Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 28
Filtrar
1.
Pharmaceuticals (Basel) ; 17(3)2024 Mar 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38543180

RESUMO

The recent introduction of the innovative therapy, onasemnogene abeparvovec (Zolgensma®), has revolutionized the spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) therapeutic landscape. Although Zolgensma® therapy has proven to lead to functional improvements in SMA children, some gaps in its safety profile still need to be investigated. To better characterize the Zolgensma® safety profile, we conducted a retrospective observational study, analyzing all the Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSRs) referred to it and collected in the European pharmacovigilance database between 1 January 2019 and 22 September 2023. We found 661 ICSRs related to Zolgensma®, with a growing trend in the annual reporting. The majority of the reports were sent by healthcare professionals and referred to infant females. In more than 90% of the cases, Zolgensma® was the only reported suspected drug. Out of a total of 2744 reported ADRs, increased hepatic enzymes, pyrexia, vomiting, and thrombocytopenia were the most commonly reported adverse reactions. Of these adverse reactions (ADRs), 56.9% were serious, causing or prolonging the patient's hospitalization. A total of 39 ICSRs related to cases with a fatal outcome. Alterations in the heart rhythm, acute hepatic failure, and hepatic cytolysis emerged among the cardiac and hepatic disorders, respectively.

2.
Pharmaceuticals (Basel) ; 16(11)2023 Nov 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38004476

RESUMO

Botulinum toxin is a protein deriving from the bacteria Clostridium botulinum and it is widely used for the treatment of a variety of muscle hyperactivity syndromes and for cosmetic indications. Having a long-lasting effect, Botulinum toxin type A (BTA) is one of the most botulin toxin products used. Even if BTA has shown benefits in reducing the vertical lines between the eyebrows, Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) have been experienced as well, of which the most common ones are headache and drooping eyelids. In addition, since other local and systemic risks have been identified, a non-interventional post-authorization safety study (PASS) has been started. The aim of the present study was to report cases of skin toxicity associated with this drug, considering Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSRs) existing on the Eudravigilance website. Among 1464 ICSRs sent to the EV database, 718 ICSRs, including 5154 PTs, reported BTA as a suspected drug associated with cutaneous toxicity. The majority of patients experiencing BTA-induced skin toxicity were female (92.1%) belonging mostly to the age group of 18-64 years. The most serious criteria, when reported, were "Other Medically Important Condition" and "Caused/prolonged hospitalization", although the outcome was mainly reported as "Unknown". The most reported PTs, related to skin disorders, were: "Erythema", "Rash", "Pruritus", "Urticaria", "Swelling face", "Brow ptosis", "Eyelid ptosis", "Injection site pain", and "Angioedema". Considering that in most ICSRs, ADRs related to skin disorders were symptoms of hypersensitivity reactions which in some conditions could be life-threatening, further studies are required to better define the safety profile of BTA used for aesthetic procedures.

3.
Front Pharmacol ; 14: 1245642, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38027019

RESUMO

Background: The risk of falls and bone fractures with sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors has been characterized by conflicting evidence. Therefore, we decided to investigate the reporting probability of falls and fractures by comparing SGLT2 inhibitors with DPP4 inhibitors. Methods A retrospective, pharmacovigilance study of the European database of Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSRs) was conducted. Disproportionality analyses (Reporting Odds Ratio, ROR) were conducted to compare the reporting probability of falls or fracture between treatments. Results A total of 507 ICSRs reporting at least one fall or fracture with SGLT2 inhibitors were identified. The most reported SGLT2 inhibitor was canagliflozin (N = 188; 36.9%), followed by empagliflozin (N = 176; 34.5%), and dapagliflozin (N = 143; 28.0%). A total of 653 events related to fall or bone fracture were reported. Fall was the most reported event (N = 333; 51.0%). Among fractures (N = 320; 49.0%), the most reported were foot fractures (N = 40; 6.1%) and hip fractures (N = 32; 4.9%). SGLT2 inhibitors were associated with a lower reporting probability of fall than DPP4 inhibitors (ROR, 0.66; 95%CI, 0.57-0.78). The lower reporting probability of fall was also observed when the single SGLT2 inhibitor was compared to DPP4 inhibitors: dapagliflozin (ROR, 0.67; 95%CI, 0.53-0.83), canagliflozin (ROR, 0.56; 95%CI, 0.45-0.70), and empagliflozin (ROR, 0.77; 95%CI, 0.63-0.94). For fractures, canagliflozin showed a slightly significant increased reporting when compared with DPP4 inhibitors (not confirmed in the sensitivity analysis), whereas all other comparison showed no statistically significant difference. Conclusion SGLT2 inhibitors were associated with a lower reporting probability of fall than DPP4 inhibitors, in accordance with the reassuring evidence about the safety profile of these drugs. Future researches will help to confirm their long-term safety profile.

4.
Front Immunol ; 13: 965171, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36263025

RESUMO

Introduction: Although the European Medicines Agency (EMA) encourage coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination in pregnant women, the scientific evidence supporting the use of COVID-19 vaccines during pregnancy is still limited. Aim: We aimed to investigate adverse events following immunization (AEFI) with COVID-19 vaccines during pregnancy. Methods: We retrieved Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSRs) related to the use of COVID-19 vaccines during pregnancy from the EudraVigilance database for the year 2021. We analyzed AEFI related to the mother and fetus/newborn. The reporting odds ratio (ROR) was computed to compare the reporting probability of spontaneous abortion between COVID-19 vaccines. Results: During the study period, among 1,315,315 ICSRs related to COVID-19 vaccines, we retrieved 3,252 (0.25%) reports related to the use in pregnancy. More than half (58.24%) of ICSRs were submitted by non-healthcare professionals. Although the majority (87.82%) of ICSRs concerned serious AEFI, their outcomes were mostly favorable. In this study, 85.0% of total ICSRs referred to pregnant women (n = 2,764), while 7.9% referred to fetuses/newborns (n = 258). We identified 16,569 AEFI. Moreover, 55.16% were AEFI not related to pregnancy (mostly headache, pyrexia, and fatigue), while 17.92% were pregnancy-, newborn-, or fetus-related AEFI. Among pregnancy-related AEFI, the most reported was spontaneous abortion. Messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines had a lower reporting probability of spontaneous abortion than viral vector-based vaccines (ROR 0.80, 95% CI 0.69-0.93). Moderna and Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccines had a higher reporting probability of spontaneous abortion (ROR 1.2, 95% CI 1.05-1.38 and ROR 1.26, 95% CI 1.08-1.47, respectively), while a lower reporting probability was found for Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine compared with all other COVID-19 vaccines (ROR 0.73, 95% CI 0.64-0.84). In addition, 5.8% of ICSRs reported a fatal outcome. Conclusions: No strong insight of unknown AEFI associated with COVID-19 vaccination in pregnant women was observed. Considering the high risk associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, our analysis suggests that the benefits of COVID-19 vaccines during pregnancy outweigh the possible risks. However, it is important to continue monitoring the safety profile of COVID-19 vaccines in this subpopulation.


Assuntos
Aborto Espontâneo , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Gravidez , Aborto Espontâneo/epidemiologia , Aborto Espontâneo/etiologia , Sistemas de Notificação de Reações Adversas a Medicamentos , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19/efeitos adversos , Gestantes , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacinação/efeitos adversos , Vacinas de mRNA
5.
Front Pediatr ; 10: 929122, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35935358

RESUMO

Background: Blinatumomab is a bispecific CD19-directed CD3 T-cell engager that has proven efficacy in children with relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Despite its efficacy, it has also been associated with the development of potentially serious adverse events such as the cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurologic events. The present meta-analysis aimed to assess the safety profile of blinatumomab in terms of serious adverse events, CRS, and neurologic events (such as seizure and encephalopathy) in pediatric patients with B-cell ALL. Methods and findings: A systematic review was conducted in Pubmed up to December 10, 2021 to retain pediatric clinical trials on blinatumomab. A random effect meta-analysis approach was used. This study followed the PRISMA statement. Four out of the 255 initial references were selected, of which 2 were phase 1/2 clinical trials and 2 phase 3 clinical trials. Blinatumomab was associated with a lower risk of serious adverse events (Risk ratio RR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.32-0.99), febrile neutropenia (RR, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.06-0.26), infection (RR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.29-0.56), and grade ≥ 3 adverse events (RR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.67-0.93) compared to chemotherapy. No difference in the risk of CRS (RR, 8.37; 95% CI, 0.27-260.97) and seizure (RR, 6.43; 95% CI, 0.79-53.08) was observed between groups, while for encephalopathy a higher risk was associated with blinatumomab compared to chemotherapy (RR, 8.90; 95% CI, 1.08-73.29). Conclusion: Our data support the good safety profile of bliantumomab in treating pediatric patients with B-ALL.

6.
Pharmaceuticals (Basel) ; 15(6)2022 May 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35745596

RESUMO

Few data have been published on the effects of impaired glucose metabolism induced by COVID-19 vaccines. We decided to perform a study to describe Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSRs) of impaired glucose metabolism events reported in the European database (Eudravigilance, EV). ICSRs were retrieved from the online website of Eudravigilance. The reporting odds ratios (ROR) were computed to assess the reporting frequency for COVID-19 mRNA vaccines compared to COVID-19 viral vector-based vaccines. A total of 3917 ICSRs with a COVID-19 vaccine suspected were retrieved, with a total of 4275 impaired glucose metabolism events. Overall, the most reported events were related to "high glucose levels" (2012; 47.06%). The mRNA vaccines were associated with an increased reporting frequency of "type 1 diabetes mellitus" (ROR 1.86; 95% CI 1.33-2.60), "type 2 diabetes mellitus" (ROR 1.58; 95% CI 1.03-2.42), "high glucose levels" (ROR 1.16; 95% CI 1.06-1.27), "diabetes mellitus inadequate control" (ROR 1.63; 95% CI 1.25-2.11), and "hypoglycemia" (ROR 1.62; 95% CI 1.41-1.86) compared to viral vector-based vaccines. mRNA COVID-19 vaccines were associated with an increased reporting frequency of alterations of glucose homeostasis compared to viral-vector COVID-19 vaccines. Clinicians should be aware of these events to better manage glycemic perturbations. Larger nationwide studies are warranted to verify these findings.

7.
Front Oncol ; 12: 824511, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35372076

RESUMO

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are widely used improving clinical outcomes in many cancer patients. However, they can induce serious consequences, like neurological immune-related adverse drug reactions (NirADRs). Although these are rare complications, they can be serious with important impact on patients' quality of life. Our purpose is to describe these adverse events observed in the European clinical practice context. We carried out a descriptive analysis of individual case safety reports (ICSRs) related to ICIs collected until February 7, 2020, in the European spontaneous reporting database, EudraVigilance, and reported nervous disorders as suspect adverse drug reactions (ADRs). NirADRs were classified according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA). In order to identify a hypothetical different reporting probability of the NirADR types between the ICI classes, we carried out a disproportionality analysis. The reporting odds ratio (ROR) with 95% CI was computed comparing the different ICI classes to each other based on their pharmacological target [the cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4), the programmed death-1 (PD-1) or its ligand (PD-L1)]. Finally, we researched in the literature the hypothesized mechanisms, which could explain the onset of these ICI-related neurological complications. Overall, we found 4,875 cases describing 6,429 ICI-related suspected NirADRs. ICI-related neurotoxicities include a wide range of central and peripheral events. These were mainly related to anti-PD-1 agents and occurred in male patients (59%). Our analysis confirmed a gender difference of NirADRs. Twenty-three percent of the events (comprising myasthenia gravis, neuropathy peripheral, and cerebral infarction) had unfavorable fallouts, including fatal outcome (7%). Majority of the NirADRs were categorized as "Neurological disorders NEC" HLGTs MedDRA (2,076; 32%). In 1,094 cases (22%), more NirADRs overlapped with other neurologic complications. An interesting overlapping of myasthenia gravis with myositis or myocarditis emerged. From our disproportionality analysis, an increased reporting probability of peripheral neuropathies and headaches emerged with ipilimumab when compared to anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 agents. However, neuromuscular disorders were more probably reported with anti-PD-1. Several pathogenic mechanisms, including neuronal damage by T cells and autoantibodies and/or cytokine-mediated inflammation processes, have been hypothesized. However, the pathogenesis of these ICI-related complications is not completely understood. Considering the recent marketing authorizations of ICIs, further studies are strongly needed to monitor their neurologic safety profile.

8.
Pharmaceuticals (Basel) ; 15(3)2022 Feb 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35337085

RESUMO

Dapagliflozin was associated with an increased risk of diabetic ketoacidosis that has led to the European withdrawal of the authorization for the type 1 diabetes. However, it is still used for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Therefore, we aim to evaluate the occurrence of dapagliflozin-induced ketoacidosis events by using the European spontaneous reporting system. The reporting odds ratios (ROR) were computed to assess the reporting frequency of ketoacidosis events for dapagliflozin compared to Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, insulins, or all other Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors. A total of 2406 cases with dapagliflozin reported at least one event of ketoacidosis. The three most reported events were: diabetic ketoacidosis (1412; 55.39%), ketoacidosis (476; 18.67%), and euglycaemic diabetic ketoacidosis (296; 11.61%). Dapagliflozin was associated with the higher reporting frequency of ketoacidosis events compared to DPP-4 inhibitors (ROR 12.07, 95%CI 11.67-13.81) or insulins (ROR 7.59, 95%CI 7.13-7.89). A lower reporting frequency was instead observed compared to other SGLT2 inhibitors (ROR 0.91, 95%CI 0.87-0.96). Considering the higher reporting frequency of ketoacidosis observed with dapagliflozin then DPP-4 inhibitors or insulins, attention should be given to patients treated with this drug.

10.
Pharmacol Res ; 176: 106062, 2022 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35017046

RESUMO

Gliflozins are a novel class of oral anti-diabetic drugs, acting as inhibitors of sodium-glucose co-transporters (SGLTs) through the proximal convoluted tubules (PCT) and intestinal epithelium. The sodium-glucose co-transporters 2 (SGLT2) are mainly expressed in S1 and S2 segments of the proximal convoluted tubule in the kidneys. Clinical guidelines recommend their use especially in Type 2 Diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients with vascular complications and/or heart failure highlighting the importance of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) pleiotropic effects. Interestingly, cognitive decline is a widely recognized complication of T2DM and, in addition, to clarify its pathophysiology, there is an urgent need to understand how and if diabetes therapies can control diabetes-related cognitive dysfunction. At the time, although SGLT2 proteins are present in the Central Nervous System (CNS), the SGLT2i effects on cognitive impairments remain partly unknown. In pre-clinical studies, SGLT2i ameliorates cognitive dysfunction in obese and T2DM mice, reducing oxidative stress, neuroinflammation and improving neuronal plasticity and mitochondrial brain pathway. In addition, SGLT2i could bring back mTOR to a physiological state of activation, stopping neurodegenerative diseases' onset or progression. Instead, clinical studies on T2DM-related cognitive dysfunction treated by SGLT2i are much more limited. For these reasons, further studies are needed to better elucidate if SGLT2i therapy can affect T2DM-related cognitive decline. In this scenario, this review aims to summarize the state of knowledge on the role of SGLT2i in T2DM-related cognitive dysfunction and stimulate new clinical trials.


Assuntos
Disfunção Cognitiva/tratamento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Fármacos Neuroprotetores/uso terapêutico , Inibidores do Transportador 2 de Sódio-Glicose/uso terapêutico , Animais , Encéfalo/efeitos dos fármacos , Encéfalo/metabolismo , Disfunção Cognitiva/etiologia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Humanos , Transportador 2 de Glucose-Sódio/metabolismo
11.
Pharmacol Res ; 175: 106035, 2022 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34915125

RESUMO

The incidence of heart failure is primarily flat or declining for a presumably reflecting better management of cardiovascular diseases, but that of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is probably increasing for the lack of an established effective treatment. Moreover, there is no specific pharmacological treatment for patients with heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) since no substantial prospective randomized clinical trial has been performed exclusively in such population. According to the recent 2021 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines, the triad composed of an Angiotensin Converting Enzyme inhibitor or Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitor (ARNI), a beta-blocker, and a Mineralcorticoid Receptor Antagonist is the cornerstone therapy for all patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) but a substantial gap exists for patients with HFpEF/HFmrEF. Despite the important role of the Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System (RAAS) in heart failure pathophysiology, RAAS blockers were found ineffective for HFpEF patients. Indeed, even the new drug class of ARNI was found effective only in HFrEF patients. In this regard, a therapeutic alternative may be represented by drug stimulating the non-classic RAAS (ACE2 and A1-7) as well as other emerging drug classes (such as SGLT2 inhibitors). Reflecting on this global health burden and the gap in treatments among heart failure phenotypes, we summarize the leading players of heart failure pathophysiology, the available pharmacological treatments for each heart failure phenotype, and that in future development.


Assuntos
Insuficiência Cardíaca/tratamento farmacológico , Animais , Doença Crônica , Insuficiência Cardíaca/metabolismo , Hormônios/metabolismo , Humanos
12.
Pharmaceuticals (Basel) ; 14(12)2021 Dec 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34959662

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: General and local anaesthetics are widely used during surgery. These drugs have peculiar safety profiles, being commonly associated with mild and reversible local adverse drug reactions (ADRs), but also with more severe and systemic ADRs, including respiratory and cardiovascular depression and anaphylaxis. METHODS AND OBJECTIVES: We carried out a descriptive analysis of Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSRs) sent to the Campania Regional Centre of Pharmacovigilance (Southern Italy) from 2001 to 2021 that reported general or local anaesthetics as suspected drugs, with the aim of describing their overall characteristics, focussing on the ADRs' seriousness and distribution by System Organ Class (SOC) and Preferred Term (PT). RESULTS: A total of 110 ICSRs documenting general or local anaesthetics were sent to the Italian pharmacovigilance database during 20 years of spontaneous reporting activities in the Campania region. ADRs mainly occurred in patients with a median age of 48 years and in a slightly higher percentage of men. ADRs were more commonly classified as not serious and had a favourable outcome. In terms of ADRs' distribution by SOC and PT, both general and local anaesthetics were associated with general and cutaneous disorders, with common ADRs that included lack of efficacy, rash, and erythema. In addition, general anaesthetics were associated with the occurrence of respiratory ADRs, while local anaesthetics were associated with the occurrence of nervous ADRs. CONCLUSION: Even though a limited number of ICSRs documenting anaesthetics-induced ADRs were retrieved from the Italian spontaneous reporting database in the Campania region, we believe that the continuous monitoring of these drugs is highly recommended, especially among the frail population.

13.
Front Pharmacol ; 12: 667254, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33959029

RESUMO

The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) firstly considered as a cardiovascular circulating hormonal system, it is now accepted as a local tissue system that works synergistically or independently with the circulating one. Evidence states that tissue RAAS locally generates mediators with regulatory homeostatic functions, thus contributing, at some extent, to organ dysfunction or disease. Specifically, RAAS can be divided into the traditional RAAS pathway (or classic RAAS) mediated by angiotensin II (AII), and the non-classic RAAS pathway mediated by angiotensin 1-7. Both pathways operate in the heart and lung. In the heart, the classic RAAS plays a role in both hemodynamics and tissue remodeling associated with cardiomyocyte and endothelial dysfunction, leading to progressive functional impairment. Moreover, the local classic RAAS may predispose the onset of atrial fibrillation through different biological mechanisms involving inflammation, accumulation of epicardial adipose tissue, and electrical cardiac remodeling. In the lung, the classic RAAS regulates cell proliferation, immune-inflammatory response, hypoxia, and angiogenesis, contributing to lung injury and different pulmonary diseases (including COVID-19). Instead, the local non-classic RAAS counteracts the classic RAAS effects exerting a protective action on both heart and lung. Moreover, the non-classic RAAS, through the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), mediates the entry of the etiological agent of COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) into cells. This may cause a reduction in ACE2 and an imbalance between angiotensins in favor of AII that may be responsible for the lung and heart damage. Drugs blocking the classic RAAS (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers) are well known to exert a cardiovascular benefit. They are recently under evaluation for COVID-19 for their ability to block AII-induced lung injury altogether with drugs stimulating the non-classic RAAS. Herein, we discuss the available evidence on the role of RAAS in the heart and lung, summarizing all clinical data related to the use of drugs acting either by blocking the classic RAAS or stimulating the non-classic RAAS.

14.
Ital J Pediatr ; 47(1): 97, 2021 Apr 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33882987

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In 2019, a multidisciplinary panel of experts from eight Italian scientific paediatric societies developed a consensus document for the use of inhaled corticosteroids in the management and prevention of the most common paediatric airways disorders. The aim is to provide healthcare providers with a multidisciplinary document including indications useful in the clinical practice. The consensus document was intended to be addressed to paediatricians who work in the Paediatric Divisions, the Primary Care Services and the Emergency Departments, as well as to Residents or PhD students, paediatric nurses and specialists or consultants in paediatric pulmonology, allergy, infectious diseases, and ear, nose, and throat medicine. METHODS: Clinical questions identifying Population, Intervention(s), Comparison and Outcome(s) were addressed by methodologists and a general agreement on the topics and the strength of the recommendations (according to the GRADE system) was obtained following the Delphi method. The literature selection included secondary sources such as evidence-based guidelines and systematic reviews and was integrated with primary studies subsequently published. RESULTS: The expert panel provided a number of recommendations on the use of inhaled corticosteroids in preschool wheezing, bronchial asthma, allergic and non-allergic rhinitis, acute and chronic rhinosinusitis, adenoid hypertrophy, laryngitis and laryngospasm. CONCLUSIONS: We provided a multidisciplinary update on the current recommendations for the management and prevention of the most common paediatric airways disorders requiring inhaled corticosteroids, in order to share useful indications, identify gaps in knowledge and drive future research.


Assuntos
Corticosteroides/administração & dosagem , Doenças Respiratórias/tratamento farmacológico , Administração por Inalação , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Consenso , Técnica Delfos , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Itália , Masculino , Sociedades Médicas
15.
Int J Cardiol Congenit Heart Dis ; 6: 100266, 2021 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35360668

RESUMO

Background: real-world data on COVID-19 vaccine safety, immunogenicity and acceptance in adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD) are lacking. Methods: ACHD patients who were offered COVID-19 vaccination from January to June 2021 were included. Data on adverse events, on patients' attitude towards vaccination and antispike IgG titre were retrospectively collected. A group of healthy individuals with similar age and sex undergoing vaccination was included for comparison. Results: 208 patients followed in a single ACHD tertiary centre (33.3 [26-45] years, 54% male) received COVID-19 vaccine, 65% vaccinated at our institution: 199 (96%) received Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 vaccine, 4 (2%) Moderna-1273 and 5 (2%) AstraZeneca-ChAdOx1. Median follow-up after vaccination was 79 [57-96] days. No major adverse event was reported and the incidence of minor events was not different between ACHD patients and the control group. One patient was diagnosed with acute pericarditis. There were two deaths unrelated to the vaccine during follow-up. Three (1.5%) vaccinated patients tested positive for COVID-19. Antispike IgG titre, available in 159 (76%) patients, was 1334 [600-3401] BAU/ml, not significantly different from the control group (p=0.2). One patient with Fontan failure was seronegative. Advanced physiological stage was associated with lower antibody response, independently from previous viral exposure (p<0.0001). Fourteen percent refused COVID-19 vaccination at our institution. However, 50% of vaccinated patients declared to have been influenced by the discussion with the ACHD cardiologist and 66% of those vaccinated in situ reported that undergoing COVID-19 vaccination at the ACHD centre made them feel safer. Conclusion: COVID-19 vaccines appear safe in ACHD with satisfactory immunogenicity. However, the most vulnerable patients showed lower antibody response. ACHD team may play a key role in vaccine acceptance.

16.
Drug Saf ; 44(3): 337-349, 2021 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33351170

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors (PCSK9Is) were associated with a risk of neurocognitive adverse drug reactions (ADRs). OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate the occurrence of neuropsychiatric ADRs related to PCSK9Is. METHODS: We analyzed Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSRs) sent through the European pharmacovigilance database that reported alirocumab or evolocumab as the suspected drug and at least one neurological or psychiatric ADR. The reporting odds ratio (ROR) was computed to compare the probability of reporting ICSRs with neuropsychiatric ADRs between alirocumab, evolocumab and statins. RESULTS: Overall, 2041 ICSRs with alirocumab and/or evolocumab as the suspected drug described the occurrence of neuropsychiatric ADRs. The most reported preferred terms for both drugs were headache, insomnia and depression. No difference between alirocumab and evolocumab was observed for the RORs of ICSRs with ADRs belonging to the System Organ Classes (SOCs) 'Nervous system disorders' or 'Psychiatric disorders' (ROR 1.02, 95% confidence interval 0.91-1.14; and 1.12, 95% CI 0.94-1.34, respectively), while evolocumab and alirocumab had a higher reporting probability of ICSRs with ADRs belonging to the SOC 'Nervous system disorders' compared with atorvastatin and fluvastatin. A lower reporting probability was instead found for ICSRs with ADRs belonging to the SOC 'Psychiatric disorders' for evolocumab and alirocumab versus simvastatin, pravastatin and rosuvastatin. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrated that 22.7% of all ICSRs reporting alirocumab or evolocumab as suspect drugs described the occurrence of neuropsychiatric ADRs. The ROR showed that evolocumab and alirocumab had a higher reporting probability of neurological ADRs compared with statins. Further data from real-life contexts are needed.


Assuntos
Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases , Sistemas de Notificação de Reações Adversas a Medicamentos , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/epidemiologia , Humanos , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases/efeitos adversos , Inibidores de PCSK9 , Pró-Proteína Convertase 9
17.
Front Pharmacol ; 11: 830, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32581796

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in clinical practice has brought significant benefits for patients. Seven ICIs are available in Europe: nivolumab, pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, avelumab, durvalumab, cemiplimab, and ipilimumab. Despite their proven clinical efficacy, these innovative drugs may cause serious immune-related adverse drugs reactions (irADRs). Given the significance of these ADRs for patients' health, we analyzed individual case safety reports (ICSRs) related to ICIs, focusing on those reporting irADRs, collected in the Italian spontaneous reporting database. METHODS: We analyzed ICI-induced irADRs collected in the Italian Pharmacovigilance database (Rete Nazionale di Farmacovigilanza [RNF]) from January 1, 2002, to February 28, 2019, focusing on those reported in the Campania Region. We retrieved from an open-access Italian pharmacovigilance system, the RAM system (for national safety data), and from the RNF (for Campania safety data) all ICSRs reporting ADRs related to ICIs authorized until the analysis date. Focusing on irADRs, we performed descriptive and disproportionality analyses through the reporting odds ratio (ROR) with 95% confidence interval. RESULTS: National results. Among 2,088 ICI-related ICSRs, 801 reported irADRs. The majority of such ADRs occurred in male patients reporting gastrointestinal and skin toxicities. Nivolumab and pembrolizumab were drugs most commonly reported as suspect drugs. Compared to other ICIs, ROR was statistically significant for pembrolizumab and ipilimumab.Campania Region results. Out of 253 ICI-related ICSRs sent to Regional Pharmacovigilance Center of Campania Region, 121 reported at least one ICI-induced irADR. These were serious in 37.2% of cases and had an unfavorable outcome in 32.2% of cases. Overall, out of 8 ICSRs reported ADR with a fatal outcome, four reported irADRs. From disproportionality analyses on Campania Region ICSRs, statistically significant ROR emerged only for ipilimumab. CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed that during the study period several serious irADRs were reported, some of which had fatal outcome. Given the clinical relevance of irADRs, further investigations in real-life context are necessary for a better characterization of ICIs safety profiles. Oncologists should be trained to early recognize and adequately manage irADRs. Patients should also be educated to immediately report any new symptom or worsening of pre-existed ones during the ICI treatment.

18.
Int Immunopharmacol ; 84: 106519, 2020 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32311668

RESUMO

The new coronavirus outbreak is an ongoing pandemic that is caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The new coronavirus SARS-Cov-2 belongs to the subfamily of ß-coronaviruses and shares 79.5% of the genetic sequence of SARS-CoV, the causative agent of the epidemic that started in 2002 and ended in 2004. Considering the clinical impact of the new outbreak, it is highly important to study the potential responses of the human immune system during the SARS-CoV-2 infection as well as the role of virus-specific T cells and by B-lymphocytes. Moreover, specific data on the production of IgG and IgM is crucial to allow the rapid identification of the infection. In this paper we also described the importance of sensitive and specific rapid test for SARS-CoV-2. Indeed, this test represents an important immunological tool aimed at identifying the precise phase of the infection in order to undertake a more appropriate pharmacological treatment. Lastly, we provided an overview of pharmacological treatments aimed to reduce inflammatory processes underlying the infection and the need for the discovery of a new vaccine against SARS-CoV-2.


Assuntos
Anti-Inflamatórios/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Betacoronavirus , Infecções por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Infecções por Coronavirus/imunologia , Pneumonia Viral/diagnóstico , Pneumonia Viral/imunologia , COVID-19 , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Infecções por Coronavirus/prevenção & controle , Infecções por Coronavirus/virologia , Humanos , Inflamação/tratamento farmacológico , Inflamação/patologia , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Pneumonia Viral/prevenção & controle , Pneumonia Viral/virologia , SARS-CoV-2 , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Testes Sorológicos , Fatores de Tempo , Vacinas Virais/imunologia
19.
Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol ; 12(11): 1027-1032, 2019 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31608706

RESUMO

Introduction: In recent years, a significant decrease in the number of clinical trials was observed among EU countries. This decline could be attributed to several factors, including the financial crisis of EU countries, the requirements introduced by the Directive 2001/20/EC and the increased market attractiveness of not EU countries.Areas covered: The EU Clinical Trials Regulation (CTR) 536/2014 was adopted in April 2014 by the European Parliament. The main changes arising from the CTR, including but not limited to the activation of a new EU portal, the potentiation of the already existing EU database and the requirement to provide plain language summaries of clinical trials, are aimed to improve the competitiveness of Europe in clinical research scenario and promote a faster approval of clinical trials. In this review, data related to the CTR 536/2014 and its potential implications in terms of transparency are based on pertinent papers that were retrieved by the PubMed database and the internet.Expert opinion: The full implementation of the CTR 536/2014 requires close cooperation between EU member states and regulatory agencies. Some aspects should be carefully considered such as the interaction with ethics committees, the insurance coverage and the protection of personal data issues.


Assuntos
Pesquisa Biomédica/legislação & jurisprudência , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto/legislação & jurisprudência , União Europeia , Humanos , Cooperação Internacional/legislação & jurisprudência
20.
Expert Opin Drug Saf ; 18(5): 427-433, 2019 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30907147

RESUMO

Objectives: Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines have proved to be effective in preventing cervical carcinoma. Although their safety profile resembled those of any other vaccine, few clinical studies showed that HPV vaccines might also induce severe adverse events. Methods: The authors aimed to investigate the safety profile of HPV vaccines, by analyzing the individual case safety reports (ICSRs) of a suspected adverse event following immunization (AEFI) concerning HPV vaccines that were sent to the Italian Pharmacovigilance Spontaneous Reporting System (RNF) in the Campania Region from January 2007 to September 2018. Results: During the study period, 82 ICSRs, covering 181 AEFIs, related to HPV vaccines were sent to the RNF in the Campania Region. The mean age of patients who experienced an AEFI after HPV vaccinations was 13 ± 4.5 years. The majority of ICSRs reported AEFIs that were considered as not serious (82%) and that had a favorable outcome (93%). Conclusion: The overall results of the study demonstrated that, except for a few cases, AEFIs related to HPV vaccines reflect those already reported in the summary of product characteristics. The authors did not identify any new safety issues or serious, rare or unexpected AEFIs that were medically confirmed to be related to HPV vaccines.


Assuntos
Sistemas de Notificação de Reações Adversas a Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/efeitos adversos , Farmacovigilância , Vacinação/efeitos adversos , Adolescente , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Itália/epidemiologia , Masculino , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/administração & dosagem , Vacinação/métodos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...