Quantification of HIV protease inhibitors and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors in peripheral blood mononuclear cell lysate using liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry.

For pharmacokinetic monitoring, measurement of antiretroviral agents in plasma is the gold standard. However, human immunodeficiency virus protease inhibitors (PIs) or non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) exert their action within the infected cell. Cell-associated concentrations may therefore more adequately reflect therapy outcome. Therefore, for the quantification of nine PIs (amprenavir, atazanavir, darunavir, indinavir, lopinavir, nelfinavir, ritonavir, saquinavir and tipranavir), 1 active PI metabolite (nelfinavir M8) and 2 NNRTIs (efavirenz and nevirapine) in lysate of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) an assay was developed and validated, using liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry. Analytes were extracted from a PBMC pellet by means of a one-step extraction with 50% methanol containing the internal standards D6-indinavir, D5-saquinavir, 13C6-efavirenz and dibenzepine. Chromatographic separation was performed on a reversed phase C18 column (150mmx2.0mm, particle size 5microm) with a quick stepwise gradient using an acetate buffer (pH 5) and methanol, at a flow rate of 0.25mL/min. The analytical run time was 10min. The triple quadrupole mass spectrometer was operated in the positive ion-mode and multiple reaction monitoring was used for drug quantification. The method was validated over a range of 1-500ng/mL in PBMC lysate for all analytes. The method was proven to be specific, accurate, precise and robust. The mean precision and accuracy was less than +/-12% at all concentration levels. Using the developed assay and a previously developed assay for these analytes in plasma, the relationship between plasma and intracellular pharmacokinetics and their relationship with therapy outcome can now be determined.

The role of plasma D-dimers concentration in the exclusion of pulmonary embolism.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the role of four ELISA D-dimer assays in the exclusion of pulmonary embolism. DESIGN: Blinded comparison using pulmonary angiography and/or lung scintigraphy as a reference method. SETTING: A secondary and tertiary referral centre. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients with suspected pulmonary embolism underwent lung scintigraphy, followed by angiography if a non-diagnostic result was obtained. Comorbid conditions resulting in elevated plasma D-dimer levels were defined a priori. Cut-off levels for 100% sensitivity was determined. A decision-analytic model was used to determine effectiveness and costs in the management pulmonary embolism. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The exclusion efficacy of the various assays at a sensitivity of 100% and cost-effectiveness. RESULTS: A total of 179 patients were included (78 inpatients and 101 outpatients; 74 patients had comorbid conditions). Pulmonary embolism could be adequately excluded in between 8% and 18% of all patients, an in between 3% and 7% and 11% and 27% of inpatients and outpatients, respectively, depending on the assay used. D-dimer assays could exclude pulmonary embolism in <5% of patients with comorbid conditions, whereas this increased to 14-32% in outpatients without comorbid conditions. A cost-effectiveness analysis showed a cost reduction of 10% at a specificity of 30%, largely due to a 28% decrease in angiography requirements. Furthermore, for every 2% decrease to sensitivity, one per 1000 evaluated patients would die as a result of inadequately treated pulmonary embolism. CONCLUSION: D-dimer ELISA assays may have a role in the exclusion of pulmonary embolism in symptomatic outpatients, where the application may reduce angiography by 30% and costs by 10%.

A comparative analysis of D-dimer assays in patients with clinically suspected pulmonary embolism.

To avoid angiography in patients with clinically suspected pulmonary embolism and non-diagnostic lung scan results, the use of D-dimer has been advocated. We assessed plasma samples of 151 consecutive patients with clinically suspected pulmonary embolism. Lung scan results were: normal (43), high probability (48) and non-diagnostic (60; angiography performed in 43; 12 pulmonary emboli). Reproducibility, cut-off values, specificity, and percentage of patients in whom angiography could be avoided (with sensitivity 100%) were determined for two latex and four ELISA assays. The latex methods (cut-off 500 micrograms/l) agreed with corresponding ELISA tests in 83% (15% normal latex, abnormal ELISA) and 81% (7% normal latex, abnormal ELISA). ELISA methods showed considerable within- (2-17%) and between-assay variation (12-26%). Cut-off values were 25 micrograms/l (Behring), 50 micrograms/l (Agen), 300 micrograms/l (Stago) and 550 micrograms/l (Organon). Specificity was 14-38%; in 4-15% of patients angiography could be avoided. We conclude that latex D-dimer assays appear not useful, whereas ELISA methods may be of limited value in the exclusion of pulmonary embolism.