Comparing the diagnostic value of 68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen PET/CT and multiparametric MRI in pelvic lymph node metastasis of locally advanced prostate cancer.

Background: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) is a commonly used method to diagnose pelvic lymph node metastasis (PLNM) in prostate cancer (PCa) patients, but there are few comparative studies on mpMRI and 68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) in locally advanced PCa (LAPC) patients. Therefore, we designed a retrospective study to compare the diagnostic value of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI for PLNM of LAPC. Methods: A retrospective study was performed on 50 patients with LAPC who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) in Tongji Hospital from 2021 to 2023. All patients underwent PET/CT and mpMRI examination, and were diagnosed as LAPC before surgery, followed by robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy or laparoscopic RP and extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND). Routine postoperative pathological examination was performed. According to the results, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI for the diagnosis of PLNM of LAPC were compared. Results: Among the 50 patients, the mean age was 65.5±10.3 years, the preoperative total serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was 30.7±12.3 ng/mL, and the Gleason score was 7 [7, 8]. The difference in diagnostic efficacy between 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI in the preoperative diagnosis of PLNM of PCa was determined by postoperative pathological results. Based on the number of patients who developed PLNM, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT were as follows: 93.75%, 100.00%, 100.00%, 97.14%, and 68.75%, 97.06%, 91.67%, 86.84% for mpMRI, respectively. Based on the number of pelvic metastatic lymph nodes, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT were 95.24%, 100.00%, 100.00%, 99.48%, and 65.08%, 99.13%, 89.13%, 96.30% for mpMRI, respectively. It turned out that PET/CT was more sensitive than mpMRI in detecting PLNM of PCa, and the difference was statistically significant. Conclusions: 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT is more sensitive than mpMRI in the detection of PLNM in patients with LAPC. It is a promising method in the diagnosis and preoperative assessment of PLNM in LAPC.

Molecular imaging with 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in high grade glioma: A biomarker for tumour neo-angiogenesis.

There are several promising radiotracers used for both staging and restaging of primary and recurrent brain tumours based on various mechanisms of tracer localization in tumour cells. 68Ga-PSMA PET has extremely low background uptake in normal brain tissue and consequently high tumour-to-brain ratio making it a promising imaging radiotracer for gliomas. 68Ga-PSMA demonstrates utility in evaluating high grade glioma during both initial workup or when suspecting recurrence. Herein the authors evaluate the role of this imaging modality and the potential future it holds in the management of high grade gliomas.

Clinical Factors That Influence Repeat 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT Scan Positivity in Patients with Recurrent Prostate Cancer Under Observation After a Negative 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT Scan: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.

This analysis aimed to identify clinical factors associated with positivity on repeat 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT after a negative scan in patients with recurrent prostate cancer (PCa) under observation. Methods: This single-center, retrospective analysis included patients who underwent at least 2 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT scans (PET1 and PET2) at UCLA between October 2016 and June 2021 for recurrent PCa with negative PET1 and no PCa-related treatments between the 2 scans. Using Prostate Cancer Molecular Imaging Standardized Evaluation criteria to define negative and positive scans, the final cohort was divided into PET2-negative (PET2-Neg) and PET2-positive (PET2-Pos). The same PET1 was used twice in the more than 2 PET cases with inclusion criteria fulfilled. Patient characteristics and clinical parameters were compared between the 2 cohorts using Mann-Whitney U test and Fisher exact test. Areas under the curve (AUCs) of the receiver operating characteristic and the Youden index were computed to determine the discrimination ability of statistically significant factors and specific cut points that maximized sensitivity and specificity, respectively. Results: The final analysis included 83 sets of 2 PET/CT scans from 70 patients. Thirty-nine of 83 (47%) sets were PET2-Neg, and 44 of 83 (53%) sets were PET2-Pos. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) increased from PET1 to PET2 for all 83 (100%) sets of scans. Median PSA at PET1 was 0.4 ng/mL (interquartile range, 0.2-1.0) and at PET2 was 1.6 ng/mL (interquartile range, 0.9-3.8). We found higher serum PSA at PET2 (median, 1.8 vs. 1.1 ng/mL; P = 0.015), absolute PSA difference (median, 1.4 vs. 0.7 ng/mL; P = 0.006), percentage of PSA change (median, +270.4% vs. +150.0%: P = 0.031), and median PSA velocity (0.044 vs. 0.017 ng/mL/wk, P = 0.002) and shorter PSA doubling time (DT; median, 5.1 vs. 8.3 mo; P = 0.006) in the PET2-Pos cohort than in the PET2-Neg cohort. Receiver operating characteristic curves showed cutoffs for PSA at PET2 of 4.80 ng/mL (sensitivity, 34%; specificity, 92%; AUC, 0.66), absolute PSA difference of 0.95 ng/mL (sensitivity, 62%; specificity, 71%; AUC, 0.68), percentage of PSA change of a positive 289.50% (sensitivity, 48%; specificity, 82%; AUC, 0.64), PSA velocity of 0.033 ng/mL/wk (sensitivity, 57%; specificity, 80%; AUC, 0.70), and PSA DT of 7.91 mo (sensitivity, 71%; specificity, 62%; AUC, 0.67). Conclusion: Patients with recurrent PCa under observation after a negative 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT scan with markedly elevated serum PSA levels and shorter PSA DT are more likely to have positive findings on repeat 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT.

Comparison of 18F-DCFPyL and 68Ga-PSMA-11 for 177Lu-PSMA-617 therapy patient selection.

Purpose: 68Ga-PSMA-11 is recommended for the selection of patients for treatment in the package insert for 177Lu-PSMA-617. We aimed to compare imaging properties and post-treatment outcomes from radioligand therapy (RLT) of patients selected with 68Ga-PSMA-11 and 18F-DCFPyL. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 80 patients undergoing PSMA RLT, who had pretreatment imaging using either 68Ga-PSMA-11 or 18F-DCFPyL. For both groups, we compared the biodistribution and lesion uptake and the PSA response to treatment. Results: Both agents had comparable biodistribution. Patients initially imaged with 18F-DCFPyL had a higher PSA response (66% vs. 42%), and more patients had a PSA50 response (72% vs. 43%) compared to patients imaged with 68Ga-PSMA-11. Conclusion: 18F-DCFPyL and 68Ga-PSMA-11 had comparable biodistribution and lesion uptake. Patients imaged with 18F-DCFPyL demonstrated clinical benefit to PSMA RLT comparable to those imaged with 68Ga-PSMA-11, and either agent can be used for screening patients.

68Ga-PSMA-11 PET and mpMRI in the diagnosis of initial lymph node staging of prostate cancer: a head-to-head comparative meta-analysis.

Purpose: This meta-analysis evaluates the comparative diagnostic efficacy of 68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen-11 PET (68Ga-PSMA-11 PET) and multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) for the initial lymph node staging of prostate cancer. Methods: We searched PubMed and Embase databases through October 2023 for studies that provide a head-to-head comparison of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET and mpMRI, using pelvic lymph node dissection as the gold standard. We assessed sensitivity and specificity using the DerSimonian and Laird method, with variance stabilization via the Freeman-Tukey double inverse sine transformation. The quality of included studies was evaluated using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Performance Studies (QUADAS-2) tool. Results: The meta-analysis incorporated 13 articles, involving a total of 1,527 patients. 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET demonstrated an overall sensitivity of 0.73 (95% CI: 0.51-0.91) and a specificity of 0.94 (95% CI: 0.88-0.99). In comparison, mpMRI showed a sensitivity of 0.49 (95% CI: 0.30-0.68) and a specificity of 0.94 (95% CI: 0.88-0.99). Although 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET appeared to be more sensitive than mpMRI, the differences in sensitivity (p = 0.11) and specificity (p = 0.47) were not statistically significant. Conclusion: Our findings indicated that 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET and mpMRI exhibit similar sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of initial lymph node staging of prostate cancer. However, given that most included studies were retrospective, further prospective studies with larger sample sizes are essential to validate these results. Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO code is CRD42023495266.

Prospective investigation of amino acid transport and PSMA-targeted positron emission tomography for metastatic lobular breast carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To explore the feasibility of imaging amino-acid transport and PSMA molecular pathways in the detection of metastatic breast invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) and if there is superior detection compared to standard-of-care imaging [computed tomography (CT)/bone scan, or 18F-FDG positron-emission-tomography (PET)-CT]. METHODS: 20 women with de-novo or suspected metastatic ILC underwent two PET-CT scans with 18F-fluciclovine and 68Ga-PSMA-11 on separate days. Uptake per patient and in 3 regions per patient - ipsilateral axillary lymph node (LN), extra-axillary LN (ipsilateral supraclavicular or internal mammary), or distant sites of disease - was compared to standard-of-care imaging (CT/bone scan in 13 patients and 18F-FDG PET-CT in 7 patients). Results were correlated to a composite standard of truth. Confirmed detection rate (cDR) was compared using McNemar's test. Mean SUVmax of 18F-fluciclovine and 68Ga-PSMA-11 in the most avid lesion for each true positive metastatic region and intact primary lesion were compared by t-test. RESULTS: The cDR for standard-of-care imaging was 5/20 patients in 5/60 regions. 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET-CT detected metastasis in 7/20 patients in 7/60 regions. 18F-fluciclovine PET-CT detected metastasis in 9/20 patients in 12/60 regions. The cDR for 18F-fluciclovine PET-CT was significantly higher versus standard-of-care imaging on the patient and combined region levels, while there were no significant differences between 68Ga-PSMA-11 and standard-of care imaging. 18F-fluciclovine cDR was also significantly higher than 68Ga-PSMA-11 on the combined region level. Mean SUVmax for true positive metastatic and primary lesions with 18F-fluciclovine (n = 18) was significantly greater than for 68Ga-PSMA-11 (n = 11) [5.5 ± 1.8 versus 3.5 ± 2.7 respectively, p = 0.021]. CONCLUSION: In this exploratory trial, 18F-fluciclovine PET-CT has a significantly higher cDR for ILC metastases compared to standard-of-care imaging and to 68Ga-PSMA-11. Mean SUVmax for true positive malignancy was significantly higher with 18F-fluciclovine than for 68Ga-PSMA-11. Exploratory data from this trial suggests that molecular imaging of amino acid metabolism in patients with ILC deserves further study. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Early phase (I-II) clinical trial (NCT04750473) funded by the National Institutes of Health (R21CA256280).

A Comprehensive Analysis of Volumetric 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT Parameters, Clinical and Histopathologic Features: Evaluation of the Predictive Role.

Objectives: To evaluate the relationships between volumetric 68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) parameters, Gleason score (GS), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, histopathological data, and metastatic status in newly diagnosed prostate cancer (PCa) patients and to assess the predictive factors for progression despite treatment. Methods: A total of 78 newly diagnosed patients with PCa who had 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT scans were included. Clinical parameters, histopathological data, and metastatic status were documented, and volumetric parameters of primary prostate lesions were measured. All obtained data were compared statistically. Results: Primary prostate tumor maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and GS were significantly related to serum PSA levels (p<0.05). PSA levels and SUVmax values were significantly higher in patients with lymph node metastases than in those without. GS was found to be significantly increased in metastatic patients. PSMA-derived tumor volume (PSMA-TV) and total lesion PSMA of the primary lesion had a significant relationship with PSA value, GS, and regional lymph node metastases. Receiver operating characteristic analysis, conducted in patients with metastatic and localized disease, identified the cutoff value for SUVmax as 10.85. According to the results of the logistic regression analysis, PSMA-TV was found to be a predictive factor for progression despite treatment. Conclusion: 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT remains an invaluable imaging modality that should be considered first in PCa staging because of its superior compatibility with clinical and histopathologic data. The importance of this method goes beyond diagnostic accuracy; it also extends into the predictive domain, where the PSMA-TV value of primary prostate lesions is a potential predictor of treatment efficacy. This information is valuable for personalizing patient treatment, improving prognostic accuracy, and predicting clinical outcomes.

The Role of 68 Ga PSMA Imaging in Evaluating Adrenal Lesions in Prostate Cancer Patients.

Objectives Gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen ( 68 Ga-PSMA) imaging is valuable for staging because an accurate diagnosis, metastatic or nonmetastatic for prostate cancer patients, is required for deciding to treatment approaches and prognostic assessment. The aim of this study was primarily to distinguish between benign and metastatic adrenal gland lesions detected during 68 Ga-PSMA positron emission tomography (PET)/CT imaging, to evaluate the presence of factors predicting its development, and then to determine the life expectancy of patients with metastatic adrenal lesions. Materials and Methods We performed a database search for PET/CT records generated from June 2016 to February 2021 for "adrenal gland" in report for patients who underwent 68 Ga-PSMA examination with prostate cancer patients. Results Twenty-three patients (10 benign and 13 metastatic) were included in this study. The total prostate-specific antigen, adrenal gland size, adrenal gland density, and maximum standardized uptake (SUVmax) values are significantly different between groups ( p < 0.05). On receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the SUVmax cutoff value > 6.8 provided both sensitivity and specificity of 100%. However, with 29 mm as the adrenal gland size cutoff and 21.2 as Hounsfield unit, the sensitivity and specificity were 56.2 and 92.3%, and 93.8 and 92.3%, respectively. The survival of the benign and metastatic groups was compared and a statistically significant difference was found ( p = 0.006). The presence of pelvic lymph nodes was statistically negatively affected the surveillance between the groups. Conclusion The presence of atypical metastases such as adrenal gland is not insignificant in prostate cancer patients. Because of this degree of impact on patient management, accurate staging by imaging with 68 Ga-PSMA should be an integral part of prostate cancer management.

68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in Recurrent Prostate Cancer after Radical Prostatectomy Using PSMA-RADS Version 2.0.

BACKGROUND: 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT is superior to standard-of-care imaging for detecting regional and distant metastatic recurrent prostate cancer. The objective of our study was to evaluate the performance of 68Ga-PSMAPET/CT in our patient population, using the new PSMA-RADS version 2.0. METHODS: A total of 128 patients scanned with 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT for detection of recurrence after RP were analyzed with PSMA-RADS version 2.0. For the analysis of the detection rate, categories PSMA-RADS 3 to 5 were considered as "positive for malignancy" and 1-2 as "negative". RESULTS: According to PSMA-RADS v2.0, we classified patients as follows: 23 patients without PSMA-RADS because they were negative; PSMA-RADS 1: 10 patients; PSMA-RADS 2: 4 patients; PSMA-RADS 3A: 11 patients; PSMA-RADS 3B: 2 patients; PSMA-RADS 3C: 2 patients; PSMA-RADS 3D: 2 patients; PSMA-RADS 4: 13 patients; PSMA-RADS 5: 61 patients. CONCLUSIONS: The overall detection rate of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT was 71%. By dividing the patients into fourgroups according to PSA level before examination, we obtained the following detection rates: PSA < 0.2 ng/mL 38%; 0.2 ≤ PSA < 0.5 ng/mL 57%; 0.5 ≤ PSA ≤ 1 ng/mL 77%; and PSA > 1 ng/mL 95%. CONCLUSION: Using PSMA-RADS version 2.0, we obtained detection rate values comparable with recent literature both in absolute terms and in relation to different PSA levels.

Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen: Diagnostics.

Since its clinical introduction in May 2011, prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-PET/computed tomography has quickly gained worldwide recognition as a significant breakthrough in prostate cancer diagnostics. In the meantime, several new PSMA radioligands for PET imaging have been introduced into routine clinical practice. This article aims to introduce the most commonly used tracers and their key areas of application.

Dual-time-point dynamic 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT for parametric imaging generation in prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: To investigate the optimal dual-time-point (DTP) approaches using dynamic 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT imaging to generate parametric images for prostate cancer patients. METHODS: Fifteen patients with prostate cancer were intravenously administered 68Ga-PSMA-11 of 181.9 ± 47.2 MBq, followed by an immediate 60 min dynamic PET/CT scan. List-mode data were reconstructed into 25 timeframes (6 × 10 s, 8 × 30 s, and 11 × 300 s) and corrected for motion and partial volume effect. DTP parametric images were generated using different interval time points of 5 min and 10 min, with a minimum of 30 min time interval. Net influx rates (Ki) were calculated through the fitting of a single irreversible two-tissue compartmental model. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values between DTP protocols and 60 min Ki were obtained. Lesion-to-background ratios (LBRs) of Ki and standardized uptake value (SUV) images in each DTP protocol were determined. RESULTS: The DTP protocol of 5-10 min with a 40-45 min interval showed the highest ICC of 0.988 compared with the 60 min Ki, whereas the ICC values for the intervals of 0-5 min with 55-60 min and 0-10 min with 50-60 min were 0.941. The LBRs of the 60 min Ki, 5-10 min with 40-45 min Ki, 0-5 min with 55-60 min Ki, 0-10 min with 50-60 min Ki, SUVmean, and SUVmax images were 29.53 ± 27.33, 13.05 ± 15.28, 45.15 ± 53.11, 45.52 ± 70.31, 19.77 ± 23.43, and 25.06 ± 30.07, respectively. CONCLUSION: The 0-5 min with 55-60 min DTP parametric imaging exhibits a comparable Ki to 60 min parametric imaging and remarkable image quality and contrast than SUV imaging, enhancing prostate cancer diagnosis while maintaining time efficiency.

Evaluation of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT: a Phase 1 clinical study in Japanese patients with primary, recurrent, or suspected recurrent prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted radiopharmaceuticals allow whole-body imaging to detect prostate cancer (PC). Positron emission tomography imaging using gallium-68 (68Ga)-PSMA-11 has been shown to have a favorable safety and tolerability profile and high diagnostic performance. The study evaluates the safety and pharmacokinetics of 68Ga-PSMA-11 in Japanese patients with primary, recurrent, or suspected recurrent prostate cancer. METHODS: This single arm study enrolled Japanese patients with primary PC (n = 3), suspected recurrent PC following radical prostatectomy (n = 4), or suspected recurrent PC following radical radiotherapy (n = 3). All patients received a single intravenous dose of 68Ga-PSMA-11 2.0 MBq/kg (±10%) followed by PSMA PET imaging and safety and pharmacokinetic evaluations. Based on the blood concentrations of 68Ga-PSMA-11 and the radioactivity distribution rate in each organ/tissue, the absorbed doses in major organs/tissues and the whole-body effective dose were calculated by the Medical Internal Radiation Dose method. RESULTS: Ten patients were enrolled. Mean age was 73.3 ± 4.8 years, and median prostate-specific antigen was 8.250 ng/mL. Five patients (50%) experienced a total of 6 adverse events, and no grade ≥ 2 adverse events or serious adverse events were reported. No clinically significant changes in vital signs, haematology parameters, or blood chemistry or ECG abnormalities were observed. The estimated whole body effective dose of 68Ga-PSMA-11 (mean ± standard deviation) was 2.524 × 10-2 ± 2.546 × 10-3 mSv/MBq. Time to maximum concentration (1.16 × 10-4 ± 1.3 × 10-5% ID/mL) in whole blood was 2.15 ± 0.33 min. CONCLUSIONS: 68Ga-PSMA-11 has a favourable safety and tolerability profile in Japanese patients with primary, recurrent, or suspected recurrent prostate cancer, which is comparable to previous observations in other populations.

An Update on the Role of mpMRI and 68Ga-PSMA PET Imaging in Primary and Recurrent Prostate Cancer.

The objective of this work was to review comparisons of the efficacy of 68Ga-PSMA-11 (prostate-specific membrane antigen) PET/CT and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) in the detection of prostate cancer among patients undergoing initial staging prior to radical prostatectomy or experiencing recurrent prostate cancer, based on histopathological data. A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed and Web of Science, and relevant articles were analyzed with various parameters, including year of publication, study design, patient count, age, PSA (prostate-specific antigen) value, Gleason score, standardized uptake value (SUVmax), detection rate, treatment history, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and PI-RADS (prostate imaging reporting and data system) scores. Only studies directly comparing PSMA-PET and mpMRI were considered, while those examining combined accuracy or focusing on either modality alone were excluded. In total, 24 studies comprising 1717 patients were analyzed, with the most common indication for screening being staging, followed by relapse. The findings indicated that 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT effectively diagnosed prostate cancer in patients with suspected or confirmed disease, and both methods exhibited comparable efficacy in identifying lesion-specific information. However, notable heterogeneity was observed, highlighting the necessity for standardization of imaging and histopathology systems to mitigate inter-study variability. Future research should prioritize evaluating the combined diagnostic performance of both modalities to enhance sensitivity and reduce unnecessary biopsies. Overall, the utilization of PSMA-PET and mpMRI in combination holds substantial potential for significantly advancing the diagnosis and management of prostate cancer.

Prospective Comparison of 68Ga-NeoB and 68Ga-PSMA-R2 PET/MRI in Patients with Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer.

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) and gastrin-releasing peptide receptors are both overexpressed in prostate cancer (PC) but may provide complementary information.68Ga-PSMA-R2 and 68Ga-NeoB (DOTA-p-aminomethylaniline-diglycolic acid-DPhe-Gln-Trp-Ala-Val-Gly-His-NH-CH[CH2-CH(CH3)2]2) are novel PET radiopharmaceuticals that were developed for theranostic use. In this phase II imaging study, we assessed the feasibility, safety, and diagnostic performance of 68Ga-NeoB and 68Ga-PSMA-R2 PET/MRI for detection of biochemically recurrent PC. Methods: We prospectively enrolled 27 men with suspected biochemically recurrent PC after initial treatment but noncontributory conventional imaging results (negative or equivocal findings on MRI, CT, and/or bone scan). Participants underwent 68Ga-NeoB and 68Ga-PSMA-R2 PET/MRI within 2 wk in noncontrolled order. The SUVmax of putative PC lesions was measured and compared with a composite reference standard (histopathology, follow-up imaging, prostate-specific antigen change). The SUVmax and SUVmean of background organs were measured. Vital signs were recorded before injection of the radiopharmaceuticals and after the scans. Adverse events were recorded up to 72 h after each scan. Results: The prostate-specific antigen level at enrollment was 3.5 ± 3.9 ng/mL (range, 0.3-13.5 ng/mL). 68Ga-NeoB PET/MRI detected 31 lesions in 18 patients (66.7%), whereas 68Ga-PSMA-R2 identified 20 lesions in 15 participants (55.6%). 68Ga-NeoB PET/MRI showed higher sensitivity (85.7% vs. 71.4%), accuracy (88.9% vs. 77.8%), and negative predictive value (66.7% vs. 50.0%) than 68Ga-PSMA-R2, whereas specificity and positive predictive value were equally high (100.0% for both). In 6 patients, 68Ga-NeoB PET/MRI identified 14 lesions that were false-negative on 68Ga-PSMA-R2 PET/MRI. The mean lesion SUVmax was 6.6 ± 3.2 (range, 2.9-13.2) for 68Ga-NeoB and 4.4 ± 1.5 (range, 2.6-8.8) for 68Ga-PSMA-R2 (P = 0.019). Overall lower uptake was noted in tumors and background organs for 68Ga-PSMA-R2. There were no significant changes in vital signs before and after the scans. No adverse events were reported in the 72-h period after scans. Conclusion: 68Ga-NeoB and 68Ga-PSMA-R2 are safe for diagnostic imaging. 68Ga-NeoB PET/MRI showed better diagnostic performance than 68Ga-PSMA-R2. 68Ga-PSMA-R2 showed overall lower uptake, equally in background organs and tumors, and might therefore not be an ideal theranostic compound. Further evaluation in larger cohorts is needed to confirm our preliminary data.

Intense prostate-specific membrane antigen receptor expression in coronary artery pypass graft scar tissue: A potential molecular imaging pitfall.

68Gallium-PSMA positron emission tomography/computer tomography has been utilized recently for the diagnosis and staging of prostate cancer. PSMA is a transmembrane protein that is expressed not only in the prostate gland but also in other tissues. While some pitfalls have been addressed, there are still uncertainties. Herein, we report a 79-year-old male with prostate cancer who underwent a PSMA scan after coronary artery bypass graft surgery, revealing disease progression and PSMA-avid foci at the surgical stitch sites. This report discusses the immunohistochemical and molecular imaging mechanisms underlying PSMA expression in surgical scar tissues, providing critical insights for optimizing radiologic reporting in such situations.

Concomitant Bilateral Inferior Gluteal Lymph Node Involvement in Metastatic Prostate Adenocarcinoma Detected on 68 Gallium-Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography.

An unusual and unique case of prostate adenocarcinoma with involvement of bilateral inferior gluteal lymph nodes is reported. The patient was a 42-year-old male, with conventional prostatic adenocarcinoma (Gleason score: 5 + 4 = 9), who, during disease progression with rising serum prostate specific antigen levels following medical androgen deprivation therapy, demonstrated new prostate-specific membrane antigen expressing metastatic intermuscular deposits in the bilateral gluteal region, subsequently proven to be bilateral inferior gluteal nodal metastasis. A therapeutic implication to this may be that these nodes usually fall beyond the range covered by the therapeutic radiation field coverage where external radiotherapy is the advocated modality of choice and are not easily reachable through standard surgical procedures. As a result, they could have an impact on the way patients are clinically treated and on their prognosis.

Unusual Metastatic Sites of Testis and Rectum in Prostate Cancer Detected by 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT Imaging at Initial Staging.

Imaging plays a pivotal role in defining the extent of disease and deciding therapeutic strategies in recently diagnosed high-risk prostate cancer. Standard-of-care conventional imaging may often miss rare metastatic disease sites. We herein present a unique case of prostate cancer where 68 Ga-PSMA-11 positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) detected two unusual metastatic sites (testis and rectum) in a single patient at initial staging, resulting in an accurate determination of the extent of disease, more tailored multimodal treatment planning, and exploration of the theragnostic potential.

The Value of 68Ga-PSMA PET/MRI for Classifying Patients with PI-RADS 3 Lesions on Multiparametric MRI: A Prospective Single-Center Study.

Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) category 3 lesions remain a diagnostic challenge for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). This article evaluates the added value of 68Ga-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen-11 (68Ga-PSMA) PET/MRI in classifying PI-RADS 3 lesions to avoid unnecessary biopsies. Methods: Sixty biopsy-naïve men with PI-RADS 3 lesions on multiparametric MRI were prospectively enrolled between February 2020 and October 2022. In all, 56 participants underwent 68Ga-PSMA PET/MRI and prostate systematic biopsy. 68Ga-PSMA PET/MRI was independently evaluated and reported by the 5-level PRIMARY score developed within the PRIMARY trial. Receiver-operating-characteristic curve analysis was used to estimate the diagnostic performance. Results: csPCa was detected in 8 of 56 patients (14.3%). The proportion of patients with csPCa and a PRIMARY score of 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 was 0% (0/12), 0% (0/13), 6.3% (1/16), 38.5% (5/13), and 100% (2/2), respectively. The estimated area under the curve of the PRIMARY score was 0.91 (95% CI, 0.817-0.999). For a PRIMARY score of 4-5 versus a PRIMARY score of 1-3, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 87.5%, 83.3%, 46.7%, and 97.5%, respectively. With a PRIMARY score of at least 4 to make a biopsy decision in men with PI-RADS 3 lesions, 40 of 48 patients (83.3%) could avoid unnecessary biopsies, at the expense of missing 1 of 8 (12.5%) csPCa cases. Conclusion: 68Ga-PSMA PET/MRI has great potential to classify patients with PI-RADS 3 lesions and help avoid unnecessary biopsies.

Key learnings from concordant systematic biopsies in prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography-guided prostate biopsies: Enhancing targeting accuracy.

BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis and staging have evolved with the advent of 68Ga-Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PSMA-PET/CT). This study investigates the role of complementary systematic biopsies (SB) during PSMA-PET/CT-guided targeted prostate biopsies (PET-TB) for PCa detection, grading, and distribution. We address the uncertainty surrounding the necessity of SB in conjunction with PET-TB. METHODS: We analyzed PCa grading and distribution in 30 men who underwent PET-TB and SB because of contraindication to magnetic resonance imaging or high clinical suspicion of PCa. Tumor distribution was assessed in relation to the PET-highlighted lesions. Standardized reporting schemes, encompassing SUVmax, PRIMARY score, and miTNM classification, were evaluated. RESULTS: 80% of patients were diagnosed with PCa, with 70% classified as clinically significant (csPCa). SB detected more csPCa cases than PET-TB, but the differences were not statistically significant. Discordant results were observed in 25% of cases, where SB outperformed PET-TB. Spatial analysis revealed that tumor-bearing cores from SB were often located in close proximity to the PET-highlighted region. Reporting schemes showed potential for csPCa detection with significantly increased SUVmax in csPCA patients. Subsequent follow-up data underscored the importance of SB in precise PCa grading and staging. CONCLUSIONS: While PET-TB can simplify prostate biopsy and reduce invasiveness by core number, SB cannot be omitted yet due to potential PET-TB targeting errors. Factors such as limited spatial resolution and fusion inaccuracies contribute to the need for SB. Standardization in reporting schemes currently cannot compensate for targeting errors highlighting the need for refinement.

Diagnostic performance of 18F­DCFPyL PET vs. 68Ga­PSMA PET/CT in patients with suspected prostate cancer: A systemic review and meta­analysis.

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, the diagnostic performance of 68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET)/CT was compared with that of 18F-DCFPyL PET for patients with suspected prostate cancer (PCa). Up to September 2023, the PubMed, Embase and Web of Science databases were thoroughly searched for relevant papers. Studies examining the diagnostic performance of 18F-DCFPyL PET and 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in patients with suspected PCa were included in the present review. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Performance Studies-2 tool was used to rate the diagnostic performance of each study. The diagnostic performance of 18F-DCFPyL PET and 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT for primary PCa was examined by 13 studies included, comprising 1,178 patients. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of 18F-DCFPyL PET were 0.92 (95% CI, 0.85-0.96) and 0.59 (95% CI, 0.08-0.96), respectively. For 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.96 (95% CI, 0.88-0.99) and 0.71 (95% CI, 0.57-0.82), respectively. 18F-DCFPyL PET and 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT both had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.92 (95% CI, 0.89-0.94). In addition, the Fagan nomogram revealed that the post-test probabilities for 18F-DCFPyL PET and 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT could rise to 69 and 77% when the pre-test probability was set at 50%. In conclusion, a comparable diagnostic performance for patients with suspected PCa was determined for 18F-DCFPyL PET and 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT. However, it is crucial to keep in mind that the findings of the present meta-analysis come from investigations with modest sample sizes. Therefore, more extensive research is required to obtain more solid data.