Technical feasibility and clinical evaluation of 4D-MRI guided liver SBRT on the MR-linac.

PURPOSE: Image-guided stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an important local treatment for liver metastases. MRI-guidance enables direct tumor visualization, eliminating fiducial marker implantation. The purpose of this study was to test technical feasibility of our 4D-MRI guided liver SBRT workflow. Additionally, intra-fraction target motion and consequent target-coverage were studied. MATERIALS & METHODS: Patients with liver metastases were included in this sub-study of the prospective UMBRELLA-II clinical trial. Patients received mid-position (midP) SBRT. The daily adapt-to-position workflow included localization, verification and intra-fraction tumor midP monitoring using 4D-MRI. Technical feasibility was established based on persistence of the treatment protocol, treatment time ≤1 h, no geographical miss and no unexpected acute toxicity grade >3. All 4D-MRIs were registered to the planning midP-CT and tumor midP and amplitude were calculated. Additionally, delivered target dose was accumulated incorporating the 4D-MRI intra-fraction tumor motion and evaluated with Monte-Carlo error simulations. RESULTS: 20 patients with liver metastases were included and treated with 4D-MRI guided SBRT. Feasibility criteria were met in all-but-one patient. No grade ≥3 acute toxicity was observed. Group mean (M), systematic and random midP-drifts were 2.4 mm, 2.6 mm and 3.1 mm in CC-direction. 4D-MRI tumor CC-amplitudes were reduced compared to the simulation 4D-CT (M = -1.9 mm) and decreased during treatment (M = -1.4 mm). Dose accumulation showed adequate target-coverage on a population level. CONCLUSION: We successfully demonstrated technical feasibility of 4D-MRI guided SBRT in a cohort of 20 patients with liver metastases. However, substantial midposition drifts occurred which stress the need for intra-fraction motion management strategies to further increase the precision of treatment delivery.

The impact of image acquisition time on registration, delineation and image quality for magnetic resonance guided radiotherapy of prostate cancer patients.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Magnetic resonance (MR) guided radiotherapy utilizes MR images for (online) plan adaptation and image guidance. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of variation in MR acquisition time and scan resolution on image quality, interobserver variation in contouring and interobserver variation in registration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nine patients with prostate cancer were included. Four T2-weighted 3D turbo spin echo (T2w 3D TSE) sequences were acquired with different acquisition times and resolutions. Two radiologists assessed image quality, conspicuity of the capsule, peripheral zone and central gland architecture and motion artefacts on a 5 point scale. Images were delineated by two radiation oncologists and interobserver variation was assessed by the 95% Hausdorff distance. Seven observers registered the MR images on the planning CT. Registrations were compared on systematic offset and interobserver variation. RESULTS: Acquisition times ranged between 1.3 and 6.3 min. Overall image quality and capsule definition were significantly worse for the MR sequence with an acquisition time of 1.3 min compared to the other sequences. Median 95% Hausdorff distance showed no significant differences in interobserver variation of contouring. Systematic offset and interobserver variation in registration were small (<1 mm) and of no clinical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Our results can be used to effectively shorten overall fraction time for online adaptive MR guided radiotherapy by optimising the imaging sequence used for registration. From the sequences studied, a sequence of 3.1 min with anisotropic voxels of 1.2 × 1.2 × 2.4 mm3 provided the shortest acquisition time without compromising image quality.

Evaluation of delineating the target volume by radiation therapists in breast cancer patients.

AIM: Breast radiotherapy accounts for a significant workload in radiotherapy departments. In 2015 it became clinical practice at the Netherlands Cancer Institute for radiation therapists (RTTs) to delineate the clinical target volume of the breast tissue (CTVbreast) and in 2017 axilla level I-II (CTVln12) according to a delineation atlas. All RTTs were trained and got individual feedback. The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the variation between the CTVbreast with or without CTVln12 delineated by a trained group of radiation therapists and the clinical adjusted delineations by the radiation oncologist/physician assistant (RO/PA), in a large group of patients treated between January 2017 and June 2020. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 1012 computer tomography based delineations of CTVbreast and 146 of CTVln12 were collected from January 2017-June 2020. The RTT and RO/PA delineations were compared using the Dice coefficient and the 95th percentile Hausdorff Distance (95%HD). Statistical significance of the differences was tested using a Mann-Whitney test. RESULTS: Differences in CTVbreast delineations were small. A median Dice score of 1.00 for all years, where 83% of the patients had a Dice score > 0.99. For CTVln12 the magnitude of edits made by RO/PAs decreased over time, with the Dice increasing from a median of 0.87 in 2017 to 0.90 in 2020 (p = 0.031). The 95%HD decreased from a median of 0.93 cm in 2017 to 0.61 cm in 2020 (p = 0.051). CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective study shows that trained dedicated RTTs are capable in delivering the same quality delineations as RO/PAs. The low variability supports the increasing role of RTTs in the contouring process, likely making it more time efficient.