Biomechanical comparative study of midline cortical vs. traditional pedicle screw trajectory in osteoporotic bone.

INTRODUCTION: In lumbar spinal stabilization pedicle screws are used as standard. However, especially in osteoporosis, screw anchorage is a problem. Cortical bone trajectory (CBT) is an alternative technique designed to increase stability without the use of cement. In this regard, comparative studies showed biomechanical superiority of the MC (midline cortical bone trajectory) technique with longer cortical progression over the CBT technique. The aim of this biomechanical study was to comparatively investigate the MC technique against the not cemented pedicle screws (TT) in terms of their pullout forces and anchorage properties during sagittal cyclic loading according to the ASTM F1717 test. METHODS: Five cadavers (L1 to L5), whose mean age was 83.3 ± 9.9 years and mean T Score of -3.92 ± 0.38, were dissected and the vertebral bodies embedded in polyurethane casting resin. Then, one screw was randomly inserted into each vertebra using a template according to the MC technique and a second one was inserted by freehand technique with traditional trajectory (TT). The screws were quasi-static extracted from vertebrae L1 and L3, while for L2, L4 and L5 they were first tested dynamically according to ASTM standard F1717 (10,000 cycles at 1 Hz between 10 and 110 N) and then quasi-static extracted. In order to determine possible screw loosening, there movements were recorded during the dynamic tests using an optical measurement system. RESULTS: The pull-out tests show a higher pull-out strength for the MC technique of 555.4 ± 237.0 N compared to the TT technique 448.8 ± 303.2 N. During the dynamic tests (L2, L4, L5), 8 out of the 15 TT screws became loose before completing 10,000 cycles. In contrast, all 15 MC screws did not exceed the termination criterion and were thus able to complete the full test procedure. For the runners, the optical measurement showed greater relative movement of the TT variant compared to the MC variant. The pull-out tests also revealed that the MC variant had a higher pull-out strength, measuring at766.7 ± 385.4 N, while the TT variant measured 637.4 ± 435.6 N. CONCLUSION: The highest pullout forces were achieved by the MC technique. The main difference between the techniques was observed in the dynamic measurements, where the MC technique exhibited superior primary stability compared to the conventional technique in terms of primary stability. Overall, the MC technique in combination with template-guided insertion represents the best alternative for anchoring screws in osteoporotic bone without cement.

Spondylodiscitis in Geriatric Patients: What Are the Issues?

STUDY DESIGN: Review article. OBJECTIVES: A review of literature on the treatment of pyogenic spondylodiscitis in geriatric patients was performed with the aim to give an overview about these special patients and a recommendation on necessary diagnostics as well as conservative and operative treatment options. METHODS: A systematic computerized literature search was done by the spondylodiscitis working group of the German Society for Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery. RESULTS: Spondylodiscitis has an increasing incidence by age with a peak at 75 years or older. The 1-year mortality without an appropriate treatment is with 15 to 20% extremely high. Pathogen detection is the essential diagnostic step and the basis for a sufficient antibiotic treatment. Geriatric patients have initially less elevated inflammatory parameters. Compared to younger patients. They have a longer length of hospital stay and take longer for CRP normalization. Even the outcome between conservative and operative treatment is comparable after one year. Patients with spinal instability, immobilizing pain, epidural abscess, and newly emerged neurological deficits should be considered for operative treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The treatment of geriatric patients with pyogenic spondylodiscitis must take into account that these patients usually have multiple comorbidities. The main goals are resistance-based antibiotics and the shortest possible time of immobilization of the patient.

A Biomechanical Model for Testing Cage Subsidence in Spine Specimens with Osteopenia or Osteoporosis Under Permanent Maximum Load.

BACKGROUND: Intervertebral fusions in cases of reduced bone density are a tough challenge. From a biomechanical point of view, most current studies have focused on the range of motion or have shown test setups for single-component tests. Definitive setups for biomechanical testing of the primary stability of a 360° fusion using a screw-rod system and cage on osteoporotic spine are missing. The aim of this study was to develop a test stand to provide information about the bone-implant interface under reproducible conditions. METHODS: After pretesting with artificial bone, functional spine units were tested with 360° fusion in the transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion technique. The movement sequences were conducted in flexion/extension, right and left lateral bending, and right and left axial rotation on a human model with osteopenia or osteoporosis under permanent maximum load with 7.5 N-m. RESULTS: During the testing of human cadavers, 4 vertebrae were fully tested and were inconspicuous even after radiological and macroscopic examination. One vertebra showed a subsidence of 2 mm, and 1 vertebra had a cage collapsed into the vertebra. CONCLUSIONS: This setup is suitable for biomechanical testing of cyclical continuous loads on the spine with reduced bone quality or osteoporosis. The embedding method is stable and ensures a purely single-level setup with different trajectories, especially when using the cortical bone trajectory. Optical monitoring provides a very accurate indication of cage movement, which correlates with the macroscopic and radiological results.

Pyogenic Spondylodiscitis of the Thoracic Spine: Outcome of 1-Stage Posterior Versus 2-Stage Posterior and Anterior Spinal Reconstruction in Adults.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the clinical, radiologic, and functional outcomes of a 1-stage posterior treatment versus a 2-stage posterior-anterior treatment in patients with pyogenic thoracic spondylodiscitis. METHODS: A 1-stage posterior debridement, stabilization, and fusion with titanium-coated polyetheretherketone (PEEK) or mesh cage through a dorsolateral approach was performed in group A. A 2-stage procedure with initial posterior stabilization and debridement and second-stage fusion with a PEEK cage or mesh cage was performed with an anterior approach in group B. Clinical outcomes included Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire and visual analog scale score. Radiologic outcomes included fusion rate and kyphotic angle correction. Secondary variables included pathogens, complications, blood loss, and operative time. RESULTS: One-level spondylodiscitis was treated surgically in the thoracic spine of 47 patients: 25 patients in group A and 22 patients in group B. The most frequent segment was T12-L1 (27%). There was a significantly longer operative time and greater blood loss (P > 0.001) in group B. At last follow-up, sagittal profile reconstruction was significantly better (P > 0.05) in group B. Both groups showed similar radiologic results with fusion in 92% of cases. Improved clinical outcomes, pain, and quality of life were achieved in both groups with no significant differences between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Better reconstruction of the sagittal profile was achieved in the posterior-anterior-treated group, but this did not affect the clinical outcome. No significant differences were found in the clinical and functional outcomes between the 2 groups. Posterior-anterior combined treatment should be considered in cases of large anterior defects if a posterior reconstruction is inadequate.