Low-dose Desmopressin Orally Disintegrating Tablet: Suggested Clinically Meaningful Benefit in Patients with Nocturia Due to Nocturnal Polyuria.

BACKGROUND: Clinical benefit has not been evaluated much in patients with nocturia. OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical benefit of desmopressin orally disintegrating tablet (ODT) in women (25µg) and men (50µg) with nocturia due to nocturnal polyuria (NP). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Patients with NP from two randomised, placebo-controlled trials in men (CS41) and women (CS40) with two or more nocturnal voids per night were included. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Change from baseline in nocturnal voids, 33% and 50% responder status (average reduction of ≤33% and ≤50%, respectively, in the mean number of nocturnal voids vs baseline), and percentage of nights with at most one void or no voids (ie, complete response) during 3-mo treatment period were assessed for clinical benefit. Two-sided test (5% significance level) was used for all endpoints. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Demographics and baseline characteristics of patients in CS41 (N=230) and CS40 (N=232) were similar. A greater reduction in the mean number of nocturnal voids was seen with desmopressin ODT in men (treatment difference [TD]: -0.37 voids) compared with women (TD: -0.29 voids). For 33% and 50% responder status, TD with ODT versus placebo were 21% and 12%, respectively, in men, and 12% and 17%, respectively, in women. For the number of nights with at most one void, TDs were 11% and 13% (p<0.009 for both) for men and women, respectively. For complete response, TD was significant in men (TD: 9%, p<0.001). Limitations inherent in this analysis were evident as the data for cotreatments (baseline) and quality of life were not collected. CONCLUSIONS: A stronger treatment effect with desmopressin ODT versus placebo and the magnitude of differences are indicative of clinical benefit in patients with NP. PATIENT SUMMARY: We looked at the clinical benefit of desmopressin ODT in patients with nocturnal polyuria. We conclude that clinical benefit was observed with desmopressin ODT in these patients.

Efficacy and safety of low dose desmopressin orally disintegrating tablet in men with nocturia: results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled, parallel group study.

PURPOSE: We investigated the efficacy and safety of 50 and 75 µg desmopressin orally disintegrating tablets in men with nocturia (2 or more nocturnal voids). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this 3-month, randomized, double-blind, parallel study 50 and 75 µg desmopressin were compared with placebo. The co-primary efficacy end points were changes from baseline in mean number of nocturnal voids and proportions of patients achieving at least a 33% reduction from baseline in nocturnal voids (33% responders) during a 3-month treatment period. RESULTS: The full analysis set comprised 385 men (age range 20 to 87 years). The 50 and 75 µg doses significantly reduced the number of nocturnal voids (-0.37, p <0.0001 and -0.41, p = 0.0003, respectively) and increased the odds of a 33% or greater response (OR 1.98, p = 0.0009 and OR 2.04, p = 0.0004, respectively) compared with placebo during 3 months. Desmopressin 50 and 75 µg increased the time to first void from baseline by approximately 40 minutes compared to placebo (p = 0.006 and p = 0.003, respectively). The response to desmopressin was seen by 1 week of treatment and was sustained. Significant increases in health related quality of life and sleep quality were observed compared to placebo. Desmopressin was well tolerated as only 2 subjects (age 74 and 79 years) on 50 µg had a serum sodium level of less than 130 mmol/L (vs 9 subjects on 75 µg). CONCLUSIONS: Desmopressin (orally disintegrating tablet) is an effective and well tolerated treatment for men with nocturia. Treatment with 50 µg desmopressin, the minimum effective dose, provided sustained improvement of nocturia throughout the study and meaningful benefits to patients with an improved safety profile.

Efficacy and safety of low dose desmopressin orally disintegrating tablet in women with nocturia: results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled, parallel group study.

PURPOSE: Previous studies suggest a lower dose of desmopressin orally disintegrating tablet may be effective in females compared to males with nocturia. We confirm the efficacy and safety of 25 µg desmopressin orally disintegrating tablet compared to placebo in female patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this 3-month, randomized, double-blind, parallel group study 25 µg desmopressin once daily was compared to placebo in women with nocturia (2 or more nocturnal voids). The co-primary efficacy end points were change from baseline in mean number of nocturnal voids and proportion of patients achieving at least a 33% reduction from baseline in the mean number of nocturnal voids (33% responders). RESULTS: The full analysis set comprised 261 patients (age range 19 to 87 years). Desmopressin significantly reduced the mean number of nocturnal voids and increased the odds of a 33% or greater response compared to placebo during 3 months, assessed by longitudinal analysis (-0.22, p = 0.028 and OR 1.85, p = 0.006, respectively). Desmopressin increased the mean time to first nocturnal void by 49 minutes compared to placebo at 3 months (p = 0.003). The response to desmopressin was seen by week 1 of treatment and was sustained throughout the trial. Significant increases in health related quality of life and sleep quality were observed compared to placebo. Desmopressin was well tolerated. Serum sodium levels remained greater than 125 mmol/L throughout the trial and 3 transient decreases to less than 130 mmol/L were recorded. CONCLUSIONS: At a dose of 25 µg, desmopressin orally disintegrating tablet is an effective and well tolerated treatment for women with nocturia. Treatment provides rapid and sustained improvement in nocturia and quality of life.

Longitudinal analysis of the suicidal behaviour risk in short-term placebo-controlled studies of mirtazapine in major depressive disorder.

OBJECTIVE: To examine suicidal behaviour risk in the short-term placebo-controlled studies of mirtazapine in Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). METHOD: Longitudinal Generalized Estimating Equations analyses were performed on pooled data from 15 placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind, short-term trials of mirtazapine, using the suicide item scores from the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) as a proxy outcome measure for suicidality risk. RESULTS: The overall analysis using the convention that a patient is at risk if the HAMD suicide item score is > or =3, and excluding patients at risk at baseline, demonstrated a statistically significantly lower risk for mirtazapine- compared to placebo-treated patients on the HAMD (odds ratio mirtazapine versus placebo 0.38; 95% confidence interval 0.21-0.66; P= 0.0008). CONCLUSION: Our results based on pooled data from 15 placebo-controlled, short-term studies of mirtazapine in MDD using the suicide item scores from the HAMD as a proxy outcome measure for suicidality risk, demonstrate that mirtazapine was associated with statistically significantly lower suicidality risk compared to placebo.

Are we really that blind?

In double-blind randomized clinical trials, it is common practice to randomize patients using randomly permuted blocks. In this article, it is demonstrated that before unblinding statistical inference of the treatment effects can be conducted, yielding consistent and rather precise estimates even in the presence of an additive block effect. With an even greater precision, the within-group standard deviation on which power calculation are usually based can be inferred from blinded data. The use of blocks of random lengths as suggested by ICH-E9 in the (unlikely) case that previous treatment allocation can be guessed by strong pharmacological effects, merely complicates the analysis but blinded inference can still be conducted without much extra loss of information. On the one hand, one might argue that this possibility of blinded inference takes away the need of conducting interim analyses for administrative or business reasons or for sample size reestimation. On the other hand, however, it most probably will have a disputable, positive or negative effect on the conduct of the remainder of the trial. If regulators and the pharmaceutical world at large want to avoid this possibility, then other unrestricted, biased coin, or more general dynamic allocation randomization procedures may be less controversial alternatives. It at least provides another strong argument in favor of using large blocks as the precision of blinded inference decreases with increasing block lengths. If blinded inferences are deemed a useful replacement of interim analyses in nonpivotal trials, then further guidelines will be needed on consequent decision-making aspects.