Coaching doctors to improve ethical decision-making in adult hospitalized patients potentially receiving excessive treatment. The CODE stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess whether coaching doctors to enhance ethical decision-making in teams improves (1) goal-oriented care operationalized via written do-not-intubate and do-not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation (DNI-DNACPR) orders in adult patients potentially receiving excessive treatment (PET) during their first hospital stay and (2) the quality of the ethical climate. METHODS: We carried out a stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial in the medical intensive care unit (ICU) climate questionnaire (ethical decision-making climate questionnaire, EDMCQ) before and after the study, and anonymously identified PET via an electronic alert during the entire study period. All departments were randomly assigned to a 4-month coaching. At least one month of coaching was compared to less than one month coaching and usual care. The first primary endpoint was the incidence of written DNI-DNACPR decisions. The second primary endpoint was the EDMCQ before and after the study period. Because clinicians identified less PET than required to detect a difference in written DNI-DNACPR decisions, a post-hoc analysis on the overall population was performed. To reduce type I errors, we further restricted the analysis to one of our predefined secondary endpoints (mortality up to 1 year). RESULTS: Of the 442 and 423 clinicians working before and after the study period, respectively 270 (61%) and 261 (61.7%) filled out the EDMCQ. Fifty of the 93 (53.7%) doctors participated in the coaching for a mean (standard deviation [SD]) of 4.36 (2.55) sessions. Of the 7254 patients, 125 (1.7%) were identified as PET, with 16 missing outcome data. Twenty-six of the PET and 624 of the overall population already had a written DNI-DNACPR decision at study entry, resulting in 83 and 6614 patients who were included in the main and post hoc analysis, respectively. The estimated incidence of written DNI-DNACPR decisions in the intervention vs. control arm was, respectively, 29.7% vs. 19.6% (odds ratio 4.24, 95% confidence interval 4.21-4.27; P < 0.001) in PET and 3.4% vs. 1.9% (1.65, 1.12-2.43; P = 0.011) in the overall study population. The estimated mortality at one year was respectively 85% vs. 83.7% (hazard ratio 2.76, 1.26-6.04; P = 0.011) and 14.5% vs. 15.1% (0.89, 0.72-1.09; P = 0.251). The mean difference in EDMCQ before and after the study period was 0.02 points (- 0.18 to 0.23; P = 0.815). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that coaching doctors regarding ethical decision-making in teams safely improves goal-oriented care operationalized via written DNI-DNACPR decisions in hospitalized patients, however without concomitantly improving the quality of the ethical climate.

Family perspectives on and experiences with advance care planning in nursing homes: A thematic synthesis.

OBJECTIVES: To synthesize family members' experiences and perspectives on advance care planning (ACP) in nursing homes. METHODS: The thematic synthesis is reported following the Enhancing Transparency in Reporting the Synthesis of Qualitative Research (ENTREQ) statement. A systematic search of the APA PsycINFO, CINAHL Plus, Embase and PubMed databases is initially conducted in October 2022, and the search is updated in January 2024. Qualitative studies that presented family members' quotes regarding advance care planning in nursing homes published in a peer-reviewed journal were included. Screening and data extraction were independently performed by two reviewers, and any discrepancies were resolved with the assistance of the third author. RESULTS: A total of 1027 articles were identified, and 23 articles were included in the full-text review. Subsequently, a total of 17 studies were ultimately included, and 127 quotes were extracted and analysed. The main findings were categorized into three themes: (1) invitation to conversation and care, (2) the resident's surrogate and (3) nurses. Considering the importance of family members' roles in ACP conversations in a nursing home setting, this study provided an in-depth understanding of family members' perceptions and experiences of ACP by synthesizing qualitative studies. Family members' lack of knowledge regarding the timing and pursuits of ACP was also identified. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study provide synthesized qualitative evidence of family members' perspectives on ACP, which can inform care and treatment in nursing homes. As this study synthesizes the experiences of family members in nursing homes about ACP, the findings of this study contribute to reflecting family members' experiences and providing evidence for nursing home healthcare professionals. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: This study reports the experiences of family members in ACP nursing homes. The findings of this study contribute to reflecting family members' experiences and building evidence for nursing home healthcare professionals.

Culturally Adapted RN-MD Collaborative SICP-Based ACP: Feasibility RCT in Advanced Cancer Patients.

CONTEXT: Cultural adaptation is essential for optimizing programs centered around autonomy, such as the Serious Illness Care Program (SICP), especially for populations valuing family-involved decision-making. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of a culturally adapted SICP-based nurse-physician collaborative Advance Care Planning (ACP) intervention tailored for patients with advanced cancer who prefer family-involved decision-making. METHODS: Oncology nurses, extensively trained and closely collaborating with physicians, conducted structured discussions with patients in the intervention group. The culturally adapted SICP-based ACP intervention was supplemented with trust-building, family involvement, and understanding of patient values. Primary inclusion criteria included patients within six weeks of initiating first-line palliative chemotherapy. Primary endpoints were achieving a 70% completion rate and assessing spiritual well-being (FACIT-Sp) at six months. Secondary endpoints included anxiety (GAD-7), depression (PHQ-9), quality of life (QOL) (CoQoLo), and ACP progress (ACP Engagement Scale) at the same interval. RESULTS: Forty-one patients (67.2%) completed the six-month follow-up, falling short of the targeted completion rate. The least-squares mean change from baseline in spiritual well-being at six months was 3.00 in the intervention group and -2.22 in the standard care group (difference, 5.22 points; 95% confidence interval, 1.38-9.06; p = .009). Similar superiority of the intervention was observed in QOL and ACP progress. CONCLUSION: Despite not meeting the targeted completion rate, the intervention group demonstrated enhanced spiritual well-being, QOL, and ACP progress. Our findings suggest revisions to the intervention manual to improve feasibility and to progress to an efficacy-focused randomized controlled trial.

Machine learning for targeted advance care planning in cancer patients: a quality improvement study.

CONTEXT: Prognostication challenges contribute to delays in advance care planning (ACP) for patients with cancer near the end of life (EOL). OBJECTIVES: Examine a quality improvement mortality prediction algorithm intervention's impact on ACP documentation and EOL care. METHODS: We implemented a validated mortality risk prediction machine learning model for solid malignancy patients admitted from the emergency department (ED) to a dedicated solid malignancy unit at Duke University Hospital. Clinicians received an email when a patient was identified as high-risk. We compared ACP documentation and EOL care outcomes before and after the notification intervention. We excluded patients with intensive care unit (ICU) admission in the first 24 hours. Comparisons involve chi-square/Fisher's exact tests and Wilcoxon rank sum tests; comparisons stratified by physician specialty employ Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel tests. RESULTS: Pre-intervention and post-intervention cohorts comprised 88 and 77 patients, respectively. Most were White, non-Hispanic/Latino, and married. ACP conversations were documented for 2.3% of hospitalizations pre-intervention vs. 80.5% post-intervention (p<0.001), and if the attending physician notified was a palliative care specialist (4.1% vs. 84.6%) or oncologist (0% vs. 76.3%) (p<0.001). There were no differences between groups in length of stay (LOS), hospice referral, code status change, ICU admissions or LOS, 30-day readmissions, 30-day ED visits, and inpatient and 30-day deaths. CONCLUSION: Identifying patients with cancer and high mortality risk via machine learning elicited a substantial increase in documented ACP conversations but did not impact EOL care. Our intervention showed promise in changing clinician behavior. Further integration of this model in clinical practice is ongoing.

Oncology Nurses' Communication Practices and Challenges Towards Advance Care Planning: A Sequential Explanatory Mixed-Method Study.

AIMS: This study aims to explore the practice of advance care planning (ACP) among Chinese oncology nurses and identify challenges influencing care provision. DESIGN: A sequential explanatory mixed-method design was employed, comprising a quantitative phase to assess communication practices, followed by a qualitative phase to explore the challenges faced in ACP. METHODS: The study employed convenience sampling, including 532 oncology nurses from seven hospitals in northern China. Quantitative data were collected through a cross-sectional survey and the ACP communication index from December 2021 to January 2022. The qualitative phase consisted of 19 interviews conducted between May and July 2022, which were thematically analysed to elucidate the challenges in ACP practices. RESULTS: Quantitative findings revealed a low frequency of ACP communication among Chinese oncology nurses. Qualitative analysis identified four themes: lack of optimal timing, passive engagement of patients or families, reluctance of healthcare professionals and unsupported policies. CONCLUSION: The study concluded that identified challenges compromise the effectiveness of ACP practices among Chinese oncology nurses. Inadequate communication, limited interdisciplinary collaboration and policy gaps contribute to nonstandardised ACP processes. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE: The findings underscore the need for targeted interventions to enhance nurses' communication skills, foster interdisciplinary collaboration and provide policy support. Such interventions are pivotal to optimising end-of-life care in oncology settings and facilitating the integration of ACP into routine nursing practices. REPORTING METHODS: This study adhered to the Mixed Methods Article Reporting Standards. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No contributions from patients or the public were involved in this study.

Perceptions of Older People in Nursing Facilities About Advance Care Planning: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: With the ageing of the population intensifying, the implementation of advance care planning (ACP) in nursing facilities is especially crucial. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to search and synthesise qualitative studies exploring the perspectives of older people in nursing facilities about ACP discussions. METHODS: The researchers conducted searches of PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang, VIP and CBM between the time of inception and October 2023. The PICo model was used to build the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Following the inclusion and exclusion criteria, two researchers screened the literature, extracted data and then integrated the literature using the integrative synthesis. RESULTS: A total of 12 articles were included, 47 themes were extracted, and three research integrations were summarised: (1) understanding of ACP; (2) attitude towards ACP; and (3) influencing factors of participation in ACP. CONCLUSION: This study offers guidance for the future development of ACP on the participation of older people in nursing facilities. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: It is necessary to strengthen the education of ACP-related knowledge in conjunction with the cultural characteristics of different countries, to provide interdisciplinary support for older people through professional teamwork and to promote the development and improvement of ACP-related practices.

Feasibility of Using Simulation to Evaluate Implementation Fidelity in an Advance Care Planning Pragmatic Trial.

Background and Objectives: Traditional methods of fidelity monitoring are not possible in pragmatic trials in real-world clinical settings. We describe our approach to monitoring and reinforcing the fidelity to ACP conversations for a hard-to-reach subpopulation by using standardized patients in a pragmatic trial. Research Design and Methods: We developed standardized patient scenarios grounded in the Respecting Choices First Steps™ Advance Care Planning curriculum to provide an opportunity to reinforce and assess ACP facilitator competency. Scenarios represented one-on-one encounters. The first case was a standardized patient with cognitive impairment and the second case involved a standardized patient with dementia and their care partner. A previously validated fidelity checklist was used to score skills and behaviors observed during simulations including encounter set-up, ACP topics, and general communication. Simulations involved voice teleconferencing to align primary modality of ACP in the pragmatic trial. Results: Six facilitators completed two standardized patient cases each. Overall fidelity scores were moderately high (78.8% ± 11.7; 63.4 - 95.6) for the case with cognitive impairment and for the case with the patient with dementia and care partner (76.2% ± 13.0; 54.4 - 91.5). Discussion and Implications: Simulation using standardized patients supported fidelity monitoring and provided coachable feedback to support facilitator competency. Our study can help inform future research and training related to advance care planning in older adults living with Alzheimer's disease and related disorders.

Fundamentals of end-of-life communication as part of advance care planning for older people: An interview study with nursing staff.

This exploratory interview study investigated nursing staff members' perspectives on the fundamentals of end-of-life communication with older people as part of advance care planning in home care, nursing home, and hospital settings. Separate semi-structured interviews were conducted with 17 nursing staff members about their experiences, opinions, and preferences before, during, and after end-of-life conversations. Overall themes clustering the fundamentals include preconditions such as feeling comfortable talking about the end of life and creating space for open communication. Fundamentals related to the actual conversation-such as using senses and applying associative communication techniques (e.g., using understandable language), following conversation phases, and being aware of interprofessional collaboration-were also considered important. This study emphasizes the importance of moving along with the older person as well as connecting, adapting, and letting go of control over the conversation's outcome. Many fundamentals can be traced back to the basics of nursing and the humanity of conversation.

Experiences with a national team-based learning program for advance care planning in pediatric palliative care.

BACKGROUND: Advance Care Planning (ACP) enables patients and relatives to define and share values, goals and preferences for future medical treatment and care. The IMplementing Pediatric Advance Care Planning Toolkit (IMPACT), developed in the Netherlands, is a method for conducting ACP in pediatric palliative care. Healthcare professionals who were trained to use IMPACT, indicated their need for ongoing support to practice ACP communication skills optimally over time. Therefore, we developed a team-based learning program aimed at teaching participants how to transfer knowledge on ACP, continue practicing ACP communication skills and reflect on ACP conversations within their own team context. The aim of this study was to evaluate the program's transfer of knowledge as well as the professionals' experience and team reflection on ACP. METHODS: A one-day IMPACT train-the-trainer course was developed and a selection of healthcare professionals (facilitators) from pediatric palliative care teams (PPCTs) from all seven Dutch university hospitals and the specialized Center for Pediatric Oncology were invited to participate. Hereafter, facilitators were asked to transfer their course-acquired knowledge to their team members (learners) by organizing two coaching-on-the-job sessions. A mixed-methods design, combining questionnaires and field notes, was used to evaluate the level of knowledge transfer and team reflection achieved. RESULTS: Eighteen healthcare professionals in the role of facilitator participated in the train-the-trainer course. In seven PPCTs one (n = 3) or two (n = 4) coaching-on-the-job session(s) took place, attended by 29 and 17 learners, respectively. In the questionnaires, 11 facilitators indicated that they had to some extent transferred acquired knowledge to their team members as intended. Sixteen out of 21 learners who participated in at least one coaching-on-the-job session, reported (somewhat) increased self-confidence for conducting ACP conversations. The reported main strength of the program was practicing with/learning from colleagues whereas dealing with workload and variation in existing ACP skills within PPCTs need more attention. CONCLUSIONS: The newly developed team-based learning program resulted in intended transfer of knowledge and methodical reflection on ACP in coaching-on-the-job sessions in most participating PPCTs. Planning coaching-on-the-job sessions regarding ACP in pediatric palliative care with multiple healthcare professionals is challenging and needs more emphasis in the training.

Psychological stress of general practitioners in the care of patients with palliative care needs: an exploratory study.

BACKGROUND: In Germany, general practitioners play a pivotal role in palliative care provision. Caring for patients with palliative care needs can be a burden for general practitioners, highlighting the importance of self-care and mental health support. This study aimed to explore the role of palliative care in general practitioners' daily work, the stressors they experience, their coping mechanisms, and the potential benefits of Advance Care Planning in this context. METHODS: An exploratory approach was employed, combining a short quantitative survey with qualitative interviews. The analysis was based on a structuring qualitative content analysis, following a deductive-inductive procedure and integrating the Stress-Strain Model and Lazarus' Transactional Model of Stress and Coping. We recruited eleven general practitioners to take part in the study. RESULTS: General practitioners viewed palliative care as integral to their practice but faced challenges such as time constraints and perceived expertise gaps. Societal taboos often hindered conversations on the topic of death. Most general practitioners waited for their patients to initiate the topic. Some general practitioners viewed aspects of palliative care as potentially distressing. They used problem-focused (avoiding negative stressors, structuring their daily schedules) and emotion-focused (discussions with colleagues) coping strategies. Still, general practitioners indicated a desire for specific psychological support options. Advance Care Planning, though relatively unfamiliar, was acknowledged as valuable for end-of-life conversations. CONCLUSIONS: Palliative care can be associated with negative psychological stress for general practitioners, often coming from external factors. Despite individual coping strategies in place, it is advisable to explore concepts for professional psychological relief. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not registered.

Mid-Atlantic primary care providers' perception of barriers and facilitators to end-of-life conversation.

Background: Among the chronically ill, end-of-life conversations are often delayed until emergently necessary and the quality of those conversations and subsequent decision-making become compromised by critical illness, uncertainty, and anxiety. Many patients receive treatment that they would have declined if they had a better understanding of benefits and risks. Primary care providers are ideal people to facilitate end-of-life conversations, but these conversations rarely occur in the out-patient setting. Objective: To investigate the self-reported experiences of physicians and advanced practice nurses with conversational barriers and facilitators while leading end-of-life discussions in the primary care setting. Design: A qualitative descriptive study. Methods: Six physicians and eight advanced practice nurses participated in singular semi-structured interviews. Results were analyzed using a qualitative descriptive design and content analysis approach to coding. Results: Reported barriers in descending order included resistance from patients and families, insufficient time, and insufficient understanding of prognosis and associated expectations. Reported facilitators in descending order included established trusting relationship with provider, physical and/or cognitive decline and poor prognosis; and discussion standardization per Medicare guidelines. Conclusion: Recommendations for improving the end-of-life conversational process in the primary care setting include further research regarding end-of-life conversational facilitators within families, the improvement of patient/family education about hospice/palliative care resources and examining the feasibility of longer appointment allotment.1.

Exploring confidence in financial planning topics among care partners of persons living with dementia.

OBJECTIVE: Care partners of persons living with dementia perform significant financial planning in partnership with the person for whom they care. However, research is scarce on care partners' confidence and experiences with financial planning. The purpose of this study was, first, to quantify care partners' confidence across different financial planning topics. We sought to understand whether income, education, relationship type, and years of experience are related to care partners' level of confidence in financial planning. Second, we sought to better understand the reasons for these confidence ratings by examining care partners' experiences of financial planning. METHODS: We conducted an online survey that asked a combination of quantitative and qualitative questions to understand care partners' confidence and experiences with financial planning. Participants were nationally recruited care partners of persons living with dementia. Multivariate linear regression was used to understand different subgroups' levels of confidence in each financial planning topic. Inductive thematic analysis was used to understand qualitative data. RESULTS: The financial planning topics in which participants (N = 318) felt the least confident were: options when there is not enough money to provide care; tax deductions available to cut care costs; and sources of money from government programs for which the care recipient is eligible. Differences in confidence were observed among care partners with lower incomes, less experience, and caring for a parent. Qualitatively, participants described the challenges of care budgeting and protecting personal finances; confusion about long-term care insurance and accessing resources; and, among confident care partners, reasons for this sense of preparedness. CONCLUSIONS: These results underscore the need for tailored interventions and technologies that increase care partners' confidence in specific aspects of financial planning, including long-term care insurance, available financial support, and what to do when money runs out.

Acceptance level of advance care planning and its associated factors among the public: A nationwide survey.

BACKGROUND: Advance care planning (ACP) can contribute to individuals making decisions about their healthcare preferences in advance of serious illness. Up to now, the acceptance level and associated factors of ACP among the public in China remain unclear. This study aims to investigate the acceptance level of ACP in China and identify factors associated with it based on the socioecological model. METHODS: A total of 19,738 participants were included in this survey. We employed a random forest regression analysis to select factors derived from the socioecological model. Multivariate generalized linear model analysis was then conducted to explore the factors that were associated with the acceptance level of ACP. RESULTS: On a scale ranging from 0 to 100, the median score for acceptance level of ACP was 64.00 (IQR: 48.00-83.00) points. The results of the multivariate generalized linear model analysis revealed that participants who scored higher on measures of openness and neuroticism personality traits, as well as those who had greater perceptions of social support, higher levels of health literacy, better neighborly relationships, family health, and family social status, were more likely to accept ACP. Conversely, participants who reported higher levels of subjective well-being and greater family communication levels demonstrated a lower likelihood of accepting ACP. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified multiple factors associated with the acceptance level of ACP. The findings offer valuable insights that can inform the design and implementation of targeted interventions aimed at facilitating a good death and may have significant implications for the formulation of end-of-life care policies and practices in other countries facing similar challenges.

Pilot Study: Moving Towards a Scalable Intervention for Postgraduate Communication Skills Training.

Background: Communication skills are foundational to the practice of medicine and training to build them is recommended. Serious illness communication skills (SICSs) teaching is inconsistently and sparsely taught in postgraduate training and residents report feeling inadequately trained to have difficult conversations. The authors developed an e-module demonstrating high-yield communication skills from a known evidence-based training program to standardize core SICS teaching and questioned how using it before skills practice impacted comfort and preparedness for residents to complete advance care planning (ACP). Methods: Family medicine residents at an academic hospital in Toronto, Canada, completed a novel e-module that replaced a typical didactic-lecture introducing core SICS relevant to ACP conversations. Residents then discussed the skills, followed by practicing them deliberately in a structured role-play simulation with feedback by trained facilitators. Residents completed pre- and post-intervention attitudinal surveys. Results: Residents preferred a combination of learning modalities and welcomed online and virtual teaching methods for learning SICS. Residents reported higher levels of preparedness for engaging in ACP, delivering serious news, and discussing goals of care post-intervention. Residents showed more interest in discussing ACP post-intervention but questioned feasibility for doing so in busy ambulatory clinics. Conclusion: Scalable time-efficient teaching strategies are needed to fill a known education gap. This study demonstrated benefits of incorporating brief e-module learning into residents' preparation for SICS training using deliberate practice simulation training. The online, interactive virtual training improved resident readiness and comfort for ACP, an area often overlooked in medical education. Moreover, it provides an evidence-informed standardized tool for clinician teachers to seamlessly incorporate into their teaching practices.

Action plans increase advance care planning documentation and engagement among English and Spanish-speaking older adults.

BACKGROUND: Advance care planning (ACP) has been reconceptualized as a health behavior. Action plans (APs), or patient-directed mini contracts, improve behavior change. However, no prior studies have assessed whether APs can increase ACP documentation and engagement. METHODS: We included English and Spanish-speaking primary care patients from San Francisco, ≥55 years of age, with ≥2 serious or chronic illnesses. Participants were in the intervention arm of the PREPAREforYOURcare.org trial and asked at baseline to choose 1 of 5 actions (e.g., choose a surrogate). At 6 months, we assessed whether participants completed their AP and if completion was associated with demographics, electronic health record (EHR) ACP documentation, and five-point ACP Engagement Survey scores. We used t-tests, chi-squared, multivariate analysis adjusted for baseline ACP and clustering by physician, and qualitative thematic analysis to explore reasons for non-completion. RESULTS: The mean age of 586 participants was 65 ± 10 years; 44.0% women, 45.9% Spanish-speaking, 31.4% had limited health literacy, and 43% completed an AP at 6 months; surrogate-related (47.4%), tell others about medical wishes (33.7%), ask clinicians questions (13.7%), and decide what matters most in life (5.2%). Participants with limited versus adequate health literacy were less likely to complete an AP (25.4% vs 35.9%, p = 0.01). Completing an AP was associated with greater ACP EMR documentation 49.8% vs 35.6%, p < 0.001 (adjusted odds ratio: 2.06; 95% CI [1.43-2.97]) and engagement (adjusted five-point scores [3.69; 95% CI 3.57-3.81 vs 3.10; 95% CI: 2.98-3.21], p < 0.001). Themes for non-completion included not being ready and logistical issues (e.g., surrogate deceased). CONCLUSIONS: Among English and Spanish-speaking older adults, creating an ACP AP resulted in greater documentation and engagement. APs may help facilitate ACP behavior change as part of effective ACP interventions. Additional support may be needed for patients with limited health literacy and those facing logistical barriers.

Impacts of COVID-19 pandemic prevention measures to the palliative care in Taiwan.

Background: Prevention measures for palliative care and the provision of discharge planning services for inpatients in Taiwan before and during the COVID-19 pandemic had not been investigated. This study was aimed to investigate the factors associated with heightened palliative care needs and increased mortality rates. Methods: This research adopts a retrospective case-control study design. The investigation encompasses patients admitted before the pandemic (from January 1, 2019, to May 31, 2019) and during the COVID-19 pandemic (from January 1, 2020, to May 31, 2020). The case group consisted of 231 end-of-life inpatients during the pandemic, control group was composed of the pool of inpatients with pre-pandemic and matched with cases by sex and age in a 1:1 ratio. Results: The results showed that the prevalence of respiratory failure symptoms (p = 0.004), residing in long-term care facilities (p = 0.017), palliative care needs assessment scores (p = 0.010), as well as the provision of guidance for nasogastric tube feeding (p = 0.002), steam inhalation (p = 0.003), turning and positioning (p < 0.001), percussion (p < 0.001), passive range of motion (p < 0.001), and blood pressure measurement (p < 0.001). Furthermore, the assessment of the necessity for assistive devices, including hospital beds, also exhibited statistically significant variations (p < 0.001). Further investigation of the factors associated with high palliative care needs and the risk of mortality for both the case and control groups. Risk factors for high palliative care needs encompassed assessments of daily activities of living, the presence of pressure ulcers, and the receipt of guidance for ambulation. Risk factors for mortality encompassed age, a diagnosis of cancer, palliative care needs assessment scores, and the provision of guidance for disease awareness. Conclusion: This research highlights the heightened risk of COVID-19 infection among end-of-life inpatients during the COVID-19 pandemic. The findings of this study may advance care planning to alleviate avoidable suffering. To meet the needs of inpatients during pandemic, healthcare professionals should undergo comprehensive palliative care training and receive policy support.

Perspectives on advance care planning and related end-of-life care in people with heart failure: A Q methodology study.

Negative perspectives around advance care planning (ACP) prevent people with heart failure (HF) from preparing their end-of-life (EOL) effectively. A Q methodology study was conducted to identify types of ACP perspectives in Koreans with HF. The Q sample (31 statements representing ACP perspectives) was constructed through an extensive literature review and in-depth qualitative interview. The P sample (individuals with HF) completed each grid with a statement on the Q sorting table. The data were analyzed using the PQ program. Individuals with HF have both different and common perspectives on ACP. Three types of perspectives were identified: "positive acceptance," "contemplative support," and "hesitancy in acceptance." Common perspectives across types indicated that people with HF had positive attitudes toward ACP and emphasized their autonomy in EOL decisions. Clinicians need to consider these different and common perspectives on ACP to facilitate patients' engagement and provide relevant support.

[Advance care planning in the acute hospital: A qualitative analysis of terms and conditions]. / Advance Care Planning im Akutkrankenhaus.

Advance care planning in the acute hospital: A qualitative analysis of terms and conditions Abstract: Background: Advance Care Planning (ACP) is an internationally established concept aimed to facilitate anticipatory care planning in the event of future inability to consent. In Germany, ACP is currently not regularly offered to patients in acute care hospitals. Aim: We aimed to identify preconditions for implementation of ACP in acute care hospitals in Germany through review of the international literature and expert interviews. Methods: A systematic literature search was carried out in the databases MEDLINE and CINAHL for internationally used strategies for implementing ACP in acute care hospitals. Consecutively, a guide for interviews with experts to evaluate the strategies was developed. Interviews were analyzed by qualitative content analysis according to Mayring. Results: Out of 13 included publications, 17 preconditions were identified and assigned to 16 categories after evaluation by experts. In international ACP programs, it was described how to proceed and organize the ACP conversation. German experts emphasized that appropriate preconditions, such as sufficient time resources and training, must be granted, whereas the literature search revealed the conversation process and organization as important determinants. Conclusions: The implementation of ACP programs is conceivable, but requires specific conditions as legal regulation and defining and structuring of the processes.

Care conundrum in the emergency department: The gap between clinician awareness and patient expectations surrounding advance directives.

OBJECTIVES: Clinicians in the emergency department (ED) frequently encounter seriously ill patients at a time when advance directives may be pivotal in improved clinician decision-making. The objectives of this study were to identify the prevalence of advanced directives in ED patients, as well as patterns of advance care discussions between patients and providers. This study describes patients' perceptions and expectations of such serious illness discussions in an emergency care setting with the expectation of including patients as strategic members of the care team. METHODS: Trained research assistants in two emergency departments surveyed patients over age 65, or their caregivers, from July 2016 to August 2018. Patients were verbally administered a standard survey tool related to advance directives and advance care planning. RESULTS: 497 out of 877 patients completed surveys (59.4%). 50% of patients reported having an advance care planning document. The large majority (92%) of patients with an advance directive had not been asked about it during their ED visit. When questioned about their personal preferences, 79% of patients thought emergency physicians should be aware of their wishes regarding life-sustaining treatments and end-of-life care. Paradoxically, only 38% expressed a desire to discuss advance care plans with an ED clinician. CONCLUSIONS: Older patients expect emergency clinicians to be aware of their care preferences, yet most are not asked about these care preferences in the ED. The large gap between patient preference and reality suggests the need for more targeted discussion by ED clinicians and translation of patient perspectives into system healthcare improvements. Future studies should explore barriers to advance care planning in the ED as well as patient preferences for these conversations to support a true healthcare learning system.