Carotid tortuosity is associated with extracranial carotid artery aneurysms.

Background: Tortuous arteries may be associated with carotid dissection. The intima disruption caused by a carotid dissection is a possible cause of extracranial carotid artery aneurysms (ECAAs). The aim was to investigate if carotid tortuosity is also associated with ECAA in patients without presence or history of a carotid artery dissection. Methods: A retrospective case-control study was performed including 35 unilateral ECAA patients (cases) and 105 age- and sex-matched controls. Tortuosity was expressed as tortuosity-index (TI), curvature, and torsion measured on computed tomography angiography (CTA) data in 3Mensio Vascular and MATLAB by two independent investigators. Primary comparison was tortuosity in ipsi- versus contralateral carotid artery within the cohort of ECAA patients. Secondary comparison was tortuosity with ipsilateral carotid arteries in control patients. All observations were assessed on inter- and intra-operator reproducibility. Results: Carotid tortuosity was comparable within the cohort of ECAA patients (Spearman correlation 0.76, P<0.001), yet distinctively higher in comparison with unilateral controls. After adjustment for patient characteristics, presence of ECAA was associated with TI (ß 0.146, 95% CI: 0.100-0.192). All tortuosity observations showed excellent inter- and intra-operator reproducibility. Conclusions: Carotid tortuosity seems to be a risk factor for development of ECAA. Surveillance of individuals with increased carotid tortuosity therefore potentially ensures prompt diagnosis and treatment of ECAA. However, future research should investigate if persons with an increased tortuosity do indeed develop ECAA.

In-hospital Enrollment Into an Electronic Patient Portal Results in Improved Follow-up After Orthopedic Surgery: Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Electronic patient portal (EPP) use is associated with lower no-show rates and increased patient satisfaction. However, there are disparities in enrollment into these communication platforms. OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that guided inpatient enrollment into an EPP would improve clinical follow-up and EPP use rates for patients who underwent orthopedic surgery compared to the usual practice of providing information in the discharge summary. METHODS: We performed a randomized controlled trial of 229 adult patients who were admitted to the hospital for an orthopedic condition that required a 3-month follow-up visit. Patients were cluster-randomized by week to either the control or intervention group. The control group received information on how to enroll into and use the EPP in their discharge paperwork, whereas the intervention group was actively enrolled and taught how to use the EPP. At 3 months postdischarge, the patients were followed to see if they attended their follow-up appointment or used the EPP. RESULTS: Of the 229 patients, 83% (n=190) presented for follow-up at 3 months (control: 93/116, 80.2%; intervention: 97/113, 85.8%; P=.25). The likelihood of EPP use was significantly higher in the intervention group (control: 19/116, 16.4%; intervention: 70/113, 62%; odds ratio [OR] 8.3, 95% CI 4.5-15.5; P<.001). Patients in the intervention group who used the EPP were more likely to present for postsurgical follow-up (OR 3.59, 95% CI 1.28-10.06; P=.02). CONCLUSIONS: The inpatient enrollment of patients who underwent orthopedic surgery into an EPP increased EPP use but did not independently result in enhanced follow-up. Patients who were enrolled as inpatients and subsequently used the portal had the highest likelihood of 3-month follow-up. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03431259; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03431259.

The use of patient-reported outcome measures in the literature on traumatic foot fractures: A systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Adequate foot function is paramount in daily activities, yet the incidence of foot fractures shows a rising trend. Patient-reported outcome measures are increasingly used for research; however, the use of a wide variety of available instruments is undesirable. In the current study, an overview is provided of patient-reported outcome measures used in clinical research evaluating outcomes of foot fractures. Tools are provided to choose the most adequate instrument in future research. METHODS: To identify the instruments, a systematic review was performed using PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Articles published since 2000, reporting on traumatic foot fractures and/or their posttraumatic sequelae, and using a minimum of one condition- or region-specific patient-reported outcome measure were included. Forty-nine instruments were identified, used 636 times collectively. These instruments were evaluated on frequency of use, bones or joints analyzed with the instruments, the type and amount of contained items, and existing literature on their psychometric properties. RESULTS: The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot Scale was used predominantly (AOFAS Ankle-Hindfoot Scale; n = 243, 38.2%), followed by the Maryland Foot Score (n = 90, 14.2%). Twenty-seven instruments were included for further analysis. The majority included questions on mobility (27/27) and pain (24/27). Tools to select an adequate instrument for new research are presented in the appendices. DISCUSSION: Controversy surrounds the AOFAS Ankle-Hindfoot Scale as other authors have found that its psychometric properties, indicating it measures what it is supposed to measure adequately, are flawed. CONCLUSION: A multitude of specific patient-reported outcome measures concerning foot fractures exists. Furthermore, the predominantly used instrument is deemed insufficient regarding quality as found by other studies. A valid, reliable, and responsive patient-reported outcome measure for clinical research on foot fractures is necessary. The most adequate existing ones for future research on different topics can be found through the tools provided.

Blunt thoracic aortic injury and TEVAR: long-term outcomes and health-related quality of life.

PURPOSE: Treatment of blunt thoracic aortic injuries (BTAIs) has shifted from the open surgical approach to the use of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), of which early outcomes appear promising but controversy regarding long-term outcomes remains. The goal of this study was to determine the long-term TEVAR outcomes for BTAI, particularly radiographic outcomes, complications and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). METHODS: Retrospectively, all patients with BTAIs presented at a single level 1 trauma center between January 2008 and December 2018 were included. Radiographic and clinical outcomes were determined (early and long term). In addition, HRQoL scores using EuroQOL-5-Dimensions-3-Level (EQ-5D-3L) and Visual Analog Scale (EQ-VAS) questionnaires were assessed, and compared to an age-adjusted reference and trauma population. RESULTS: Thirty-one BTAI patients met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 19/31 received TEVAR of which three died in hospital due to aorta-unrelated causes. In total, 10/31 patients died due to severe (associated) injuries before TEVAR could be attempted. The remaining 2/31 had BTAIs that did not require TEVAR. Stent graft implantation was successful in all 19 patients (100%). At a median radiographic follow-up of 3 years, no stent graft-related problems (endoleaks/fractures) were observed. However, one patient experienced acute stent graft occlusion approximately 2 years after TEVAR, successfully treated with open repair. Twelve patients required complete stent graft coverage of the left subclavian artery (LSCA) (63%), which did not result in ischemic complaints or re-interventions. Of fourteen surviving TEVAR patients, ten were available for questionnaire follow-up (follow-up rate 71%). At a median follow-up of 5.7 years, significant HRQoL impairment was found (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: This study shows good long(er)-term radiographic outcomes of TEVAR for BTAIs. LSCA coverage did not result in complications. Patients experienced HRQoL impairment and were unable to return to an age-adjusted level of daily-life functioning, presumably due to concomitant orthopedic and neurological injuries.

In-house versus on-call trauma surgeon coverage: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: A rapid trauma response is essential to provide optimal care for severely injured patients. However, it is currently unclear if the presence of an in-house trauma surgeon affects this response during call and influences outcomes. This study compares in-hospital mortality and process-related outcomes of trauma patients treated by a 24/7 in-house versus an on-call trauma surgeon. METHODS: PubMed/Medline, Embase, and CENTRAL databases were searched on the first of November 2020. All studies comparing patients treated by a 24/7 in-house versus an on-call trauma surgeon were considered eligible for inclusion. A meta-analysis of mortality rates including all severely injured patients (i.e., Injury Severity Score of ≥16) was performed. Random-effect models were used to pool mortality rates, reported as risk ratios. The main outcome measure was in-hospital mortality. Process-related outcomes were chosen as secondary outcome measures. RESULTS: In total, 16 observational studies, combining 64,337 trauma patients, were included. The meta-analysis included 8 studies, comprising 7,490 severely injured patients. A significant reduction in mortality rate was found in patients treated in the 24/7 in-house trauma surgeon group compared with patients treated in the on-call trauma surgeon group (risk ratio, 0.86; 95% confidence interval, 0.78-0.95; p = 0.002; I2 = 0%). In 10 of 16 studies, at least 1 process-related outcome improved after the in-house trauma surgeon policy was implemented. CONCLUSION: A 24/7 in-house trauma surgeon policy is associated with reduced mortality rates for severely injured patients treated at level I trauma centers. In addition, presence of an in-house trauma surgeon during call may improve process-related outcomes. This review recommends implementation of a 24/7 in-house attending trauma surgeon at level I trauma centers. However, the final decision on attendance policy might depend on center and region-specific conditions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Systematic review/meta-analysis, level III.

Factors for Increased Hospital Stay and Utilization of Post -Acute Care Facilities in Geriatric Orthopaedic Fracture Patients.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to determine the extent of utilization of health care resources in the geriatric fracture population and to identify factors associated with burden on resources. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 1074 patients ≥65 years admitted to an orthopaedic service for a long bone fracture between July 2014 - June 2015. Outcomes were hospital length of stay (LOS), discharge disposition, and post-acute care facility LOS. Secondarily, readmission rates and mortality were assessed. Multivariable regression was performed to identify factors associated with utilization. RESULTS: Prior to injury, 96% of patients lived at home and 50% ambulated independently. Median hospital LOS was 5 days (IQR 3 - 7). 878 patients were discharged to a rehabilitation facility, with 45% being discharged <20 days. Ten percent of patients (n = 108) were re-admitted <90 days of their discharge. 924 patients were still alive one year after the injury. Higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) (P=0.048), male sex (P<0.001), pre-injury use of an ambulatory device (P = 0.006), and undergoing surgical treatment (P<0.001) were associated with longer hospital LOS. Older age (P<0.001), pre-injury ambulatory device (P=0.001), and surgery (P=0.012) were risk factors for requiring discharge to another inpatient facility. Older age (P<0.001), pre-injury ambulatory aid (P<0.001), and pre-existing immobility (P<0.001) were independent risk factors for LOS >20 days in a rehabilitation facility. Discharge home was not found to be associated with an increase in 1-year mortality after adjusting for age, CCI, sex, fracture location, and surgery (P=0.727). Shorter LOS in rehabilitation facilities (<20 days) was also not associated with an increase in 1-year mortality (P=0.520). CONCLUSION: Elderly fracture patients utilize a significant amount of post-acute care resources and age, CCI, surgery, fracture location, pre-injury ambulatory status, and pre-injury living status were found to be associated with the use of these resources.

Blunt cerebrovascular injury: incidence and long-term follow-up.

PURPOSE: Blunt cerebrovascular injuries (BCVI), which can result in ischemic stroke, are identified in 1-2% of all blunt trauma patients. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) scanning has improved and is the diagnostic modality of choice in BCVI suspected patients. Data about long-term functional outcomes and the incidence of ischemic stroke after BCVI are limited. The aim of this study was to determine BCVI incidence in relation to imaging modality improvements and to determine long-term functional outcomes. METHODS: All consecutive trauma patients from 2007 to 2016 with BCVI were identified from the level 1 trauma center prospective trauma database. Three periods were identified where CTA diagnostic modalities for trauma patients were improved. Long-term functional outcomes using the EuroQol six-dimensional (EQ-6D™) were determined. RESULTS: Seventy-one BCVI patients were identified among the 12.122 (0.59%) blunt trauma patients. In the first period BCVI incidence among the overall study cohort, polytrauma, basilar skull fracture and cervical trauma subgroups was found to be 0.3%, 0.9%, 1.2%, 4.6%, respectively, which more than doubled towards the third period (0.8, 2.4, 1.9 and 8.5% respectively). Ischemic stroke as a result of BCVI was found in 20 patients (28%). In-hospital stroke rate was lower in patients receiving antiplatelet therapy (p < 0.01). Six in-hospital deaths were BCVI related. Long-term follow-up (follow-up rate of 83%) demonstrated lower functional outcomes compared to Dutch reference populations (p < 0.01). Ischemic stroke was identified as a major cause of functional impairment at long-term follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Improved CTA diagnostic modalities have increased BCVI incidence. Furthermore, BCVI patients reported significant functional impairment at long-term follow-up. Antiplatelet therapy showed a significant effect on in-hospital stroke rate reduction.

Association of Patient-reported Outcomes With Clinical Outcomes After Distal Humerus Fracture Treatment.

In this study, we assessed the patient-reported outcomes of distal humerus fracture treatment using Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) or QuickDASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand) scores and the association between patient-reported outcomes and clinical outcomes. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 76 adult patients who sustained an acute distal humerus fracture between 2016 and 2018; 53 patients completed at least one patient-reported outcome measure used to assess physical function (PF) during their routine follow-up care (69.7% response rate). The average time to follow-up patient-reported outcome measure was 10.3 months. Patients completed the PROMIS PF 10a, PROMIS upper extremity (UE) 16a, and/or QuickDASH based on the treating institution/service. In addition, the PROMIS Global (Mental) subscale score was used as a measure of self-rated mental health. To assess clinical outcomes, we measured radiographic union, range of motion, and postoperative complications. Results: Most fractures were intra-articular (67.9%), and 84.9% were treated surgically. After treatment, 98.1% of fractures united radiographically. By the final follow-up, the average arc of motion was 18° to 122°. Average (±SD) PROMIS PF and UE scores were 41.7 ± 11.1 and 40.8 ± 12.4, respectively. The average QuickDASH score was 39.4 ± 26.5. The arc of flexion-extension and PROMIS Global (Mental) score were independently associated with PROMIS PF and PROMIS UE scores. Conclusions: We found that clinical factors (the arc of flexion-extension) and patient psychological factors (PROMIS Global [Mental] score) were independently associated with PROMIS measures of PF after distal humerus fracture treatment. These data can be used to contextualize patient outcomes and guide patient expectations.

Open Versus Closed Operative Treatment for Tongue-Type Calcaneal Fractures: Case Series and Literature Review.

Because consensus on the optimal surgical treatment of tongue-type calcaneal fractures is lacking, this study aimed to compare outcomes and postoperative complications of open and closed surgical treatment of these fractures. For this cases series, all patients 18 years or older who underwent operative fixation of tongue-type calcaneal fractures at 2 level I trauma centers between 2004 and 2015 were considered eligible for participation. Data on explanatory and outcome variables were collected from medical records based on available follow-up. Additionally, a systematic literature review on surgical treatment of these fractures was conducted. Fifty-six patients (58 tongue-type fractures) were included. Open reduction internal fixation was performed in 33 fractures, and closed reduction internal (percutaneous) fixation was performed in 25. More wound problems and deep infections were observed with open treatment compared with the closed approach: 10 (30%) versus 3 (12%) and 4 (12%) versus 0 (0%) procedures, respectively. In contrast, revision and hardware removal predominated in patients with closed treatments: 4 (16%) versus 1 (3%) and 9 (36%) versus 8 (24%) procedures, respectively. The systematic literature review yielded 10 articles reporting on surgical treatment for tongue-type fractures, all showing relatively good outcomes and low complication rates with no definite advantage for either technique. Both open and closed techniques are suggested as accurate surgical treatment options for tongue-type calcaneal fractures. Surgical treatment should be individualized, considering both fracture and patient characteristics and the treating surgeon's expertise. We recommend attempting closed reduction internal fixation if deemed feasible, with conversion to an open procedure if satisfactory reduction or fixation is unobtainable.

Does Surgical Approach Influence the Risk of Postoperative Infection After Surgical Treatment of Tibial Pilon Fractures?

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether a particular surgical approach or combination of approaches is a risk factor for infection. DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: Two Level-1 trauma centers. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Five hundred ninety pilon fractures in 581 patients (66% male) with a median age of 45 years were identified. INTERVENTION: Open reduction internal fixation of pilon fractures. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Postoperative deep surgical site infection and risk factors for postoperative deep infection. RESULTS: The most common primary surgical approach was medial (54%), followed by anterolateral (25%), anteromedial (11%), posterolateral (8%), and posteromedial (2%). A dual approach to the distal tibia was used in 18% of the cases. The overall deep infection rate was 19%. There was no association between primary surgical approach and development of infection (P = 0.19-0.78). Independent risk factors for infection were smoking (hazard ratio, 2.1; P < 0.001) and need for soft tissue coverage (hazard ratio, 6.9; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Surgical approach does not appear to be a significant risk factor for postoperative infection after open reduction internal fixation of distal tibial pilon fractures. When treating tibial plafond fractures, surgeons should select the approach they feel best addresses the specific fracture pattern. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Injury-related variation in patient-reported outcome after musculoskeletal trauma: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to explore injury-related characteristics that differentiate between patient-reported outcomes (PROs) following traumatic musculoskeletal injury. METHODS: We reviewed English-language articles in PubMed/MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (January 1995 to September 2018). We included studies that compared patient-reported outcomes of musculoskeletal trauma based on injury characteristics, and excluded studies related to development or validation of outcome tools without implementation, measurement, or comparison. Studies on patients with isolated neurotrauma or spine trauma were not included. Study level of evidence was assessed by 2 reviewers using the modified Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine rating system. RESULTS: A total of 20 studies (21 articles) that reported on a total of 10,186 patients were included (4 were prospective cohort-studies, 8 were matched-control retrospective cohort-studies, and 8 were retrospective cohort-studies). Median minimum follow-up was 3 years (range 0.5-10 years). Injury-related factors associated with worse PROs were polytrauma or multiple injuries (10 studies), neurotrauma (11 studies), and high-energy injury mechanism (7 studies). Among all studies, 32 different outcome metrics were used (17 general health status metrics and 15 limb-specific metrics) making meta-analysis infeasible. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the included studies, we propose a framework where musculoskeletal injuries occur in one of 4 scenarios that is associated with a different context-dependent outcome: (1) polytrauma with neurotrauma, (2) polytrauma without neurotrauma, (3) high-energy monotrauma, and (4) low-energy monotrauma. Our results suggest that standardization of outcome instruments is needed to facilitate future meta-analyses that assess PROs in this population.

Is the proximity of external fixator pins to eventual definitive fixation implants related to the risk of deep infection in the staged management of tibial pilon fractures?

INTRODUCTION: In the staged management of tibial pilon fractures, overlap between definitive internal fixation and external fixation pin sites has been investigated as a risk factor for infection with equivocal conclusions. Our aim was to determine if overlap or proximity of definitive internal fixation to external fixation pin sites influences the risk of deep infection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed 280 AO/OTA 43B or 43C type distal tibia fractures in 277 patients at two level-one trauma centers. Patients underwent staged management using early temporizing external fixation followed by definitive open reduction and plate fixation. Primary outcome was the association between pin site overlap and the development of deep infection. Secondary outcome was the relationship between development of deep infection and the distance from pin site to definitive fixation. RESULTS: The average duration between external fixation and definitive internal fixation was 14 days. 24% of fractures developed deep infection requiring surgical intervention. There was no association between pin site overlap and the development of deep infection (p = 0.18). There was no relationship between infection and the distance between proximal plate extent and pin site (p = 0.13). DISCUSSION: We identified no association between pin site overlap and the development of deep infection. We suggest that temporizing external fixation pins should be placed so as to obtain optimal stability of the construct with lesser emphasis on aiming to be absolutely outside the zone of future fixation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III Therapeutic Retrospective Comparative study.

Cross-Cultural Comparison of Postoperative Discharge Opioid Prescribing After Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery.

BACKGROUND: The extent of variation in analgesic prescribing following musculoskeletal injury among countries and cultural contexts is poorly understood. Such an understanding can inform both domestic prescribing and future policy. The aim of our survey study was to evaluate how opioid prescribing by orthopaedic residents varies by geographic context. METHODS: Orthopaedic residents in 3 countries in which residents are the primary prescribers of postoperative analgesia in academic medical centers (Haiti, the Netherlands, and the U.S.) responded to surveys utilizing vignette-based musculoskeletal trauma case scenarios. The residents chose which medications they would prescribe for post-discharge analgesia. We standardized opioid prescriptions in the surveys by conversion to morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs). We then constructed multivariable regressions with generalized estimating equations to describe differences in opiate prescription according to country, the resident's sex and training year, and the injury site and age in the test cases. RESULTS: U.S. residents prescribed significantly more total MMEs per case (mean [95% confidence interval] = 383 [331 to 435]) compared with residents from the Netherlands (229 [160 to 297]) and from Haiti (101 [52 to 150]) both overall (p < 0.0001) and for patients treated for injuries of the femur (452 [385 to 520], 315 [216 to 414], and 103 [37 to 169] in the U.S., the Netherlands, and Haiti, respectively), tibial plateau (459 [388 to 531], 280 [196 to 365], and 114 [46 to 183]), tibial shaft (440 [380 to 500], 294 [205 to 383], and 141 [44 to 239]), wrist (239 [194 to 284], 78 [36 to 119], and 63 [30 to 95]), and ankle (331 [270 to 393], 190 [100 to 280], and 85 [42 to 128]) (p = 0.0272). U.S. residents prescribed significantly more MMEs for patients <40 years old (432 [374 to 490]) than for those >70 years old (327 [270 to 384]) (p = 0.0019). CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate greater prescribing of postoperative opioids at discharge in the U.S. compared with 2 other countries, 1 low-income and 1 high-income. Our findings highlight the high U.S. reliance on opioid prescribing for postoperative pain control after orthopaedic trauma. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Our findings point toward a need for careful reassessment of current opioid prescribing habits in the U.S. and demand reflection on how we can maximize effectiveness in pain management protocols and reduce provider contributions to the ongoing opioid crisis.

Redesigning an International Orthopaedic CME Course: The Effects on Participant Engagement over 5 Years.

The time required to observe changes in participant evaluation of continuing medical education (CME) courses in surgical fields is unclear. We investigated the time required to observe changes in participant evaluation of an orthopaedic course after educational redesign using aggregate course-level data obtained from 1359 participants who attended one of 23 AO Davos Courses over a 5-year period between 2007 and 2011. Participants evaluated courses using two previously validated, 5-point Likert scales based on content and faculty performance, and we compared results between groups that underwent educational redesign incorporating serial needs assessment, problem-based learning, and faculty training initiatives (Masters Course), and those that did not (Non-Masters Course). Average scores for the usefulness and relevancy of a course and faculty performance were significantly higher for redesigned courses (p < 0.0001) and evaluations were significantly improved for both groups after faculty training was formalised in 2009 (p < 0.001). In summary, educational redesign incorporating serial needs assessment, problem-based learning, and faculty training initiatives were associated with improvement in participant evaluation, but these changes required 4-5 years to become evident.

Routine incorporation of longer-term patient-reported outcomes into a Dutch trauma registry.

PURPOSE: Routine collection of post-discharge patient-reported outcomes within trauma registries can be used to benchmark quality of trauma care. This process is dependent on geographic and cultural context, but results are lacking regarding the European experience. We aimed to investigate the feasibility of routine inclusion of longer-term patient-reported health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in a Dutch National Trauma Database (DNTD) and to characterize these outcomes in a prospective cohort study. METHODS: All adult patients (≥ 18 years) who presented for traumatic injury in 2015-2016 and met the inclusion criteria of the DNTD were included. Inclusion criteria of the DNTD are presence of traumatic injury, hospital presentation within 48 h from trauma and hospital admission for treatment of traumatic injury or immediate mortality from traumatic injury after presentation. Exclusion criteria were death, mental impairment, insufficient command of Dutch language and residency outside the Netherlands. Primary outcomes were process-related measures of feasibility (response rate, response methods and reasons for non-response). Secondary outcomes were HRQoL measures [EuroQOL 5-Dimensions 3-Level (EQ-5D-3L) with added cognitive dimension and Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS)]. RESULTS: 2025 unique patients met the initial inclusion criteria, with 1753 patients eligible for follow-up. Of these, 1315 patients participated (response rate 75%). The majority of questionnaires, 990 (75%), were completed on paper, with an additional 325 (25%) through telephone interviews. Primary reason for non-response was lack of contact information (245/438 non-responders; 56%). Median EQ-5D score was 0.81 (IQR 0.68-1.00) (mean 0.74; SD 0.31) and median EQ-VAS score was 78 (IQR 65-90). Compared to a Dutch reference population (mean EQ-5D = 0.87), EQ-5D scores were significantly lower (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Routine collection of HRQoL is feasible within European health systems, like in the Netherlands. Further integration of these measures into trauma registries may aid worldwide benchmarking of trauma care quality.

Severely injured patients benefit from in-house attending trauma surgeons.

INTRODUCTION: There is continuous drive to optimize healthcare for the most severely injured patients. Although still under debate, a possible measure is to provide 24/7 in-house (IH) coverage by trauma surgeons. The aim of this study was to compare process-related outcomes for severely injured patients before and after transition of attendance policy from an out-of-hospital (OH) on-call attending trauma surgeon to an in-house attending trauma surgeon. METHODS: Retrospective before-and-after study using prospectively gathered data in a Level 1 Trauma Center in the Netherlands. All trauma patients with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) >24 presenting to the emergency department for trauma before (2011-2012) and after (2014-2016) introduction of IH attendings were included. Primary outcome measures were the process-related outcomes Emergency Department length of stay (ED-LOS) and time to first intervention. RESULTS: After implementation of IH trauma surgeons, ED-LOS decreased (p = 0.009). Time from the ED to the intensive care unit (ICU) for patients directly transferred to the ICU was significantly shorter with more than doubling of the percentage of patients that reached the ICU within an hour. The percentage of patients undergoing emergency surgery within 30 min nearly doubled as well, with a larger amount of patients undergoing CT imaging before emergency surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Introduction of a 24/7 in-house attending trauma surgeon led to improved process-related outcomes for the most severely injured patients. There is clear benefit of continuous presence of physicians with sufficient experience in trauma care in hospitals treating large numbers of severely injured patients.

Long-term outcomes after operative treatment for tibial pilon fractures.

OBJECTIVES: Aims of the present study were to establish generalizable outcome data on long-term functional outcomes and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) after operative treatment of pilon fractures on a large scale. Second, it was aimed to examine factors associated with these outcomes. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study with follow-up by questionnaire. SETTING: Two level 1 trauma centers. PATIENTS: Two hundred twenty-five of 480 eligible patients completed the survey (response rate 47%). INTERVENTION: Open reduction internal fixation for tibial pilon fracture. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Ankle function measured using the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure, physical function using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement System Physical Function (PROMIS PF, Short Form 10a) questionnaire and HRQoL using the EuroQol 5-Dimensions 3-Level (EQ-5D-3L) questionnaire. RESULTS: At a medium follow-up of 82 months (82 (interquartile range (IQR), 45-120), median Foot and Ankle Ability Measure was 74 (IQR, 57-82), median PROMIS PF 49 (IQR, 44-57), median EQ-5D-3L 0.81 (IQR, 0.71-0.84). HRQoL was significantly lower compared to a reference population (P < .001). In multivariable regression analyses, smoking was associated with poorer HRQoL. Higher body mass index, deep infection, and lower HRQoL were associated with worse ankle function. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term patient-reported outcomes after operative treatment of pilon fractures reveal impaired functionality and lower HRQoL compared to an uninjured reference population. As pilon fractures can have significant effects on a patient's life, patients should be counseled about the expected long-term outcomes to set realistic expectations. This study emphasizes the importance of obtaining both general and region-specific measures when evaluating outcomes after injury, in order to evaluate the injury of interest in the accurate context. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic level III.

Functional outcomes of traumatic midfoot injuries.

INTRODUCTION: Midfoot injuries are rare injuries, often the result of high-energy trauma and occurring in the context of multiple trauma. This study aimed to evaluate functional outcomes and health-related quality of life after open reduction and internal fixation for midfoot injuries at a level 1 trauma center treating complex foot injuries. METHODS: Retrospective single level 1 center study with follow-up by questionnaire. All adult patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for Lisfranc and/or Chopart injuries between 2000 and 2016 were included and invited to complete the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Midfoot Score, the EuroQOL Visual Analog Scale (EQ-VAS), and the EuroQOL five-dimensional questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L). Chart reviews were performed to collect demographic, injury, and treatment characteristics. RESULTS: Forty patients with 45 midfoot injuries were included. Follow-up was available for 29 patients (31 feet), leading to a response rate of 83%. The majority of patients suffered high-energy trauma and nearly all patients had a concomitant injury. Secondary arthrodesis was performed in 7/45 injuries. Median AOFAS score was 64 (IQR 47-78). Higher injury severity score (ISS) was associated with poorer functionality as measured with the AOFAS Midfoot Score (p = 0.046), concomitant injuries were associated with lower quality of life (p = 0.01). EQ-5D scores were significantly lower when compared to the Dutch reference population (p< 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Injuries of the midfoot have negative effects on mid- to long-term quality of life after trauma, with considerable potential for long-term impaired functionality. When counseling patients with these rare injuries after high-energy trauma mechanisms or in the context of multiple trauma, realistic expectations on postoperative recovery should be given.

Factors Influencing Functional Outcomes of Subtalar Fusion for Posttraumatic Arthritis After Calcaneal Fracture.

BACKGROUND: Subtalar arthrodesis is a common salvage operation for posttraumatic subtalar arthritis. This study aimed to identify factors associated with functional outcomes and quality of life after subtalar fusion for posttraumatic subtalar arthritis after calcaneal fracture. METHODS: This is a retrospective study with follow-up by questionnaire in two level 1 trauma centers. Patients who underwent subtalar arthrodesis for posttraumatic arthritis after a calcaneal fracture between 2001 and 2016 were identified and contacted for completion of a survey consisting of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM), Maryland Foot Score (MFS), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement System Physical Function (PROMIS PF, Short Form 10a) questionnaire, EuroQol 5-dimensional (EQ-5D) questionnaire, and EuroQol visual analog scale (EQ-VAS). Exclusion criteria were initial subtalar arthrodesis at an outside facility, primary arthrodesis for fracture, initial arthrodesis earlier than 2001, amputation of the fused foot or leg, younger than 18 years at time of fusion, and inability to communicate in English. A total of 159 patients met our inclusion criteria. Eighty-four patients completed the questionnaires, resulting in a response rate of 59%. RESULTS: Median FAAM score was 79 (interquartile range [IQR], 48-90), median MFS was 74 (IQR, 56-86), and median PROMIS PF was 45 (IQR, 38-51). Quality of life was significantly lower when compared to a reference population ( P = .001). Smoking was independently associated with worse outcomes. Complications after fusion (such as nonunion, implant failure, and infectious complications), high-energy trauma, and ipsilateral injury were also predictors for poorer outcomes. CONCLUSION: Acceptable functional outcomes and quality of life were observed after subtalar fusion. Smoking, complications after subtalar fusion, high-energy trauma, and presence of ipsilateral injuries were independently associated with worse functionality and quality of life. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic level III, comparative series.