statement Over the past decades, locally delivered host-modulating pharmacological agents have been extensively investigated for periodontal regeneration. Although a small category of agents has been tested in clinical trials, most of them were reported in the animal experiments. Considering the increasing amount of preclinical evidence and the need for future clinical trials, a systematic review and meta-analysis of all preclinical data was performed to determine the translational value of host-modulating drugs for human application. The results showed that host-modulating therapy significantly increased bone formation and decreased bone and attachment loss. This study contributes to researchers working on the periodontal translational research.

Establishing a health-based recommended occupational exposure limit for nitrous oxide using experimental animal data - A systematic review protocol.

Nitrous oxide (N 2 O) is widely used as inhalation analgesic and anaesthetic in medical, paramedical, and veterinary practice. Previous evaluations resulted in classification of N 2 O as a possible risk factor for adverse reproductive health outcomes based on evidence from animal data. Available human data were considered inadequate, partly due to the possibility that other risk factors, such as co-exposures to other inhalation anaesthetics may have contributed to the adverse outcomes. As no substantial new human evidence has emerged since previous evaluations, this protocol describes a planned systematic review of the evidence obtained from animal studies. The aim is to assess the available evidence on the effects of N 2 O on reproductive and developmental outcomes in animals to inform a health-based recommended occupational exposure limit (OEL) for N 2 O. Comprehensive search strategies were designed to retrieve animal studies addressing N 2 O exposure from PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science. Screening of the studies retrieved will be performed by at least two independent reviewers, while discrepancies will be resolved by reaching consensus through repeated review and discussions. Articles will be included according to criteria specified in this protocol. Outcome data relevant for reproduction and development will be extracted and risk of bias will be assessed by two independent reviewers using the SYRCLE's risk of bias tool. Primary reproductive and developmental outcomes of interest will be the number of resorptions, malformations, and birth weight. We will focus on dose-response studies that allow to derive an OEL with the benchmark dose (BMD) approach. Adverse outcomes occurring at doses that are equivalent to the exposures occurring in human occupational settings will be particularly relevant for dose-response modelling. The proposed review has not been performed before. We will follow the procedures specified in this protocol. We will adhere to guidelines of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), adapted for animal studies. Ethical approval will not be required, as the review will use existing data available in the public domain.

The evidence for the physiological effects of lactate on the cerebral microcirculation: a systematic review.

Lactate's role in the brain is understood as a contributor to brain energy metabolism, but it may also regulate the cerebral microcirculation. The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate evidence of lactate as a physiological effector within the normal cerebral microcirculation in reports ranging from in vitro experiments to in vivo studies in animals and humans. Following pre-registration of a review protocol, we systematically searched the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases for literature covering themes of 'lactate', 'the brain', and 'microcirculation'. Abstracts were screened, and data extracted independently by two individuals. We excluded studies evaluating lactate in disease models. Twenty-eight papers were identified, 18 of which were in vivo animal experiments (65%), four on human studies (14%), and six on in vitro or ex vivo experiments (21%). Approximately half of the papers identified lactate as an augmenter of the hyperemic response to functional activation by a visual stimulus or as an instigator of hyperemia in a dose-dependent manner, without external stimulation. The mechanisms are likely to be coupled to NAD+ /NADH redox state influencing the production of nitric oxide. Unfortunately, only 38% of these studies demonstrated any control for bias, which makes reliable generalizations of the conclusions insecure. This systematic review identifies that lactate may act as a dose-dependent regulator of cerebral microcirculation by augmenting the hyperemic response to functional activation below 5 mmol/kg, and by initiating a hyperemic response above 5 mmol/kg. OPEN SCIENCE BADGES: This article has received a badge for *Pre-registration* because it made the data publicly available. The data can be accessed at www.radboudumc.nl/getmedia/53625326-d1df-432c-980f-27c7c80d1a90/THollyer_lactate_protocol.aspx. The complete Open Science Disclosure form for this article can be found at the end of the article. More information about the Open Practices badges can be found at https://cos.io/our-services/open-science-badges/.

Current insights into extracorporeal perfusion of free tissue flaps and extremities: a systematic review and data synthesis.

BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal perfusion is a promising new technique for prolonged preservation of free flaps and extremities; however, uncertainties on perfusion settings and efficacy still exist. No overview of literature is currently available. This review systematically appraised available evidence comparing extracorporeal perfusion to static storage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An electronic systematic search was performed on June 12, 2016, in MEDLINE and EMBASE. Articles were included when evaluating the effect of extracorporeal perfusion of free flaps or extremities compared to that of a control group. Two independent researchers conducted the selection process, critical appraisal, and data extraction. RESULTS: Of 3485 articles screened, 18 articles were included for further analyzation. One article studied discarded human tissue; others were studies conducted on rats, pigs, or dogs. Perfusion periods varied from 1 h to 10 d; eight articles also described replantation. Risk of bias was generally scored high; none of the articles was excluded based on these scores. Tissue vitality showed overall better results in the perfused groups, more pronounced when perfusing over 6 h. The development of edema was a broadly described side effect of perfusion. CONCLUSIONS: Although tissue vitality outcomes seem to favor extracorporeal perfusion, this is difficult to objectify because of large heterogeneity and poor quality of the available evidence. Future research should focus on validating outcome measures, edema prevention, perfusion settings, and maximum perfusion time for safe replantation and be preferably performed on large animals to increase translation to clinical settings.

Assisted delivery of antisense therapeutics in animal models of heritable neurodegenerative and neuromuscular disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Antisense oligonucleotide (AON)-based therapies hold promise for a range of neurodegenerative and neuromuscular diseases and have shown benefit in animal models and patients. Success in the clinic is nevertheless still limited, due to unfavourable biodistribution and poor cellular uptake of AONs. Extensive research is currently being conducted into the formulation of AONs to improve delivery, but thus far there is no consensus on which of those strategies will be the most effective. This systematic review was designed to answer in an unbiased manner which delivery strategies most strongly enhance the efficacy of AONs in animal models of heritable neurodegenerative and neuromuscular diseases. In total, 95 primary studies met the predefined inclusion criteria. Study characteristics and data on biodistribution and toxicity were extracted and reporting quality and risk of bias were assessed. Twenty studies were eligible for meta-analysis. We found that even though the use of delivery systems provides an advantage over naked AONs, it is not yet possible to select the most promising strategies. Importantly, standardisation of experimental procedures is warranted in order to reach conclusions about the most efficient delivery strategies. Our best practice guidelines for future experiments serve as a step in that direction.

Diabetes Mellitus and Bone Regeneration: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Animal Studies.

BACKGROUND: The regeneration of bone defects resulting from trauma, resection of tumors, infection, or congenital disease is a challenge, and bone grafts are utilized in a wide array of clinical settings to augment bone repair and regeneration. Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a chronic metabolic disease, which affects 8.3% of the world population, summing ∼387 million individuals. The consequences of the disease, for example, hyperglycemia, have been associated to a reduced capacity to form bone and poor bone quality, influencing bone healing. Our aim was to systematically review the literature to the effect of diabetic condition on bone regeneration in animal models, when using bone substitute materials from different origins, and perform a meta-analysis to quantitatively study the effect of DM on bone regeneration. METHODS: An extensive search strategy was carried out through PubMed and EMBASE to identify the potential relevant studies published from database inception until July 1, 2015. Initially, the title and abstract of 1409 studies were screened, after which inclusion criteria sorted 29 studies for full-text evaluation. After using exclusion criteria, a final number of seven studies could be included in the review. RESULTS: The seven included studies that passed our inclusion/exclusion criteria were all type 1 diabetes, comprising a total of 189 animals and 14 intrastudy comparisons. These studies presented a consistent and reduced risk of bias and showed a significant average effect size of -6.87% of bone formation for diabetes type 1 versus healthy condition [95% confidence interval: -10.55 to -3.18; I2 = 87.4%; p = 0.0003]. INTERPRETATION: These findings prove that DM type 1 negatively influences bone formation compared with a healthy condition, irrespective of the bone substitute material used.

Anti-tumor effects of metformin in animal models of hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Several studies have reported that metformin can reduce the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in diabetes patients. However, the direct anti-HCC effects of metformin have hardly been studied in patients, but have been extensively investigated in animal models of HCC. We therefore performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of animal studies evaluating the effects of metformin on HCC. METHODS: We collected the relevant studies by searching EMBASE, Medline (OvidSP), Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed Publisher, and Google Scholar. Studies were included according to the following inclusion criteria: HCC, animal study, and metformin intervention. Study quality was assessed using SYRCLE's risk of bias tool. A meta-analysis was performed for the outcome measures: tumor growth (tumor volume, weight and size), tumor number and incidence. RESULTS: The search resulted in 573 references, of which 13 could be included in the review and 12 included in the meta-analysis. The study characteristics of the included studies varied considerably. Two studies used rats, while the others used mice. Only one study used female animals, nine used male, and three studies didn't mention the gender of animals in their experiments. The quality of the included studies was low to moderate based on the assessment of their risk of bias. The meta-analysis showed that metformin significantly inhibited the growth of HCC tumour (SMD -2.20[-2.96,-1.43]; n=16), but no significant effect on the number of tumors (SMD-1.05[-2.13,0.03]; n=5) or the incidence of HCC was observed (RR 0.62[0.33,1.16]; n=6). To investigate the potential sources of significant heterogeneities found in outcome of tumor growth (I2=81%), subgroup analyses of scales of growth measures and of types of animal models used were performed. CONCLUSION: Metformin appears to have a direct anti-HCC effect in animal models. Although the intrinsic limitations of animal studies, this systematic review could provide an important reference for future preclinical animal trials of good quality and clinical development.

Systematic reviews of animal studies; missing link in translational research?

BACKGROUND: The methodological quality of animal studies is an important factor hampering the translation of results from animal studies to a clinical setting. Systematic reviews of animal studies may provide a suitable method to assess and thereby improve their methodological quality. OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were: 1) to evaluate the risk of bias assessment in animal-based systematic reviews, and 2) to study the internal validity of the primary animal studies included in these systematic reviews. DATA SOURCES: We systematically searched Pubmed and Embase for SRs of preclinical animal studies published between 2005 and 2012. RESULTS: A total of 91 systematic reviews met our inclusion criteria. The risk of bias was assessed in 48 (52.7%) of these 91 systematic reviews. Thirty-three (36.3%) SRs provided sufficient information to evaluate the internal validity of the included studies. Of the evaluated primary studies, 24.6% was randomized, 14.6% reported blinding of the investigator/caretaker, 23.9% blinded the outcome assessment, and 23.1% reported drop-outs. CONCLUSIONS: To improve the translation of animal data to clinical practice, systematic reviews of animal studies are worthwhile, but the internal validity of primary animal studies needs to be improved. Furthermore, risk of bias should be assessed by systematic reviews of animal studies to provide insight into the reliability of the available evidence.

Assessing the application of the 3Rs: a survey among animal welfare officers in The Netherlands.

Implementation of the 3Rs (Replacement, Refinement and Reduction) in animal studies is a legal requirement in many countries. In The Netherlands, animal welfare officers (AWOs) are appointed to monitor the welfare of laboratory animals. As part of this task, AWOs give advice to researchers and can therefore have an influential role in implementing 3R methods in research. A national survey was conducted to gain more insight into how Dutch AWOs obtain and apply 3R information in their daily work. Nearly half of the AWO population filled out the questionnaire (15/32; a response rate of 46.9%). Two-thirds of the respondents pointed out that finding 3R information is not an easy task and more than half of the respondents believed that information on possibilities to implement the 3Rs is regularly being missed. The respondents indicated that most 3R information is obtained directly from colleagues and other AWOs. Special online 3R databases are rarely used. All the responding AWOs feel that they contribute to Refinement (15/15), nearly one-third of the respondents feel they contribute to Reduction (4/15), and one AWO feels he/she contributes to Replacement (1/15). According to the respondents, better exchange of knowledge can contribute to more successful implementation of the 3Rs. How this knowledge exchange can best be established and facilitated needs further exploration. To this end, the authors make suggestions for a 3R-integrated evidence-based approach.

Outcomes of a Dutch workshop on improvements for the 3Rs in daily practice.

This article describes the outcome of a workshop that was held to generate new ideas to improve the use of the 3R principles in science. The participants of the workshop represented Dutch researchers, Animal Welfare Officers, and members of Animal Ethics Committees from various affiliations, including academia, industry, contract research organizations, and knowledge centers in the Netherlands. The workshop resulted in six diverse consensus statements, which are presented and discussed in this article. The results show that there is no single, straightforward solution to improving the implementation of 3R methods in animal-based research and that further improvement in 3Rs practice requires a more multi- and interdisciplinary awareness and approach.

Assessing the search for information on Three Rs methods, and their subsequent implementation: a national survey among scientists in the Netherlands.

A local survey conducted among scientists into the current practice of searching for information on Three Rs (i.e. Replacement, Reduction and Refinement) methods has highlighted the gap between the statutory requirement to apply Three Rs methods and the lack of criteria to search for them. To verify these findings on a national level, we conducted a survey among scientists throughout The Netherlands. Due to the low response rate, the results give an impression of opinions, rather than being representative of The Netherlands as a whole. The findings of both surveys complement each other, and indicate that there is room for improvement. Scientists perceive searching the literature for information on Three Rs methods to be a difficult task, and specific Three Rs search skills and knowledge of Three Rs databases are limited. Rather than using a literature search, many researchers obtain information on these methods through personal communication, which means that published information on possible Three Rs methods often remains unfound and unused. A solution might be to move beyond the direct search for information on Three Rs methods and choose another approach. One approach that seems rather appropriate is that of systematic review. This provides insight into the necessity for any new animal studies, as well as optimal implementation of available data and the prevention of unnecessary animal use in the future.