Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol ; 30(8): 1357-1362, 2020 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32458129

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Last decades there is an increased tendency of performing surgery on displaced distal radius fractures. However, it is unclear whether this affects the development of osteoarthritis. This study aims to determine the relation between anatomical position, radiological osteoarthritis and functional outcome of the elderly wrist, 10-15 years after a distal radius fracture. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 173 patients between the age of 50 and 70 at time of trauma were included in this retrospective cohort study with a 10-15-year follow-up. Based on the reassessed initial X-rays, the patients were placed into 4 groups (1: anatomical, 2a: acceptable, 2b: current operative indication but treated conservative, 2c: operative indication and operated). Functional outcome was measured, questionnaires were answered, and new bilateral X-rays of the wrist were obtained. Factors influencing osteoarthritis, the difference in osteoarthritis between the groups and the difference between the fractured and non-fractured wrists were studied. RESULTS: Group 2b showed a significantly higher degree of osteoarthritis in comparison with the contralateral wrist. In the other groups, this difference was not observed. We found no significant difference in OA and functional outcomes between the groups. The degree of osteoarthritis of the non-fractured wrist appeared to be highly associated with osteoarthritis of the fractured wrist. CONCLUSION: The results of this study showed that the degree of radiocarpal osteoarthritis is higher in conservatively treated patients that should have been operated on according to current guidelines in comparison with patients without an indication for surgery. This might suggest that our current guidelines can be effective in prevention of posttraumatic osteoarthritis. However, the effect on the functional outcome is very limited. Since the degree of radiocarpal osteoarthritis of the non-fractured wrist appeared to be highly associated with the degree of osteoarthritis of the fractured wrist, future studies should always assess osteoarthritis of both wrists in order to study the real posttraumatic effect of a fracture.


Assuntos
Osteoartrite , Fraturas do Rádio , Idoso , Seguimentos , Humanos , Osteoartrite/diagnóstico por imagem , Osteoartrite/etiologia , Fraturas do Rádio/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas do Rádio/cirurgia , Amplitude de Movimento Articular , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Articulação do Punho/diagnóstico por imagem , Articulação do Punho/cirurgia
3.
Osteoarthritis Cartilage ; 25(12): 1988-1993, 2017 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28903017

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: No randomized controlled trial (RCT) has compared the high tibial osteotomy (HTO) with non-surgical treatment in patients with medial knee osteoarthritis (OA) and varus malalignment. The aim was to compare the effectiveness of an unloader brace treatment or a usual care program to the HTO regarding pain severity and knee function. DESIGN: Surgical treatment (HTO) to two non-surgical options was compared by combining the data of two RCTs. One RCT (n = 117) compared an unloader brace to usual care treatment; the other RCT (n = 92) compared closing to opening wedge HTO. One-to-many propensity score matching was used to equalize patient characteristics. We compared clinical outcome at 1 year follow-up (VAS pain (0-10) and knee function (HSS, 0-100)) with mixed model analysis. RESULTS: Propensity score matching resulted in a comparison of 30 brace patient with 83 HTO patients, and of 28 usual care patients with 71 HTO patients. Pain at 1 year after HTO (VAS 3.8) was lower than after valgus bracing (VAS 5.0) with a mean difference of -1.1 (95% CI -2.2; -0.1). Function showed a nonsignificant mean difference of 2.1 [95% CI -3.1; 7.3]. Comparing HTO to usual care a difference was seen in pain (-1.7 [95% CI -2.8; -0.6]) and function (6.6 [95% CI 0.2; 13.1]), in favor of the HTO. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that HTO was more effective in pain reduction compared to both non-surgical treatments. Function improved only when HTO was compared to usual care treatment. These small differences question the benefits of surgical treatment over the brace treatment.


Assuntos
Analgésicos/uso terapêutico , Braquetes , Genu Varum/terapia , Osteoartrite do Joelho/terapia , Osteotomia/métodos , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/métodos , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Tíbia/cirurgia , Adulto , Feminino , Genu Varum/etiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Osteoartrite do Joelho/complicações , Medição da Dor , Pontuação de Propensão , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Resultado do Tratamento , Suporte de Carga
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA