Assisting the implementation of screening for type 1 diabetes by using artificial intelligence on publicly available data.

The type 1 diabetes community is coalescing around the benefits and advantages of early screening for disease risk. To be accepted by healthcare providers, regulatory authorities and payers, screening programmes need to show that the testing variables allow accurate risk prediction and that individualised risk-informed monitoring plans are established, as well as operational feasibility, cost-effectiveness and acceptance at population level. Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to contribute to solving these issues, starting with the identification and stratification of at-risk individuals. ASSET (AI for Sustainable Prevention of Autoimmunity in the Society; www.asset.healthcare ) is a public/private consortium that was established to contribute to research around screening for type 1 diabetes and particularly to how AI can drive the implementation of a precision medicine approach to disease prevention. ASSET will additionally focus on issues pertaining to operational implementation of screening. The authors of this article, researchers and clinicians active in the field of type 1 diabetes, met in an open forum to independently debate key issues around screening for type 1 diabetes and to advise ASSET. The potential use of AI in the analysis of longitudinal data from observational cohort studies to inform the design of improved, more individualised screening programmes was also discussed. A key issue was whether AI would allow the research community and industry to capitalise on large publicly available data repositories to design screening programmes that allow the early detection of individuals at high risk and enable clinical evaluation of preventive therapies. Overall, AI has the potential to revolutionise type 1 diabetes screening, in particular to help identify individuals who are at increased risk of disease and aid in the design of appropriate follow-up plans. We hope that this initiative will stimulate further research on this very timely topic.

Immunological and virological triggers of type 1 diabetes: insights and implications.

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is caused by an autoimmune process which culminates in the destruction of insulin-producing beta cells in the pancreas. It is widely believed that a complex and multifactorial interplay between genetic and environmental factors, such as viruses, play a crucial role in the development of the disease. Research over the past few decades has shown that there is not one single viral culprit, nor one single genetic pathway, causing the disease. Rather, viral infections, most notably enteroviruses (EV), appear to accelerate the autoimmune process leading to T1D and are often seen as a precipitator of clinical diagnosis. In support of this hypothesis, the use of anti-viral drugs has recently shown efficacy in preserving beta cell function after onset of diabetes. In this review, we will discuss the various pathways that viral infections utilize to accelerate the development of T1D. There are three key mechanisms linking viral infections to beta-cell death: One is modulated by the direct infection of islets by viruses, resulting in their impaired function, another occurs in a more indirect fashion, by modulating the immune system, and the third is caused by heightened stress on the beta-cell by interferon-mediated increase of insulin resistance. The first two aspects are surprisingly difficult to study, in the case of the former, because there are still many questions about how viruses might persist for longer time periods. In the latter, indirect/immune case, viruses might impact immunity as a hit-and-run scenario, meaning that many or all direct viral footprints quickly vanish, while changes imprinted upon the immune system and the anti-islet autoimmune response persist. Given the fact that viruses are often associated with the precipitation of clinical autoimmunity, there are concerns regarding the impact of the recent global coronavirus-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on the development of autoimmune disease. The long-term effects of COVID-19 infection on T1D will therefore be discussed, including the increased development of new cases of T1D. Understanding the interplay between viral infections and autoimmunity is crucial for advancing our knowledge in this field and developing targeted therapeutic interventions. In this review we will examine the intricate relationship between viral infections and autoimmunity and discuss potential considerations for prevention and treatment strategies.

Liraglutide protects ß-cells in novel human islet spheroid models of type 1 diabetes.

To enable accurate, high-throughput and longer-term studies of the immunopathogenesis of type 1 diabetes (T1D), we established three in-vitro islet-immune injury models by culturing spheroids derived from primary human islets with proinflammatory cytokines, activated peripheral blood mononuclear cells or HLA-A2-restricted preproinsulin-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes. In all models, ß-cell function declined as manifested by increased basal and decreased glucose-stimulated insulin release (GSIS), and decreased intracellular insulin content. Additional hallmarks of T1D progression such as loss of the first-phase insulin response (FFIR), increased proinsulin-to-insulin ratios, HLA-class I expression, and inflammatory cytokine release were also observed. Using these models, we show that liraglutide, a glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist, prevented loss of GSIS under T1D-relevant stress, by preserving the FFIR and decreasing immune cell infiltration and cytokine secretion. Our results corroborate that liraglutide mediates an anti-inflammatory effect that aids in protecting ß-cells from the immune-mediated attack that leads to T1D.

Induction of antigenic immune tolerance to delay type 1 diabetes - challenges for clinical translation.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Dissect the field of antigen-specific immunotherapy (ASIT) in type 1 diabetes (T1D), highlighting the major barriers currently blocking clinical translation. RECENT FINDINGS: ASIT remains a promising approach in T1D to re-establish the proper balance in the immune system to avoid the autoimmune-mediated attack or destruction of beta-cells in the pancreas. Despite some encouraging preclinical results, ASIT has not yet successfully translated into clinical utility, predominantly due to the lack of validated and clinically useful biomarkers. SUMMARY: To restore immune tolerance towards self-antigens, ASIT aims to establish a favourable balance between T effector cells and T regulatory cells. Whilst most ASITs, including systemic or oral administration of relevant antigens, have appeared safe in T1D, meaningful and durable preservation of functional beta-cell mass has not been proven clinically. Development, including clinical translation, remains negatively impacted by lack of predictive biomarkers with confirmed correlation between assay readout and clinical outcomes. To be able to address the high unmet medical need in T1D, we propose continued reinforced research to identify such biomarkers, as well efforts to ensure alignment in terms of trial design and conduct.

Effect of IL4 and IL10 on a human in vitro type 1 diabetes model.

We defined the effect of the anti-inflammatory cytokines IL4 and IL10 on an in vitro model of human T1D. After preincubation with IL4 or IL10, human islet microtissues were co-cultured with PBMC and proinflammatory cytokines for a few hours or for multiple days to assess acute and chronic effects. This resulted in an immune attack with infiltration of T cells into the islet, a loss of beta cell endocrine function, and an upregulation of HLA-I on the beta cells. HLA-I upregulation was associated with infiltration of T cells and both HLA-I expression and infiltration were associated with impaired insulin secretion. Preincubation with IL4 or IL10 did not preserve beta cell function but decreased infiltration of T cells. Our data support the hypothesis that a loss of beta cell endocrine function mediates an increase in beta cell specific antigen presentation. IL4 and IL10 failed to preserve beta cell endocrine function.

Interleukin 6 in diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and cardiovascular disease: mechanisms and therapeutic perspectives.

INTRODUCTION: Diabetes, chronic kidney disease (CKD) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) are cardiometabolic diseases that remain amongst the leading causes of morbidity and premature mortality. Here, we review the current understanding of how anti-inflammatory intervention via inhibition of the pro-inflammatory but pleiotropic cytokine interleukin (IL) 6 may benefit patients with these or related diseases or complications. AREAS COVERED: Based on a PubMed literature search, this review integrates and contextualizes evidence regarding the clinical utility of anti-IL-6 intervention in the treatment of cardiometabolic diseases, as well as of the associated condition nonalcoholic hepatosteatosis. EXPERT OPINION: Evidence implicates the pro-inflammatory effects of IL-6 in the pathophysiology of diabetes, CKD and CVD. Thus, targeting the IL-6 pathway holds a therapeutic potential in these cardiometabolic disorders. However, because IL-6 has multiple homeostatic roles, antagonizing this cytokine may be associated with side effects, such as increased risk of infection as seen with other anti-inflammatory drugs. Additional studies are required to establish the benefit-risk profile of anti-IL-6 intervention in the cardiometabolic diseases, whilst also considering alternative interventions such as lifestyle changes. IL-6 is also elevated in NASH, but the clinical usefulness of targeting IL-6 in this hepatic disorder remains largely unexplored.

Upregulation of HLA class II in pancreatic beta cells from organ donors with type 1 diabetes.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: We aimed to characterise and quantify the expression of HLA class II (HLA-II) in human pancreatic tissue sections and to analyse its induction in human islets. METHODS: We immunostained human pancreatic tissue sections from non-diabetic (n = 5), autoantibody positive (Aab+; n = 5), and type 1 diabetic (n = 5) donors, obtained from the Network of Pancreatic Organ Donors (nPOD), with HLA-II, CD68 and insulin. Each tissue section was acquired with a widefield slide scanner and then analysed with QuPath software. In total, we analysed 7415 islets that contained 338,480 cells. Widefield microscopy was further complemented by high resolution imaging of 301 randomly selected islets, acquired using a Zeiss laser scanning confocal (LSM880) to confirm our findings. Selected beta cells were acquired in enhanced resolution using LSM880 with an Airyscan detector. Further, we cultured healthy isolated human islets and reaggregated human islet microtissues with varying concentrations of proinflammatory cytokines (IFN-γ, TNF-α and IL-1ß). After proinflammatory cytokine culture, islet function was measured by glucose-stimulated insulin secretion, and HLA-I and HLA-II expression was subsequently evaluated with immunostaining or RNA sequencing. RESULTS: Insulin-containing islets (ICIs) of donors with type 1 diabetes had a higher percentage of HLA-II positive area (24.31%) compared with type 1 diabetic insulin-deficient islets (IDIs, 0.67%), non-diabetic (3.80%), and Aab+ (2.31%) donors. In ICIs of type 1 diabetic donors, 45.89% of the total insulin signal co-localised with HLA-II, and 27.65% of the islet beta cells expressed both HLA-II and insulin, while in non-diabetic and Aab+ donors 0.96% and 0.59% of the islet beta cells, respectively, expressed both markers. In the beta cells of donors with type 1 diabetes, HLA-II was mostly present in the cell cytoplasm, co-localising with insulin. In the experiments with human isolated islets and reaggregated human islets, we observed changes in insulin secretion upon stimulation with proinflammatory cytokines, as well as higher expression of HLA-II and HLA-I when compared with controls cultured with media, and an upregulation of HLA-I and HLA-II RNA transcripts. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: After a long-standing controversy, we provide definitive evidence that HLA-II can be expressed by pancreatic beta cells from patients with type 1 diabetes. Furthermore, this upregulation can be induced in vitro in healthy isolated human islets or reaggregated human islets by treatment with proinflammatory cytokines. Our findings support a role for HLA-II in type 1 diabetes pathogenesis since HLA-II expressing beta cells can potentially become a direct target of autoreactive CD4+ lymphocytes.

Multicomponent Plasmid Protects Mice From Spontaneous Autoimmune Diabetes.

Type 1 diabetes is an autoimmune disease in which insulin-secreting ß-cells are destroyed, leading to a life-long dependency on exogenous insulin. There are no approved disease-modifying therapies available, and future immunotherapies would need to avoid generalized immune suppression. We developed a novel plasmid expressing preproinsulin2 and a combination of immune-modulatory cytokines (transforming growth factor-beta-1, interleukin [IL] 10 and IL-2) capable of near-complete prevention of autoimmune diabetes in non-obese diabetic mice. Efficacy depended on preproinsulin2, suggesting antigen-specific tolerization, and on the cytokine combination encoded. Diabetes suppression was achieved following either intramuscular or subcutaneous injections. Intramuscular plasmid treatment promoted increased peripheral levels of endogenous IL-10 and modulated myeloid cell types without inducing global immunosuppression. To prepare for first-in-human studies, the plasmid was modified to allow for selection without the use of antibiotic resistance; this modification had no impact on efficacy. This pre-clinical study demonstrates that this multi-component, plasmid-based antigen-specific immunotherapy holds potential for inducing self-tolerance in persons at risk of developing type 1 diabetes. Importantly, the study also informs on relevant cytokine and immune cell biomarkers that may facilitate clinical trials. This therapy is currently being tested for safety and tolerability in a phase 1 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04279613).

IL-17 is expressed on beta and alpha cells of donors with type 1 and type 2 diabetes.

PURPOSE: IL-17 is an important effector cytokine driving immune-mediated destruction in autoimmune diseases such as psoriasis. Blockade of the IL-17 pathway after the initiation of insulitis was effective in delaying or preventing the onset of type 1 diabetes (T1D) in rodent models. Expression of IL-17 transcripts in islets from a donor with recent-onset T1D has been reported, however, studies regarding IL-17 protein expression are lacking. We aimed to study whether IL-17 is being expressed in the islets of diabetic donors. METHODS: We stained human pancreatic tissues from non-diabetic (n = 5), auto-antibody positive (aab+) (n = 5), T1D (n = 6) and T2D (n = 5) donors for IL-17, Insulin, and Glucagon, and for CD45 in selected cases. High resolution images were acquired with Zeiss laser scanning confocal microscope LSM780 and analyzed with Zen blue 2.3 software. Cases stained for CD45 were also acquired with widefield slide scanner and analyzed with QuPath software. RESULTS: We observed a clear cytoplasmic staining for IL-17 in insulin-containing islets of donors with T1D and T2D, accounting for an average of 7.8 ± 8.4% and 14.9 ± 16.8% of total islet area, respectively. Both beta and alpha cells were sources of IL-17, but CD45+ cells were not a major source of IL-17 in those donors. Expression of IL-17 was reduced in islets of non-diabetic donors, aab+ donors and in insulin-deficient islets of donors with T1D. CONCLUSION: Our finding that IL-17 is expressed in islets of donors with T1D or T2D is quite intriguing and warrants further mechanistic studies in human islets to understand the role of IL-17 in the context of metabolic and immune stress in beta cells.

Multicomponent Plasmid Protects Mice From Spontaneous Autoimmune Diabetes.

Type 1 diabetes is an autoimmune disease in which insulin-secreting ß-cells are destroyed, leading to a life-long dependency on exogenous insulin. There are no approved disease-modifying therapies available, and future immunotherapies would need to avoid generalized immune suppression. We developed a novel plasmid expressing preproinsulin2 and a combination of immune-modulatory cytokines (transforming growth factor-beta-1, interleukin [IL] 10 and IL-2) capable of near-complete prevention of autoimmune diabetes in non-obese diabetic mice. Efficacy depended on preproinsulin2, suggesting antigen-specific tolerization, and on the cytokine combination encoded. Diabetes suppression was achieved following either intramuscular or subcutaneous injections. Intramuscular plasmid treatment promoted increased peripheral levels of endogenous IL-10 and modulated myeloid cell types without inducing global immunosuppression. To prepare for first-in-human studies, the plasmid was modified to allow for selection without the use of antibiotic resistance; this modification had no impact on efficacy. This pre-clinical study demonstrates that this multi-component, plasmid-based antigen-specific immunotherapy holds potential for inducing self-tolerance in persons at risk of developing type 1 diabetes. Importantly, the study also informs on relevant cytokine and immune cell biomarkers that may facilitate clinical trials. This therapy is currently being tested for safety and tolerability in a phase 1 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04279613).

Efficacy and safety of liraglutide in type 1 diabetes by baseline characteristics in the ADJUNCT ONE and ADJUNCT TWO randomized controlled trials.

AIM: To evaluate 26 weeks of liraglutide treatment in type 1 diabetes (T1D) by subgroups in the ADJUNCT ONE and ADJUNCT TWO trials. MATERIALS AND METHODS: ADJUNCT ONE and ADJUNCT TWO were randomized controlled phase 3 trials in 1398 and 835 participants with T1D treated with liraglutide (1.8, 1.2, or 0.6 mg) or placebo (adjuncts to insulin). This post hoc analysis evaluated treatment effects by subgroups: HbA1c (< or ≥8.5%), body mass index (BMI; < or ≥27 kg/m2 ), and insulin regimen (basal bolus or continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion). RESULTS: In both trials at week 26, reductions in HbA1c, body weight, and daily insulin dose did not differ significantly (P > .05) by baseline HbA1c or BMI. Risk of clinically significant hypoglycaemia or hyperglycaemia with ketosis did not differ significantly (P > .05) by baseline HbA1c, BMI, or insulin regimen. At week 26 in ADJUNCT ONE, these risks did not differ (P > .05) between treatment groups. Placebo-adjusted reductions in HbA1c, body weight, and insulin dose (-0.30%-points, -5.0 kg, and -12%, respectively, with liraglutide 1.8 mg), were significant (P < .05), greater than at week 52, and similar to those in ADJUNCT TWO (-0.35%, -4.8 kg, and -10%, respectively, with liraglutide 1.8 mg). CONCLUSIONS: In ADJUNCT ONE and ADJUNCT TWO, the efficacy and glycaemic safety of liraglutide did not depend on subgroups, leaving residual beta-cell function as the only identified variable impacting the effect of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) in T1D. These findings support a role for GLP-1 RAs as adjuncts to insulin in T1D, warranting further study.

Peripheral autoreactive CD8 T-cell frequencies are too variable to be a reliable predictor of disease progression of human type 1 diabetes.

OBJECTIVES: The detection of a peripheral immune cell signature that specifically reflects autoimmunity in type 1 diabetes would enable the prediction and staging of disease on an individual basis. However, defining such a signature is technically challenging. Reliable interpretation of immune cell-related biomarkers depends on their inherent variability and, to understand this variability, longitudinal analyses are required. METHODS: We performed a longitudinal observational study in which 40 individuals with elevated genetic risk of type 1 diabetes and persistent islet autoantibodies provided a blood sample every 4-6 weeks for > 1 year. RESULTS: Peripheral immune cell composition (T cells, NK cells and monocytes) was assessed using well-validated flow cytometry panels and demonstrated that, while non-antigen-specific immune cell subsets were stable over time, autoantigen-reactive T-cell frequencies were highly variable in and between individuals. Neither the frequency nor phenotype of non-antigen-specific subsets or autoreactive CD8+ T cells associated with clinical onset of T1D. CONCLUSION: The findings from the Type 1 Diabetes Longitudinal BIomarker Trial underscore the inherent challenge of evaluating changes in peripheral immune cell populations as surrogates of organ-specific disease activity. The variability of peripheral antigen-specific T cells precludes their use as a prognostic marker and clearly demonstrates that a reliable prognostic cell signature remains elusive.

Means, Motive, and Opportunity: Do Non-Islet-Reactive Infiltrating T Cells Contribute to Autoimmunity in Type 1 Diabetes?

In human type 1 diabetes and animal models of the disease, a diverse assortment of immune cells infiltrates the pancreatic islets. CD8+ T cells are well represented within infiltrates and HLA multimer staining of pancreas sections provides clear evidence that islet epitope reactive T cells are present within autoimmune lesions. These bona fide effectors have been a key research focus because these cells represent an intellectually attractive culprit for ß cell destruction. However, T cell receptors are highly diverse in human insulitis. This suggests correspondingly broad antigen specificity, which includes a majority of T cells for which there is no evidence of islet-specific reactivity. The presence of "non-cognate" T cells in insulitis raises suspicion that their role could be beyond that of an innocent bystander. In this perspective, we consider the potential pathogenic contribution of non-islet-reactive T cells. Our intellectual framework will be that of a criminal investigation. Having arraigned islet-specific CD8+ T cells for the murder of pancreatic ß cells, we then turn our attention to the non-target immune cells present in human insulitis and consider the possible regulatory, benign, or effector roles that they may play in disease. Considering available evidence, we overview the case that can be made that non-islet-reactive infiltrating T cells should be suspected as co-conspirators or accessories to the crime and suggest some possible routes forward for reaching a better understanding of their role in disease.

Current state of antigen-specific immunotherapy for type 1 diabetes.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Update on antigen-specific immunotherapy (ASIT) in type 1 diabetes (T1D) with focus on deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA)-induced immunization and the current obstacles to further research and clinical realization. RECENT FINDINGS: In T1D, immune system imbalances together with malfunctioning islet-specific processes cause autoreactive immune cells to destroy beta cells in the islets. ASIT may restore self-tolerance; however, the approach has yet to fully meet its promise and may require co-administration of antigen (preproinsulin) and suitable immune response modifiers. SUMMARY: A self-tolerant immune system may be regained using ASIT where T effector cells are repressed and/or T regulatory cells are induced. Administration of exogenous antigens has been safe in T1D. Conversely, adequate and lasting beta cell preservation has yet to be tested in sufficiently large clinical trials in suitable patients and may require targeting of multiple parts of the immunopathophysiology using combination therapies. DNA-based induction of native antigen expression to ensure important posttranscriptional modifications and presentation to the immune system together with tolerance-enhancing immune response modifiers (i.e., cytokines) may be more efficacious than exogenous antigens given alone. Progress is limited mainly by the scarcity of validated biomarkers to track the effects of ASIT in T1D.

Anti-interleukin-21 antibody and liraglutide for the preservation of ß-cell function in adults with recent-onset type 1 diabetes: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: Type 1 diabetes is characterised by progressive loss of functional ß-cell mass, necessitating insulin treatment. We aimed to investigate the hypothesis that combining anti-interleukin (IL)-21 antibody (for low-grade and transient immunomodulation) with liraglutide (to improve ß-cell function) could enable ß-cell survival with a reduced risk of complications compared with traditional immunomodulation. METHODS: This randomised, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, double-dummy, double-blind, phase 2 trial was done at 94 sites (university hospitals and medical centres) in 17 countries. Eligible participants were adults aged 18-45 years with recently diagnosed type 1 diabetes and residual ß-cell function. Individuals with unstable type 1 diabetes (defined by an episode of severe diabetic ketoacidosis within 2 weeks of enrolment) or active or latent chronic infections were excluded. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1), with stratification by baseline stimulated peak C-peptide concentration (mixed-meal tolerance test [MMTT]), to the combination of anti-IL-21 and liraglutide, anti-IL-21 alone, liraglutide alone, or placebo, all as an adjunct to insulin. Investigators, participants, and funder personnel were masked throughout the treatment period. The primary outcome was the change in MMTT-stimulated C-peptide concentration at week 54 (end of treatment) relative to baseline, measured via the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) over a 4 h period for the full analysis set (intention-to-treat population consisting of all participants who were randomly assigned). After treatment cessation, participants were followed up for an additional 26-week off-treatment observation period. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02443155. FINDINGS: Between Nov 10, 2015, and Feb 27, 2019, 553 adults were assessed for eligibility, of whom 308 were randomly assigned to receive either anti-IL-21 plus liraglutide, anti-IL-21, liraglutide, or placebo (77 assigned to each group). Compared with placebo (ratio to baseline 0·61, 39% decrease), the decrease in MMTT-stimulated C-peptide concentration from baseline to week 54 was significantly smaller with combination treatment (0·90, 10% decrease; estimated treatment ratio 1·48, 95% CI 1·16-1·89; p=0·0017), but not with anti-IL-21 alone (1·23, 0·97-1·57; p=0·093) or liraglutide alone (1·12, 0·87-1·42; p=0·38). Despite greater insulin use in the placebo group, the decrease in HbA1c (a key secondary outcome) at week 54 was greater with all active treatments (-0·50 percentage points) than with placebo (-0·10 percentage points), although the differences versus placebo were not significant. The effects diminished upon treatment cessation. Changes in immune cell subsets across groups were transient and mild (<10% change over time). The most frequently reported adverse events included gastrointestinal disorders, in keeping with the known side-effect profile of liraglutide. The rate of hypoglycaemic events did not differ significantly between active treatment groups and placebo, with an exception of a lower rate in the liraglutide group than in the placebo group during the treatment period. No events of diabetic ketoacidosis were observed. One participant died while on liraglutide (considered unlikely to be related to trial treatment) in connection with three reported adverse events (hypoglycaemic coma, pneumonia, and brain oedema). INTERPRETATION: The combination of anti-IL-21 and liraglutide could preserve ß-cell function in recently diagnosed type 1 diabetes. The efficacy of this combination appears to be similar to that seen in trials of other disease-modifying interventions in type 1 diabetes, but with a seemingly better safety profile. Efficacy and safety should be further evaluated in a phase 3 trial programme. FUNDING: Novo Nordisk.

HLA class I hyper-expression unmasks beta cells but not alpha cells to the immune system in pre-diabetes.

Human leukocyte antigens of class-I (HLA-I) molecules are hyper-expressed in insulin-containing islets (ICI) of type 1 diabetic (T1D) donors. This study investigated the HLA-I expression in autoantibody positive (AAB+) donors and defined its intra-islet and intracellular localization as well as proximity to infiltrating CD8 T cells with high-resolution confocal microscopy. We found HLA-I hyper-expression had already occurred prior to clinical diagnosis of T1D in islets of AAB+ donors. Interestingly, throughout all stages of disease, HLA-I was mostly expressed by alpha cells. Hyper-expression in AAB+ and T1D donors was associated with intra-cellular accumulation in the Golgi. Proximity analysis showed a moderate but significant correlation between HLA-I and infiltrating CD8 T cells only in ICI of T1D donors, but not in AAB+ donors. These observations not only demonstrate a very early, islet-intrinsic immune-independent increase of HLA-I during diabetes pathogenesis, but also point towards a role for alpha cells in T1D.

Current and future therapies for type 1 diabetes.

In type 1 diabetes, insulin remains the mature therapeutic cornerstone; yet, the increasing number of individuals developing type 1 diabetes (predominantly children and adolescents) still face severe complications. Fortunately, our understanding of type 1 diabetes is continuously being refined, allowing for refocused development of novel prevention and management strategies. Hitherto, attempts based on immune suppression and modulation have been only partly successful in preventing the key pathophysiological feature in type 1 diabetes: the immune-mediated derangement or destruction of beta cells in the pancreatic islets of Langerhans, leading to low or absent insulin secretion and chronic hyperglycaemia. Evidence now warrants a focus on the beta cell itself and how to avoid its dysfunction, which is putatively caused by cytokine-driven inflammation and other stress factors, leading to low insulin-secretory capacity, autoantigen presentation and immune-mediated destruction. Correspondingly, beta cell rescue strategies are being pursued, which include antigen vaccination using, for example, oral insulin or peptides, as well as agents with suggested benefits on beta cell stress, such as verapamil and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists. Whilst autoimmune-focused prevention approaches are central in type 1 diabetes and will be a requirement in the advent of stem cell-based replacement therapies, managing the primarily cardiometabolic complications of established type 1 diabetes is equally essential. In this review, we outline selected recent and suggested future attempts to address the evolving profile of the person with type 1 diabetes.

One in Ten CD8+ Cells in the Pancreas of Living Individuals With Recent-Onset Type 1 Diabetes Recognizes the Preproinsulin Epitope PPI15-24.

In type 1 diabetes (T1D), a lifelong autoimmune disease, T cells infiltrate the islets and the exocrine pancreas in high numbers. CD8+ T cells are the main cell type found in the insulitic lesion, and CD8+ T cells reactive against ß-cell antigens have been detected in peripheral blood and in the pancreas of patients with short- or long-term disease. In the Diabetes Virus Detection (DiViD) study, researchers collected pancreatic tissue, by pancreatic tail resection, from living patients with recent-onset T1D. These tissues have been extensively studied by the scientific community, but the autoreactive nature of the T-cell infiltrate has remained unexplored. Our objective was to determine the number and localization of these cells in pancreas samples obtained through the DiViD study. Here, we demonstrate the presence of high frequencies of CD8+ T cells reactive against a highly relevant epitope derived from the preproinsulin signal peptide in pancreatic tissue samples from these donors. We also show the heterogeneity of islet distribution and CD8+ T-cell infiltration. Our findings contribute to the current limited existing knowledge of T-cell reactivity in the pancreas of donors with recent-onset T1D and indicate that antigen-specific therapies directed toward preproinsulin could have high clinical impact.

The effect of Toll-like receptor stimulation on the motility of regulatory T cells.

Regulatory T cells (Tregs) have suppressive functions and play an important role in controlling inflammation and autoimmunity. The migratory capacity of Tregs determines their location and their location determines whether they inhibit the priming of naïve lymphocytes in lymphoid tissues or the effector phase of immune responses at inflamed sites. Tregs generated or expanded in vitro are currently being tested in clinics for the treatment of autoimmune disorders, however, little is known about the factors controlling their migration towards therapeutically relevant locations. In this study, we have modulated Treg dynamics using Toll-like receptor (TLR) agonists. Dynamic imaging with confocal and two-photon microscopy revealed that Tregs generated in vitro and stimulated with P3C (a TLR2 agonist) but not with R848 (a TLR7 agonist) or LPS (a TLR4 agonist) showed enhanced cell migration within splenic white pulp or draining lymph node when transferred into mice intravenously or into the footpad, respectively. In summary, our data demonstrate that Tregs are more motile in response to direct TLR stimulation in particular towards TLR2 signals. This may have implications for efficient clinical Treg induction protocols.