Severity of oligo-asteno-teratozoospermia no longer determines overall success rate in male subfertility.

In this longitudinal multicentre cohort study, the overall ongoing pregnancy rate after current evidence-based management in male subfertility was studied. All subfertile couples who visited the fertility clinic for the first time between 2002 and 2006, and had male subfertility as a single diagnosis (n = 762 of 2476 couples), were included in this study. Couples were grouped by the severity of male factor. Group I (n = 541) had a total motile sperm count (TMSC) 1-20 × 10(6). Group II (n = 161) had a TMSC <1 × 10(6). Group III (n = 60) had azoospermia. The overall ongoing pregnancy rate was 65.5% (500/762). The overall ongoing pregnancy rates in group I (69.3%) and group II (61.5%) were comparable (p = 0.06). However, group I and group II conceived significantly more frequently than group III (43.3%) (group I vs. group III p < 0.001 and group II vs. group III p = 0.02, respectively). Moreover, the spontaneous ongoing pregnancy rate in group I was 35.3%, in group II 22.4% and in group III, 1.7% (group I vs. group II p = 0.002; group I vs. group III p < 0.001; group II vs. group III p < 0.001). Thus, despite a significant difference in spontaneous ongoing pregnancy rates, except for azoospermia, the overall ongoing pregnancy rates, regardless of the severity of the male factor, were comparable. Couples with poorer sperm parameters, however, have to undergo more invasive treatment to reach the same goal.

Unexplained infertility: overall ongoing pregnancy rate and mode of conception.

BACKGROUND: Unexplained infertility is one of the most common diagnoses in fertility care. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of current fertility management in unexplained infertility. METHODS: In an observational, longitudinal, multicentre cohort study, 437 couples were diagnosed with unexplained infertility and were available for analysis. They were treated according to their prognosis using standing national treatment protocols: (i) expectant management-IUI-IVF (main treatment route), (ii) IUI-IVF and (iii) directly IVF. Primary outcome measures were: ongoing pregnancy rate, patient flow over the strategies, numbers of protocol violation and drop out rates. A secondary outcome measure was the prediction of ongoing pregnancy and mode of conception. RESULTS: Of all couples 81.5% (356/437) achieved an ongoing pregnancy and 73.9% (263/356) of the pregnancies were conceived spontaneously. There were 408 couples (93.4%) in strategy-1, 21 (5.0%) in strategy-2 and 8 (1.8%) in strategy-3. In total, 33 (7.6%) couples entered the wrong strategy. There were 104 couples (23.8%) who discontinued fertility treatment prematurely: 26 on doctor's advice (with 4 still becoming pregnant) and 78 on their own initiative (with 33 still achieving a pregnancy). Predictors for overall pregnancy chance and mode of conception were duration of infertility, female age and obstetrical history. CONCLUSIONS: Overall success rate in couples with unexplained infertility is high. Most pregnancies are conceived spontaneously. We recommend that if the pregnancy prognosis is good, expectant management should be suggested. The prognosis criteria for treatment with IUI or IVF needs to be investigated in randomized controlled trials.

When and why do subfertile couples discontinue their fertility care? A longitudinal cohort study in a secondary care subfertility population.

BACKGROUND: A substantial number of subfertile couples discontinues fertility care before achieving pregnancy. Most studies on dropouts are related to IVF. The aim here is to examine dropout rates at all stages of fertility care. METHODS: We analysed a consecutive cohort of 1391 couples, referred to our secondary care hospital between January 2002 and December 2006. Discontinuation rates were studied at six stages. Stage I: immediately after first visit, Stage II: during diagnostic workup, Stage III: after finishing diagnostic workup but before treatment, Stage IV: during or after non-IVF treatment, Stage V: during IVF, Stage VI: after at least 3 cycles of IVF. Reasons to discontinue and spontaneous pregnancy rates after discontinuation were secondary outcomes. RESULTS: In our cohort 319 couples dropped out of fertility care, 76.8%, [95% confidence interval (CI): 72.2-81.4] on their own initiative and 23.2% (95% CI: 18.6-27.8) on doctor's advice. Percentage (95% CI) of couples discontinuing per stage were: Stage I 6.0% (3.4-8.6), Stage II 3.4% (1.5-5.5), Stage III 35.7% (30.5-41.0), Stage IV 23.5% (18.9-28.2), Stage V 17.9% (13.7-22.1) and Stage VI 13.5% (9.7-17.2). Main reasons for dropout (%, 95% CI) were 'emotional distress' (22.3%, 17.7-26.8), 'poor prognosis' (18.8%, 14.5-23.1) and 'reject treatment' (17.2%, 13.1-21.4). The spontaneous ongoing pregnancy rate after discontinuation was 10% (6.7-13.3). CONCLUSION: About half of the couples stopped before any fertility treatment was started and one-third stopped after at least one IVF cycle. The main reasons for withdrawal were emotional distress and poor prognosis. This insight may help to improve quality of patient care by making care more responsive to the needs and expectations of subfertile couples.