[Development of quality standards for patients with rheumatoid arthritis for use in Germany]. / Entwicklung von Qualitätsstandards für die Versorgung von Patient*innen mit rheumatoider Arthritis zur Anwendung in Deutschland.

Despite a qualitatively and structurally good care of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in Germany, there are still potentially amendable deficits in the quality of care. For this reason, the German Society for Rheumatology (DGRh) has therefore decided to ask a group of experts including various stakeholders to develop quality standards (QS) for the care of patients with RA in order to improve the quality of care. The QS are used to determine and quantitatively measure the quality of care, subject to relevance and feasibility. The recently published NICE and ASAS standards and a systematic literature search were used as the basis for development. A total of 8 QS, now published for the first time, were approved with the intention to measure and further optimize the quality of care for patients with RA in Germany.

[Outpatient specialist medical treatment (ASV)-a new treatment level in rheumatology]. / Ambulante spezialfachärztliche Versorgung (ASV) ­ eine neue Versorgungsebene in der Rheumatologie.

Since April 2018, the new third level care model of outpatient specialist care (ASV) according to §116b of the Social Code Book V (SGBV) has been available for patients with chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases in Germany. Not only is a multiprofessional cooperation between the disciplines involved in treating rheumatic diseases promoted but also the cooperation between specialized rheumatologists and other specialists in private practice and in hospitals is encouraged. As budget capping limiting services and number of cases do not apply in ASV, a significant improvement of patient care in rheumatology is expected due to an increase in provider capacity. At the end of May 2019, 72 rheumatologists in the first 9 newly approved ASV teams had qualified for this new care concept. Bureaucratic obstacles have so far delayed the implementation of ASV. Difficulties arose in building a team with different specialties, in the process of registration of the teams and the assessment of the registration by certain regional boards responsible for access control. The national associations of rheumatologists, the Professional Association of German Rheumatologists (BDRh), the VRA (Verband der Rheumatologischen Akutkliniken e. V.) and the German Society of Rheumatology (DGRh) campaign for an easier admission of providers to the ASV and for adequate financing of all specialties involved in the ASV. The aim is to realize the chance of the ASV for better rheumatological care nationwide with shorter waiting times for a medical appointment and a better cooperation between specialists.

[Characteristics and challenges of rheumatology-specific laboratories in practice]. / Besonderheiten und Herausforderungen des spezifischen Rheumalabors in der Praxis.

In Germany rheumatological laboratory investigations are increasingly being carried out by rheumatologists in private practice. The professional and economic value is shown in association with the historical development of laboratory medicine and the current discussion on vocational politics.

Comparison of the clinical efficacy and safety of subcutaneous versus oral administration of methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: results of a six-month, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, controlled, phase IV trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous (SC) versus oral administration of methotrexate (MTX) in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: MTX-naive patients with active RA (Disease Activity Score in 28 joints >or= 4) were eligible for the study if they had not previously taken biologic agents and had not taken disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs for 2 weeks prior to randomization. Patients were randomly assigned to receive 15 mg/week of MTX either orally (2 7.5-mg tablets plus a dummy prefilled syringe; n=187 patients) or SC (prefilled syringe containing 10 mg/ml plus 2 dummy tablets; n=188 patients) for 24 weeks. At week 16, patients who did not meet the American College of Rheumatology criteria for 20% improvement (ACR20) were switched from 15 mg of oral MTX to 15 mg of SC MTX and from 15 mg of SC MTX to 20 mg of SC MTX for the remaining 8 weeks, still in a blinded manner. The primary outcome was an ACR20 response at 24 weeks. RESULTS: At week 24, significantly more patients treated with SC MTX than with oral MTX showed ACR20 (78% versus 70%) and ACR70 (41% versus 33%) responses. Patients with a disease duration >or= 12 months had even higher ACR20 response rates (89% for SC administration and 63% for oral). In 52 of the ACR20 nonresponders (14%), treatment was switched at week 16. Changing from oral to SC MTX and from 15 mg to 20 mg of SC MTX resulted in 30% and 23% ACR20 response rates, respectively, in these patients. MTX was well tolerated. The rate of adverse events was similar in all groups. CONCLUSION: This 6-month prospective, randomized, controlled trial is the first to examine oral versus SC administration of MTX. We found that SC administration was significantly more effective than oral administration of the same MTX dosage. There was no difference in tolerability.

[Current status of ambulatory rheumatologic health care in Germany. Structure of health care and range of services]. / Bestandsaufnahme der ambulanten rheumatologischen Versorgung in Deutschland. Versorgungsstruktur und Leistungsspektrum.

AIM: To gather information on current organizational structures in rheumatologic ambulatory health care in Germany. Based on the results recommendations on future structures will be discussed. METHODS: This study involved data collection and statistical analysis via a structured 10-page questionnaire among the members of the German Association of Rheumatologists. The questions concerned a variety of topics including information on office structures, patient structure, structure of services offered, co-operation with colleagues and hospitals, quality assurance measures, economic factors, and a subjective assessment of the health care structures in rheumatology by the participants. RESULTS: Data obtained from 197 rheumatologists who participate in health care were analyzed. In this paper results concerning the organizational as well as the medical ambulatory health care structure will be presented. Data on economic factors will be presented in part 2 of this study. CONCLUSIONS: The organization of ambulatory treatment regarding processes and treatment differences between office-based physicians and rheumatologic outpatient departments in hospitals was very homogeneous. However, physicians in the eastern regions treated significantly more patients compared with the western parts of Germany. This difference was also observed between the north and south. Differences in patient groups (e.g. underlying diseases) were reported between different sub-groups of rheumatologists (e.g. internal specialists vs. GP vs. orthopedic rheumatologists). Integrated health care, as promoted by German social law, did not play a major role. Overall there was a high level of self-initiated training of physicians and participation in education of patients and other physicians.

[Current status and perspectives of ambulatory rheumatologic health care in Germany : economic structural conditions and motivation of rheumatologists]. / Bestandsaufnahme und Perspektiven der ambulanten rheumatologischen Versorgung in Deutschland : Okonomische Rahmenbedingungen und Motivation der Rheumatologen.

AIM: To gather information about current structures in rheumatologic ambulatory health care in Germany. Based on the results recommendations on future structures will be evaluated. METHODS: Data collection and statistical analysis via a structured 10-page questionnaire answered by members of the German Association of Rheumatologists. Questions in this second part of the study related to two topics: economic factors and a subjective assessment of the health care structures by the participants. RESULTS: Data from 197 ambulatory rheumatologists who participated in health care could be included in the analyses. Extensive and detailed data on economic issues surrounding ambulatory patient treatment and practice management from the perspective of ambulatory rheumatologists are presented (e.g., revenue, income, income differences between regions or practice size). In addition, perceptions of participating rheumatologists on future perspectives of patient treatment, health policy, and their own economical survival are reported. CONCLUSIONS: As in other specialties there is a significant difference not only between the eastern and western regions in Germany but also between the north and the south looking at e.g., revenue, income, with rheumatologists in the east treating significantly more patients. Reasons for those differences are not only related to regional remuneration schemes or the number of patients with a private but statutory health insurance, but are also driven by the number of different services provided (e.g., own laboratory). Physicians perceptions towards their own future in rheumatology are generally positive. Scepticism was reported for the individual economic survival in ambulatory treatment and future changes in health policy.