Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Schmerz ; 31(3): 246-254, 2017 Jun.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28493229

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The regular update of the guidelines on fibromyalgia syndrome, AWMF number 145/004, was scheduled for April 2017. METHODS: The guidelines were developed by 13 scientific societies and 2 patient self-help organizations coordinated by the German Pain Society. Working groups (n =8) with a total of 42 members were formed balanced with respect to gender, medical expertise, position in the medical or scientific hierarchy and potential conflicts of interest. A search of the literature for systematic reviews on randomized, controlled trials on patient education and shared decision-making from December 2010 to May 2016 was performed in the Cochrane library, MEDLINE, PsycINFO and Scopus databases. Levels of evidence were assigned according to the classification system of the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine version 2009. The strength of recommendations was achieved by multiple step formalized procedures to reach a consensus. Efficacy, risks, patient preferences, clinical and practical applicability of available therapies were weighed up against each other. The guidelines were reviewed and approved by the board of directors of the societies engaged in the development of the guidelines. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The diagnosis of fibromyalgia syndrome should be explicitly communicated to the affected individual. Shared decision-making with the patient on the therapeutic options based on individual preferences of the patient, comorbidities and the success of previous treatment is recommended. A step-wise treatment approach depending on the severity of fibromyalgia syndrome and the response to therapeutic measures is recommended.


Assuntos
Fibromialgia/diagnóstico , Fibromialgia/terapia , Comunicação Interdisciplinar , Colaboração Intersetorial , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/métodos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Tomada de Decisões , Fibromialgia/classificação , Alemanha , Humanos , Sociedades Médicas
2.
Schmerz ; 26(3): 268-75, 2012 Jun.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22760459

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The scheduled update to the German S3 guidelines on fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) by the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies ("Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften", AWMF; registration number 041/004) was planned starting in March 2011. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The development of the guidelines was coordinated by the German Interdisciplinary Association for Pain Therapy ("Deutsche Interdisziplinären Vereinigung für Schmerztherapie", DIVS), 9 scientific medical societies and 2 patient self-help organizations. Eight working groups with a total of 50 members were evenly balanced in terms of gender, medical field, potential conflicts of interest and hierarchical position in the medical and scientific fields. Literature searches were performed using the Medline, PsycInfo, Scopus and Cochrane Library databases (until December 2010). The grading of the strength of the evidence followed the scheme of the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. The formulation and grading of recommendations was accomplished using a multi-step, formal consensus process. The guidelines were reviewed by the boards of the participating scientific medical societies. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: A diagnosis of FMS should be explicitly communicated with the afflicted individual. A step-wise treatment, depending on the severity of FMS and the responses to therapeutic measures, is recommended. Therapy should only be continued if the positive effects outweigh the side effects. The English full-text version of this article is available at SpringerLink (under "Supplemental").


Assuntos
Comportamento Cooperativo , Fibromialgia/reabilitação , Comunicação Interdisciplinar , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Adulto , Terapia Combinada , Comunicação , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Fibromialgia/diagnóstico , Fibromialgia/psicologia , Humanos , Dor Intratável/diagnóstico , Dor Intratável/psicologia , Dor Intratável/reabilitação , Admissão do Paciente , Assistência Centrada no Paciente , Centros de Reabilitação , Transtornos Somatoformes/diagnóstico , Transtornos Somatoformes/psicologia , Transtornos Somatoformes/reabilitação
3.
Schmerz ; 22(3): 283-94, 2008 Jun.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18478270

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: A guideline for the treatment and diagnostic procedures for fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) was developed in cooperation with 10 German medical and psychological associations and 2 patient self-help groups. METHODS: A systematic literature search including all controlled studies evaluating physiotherapy, exercise and strength training as well as physical therapies was performed in the Cochrane Collaboration Reviews (1993-12/2006), Medline (1980-12/2006), PsychInfo (1966-12/2006) and Scopus (1980-12/2006). Levels of evidence were assigned according to the classification system of the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. Grading of the strengths of recommendations was done according to the German program for disease management guidelines. Standardized procedures to reach a consensus on recommendations were used. RESULTS: Patient's information at first diagnosis of FMS is strongly recommended (grade A). Patient-centered communication is recommended (grade B). A stepwise treatment approach depending on the adapatation to restrictions in daily life and response to treatment options can be considered (grade C). CONCLUSIONS: The long-term treatment should be based on principles of basic psychosomatic care and shared decision making on treatment options.


Assuntos
Fibromialgia/reabilitação , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Algoritmos , Terapia Combinada , Comportamento Cooperativo , Gerenciamento Clínico , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Fibromialgia/diagnóstico , Seguimentos , Alemanha , Humanos , Grupos de Autoajuda , Sociedades Médicas
4.
Gesundheitswesen ; 62(8-9): 451-6, 2000.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11037671

RESUMO

This study examines the relationship between psychosocial stress and social support before coronary surgery and the amount of health care utilization in a sample of 136 patients during postoperative hospitalization. The aim of the study is to test the hypothesis that there is a correlation between a high psychosocial stress profile and the utilization of medical care (so called high utilizers). The sample consists of 80.7% men and 19.3% women aged between 31 and 78 years (mean 64; sd 9.1). In this first data analysis psychosocial impact is assessed by anxiety, depression and social support (HADS-D, F-SOZU). Detailed somatic factors concerning severity of the illness, inpatient course and the utilization of health care (medication, technical examinations, consultations) are assessed by means of a documentation system. With regard to anxiety, depression and social support the sample is located within the normal range. In contrast to our expectations the results show that high scores of anxiety and depression as well as a low level of emotional support do not correlate significantly with an increased use of medication, the number of consultations and technical examinations. Furthermore no correlation has been found between the length of hospitalization and preoperative comorbidity as compared to the mentioned psychosocial stress variables. On the other hand the data analysis showed that about 30% of the patients during the postoperative period utilize about half of the total amount of the different medical treatments. In the postoperative period these high utilizers cannot be distinguished from the other patients, neither by sociodemographic variables nor by means of an increased psychosocial stress or severity of illness.


Assuntos
Ponte de Artéria Coronária/psicologia , Mau Uso de Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Apoio Social , Estresse Psicológico/complicações , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Alemanha , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Revisão da Utilização de Recursos de Saúde
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...