Efficacy and safety of camrelizumab combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced biliary malignancy and associations between peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets and clinical outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Biliary tract cancer (BTC) is a highly heterogeneous aggressive tumor, and advanced patients have poor prognosis. This work aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of camrelizumab combined with chemotherapy in treating advanced BTC, and to explore predictive biomarkers for distinguishing effective population. METHODS: 183 advanced BTC patients admitted from September 2018 to September 2021 were retrospectively selected. 93 patients were treated with camrelizumab combined with chemotherapy (C+C group) and 90 patients were treated with chemotherapy alone (C group). Objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), median progression-free survival (mPFS), and median overall survival (mOS) were analyzed between two groups. Peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets were assessed by flow cytometry pre- and post-treatment. RESULTS: The mPFS (6.9 months) and mOS (12.1 months) in the C+C group were significantly longer than those in the C group, which were 5.2 months and 9.8 months respectively (HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.38-0.54, p=0.017; HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.32-0.47, p=0.033). The percentage of Total T, CD4+T, natural killer (NK) cells, lymphocyte, and CD4+/CD8+ cell ratios were significantly increased in effective patients after C+C treatment, but didn't increase in progressive disease (PD) patients. Higher percentage of Total T, CD4+T, and higher CD4+/CD8+ cell ratios post-treatment were associated with longer OS. CONCLUSIONS: Camrelizumab combining chemotherapy significantly prolonged the mPFS and mOS of advanced BTC patients. Immunotherapy may improve the immune status of advanced patients, and immunotherapy efficacy might be predicted based on the peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets.

Moving beyond single-agent checkpoint inhibition in biliary tract cancers: what is the next frontier?

Background: Immunotherapy has been shown to improve outcomes for patients with cancer. Biliary tract cancers are a group of lethal diseases, and immunotherapy is an exciting new strategy to treat patients in advanced stages. Role of immunotherapy in biliary cancers: Durvalumab, an anti-PD-L1 antibody, is a new immunotherapy option for patients with advanced biliary cancers. In a randomized phase III trial, the combination of durvalumab and chemotherapy improved disease outcomes, including overall survival, in patients with advanced biliary cancers regardless of PD-L1 expression. Future perspective: Promising new combinations with new and potent antibodies or antiangiogenics are under development. Combinations with new immunotherapy agents targeting CTLA-4 or OX40 can enhance T-cell activation and improve outcomes compared with single anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents. Furthermore, ctDNA is being used as an alternative to tissue genomic analysis and can be used to identify actionable targets. In this review, we will discuss the most important studies involving immunotherapy in biliary cancers as well as future perspectives in the field.

New treatment strategies for advanced biliary cancers with chemoimmunotherapy combinations have been shown to lead to better tumor responses and overall survival compared with chemotherapy alone. The combination of durvalumab, cisplatin and gemcitabine may become a new standard of care for advanced disease despite the modest improvement in median overall survival of less than 2 months. Promising combinations with anti-CTLA-4 antibodies or antiangiogenics are underway with the objective of improvement in survival. Although multiple combinations are available with the potential to establish a new standard of care, concerns regarding toxicities should also be evaluated. In this review, we will discuss the most important studies involving immunotherapy in biliary cancers as well as future perspectives in the field.

Immunotherapy in Cancer Management: A Literature Review of Clinical Efficacy of Pembrolizumab in the Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Treatment.

Purpose: Cancer is a global public health problem that affects millions of people every year and the immunotherapy has been a promising alternative for its treatment. The aim of this study was to gather data concerning the efficacy and safety of immunotherapy in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), emphasizing pembrolizumb, a humanized antibody. This study also reports the role of immunotherapy in cancer treatments, contemplating the anti-CTLA4, anti-PD-L1 and anti PD-1 action in lymphocyte T cells. Methods: A bibliographic review was performed using Pubmed, SCIELO and SCOPUS databases, screening the scientific studies published within the last 5 years. Results: Seven clinical trials were selected to discuss the benefits of pembrolizumab as NSCLC therapy in untreated and previously treated patients, considering or not the tumor proportion score (TPS). It was found that NSCLC occurs with great frequency in Brazil and worldwide, presenting a poor prognosis due to its late diagnosis in most cases. Immunotherapy is a promising treatment strategy for NSCLC because its benefits overcome its risks compared to other therapies. Besides, the studies evidenced the efficiency of pembrolizumab as monotherapy or in association whit chemotherapy, in the first or second line of treatment and, additionally, patient's whit TPS ≥ 50% seem to have a greater benefit from the treatment. Conclusion: The data collected herein showed that pembrolizumab is a very promising, effective, and safe treatment option against NSCLC. Lastly, it is important to highlight the relevance of review's studies, since they are easy-to-read materials, collecting relevant information on a subject.

Immunotherapy in microsatellite instability metastatic colorectal cancer: Current status and future perspectives.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most frequent and deadly malignancies worldwide. This specific pathology is composed of various molecular entities, with distinct immunological phenotypes. In addition to KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mutation status, other druggable alterations such as those in HER2, MET, NTRK, ALK, and ROS1 have been identified in recent years offering new therapeutic options for some patients with CRC. AIM: This review will focus on the molecular biology, immunological fingerprints, and current clinical evidence for the use of immunotherapy in patients with CRC. RELEVANCE FOR PATIENTS: High microsatellite instability (MSI-H) and mutations in mismatch repair genes constitute a new molecular entity within CRC, which is characterized by a high mutational and neoantigen burden, frequent immune cell infiltration, and where immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown high response and survival rates compared to microsatellite stable (MSS) tumors. Indeed, the approval of pembrolizumab in MSI-H tumors was the first agnostic FDA approval in solid tumors. While monotherapy with anti-programmed cell death protein-1 agents achieves objective response rates (ORR) of around 30% and 1-year overall survival (OS) rates of 76%, anti-PD1, and anti-CTLA4 combinations achieve a 55% ORR and a 1-year OS rate of 85%. Several ongoing trials are evaluating the use of different immunotherapy combinations, both in the advanced and early settings and in MSI-h and MSS CRCs.

Update on immunotherapy for renal cancer. / Actualidades sobre inmunoterapia para el cáncer renal.

In the last decade, the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized the treatment of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma, with the potential for dramatic changes in the therapeutic landscape. Nivolumab, a monoclonal antibody inhibitor of transmem-brane programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), was approved as monotherapy in 2015 for advanced renal cell carcinoma in patients previously treated with an agent targeting vascular endothelial growth factor. In April 2018, the combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab, a cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 inhibitor, was approved for patients with previously untreated intermediate- and poor-risk advanced renal cell carcinoma. Then, in 2019, combination therapies consisting of pembrolizumab (anti-PD-1) or avelumab (anti-PD-1 ligand, PD-L1) with axitinib (a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor) were also approved for use in all risk groups. This review pre-sents a brief historical review of the association between immunology and oncology; describes essential aspects of the mechanism of action of immune checkpoint inhibitors; discusses the current evidence regarding the clinical use of different immunotherapy regimens for the treatment of patients with renal cell carcinoma, both clear cell and other histological types; and provides general information on their adverse effects. The role of appropriate patient selection is analyzed to allow individualization of therapy and improve the already promising results. Finally, per-spectives on the future use of immune checkpoint inhibitors to treat renal cancer are discussed.

En la última década, el desarrollo de inhibidores de puntos de control o checkpoints inmunológicos, ha revolucionado el tratamiento de los pacientes con carcinoma de células renales avanzado avizorándose posibles cambios dramáticos en el escenario terapéutico. Nivolumab, un anticuerpo monoclonal inhibidor de la proteína transmembrana de muerte celular programada 1 (PD-1), se aprobó como monoterapia en 2015 para carcinoma de células renales avanzado en pacientes previamente tratados con algún agente dirigido al factor de crecimiento endotelial vascular. En abril de 2018, la combinación de nivolumab e ipilimumab, un inhibidor del CTLA-4, fue aprobado para pacientes con carcinoma de células renales avanzado de riesgo intermedio y riesgo desfavorable, previamente no tratados. Luego, en 2019, terapias combinadas que consisten en pembrolizumab (anti-PD-1) o avelumab (anti-ligando-PD-1, PD-L1) con axitinib (un inhibidor del receptor tirosina kinasa del factor de crecimiento endotelial vascular); también fueron aprobadas para su uso en todos los grupos de riesgo. En esta revisión se presenta una breve reseña histórica sobre la asociación entre la inmunología y la oncología; se describen aspectos básicos del mecanismo de acción de los inhibidores de puntos de control inmunológicos; se discute la evidencia actual relacionada con el uso clínico de los distintos esquemas de inmu-noterapia para el tratamiento de pacientes con carcinoma de células renales, tanto de células claras como de otros tipos histológicos; y se entrega información general sobre sus efectos adversos. Se analiza el rol de la adecuada selección de pacientes que permita una individualización de la terapia y, por ende, una mejora de los ya promisorios resultados. Por último, se discuten las perspectivas sobre el uso futuro de los inhibidores de puntos de control inmunológicos para el tratamiento del cáncer renal.

Ganglionar tuberculosis infection evolving to hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis after anti-programmed cell death 1 treatment for high-risk melanoma: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis is a rare, potentially fatal syndrome of immune hyperactivation. Here we describe a ganglionar tuberculosis evolving to hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis following adjuvant immunotherapy in a melanoma patient. CASE PRESENTATION: A 76-year-old Caucasian male with melanoma started with fever, diffuse petechiae, splenomegaly, anemia, thrombocytopenia, hypofibrinogenemia, and hyperferritinemia 2 months following completion of adjuvant treatment with nivolumab. Positron emission tomography scan showed significant hypermetabolism in cervical, supraclavicular, mediastinal, and abdominal lymph nodes. Bone marrow aspiration demonstrated no alterations, except for a hypercellular pattern. Dexamethasone and intravenous immunoglobulin were started owing to suspicion of hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. Core biopsy of the infracarinal lymph node revealed a chronic granulomatous inflammation and caseous necrosis, with positivity for Mycobacterium tuberculosis by polymerase chain reaction, and treatment for ganglionar tuberculosis was started. CONCLUSION: This case highlights the challenges involving programmed cell death 1 blockade in high-risk melanoma, in which infections, lymphoproliferative disorders, and sarcoidosis can mimic disease progression and trigger immune-related adverse events.

Systematic review and meta-analysis efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced melanoma patients with anti-PD-1 progression: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: More than half of melanoma patients taking first-line anti-PD-1 therapy either express transient or no response at all. The efficacy and safety of secondary treatments for these patients are still not well established. Here, we evaluate the efficacy and safety of different melanoma FDA-approved ICI modalities used in post-anti-PD-1 refractory settings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched the PubMed database and the ASCO meetings library for studies on advanced melanoma patients with cancer progression on anti-PD-1 therapy and were then treated with ipilimumab, nivolumab/ipilimumab combination, or retreated with anti-PD-1. Primary and secondary endpoints were efficacy and toxicity, respectively. Pooled estimates for each treatment group were obtained using a random or fixed effects model according to detected heterogeneity. RESULTS: Fourteen studies, of which 10 on ipilimumab, 2 on anti-PD-1 treatment, and 6 on combination therapies, were included, involving a total of 1460 patients. Twelve studies reported objective response rates (ORRs) and nine of them reported immune-related adverse events (irAEs). As for ORR, patients experienced a response that was inferior compared to the same therapy in treatment -naïve patients, with combination therapy having the best ORR of a pooled 23.08% (95% CI: 16.75% to 30.03%), followed by ipilimumab with a pooled ORR of 8.19% (95% CI: 5.78% to 10.92%). Survival data were also inferior in the ipilimumab cohort (mOS: 5.1 to 7.4 months) compared to ipilimumab in anti-PD-1 naive patients. As for grade 3/4 irAE occurrence, the ipilimumab cohort showed an estimate of 43.77% (95% CI 22.55% to 66.19%). CONCLUSION: Our findings provide the best current evidence that patients who progress on anti-PD-1 can still respond to different ICI modalities (ipilimumab with or without nivolumab, and retreatment or continuation beyond progression with anti-PD-1) with tolerable grade 3/4 irAEs. However, more prospective clinical trials are needed to confirm these results.

Anti-PD1 versus anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy in first-line therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Due to the increasing number of trials with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the first-line therapy of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, we performed a systematic review and meta-analyses to investigate the difference between anti PD-1 and PD-L1 antibodies, used alone or in combination with chemotherapy, through adjusted indirect analysis to minimize the potential bias regarding overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR) and grade 3-5 adverse events (AEs). METHODS: A systematic review of studies reporting clinical outcomes and toxicity associated with first-line therapy employing anti-PD1 or anti-PD-L1 antibodies alone, or in combination with chemotherapy, to treat metastatic, treatment-naïve NSCLC patients was performed. Primary outcomes were OS, PFS, ORR and grade 3-5 AEs. We used a random-effects model to generate pooled estimates for proportions. Meta-analyses using pooled risk ratios were performed for binary outcomes from comparative studies with the random effects model. RESULTS: A total of 13 eligible studies met our eligibility criteria, including 7673 patients. In the ICI-chemotherapy combination subgroup, we observed that anti-PD1 therapy was associated with better OS (p = 0.022) and PFS (p = 0.029) compared with anti-PD-L1 therapy. In the monotherapy subgroup, there was no statistical difference between the use of anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 for OS and PFS. With regard to ORR and toxicity, in the ICI-chemotherapy combination subgroup, we observed a trend of better ORR (p = 0.12) with the use of anti-PD1 therapy and less frequent grade 3-5 AEs compared to the use of anti-PD-L1 therapy (p = 0.0302). In the monotherapy subgroup, there was no statistical difference between the use of anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 regarding ORR and toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that PD-1 drug plus chemotherapy is superior to anti-PD-L1 plus chemotherapy for NSCLC; nevertheless, as monotherapy, both strategies appear to be similar.

Anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-l1 antibodies as immunotherapy against cancer: a structural perspective

ABSTRACT Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and its ligand, programmed death-ligand-1 (PD-L1), play key roles in the suppression of the cytotoxic activity of T cells. PD-L1 is overexpressed on various types of cancer cells, leading to immune evasion. In the past decade, therapeutic antibodies that target the PD-1/PD-L1 axis have been developed to inhibit the immune suppression triggered by these two proteins. At present, five antibodies (two anti-PD-1 and three anti-PD-L1) have received approval by regulatory agencies in the US and Europe. In this work, we aimed to review their clinical applications and adverse effects. Furthermore, using their reported crystal structures, we discuss the similarities and differences between the PD-1/PD-L1 interface and the epitopes that are recognized by the antibodies. Detailed analyses of the contact residues involved in the ligand-receptor and target-antibody interactions have shown partial overlap. Altogether, the data presented here demonstrate that: (1) in contrast to other therapeutic antibodies, anti-PD-1/PD-L1 has a wide range of clinical applications; (2) these targeted therapies are not exempt from adverse effects; and (3) the characterization of the structural domains that are recognized by the antibodies can guide the development of new PD-1- and PD-L1-blocking agents. (REV INVEST CLIN. 2021;73(1):8-16)

Immunotherapy in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Lacking Driver Mutations and Future Perspectives.

From a complete literature review, we were able to present in this paper what is most current in the treatment with immunotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Especially the use of immunotherapy, particularly inhibitors of PD-1 (programmed cell death protein 1), PDL-1 (programmed cell death protein ligand 1), and CTLA-4 (cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4). Since 2015, these drugs have transformed the treatment of advanced NSCLC lacking driver mutations, evolving from second-line therapy to first-line, with excellent results. The arrival of new checkpoint inhibitors such as cemiplimab and the use of checkpoint inhibitors earlier in the therapy of advanced and metastatic cancers has been making the future prospects for treating NSCLC lacking driver mutations more favorable and optimistic. In addition, for those patients who have low PDL-1 positivity tumors, the combination of cytotoxic chemotherapy, VEGF inhibitor, and immunotherapy have shown an important improvement in global survival and progression free survival regardless the PDL-1 status. We also explored the effectiveness of adding radiotherapy to immunotherapy and the most current results about this combination. One concern that cannot be overlooked is the safety profile of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and the most common toxicities are described throughout this paper as well as tumor resistance to ICI.

Comprehensive assessment of multiple tryptophan metabolites as potential biomarkers for immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: Tryptophan metabolites have immunomodulatory functions, suggesting possible roles in cancer immunity. METHODS: Plasma tryptophan metabolites were measured using liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry before immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). RESULTS: The 19 patients with NSCLC had significantly lower levels of tryptophan (p = 0.002) and xanthurenic acid (p = 0.032), and a significantly higher level of 3-hydroxyanthranilic acid (3-HAA) (p = 0.028) compared with the 10 healthy volunteers. The patients achieving objective responses had significantly lower levels of 3-HAA than those who did not (p = 0.045). Receiver operating characteristic analyses determined that the cutoff value of 3-HAA for objective response was 35.4 pmol/mL (sensitivity: 87.5% and specificity: 83.3%). The patients with 3-HAA < 35.4 pmol/mL had significantly longer median progression-free survival (7.0 months) than those without (1.6 months, p = 0.022). CONCLUSIONS: Tryptophan metabolites may have a potential for predicting the efficacy of ICIs. REGISTRATION NUMBER: University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trial Registry 000026140.

Anti-PD-1/L1-associated immune-related adverse events as harbinger of favorable clinical outcome: systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have observed an association between immune-related adverse events (irAE) and favorable clinical outcomes in the setting of cancer treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). However, results have been variable and inconclusive. Therefore, we have conducted a pan-cancer meta-analysis evaluating the relationship between irAEs and clinical outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The search included studies published in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science from conception to 12.28.2019 as well as abstracts published in the ASCO and ESMO meetings from 2015 to 2019. Studies were included if ICI was used in advanced or metastatic cancer settings and excluded if data contained only combination therapy regimens or contained anti-CTLA-4. Raw data for overall response rate (ORR), hazard ratios (HR), number of patients (n), and p values for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were extracted. Pooled sensitivity (SN), specificity (SP), positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV), and odds ratios (ORs) were calculated using the 2 × 2 table and logit transformed proportions; and summary receiver operating curve (sROC) was generated using the bivariate approach for ORR. Pooled HRs were calculated using the means weighted by inverse of the variance for OS and PFS. Heterogeneity was assumed and random effects model was used throughout the analyses. RESULTS: Final analysis included 32 studies, among which ORR data were available in 15 studies, OS in 17, and PFS in 16. 17 studies evaluated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), two studies melanoma, one study gastric cancer, three studies renal cell carcinoma (RCC), seven studies various cancer types, two studies urothelial carcinoma, and one study head and neck cancer (HNSCC). With respect to ORR, pooled SN, SP, PPV and NPV, and OR were 0.522 [0.423-0.619], 0.810 [0.771-0.844], 0.516 [0.413-0.618], 0.819 [0.764-0.864], and 4.59 [3.24-6.50], respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) derived from the sROC was 0.773. HR for OS and PFS were 0.47 [95% CI 0.37-0.60] and 0.46 [95% CI 0.37-0.56], respectively. Between-study publication bias was present for ORR, OS, and PFS; however, results remained significant after trim-fill analysis. CONCLUSION: irAEs predict OR, OS, and PFS across different types of cancer and may represent useful biomarkers in the clinical setting.

Dynamics of clinical biomarkers as predictors of immunotherapy benefit in metastatic melanoma patients.

PURPOSE: Baseline LDH, derived neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (dNLR) and immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are associated with outcomes of patients with metastatic melanoma (MM). We hypothesized whether dynamic shifts in LDH, dNLR and incidence of irAEs may impact the prognosis of MM patients treated with anti-CTLA4 or anti-PD1 as single agents. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of medical charts from MM patients with prospective monitoring of dNLR, LDH values and irAE incidence. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Patients switching from either high dNLR (≥2.5) to low dNLR (HR: 0.14; 0.03-0.74; p = 0.02) or high LDH (≥1.5 × ULN) to low LDH levels (HR: 0.08; 0.01-0.68; p = 0.02) had significantly better OS than those with high dNLR or LDH scores at the end of cycle 2. Longer OS was also observed in patients developing irAEs ≥ grade 2 as compared to no irAEs (HR: 0.2; 0.05-0.89; p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: We found that major shifts in dNLR and LDH measures from baseline to cycle 2 measures and shifts from baseline to cycle 2 are significantly associated with OS in MM patients receiving single agent anti-PD1 therapy. Laboratory changes and clinical variables may help optimize prognostic estimates.

Central Nervous System Demyelination Associated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Review of the Literature.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are a novel class of antineoplastic treatment that enhances immunity against tumors. They are associated with immune adverse events, and several neurological syndromes have been described, including multiple sclerosis and atypical demyelination. We performed a systematic literature review of case reports with neurological immune adverse events that presented with central nervous system demyelination, up to December 2019. We found 23 cases: seven with myelitis, four isolated optic neuritis, one neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder, five multiple sclerosis, and six with atypical demyelination. Ipilimumab was the most frequently used ICI (11/23). The median time to develop symptoms from the onset of ICI was 6.5 weeks [range 1.0-43.0], and from last ICI dose was 14 days [range 0-161]. Anatomopathological examination was performed in four cases, with the finding of a T-cell mediated immune response. Outcomes were generally favorable after immunosuppression: 18 patients had improvement or a full recovery, three patients did not respond to treatment, three patients died, and in one, treatment was not reported. We describe the patients' clinical presentation, treatment administered, and outcomes. We further speculate on possible pathophysiological mechanisms and discuss potential treatments that may be worth investigating.

Induction of Progenitor Exhausted Tissue-Resident Memory CD8+ T Cells Upon Salmonella Typhi Porins Adjuvant Immunization Correlates With Melanoma Control and Anti-PD-1 Immunotherapy Cooperation.

Immunotherapy has improved the clinical response in melanoma patients, although a relevant percentage of patients still cannot be salvaged. The search for the immune populations that provide the best tumor control and that can be coaxed by immunotherapy strategies is a hot topic in cancer research nowadays. Tumor-infiltrating TCF-1+ progenitor exhausted CD8+ T cells seem to grant the best melanoma prognosis and also efficiently respond to anti-PD-1 immunotherapy, giving rise to a TIM-3+ terminally exhausted population with heightened effector activity. We tested Porins from Salmonella Typhi as a pathogen associated molecular pattern adjuvant of natural or model antigen in prophylactic and therapeutic immunization approaches against murine melanoma. Porins induced protection against melanomas, even upon re-challenging of tumor-free mice. Porins efficiently expanded IFN-γ-producing CD8+ T cells and induced central and effector memory in lymph nodes and tissue-resident (Trm) T cells in the skin and tumors. Porins induced TCF-1+ PD-1+ CD8+ Trm T cells in the tumor stroma and the presence of this population correlated with melanoma growth protection in mice. Porins immunization also cooperated with anti-PD-1 immunotherapy to hamper melanoma growth. Importantly, the potentially protective Trm populations induced by Porins in the murine model were also observed in melanoma patients in which their presence also correlated with disease control. Our data support the use of cancer vaccination to sculpt the tumor stroma with efficient and lasting Trm T cells with effector activities, highlighting the use of Porins as an adjuvant. Furthermore, our data place CD8+ Trm T cells with a progenitor exhausted phenotype as an important population for melanoma control, either independently or in cooperation with anti-PD-1 immunotherapy.

COVID-19 in a patient with advanced Merkel cell carcinoma receiving immunotherapy.

Background: Little is known about the 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) course and outcomes in patients receiving immunotherapy. Here we describe a metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma patient with a severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection while receiving pembrolizumab. Case presentation: A 66-year-old man, with a metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma receiving pembrolizumab, presented with fever. Chest computed tomography (CT) showed pulmonary ground-glass opacities, suggesting viral or immuno-related etiology. On day 7, the patient was hospitalized due to dyspnea and worsening of the radiological findings. Real time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing confirmed COVID-19. The patient developed acute respiratory distress syndrome and acute kidney injury. Hydroxychloroquine was administered for 5 days, but discontinued after supraventricular extrasystoles. Clinical improvement allowed the patient's discharge after 81 days of hospitalization. Conclusion: A careful evaluation of oncologic patients receiving immunotherapy during the COVID-19 pandemic is of utmost importance.

Response to anti-PD1 immunotherapy in patients with metastatic cutaneous sarcoma: case reports and literature review.

Dermal sarcomas represent a group or rare malignancies of mesenchymal origin. Although surgical excision with wide margins can be curative, in the advanced/metastatic setting, treatment options are limited and the benefit from anthracycline-based chemotherapy or targeted agents is usually short-lived. Tumor mutational burden and PD-L1 expression scores can be used as predictive biomarker for response to immunotherapy in some metastatic cancers. The role of immune-checkpoint blockade for sarcoma patients remains investigational. Here we present three cases of dermal sarcomas with high TMB and PD-L1 expression and responses to anti-PD1 agents in two of them.

Immunotherapy-based combinations versus standard first-line treatment for metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Considering the recent publication of the results of several clinical trials for metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized studies comparing standard first-line VEGFR-targeted therapy to immune checkpoint inhibitors-based combinations for mRCC patients. METHODS: 3960 patients from 5 randomized clinical trials where available for evaluation. RESULT: In the all-comers population, immunotherapy-based combinations were able to decrease the risk of death over the standard of care by 26% (HR 0.74; 95% CI 0.60-0.92; p = 0.006), to decrease the risk of progression by 21% (HR 0.79; 95% CI 0.72-0.86; p < 0.00001), and to increase the relative risk of response by 40% (HR 1.40; 95% CI 1.11-1.77; p = 0.006). For poor/intermediate-risk patients, the risk of death is decreased by 41% and the risk of progression by 27%. CONCLUSIONS: The benefit of immunotherapy-based combinations in mRCC patients is independent from the IMDC risk group, but it is stronger for poor/intermediate-risk patients.

Eficácia, segurança e efetividade de inibidores de checkpoint imunológico para o câncer de pulmão de células não pequenas avançado ou metastático / Efficacy, safety and effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors for advanced or metastatic non small cell lung cancer

Introdução: o câncer já é a principal causa de morte prematura (abaixo dos 70 anos) em cerca de um terço dos países monitorados pela Organização Mundial da Saúde, fenômeno que se relaciona à transição epidemiológica vivida no século XXI. Dentre as neoplasias mais incidentes no mundo destacam-se os tumores de pulmão, equivalentes a 12% dos casos estimados para o ano de 2018, superando os tumores de mama, de intestino/reto e próstata. Ademais, o câncer de pulmão apresenta alta letalidade, sendo responsável por 18% dos óbitos causados por alguma neoplasia, além de um prognóstico ruim, com sobrevida de cinco anos entre 10 e 20%. A década de 2010 foi marcada pelo lançamento de anticorpos monoclonais com ação na inibição do checkpoint imunológico (pelas vias CTLA4 e PD-1/PD-L1), trazendo novas expectativas para o combate a diversos tipos de tumores, incluindo os de pulmão. Esses medicamentos trouxeram algum ganho de sobrevida e um melhor perfil de toxicidade em relação à quimioterapia tradicional, mas a um custo elevado, superando a barreira de R$ 100.000,00 por ano de tratamento. Objetivo: avaliar a eficácia, segurança e efetividade dos inibidores de checkpoint imunológico (ICI), em monoterapia, associados entre si ou associados à quimioterapia, em comparação ao tratamento tradicional para o câncer de pulmão de células não pequenas em estadiamento avançado ou metastático. Métodos: foi conduzida uma revisão sistemática com meta-análise de ensaios clínicos randomizados (ECR) e estudos observacionais publicados nas principais bases de dados eletrônicas (Cochrane Library, EMBASE, LILACS e PUBMED). Os desfechos analisados foram sobrevida global (OS), eventos adversos relacionados ao tratamento (trAE) grau 3 ou maior, eventos adversos relacionados ao uso de imunoterapia (irAE), sobrevida livre de progressão (PFS) e taxa de resposta objetiva (ORR). Resultados: dentre as 2.783 publicações identificadas na literatura, foram selecionados 19 artigos referentes a 14 ECR e apenas um artigo referente a estudo observacional. Nas meta-análises realizadas para os ECR, o uso de ICI, em monoterapia ou em associação com outro ICI ou com quimioterapia, demonstrou ser mais eficaz nos desfechos OS (diferença de média [MD] 2,66 meses; intervalo de confiança [IC] 95% 1,80 a 3,52) e ORR (risco relativo [RR] 1,47; IC95% 1,20 a 1,79). Os dados referentes à PFS não demonstraram ganho de sobrevida (MD 0,07 meses; IC95% -0,61 a 0,76). Quanto à segurança dos ICI, observou-se um melhor perfil de toxicidade no desfecho trAE (RR 0,51; IC95% 0,36 a 0,73), entretanto houve maior incidência de irAE. Também foi possível identificar associação entre a expressão da proteína de membrana PD-L1 nas células tumorais e os desfechos de sobrevida. Conclusão: apesar da heterogeneidade estatística encontrada nas meta-análises e dos conflitos de interesse identificados nos ECR, os resultados obtidos indicam que os ganhos de sobrevida são mínimos e houve incidência de irAE relevantes como colite, hipotireoidismo, hipertireoidismo e pneumonite. A carência de evidências de mundo real, com braços comparadores, somada ao alto custo por ano de vida ganho são limitações para se estimar a efetividade dessas opções terapêuticas e para incorporar essas tecnologias em sistemas de saúde de países em desenvolvimento.

Introduction: cancer has become the main cause of premature mortality (before the age of 70) in one third of the countries. This phenomenon is related to the epidemiologic transition in 21st century. Among the world's main neoplasms, lung tumors represent 12% of estimated cases in 2018, outperforming breast, colon and prostate tumors. Moreover, lung cancer show high lethality, being responsible for 18% of deaths caused by any neoplasm. The disease prognostic is poor, with a five-year survival between 10 and 20%. In 2010's there were launched monoclonal antibodies inhibiting the immune checkpoint system (CTLA4 and PD-1/PD-L1 pathways), bringing new hope against many tumors, including lung cancer. These drugs showed some survival gain and a better safety profile comparing to traditional chemotherapy. Although these benefits, they have a high cost, overcoming the R$ 100.000,00 barrier per year of treatment. Objective: to assess the efficacy, safety and effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), as monotherapy, in association with themselves or with chemotherapy, comparing with traditional treatment for advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. Methods: we did a systematic review with meta-analysis selecting randomized clinical trials (RCT) and observational studies from the main electronic database (Cochrane Library, EMBASE, LILACS e PUBMED). We analyzed overall survival (OS), treatment-related adverse events (trAE) grade 3 or greater, immune-related adverse events (irAE), progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR). Results: among the 2,783 publications identified on the electronic database, we selected 19 papers referring to 14 RCT and only papers of observational study. Considering the meta-analysis we did for the RCT outcomes, ICI showed more efficacy in the outcomes OS (mean difference [MD] 2.66 months; 95% confidence interval [95%CI] 1.80; 3.52) and ORR (relative risk [RR] 1.47; 95%CI 1.20; 1.79). Regarding PFS, we found inconclusive data (MD 0.07 months; 95%CI -0.61; 0,76). In terms of safety, we found a better safety profile in trAE (RR 0.51; 95%CI 0.36; 0.73), but there were high incidence of irAE. We also identified the association between membrane protein PD-L1 expression and survival outcomes. Conclusion: despite the statistical heterogeneity in the meta-analysis and the conflict of interest identified in the RCT, our results suggest small survival gain in the intention-to-treat population and relevant irAE incidence as colitis, hypothyroidism, hyperthyroidism and pneumonitis. There was a lack of real world evidence, which limited our estimates for the effectiveness of these drugs. Moreover, considering the high cost per life gained, there is a relevant barrier to incorporate these technologies in health systems of developing countries.

Evaluation of a ConvitVax/anti-PD-1 combined immunotherapy for breast cancer treatment.

Breast cancer therapies using checkpoints alone have not been highly effective. Based on previous experiences using the ConvitVax, an autologous tumor cells/bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG)/formalin-based vaccine, in breast cancer and the potential success of combined therapies, we sought to ascertain whether the ConvitVax combined with anti-PD-1 enhances the antitumor effect in a 4T1 breast cancer model. Animals received four weekly injections of either PBS (G1), ConvitVax (200 µg cell homogenate, 0.0625 mg BCG, 0.02% formalin) (G2), 50 µg anti-PD-1 (G3), or ConvitVax plus anti-PD-1 (200 µg cell homogenate, 0.0625 mg BCG, 0.02% formalin, 50 µg anti-PD-1) (G4). Five weeks post tumor induction all mice were euthanized, tumors extracted and evaluated pathologically and by immunohistochemistry. The combination group (G4) showed 10% more tumor necrosis, greater infiltration of PD-1+ cells and lower infiltration of TAMs, evidencing that the combination of ConvitVax and anti-PD-1 can improve the antitumor effect of the vaccine. Using a higher anti-PD-1 dose and administering each treatment at different times could further potentiate the effect of our therapy. Given the vaccine's low cost and simple preparation, its use in combination with checkpoints or other target-specific compounds may lead to a highly effective personalized breast cancer immunotherapy.