Detection of polyreactive immunoglobulin G facilitates diagnosis in children with autoimmune hepatitis.

OBJECTIVE: The detection of autoantibodies is essential to diagnose autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). Particularly in children, specificity of autoantibodies decreases due to lower titers being diagnostic and being present not only in AIH but also in other liver diseases. Recently, quantification of polyreactive IgG (pIgG) for detection of adult AIH showed the highest overall accuracy compared to antinuclear antibodies (ANA), anti-smooth muscle antibodies (anti-SMA), anti-liver kidney microsomal antibodies (anti-LKM) and anti-soluble liver antigen/liver pancreas antibodies (anti-SLA/LP). We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of pIgG for pediatric AIH. DESIGN: pIgG, quantified using HIP1R/BSA coated ELISA, and immunofluorescence on rodent tissue sections were performed centrally. The diagnostic fidelity to diagnose AIH was compared to conventional autoantibodies of AIH in training and validation cohorts from a retrospective, European multi-center cohort from nine centers from eight European countries composed of existing biorepositories from expert centers (n = 285). RESULTS: IgG from pediatric AIH patients exhibited increased polyreactivity to multiple protein and non-protein substrates compared to non-AIH liver diseases and healthy children. pIgG had an AUC of 0.900 to distinguish AIH from non-AIH liver diseases. pIgG had a 31-73% higher specificity than ANA and anti-SMA and comparable sensitivity that was 6-20 times higher than of anti-SLA/LP, anti-LC1 and anti-LKM. pIgG had a 21-34% higher accuracy than conventional autoantibodies, was positive in 43-75% of children with AIH and normal IgG and independent from treatment response. CONCLUSION: Detecting pIgG improves the diagnostic evaluation of pediatric AIH compared to conventional autoantibodies, primarily owing to higher accuracy and specificity.

Referrals for rheumatologic evaluation following a positive antinuclear antibody test result. A cross-sectional single center Brazilian study.

BACKGROUND: In general, patients are referred for rheumatological evaluation due to isolated laboratory abnormalities, especially antinuclear antibody (ANA) positivity, with the risk of more severe patients remaining on the waiting list for longer than desired. The aim of this study was to analyze the demographic, clinical, and laboratory information of patients referred to a specialized rheumatological care unit because of positive antinuclear antibody. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 99 out of 1670 patients seen by the same rheumatologist between 01/01/2011 and 01/01/2019. Patients whose referrals were exclusively due to the ANA test result and the specialist's final diagnosis being "abnormal finding of serum immunological test" (ICD-10 R769) were included. Sociodemographic, clinical, and laboratory information were extracted from the consulting rheumatologist's chart. Descriptive statistics were used for data analysis. RESULTS: A total of 99 patients were included, most of whom were female (84.8%) with a median age of 49 years. At the moment of specialist's appointment, 97 patients (97.9%) repeated the ANA test, and 77 patients remained positive. Of these, only 35 (35.35%) were in a high titer range (greater than or equal to 1:320). Complete blood count for cytopenia's investigation was not performed in a high percentage of patients (22.2%), as well as urinalysis (31.3%). In addition, more than 70% of patients score 0 to 1 classification criteria for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, according to SLE - ACR 1987 (American College of Rheumatology) and SLICC 2012 (Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics). CONCLUSIONS: Most patients are still referred for specialized evaluation due to the misinterpretation of laboratory tests that were inappropriately requested in patients without clinical evidence of autoimmune rheumatic disease.

Association between thyroid autoimmunity and antinuclear antibody prevalence among pregnant women: a cross-sectional study in Qingdao, China.

Objective: To identify the relationship between thyroid autoimmunity and antinuclear antibody (ANA) prevalence in Chinese pregnant women. Methods: The study involved 1923 first-trimester women who were measured for thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) level, thyroid autoantibodies (thyroperoxidase antibody [TPOAb] and thyroglobulin antibody [TgAb]) and ANA titer. Social demographic data were collected through standardized questionnaires. Results: In this study, 23.3% of pregnant women tested positive for TPOAb and 9.9% tested positive for TgAb. Women with a positive ANA were more likely to be TPOAb-positive or TgAb-positive than women with a negative ANA (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.96, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.47-2.62 for TPOAb [+]; AOR 3.12, 95% CI 2.18-4.48 for TgAb[+]). In addition, ANA titers were closely associated with thyroid autoimmunity. Women with an ANA titer of >1:320 had a significant higher risk of being TPOAb positive or TgAb positive (AOR 4.49, 95% CI 1.48-13.66 for TPOAb [+]; AOR 5.51, 95% CI 1.65-18.49 for TgAb [+]). The higher the ANA titer, the greater the risk of developing thyroid autoimmunity, especially for those with a high ANA titer. Conclusions: ANA positivity is strongly correlated with thyroid autoimmunity. Further study is warranted to clarify the causal relationship between thyroid autoimmunity and ANA in pregnant women.This research is essential to evaluate and predict the risk of co-existing autoimmune disorders,leading to improved care for pregnancy and neonatal health.

Relevance of antinuclear antibody in diagnosis and characteristics of multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Criteria for multiple sclerosis (MS) diagnosis rely upon clinical and paraclinical data that are supportive of MS in the absence of a better explanation. Patients referred for consideration of a MS diagnosis often undergo an extensive serologic workup including antinuclear antibody (ANA) testing, even when an individual already meets diagnostic criteria for MS. It is unclear whether ANA serostatus is associated with clinical outcomes in MS. The present study aims to determine if ANA seropositivity in those referred with concern for MS differs in those who meet 2017 revised McDonald criteria compared to those who did not receive a diagnosis of MS. Associations between ANA seropositivity and clinical or radiological phenotype of MS patients are also explored. METHODS: The cohort included people at least 18 years old, referred to our tertiary care MS center with concern for MS (regardless of prior diagnosis) who had an ANA test with known titer completed within one year of first evaluation. Electronic health record (EHR) charts were manually reviewed, and MRIs underwent blinded review by a radiologist with training in neuroradiology. Diagnosis of MS was determined by a neuroimmunologist and was based on 2017 revised McDonald Criteria. Results are reported as odds ratios from multivariable logistic regression analyses adjusted for age, sex at birth, race, smoking history, personal history of comorbid autoimmune conditions, and family history of autoimmunity. Within the MS cohort, similar analytical models were performed to assess association between ANA and clinical and radiological characteristics. RESULTS: A final cohort of 258 patients was analyzed (out of 542 referrals): 106 nonMS and 152 with MS. There was no association between MS (vs. nonMS) diagnosis and ANA status (ANA positive n = 74) in the multivariable models (OR 1.5, 95 % CI 0.82, 2.72, p = 0.20). Among those with MS, there was no association of ANA seropositivity with the odds of atypical brain MRI features, number of cardinal MRI areas involved, location of MRI lesions, or of having an atypical presentation of first demyelinating event. Black race (OR 2.8, 95 % CI 1.27, 6.26, p = 0.01) and family history of autoimmunity (OR 2.1, 95 % CI 1.09, 3.98, p = 0.03) were independently associated with increased odds of ANA positivity. Within the MS cohort analysis, progressive MS (PMS; vs relapsing-remitting MS), a covariate in the model, appeared to be at higher odds of being ANA positive (OR 3.6, 95 % CI 1.03, 13.05, p = 0.046) but only when assessing mean area of cardinal MS locations. CONCLUSIONS: While ANA testing does not appear to be useful in distinguishing MS from non-MS, it remains less clear as to whether it may be associated with differences in the clinical course of MS (relapsing-remitting vs progressive). Future studies should aim to systematically evaluate whether those who are ANA positive are more likely, in well-designed and representative prospective cohorts, to be diagnosed with or develop progressive MS. Whether a positive ANA early in MS is associated with increased risk over time of developing or diagnosing another systemic autoimmune disease would also be of interest.

Using Antinuclear Antibody Testing in Pediatric Rheumatology.

The antinuclear antibody (ANA) test is frequently used for the identification of patients who are at a high risk of developing autoimmune rheumatological diseases. The aim of this study is to evaluate the final diagnoses of patients applied to the pediatric rheumatology outpatient clinic with a positive ANA test result. In this study, the medical records of 283 children who had ANA positivity between January 2010 and January 2022 were evaluated retrospectively. All patients were younger than 18 years of age at diagnosis and were followed up in the pediatric rheumatology department for at least 6 months. The majority of the patients were females (69%), and the mean age was 9.9 ± 4.7 years. 94% of the ANA tests were requested in pediatric rheumatology outpatient clinics, and 6% in general pediatrics and other outpatient clinics. Arthritis was the most common reason for ANA testing (41.7%). Of the patients who had ANA positivity, 37% were diagnosed with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), 15% with connective tissue diseases, 10% with autoinflammatory disease, and 7% with vasculitides. Positivity at 1/320 and 1/640 titers were more common in the patients diagnosed with autoimmune connective tissue diseases or JIA compared to the patients without these diagnoses (P = .009 and P = .013, respectively). The ANA test should be judiciously requested by pediatric rheumatologists, especially in suspected cases of autoimmune rheumatic disorders and JIA patients to aid in classification. Indiscriminate use of the ANA test for screening may potentially misguide clinicians.

Autoimmunity and epithelial dysplasia in patients with oral lichenoid diseases.

OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study was to explore relationship between autoimmunity and epithelial dysplasia in patients with oral lichenoid diseases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 66 patients with oral lichen planus (OLP), 35 with oral lichenoid lesion (OLL), and 85 with oral lichenoid drug reaction (OLDR) were enrolled. OLP, OLL, and OLDR were diagnosed following the definitions of the modified World Health Organization criteria, except for the absence of epithelial dysplasia. All patients underwent diagnostic incisional biopsy and adjunctive direct immunofluorescence assays. An indirect immunofluorescence assay was conducted to determine the antinuclear antibody (ANA) positivity. RESULTS: OLP and OLDR patients with epithelial dysplasia demonstrated higher prevalence of serum ANA positivity compared to those without epithelial dysplasia. Elevated serum levels of high sensitivity-C reactive proteins were observed in the OLP, OLL, and OLDR patients with epithelial dysplasia. In the DIF analysis, patients with epithelial dysplasia in the OLP exhibited a higher prevalence of C3 deposition in the basement membrane zone. CONCLUSIONS: This study proposed that autoimmunity may contribute to elevating levels of focal and chronic systemic inflammation, potentially influencing abnormal wound healing and development of dysplastic changes in the oral epithelium among patients with oral lichenoid disease.

Systemic correlates of cutaneous manifestations of lupus erythematosus.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to investigate the prevalence of skin disease among patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and determine whether LE skin disease had clinical or serologic correlates with SLE. METHODS: We reviewed records of 335 patients with SLE (seen at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA) and abstracted skin manifestations, fulfilled mucocutaneous SLE criteria, and clinical and serologic parameters. RESULTS: Of the 231 patients with skin manifestations, 57 (24.7%) had LE-specific conditions, 102 (44.2%) had LE-nonspecific conditions, and 72 (31.2%) had both. LE skin disease was associated with photosensitivity, anti-Smith antibodies, and anti-U1RNP antibodies (all P < 0.001). Patients without LE skin disease more commonly had elevated C-reactive protein levels (P = 0.01). Patients meeting 2-4 mucocutaneous American College of Rheumatology criteria less commonly had cytopenia (P = 0.004) or anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies (P = 0.004). No significant associations were observed for systemic involvement (renal, hematologic, neurologic, and arthritis) when comparing patients with or without LE skin involvement. LE skin involvement was not significantly associated with internal SLE disease flare, number of medications, or overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: LE skin disease commonly occurs in patients with SLE. The presence of LE skin disease had no mitigating impact on the severity of SLE sequelae, disease flares, number of medications, or overall survival.

Association between serum antinuclear antibody and rheumatoid arthritis.

Background: The relationship between serum antinuclear antibody (ANA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) remains unknown. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate whether serum ANA was associated with an increased risk of RA in a case-control study. Methods: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis hospitalized at Shandong Provincial Hospital from January 2018 to December 2022 were recruited as the case group, and patients with other types of arthritis and healthy people at the same time were taken as the control group. Antinuclear antibody (ANA) was detected by indirect immunofluorescence assays. Propensity score matching was employed to construct a cohort of patients exhibiting comparable baseline characteristics. The relationship between serum ANA and the risk of rheumatoid arthritis was analyzed by logistic regression analysis. Results: A total of 1,175 patients with RA and 1,662 control subjects were included in this study. After adjusting for potential confounding factors in the propensity-score matched cohort, the risk of RA gradually increased with rising of ANA titers. When ANA titers were divided into three groups (1:100, 1:320, and 1:1,000), the OR (95% CI) for ANA titers from low to high was 3.95 (3.01, 5.18), 16.63 (9.44, 29.30), and 17.34 (9.53, 31.54), respectively, compared to those when ANA was negative. The ANA patterns closely related to the occurrence of RA include nuclear homogeneous, nuclear speckled, and cytoplasmic speckled. Among them, the positive rate of nuclear homogeneous was the highest, which accounted for 42.64%. The OR (95% CI) of ANA patterns including nuclear homogeneous, nuclear speckled, and cytoplasmic speckled was 16.81 (11.46, 24.65), 3.40 (2.49, 4.63), and 3.09 (1.77, 5.40), respectively. Conclusion: There was a curve relation between ANA titer and RA, and the higher the ANA titer, the higher the probability of RA. However, there was no statistical difference in probability of RA for 1:320 versus 1:1,000 ANA titers. The most important kind of ANA pattern in the blood of RA patients was nuclear homogeneous. These findings suggest that ANA may be a novel risk marker for RA.

Combination of cytoplasmic and nuclear patterns on Hep-2 antinuclear antibody is useful as a screening test for anti-synthetase syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to establish a screening model for differentiating anti-synthetase syndrome (ASS) from other antinuclear antibody (ANA)-associated rheumatic diseases (AARD) using a combination of cytoplasmic and non-cytoplasmic ANA (ncANA) patterns. METHODS: This retrospective observational study included patients with AARDs such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), systemic sclerosis (SSc), Sjögren's syndrome (SS), mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD), and polymyositis/dermatomyositis (PM/DM) who underwent ANA screening between April 2012 and December 2021. Variables included age, sex, ANA patterns (Cytoplasmic and ncANA), and titers. Logistic regression analysis of Cytoplasmic and ncANA patterns was performed to differentiate ASS from other AARDs. RESULT: The 981 diagnosed cases of AARDs consisted of SS (n = 451), SSc (n = 264), SLE (n = 201), PM/DM (n = 104), MCTD (n = 52), and ASS, including PM/DM (n = 64). Of these, 155 patients had ≥2 overlapping diseases; however, there was no overlap between AARDs and ASS. ASS is more likely to occur when the cytoplasmic titer is positive and the ncANA <320. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis of the Cytoplasmic and ncANA range revealed an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.885 (95% CI: 0.844 to 0.927). CONCLUSION: It is important to detect cytoplasmic patterns as an ANA screening test for ASS diagnosis, even if the titer is low. Additionally, combining the cytoplasmic and ncANA patterns yields more accurate ASS screening results.

Vitamin D levels in non-pregnant women with a history of recurrent pregnancy loss with and without autoantibodies.

Background: The objective of this study was to compare the levels of vitamin D in non-pregnant women with a history of recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) who were seropositive or seronegative for autoantibodies (autoAbs). Methods: The study examined 58 RPL patients with autoAbs (ANA, anti-TPO, or APAs), 34 RPL patients without autoAbs, and 58 healthy women with prior successful pregnancies and without autoantibodies. The levels of 25 (OH) D were measured using the sandwich ELISA technique. Results: Our results showed insufficient serum 25(OH) D levels in study groups, with significantly lower levels observed in RPL patients with or without autoAbs compared to healthy women (P=0.0006). In addition, RPL patients with autoAbs had significantly lower 25(OH) D levels compared to RPL patients without autoAbs. We also found that serum levels of 25(OH) D in RPL patients with autoAbs were significantly lower than in RPL patients without autoAbs (20.51 ± 1.15 ng/ml Vs. 23.69 ± 0.74 ng/ml, P=0.0356). Further analysis indicated that RPL patients who were positive for ANA, and APAs, except anti-TPO, had significantly lower than 25(OH)D serum levels than RPL patients without autoAbs. Conclusion: These findings suggest that RPL patients, especially those with APAs or ANA, have lower vitamin D levels compared to healthy women. This may indicate a link between maternal immune dysregulation due to vitamin D deficiency and the presence of autoantibodies in RPL.

Anticentromere antibodies are the most potent antinuclear antibodies in reducing live birth outcomes after ICSI.

RESEARCH QUESTION: How, and to what extent, do anticentromere antibodies (ACA) reduce live birth outcomes after ICSI? STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of infertile women aged 30-43 years who underwent ICSI between September 2016 and March 2021. Women with a history or current diagnosis of symptomatic connective tissue disease were excluded. Immunofluorescence staining detected antinuclear antibodies (ANA). Staining pattern and titre (cut-off, 1:160) were used to divide infertile women into three groups: positive for ACA (ACA+) (n = 28); positive for ANA other than ACA (ANA+) (n = 77); and negative for both ACA and ANA (control) (n = 3723). RESULTS: Cumulative live birth rate (CLB) was lowest in ACA+ (7%, 31% and 46% in ACA+, ANA+ and control, respectively) (ACA+ versus control, P < 0.0001; ACA+ versus ANA+, P = 0.011; ANA+ versus control, P = 0.012). A small impairment in meiosis I and a larger impairment in meiosis II, fertilization and embryo cleavage caused the decrease. Multiple pronuclei formation increased (RR versus control, 5.33; 95% CI 4.26 to 6.65) and good-quality blastocyst development decreased (RR 0.34; 95% CI 0.22 to 0.53). Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that ACA was associated with CLB outcome (OR 0.08, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.36); the other four ANA staining patterns were not. CONCLUSIONS: The effect of ACA on live birth outcomes is strongest after ICSI among ANA, primarily through the impairment of meiosis II and subsequent stages. Repeated ICSI failure and eggs with multiple pronuclei may warrant specific testing for ACA.

Elevated levels of anti-Golgi antibodies: An early sign of seronegative rheumatoid arthritis.

Anti-Golgi antibodies are uncommon antibodies that exhibit specific, polarized cytoplasmic staining on the Hep-2 substrate. The objective of our study was to identify the clinical and laboratory features associated with anti-Golgi antibodies. We examined 4.5 years of data from a Turkish tertiary hospital in this retrospective cohort analysis. The indirect immunofluorescence staining patterns, antinuclear antibody (ANA) titres and clinical data of all patients were obtained from the hospital record system. A total of 146,055 ANAs were detected, of which 224 patients (0.15%) exhibited anti-Golgi antibody staining. In total, 39.4% of diagnosed patients had autoimmune diseases (AIDs). Of the AIDs, 26 (46.4%) were rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This is a very high rate and another remarkable point is that 17 (65.3%) of these patients had seronegative RA. High-titre results (1 ≥ 1/320) were more common in patients with AID. Anti-Ro52 was prevalent in 50% of extractable nuclear antigen (ENA)-positive patients, making it a remarkable finding. The majority of individuals with high-titre anti-Golgi antibodies had AID, particularly RA. The majority of these patients also tested negative for anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) and rheumatoid factor (RF). Finally, high-titre anti-Golgi antibodies may be an important serologic marker for seronegative RA in the Turkish population.

Chronic Adult-Onset Still's Disease With Positive Antinuclear Antibodies: Navigating Diagnostic Dilemmas and Clinical Implications.

Adult-onset Still's disease (AOSD) is a rare systemic autoinflammatory disorder characterized by fever, rash, and joint pain. Despite primarily affecting young adults, it can occur at any age, presenting diagnostic challenges due to its heterogeneous nature and lack of specific laboratory findings. The subset of AOSD with positive antinuclear antibody (ANA) adds complexity, potentially overlapping with other autoimmune conditions. We describe a case of a 30-year-old female with a two-year history of fever, weight loss, and joint pain, initially misdiagnosed as seronegative arthritis with hypothyroidism. Further evaluation revealed severe anemia, leucocytosis, and hepatosplenomegaly. Despite a strongly positive ANA, the absence of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) features led to a diagnosis of chronic AOSD. Treatment with steroids and disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) resulted in clinical improvement, highlighting the importance of accurate disease classification for tailored management in ANA-positive AOSD. This case underscores the diagnostic challenges of AOSD and emphasizes the need for precise classification for optimal treatment strategies.

The presence of autoantibodies as a potential prognostic biomarker for breast cancer.

The presence of autoantibodies is closely associated with the occurrence and development of cancer. Autoantibodies can be used as biomarkers for early breast cancer diagnosis. However, the relationship between autoantibodies and the prognosis of breast cancer patients remains elusive. This retrospective study aimed to investigate the correlation between the presence of autoantibodies and outcomes in breast cancer patients. This study included a total of 155 patients from People's Hospital of Henan University (Zhengzhou, China) who were diagnosed with breast cancer from January 2017 to December 2021. The enrolled patients' clinicopathological features were collected, and 88 patients were ultimately involved in the analysis. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to search for the risk factors related to the poor prognosis of breast cancer patients. The association between the presence of autoantibodies and patients' survival was analysed using Kaplan-Meier curves. After screening, there were 38 autoantibody-positive cases and 50 autoantibody-negative cases. Breast cancer patients with autoantibody-positive had a 57% lower risk of death compared with autoantibody-negative patients. Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that the presence of autoantibody could be a potential prognostic predictor for breast cancer, independent of age, histological grade, pathological classification, clinical stage, and the expression levels of hormonal receptors. In addition, autoantibody-positive breast cancer patients had longer progression-free survival and overall survival compared with autoantibody-negative cases. Positive autoantibody was found as an independent biomarker of better prognosis in breast cancer patients, providing a new strategy for the prognostic assessment of breast cancer patients.

Association of urine autoantibodies with disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus.

Objective: The presence of urinary autoantibodies in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) has been confirmed by several studies; however, the significance of their presence in urine remains unclear. This study aims to further investigate the association between urine autoantibodies and disease activity as well as organ involvement in SLE. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 89 SLE patients. Data collected included anti-nuclear antibody (ANA), anti-ENA antibodies, and anti-dsDNA antibody levels in both serum and urine, complement (C) 3, C4 levels in serum, SLE disease activity index-2000 (SLEDAI-2000), renal domains of SLEDAI (RSLEDAI) and non-renal SLEDAI (NRSLEDAI). Results: The rate of positive urine ANA (uANA) was 33.3% (29/87) among the enrolled patients. Compared to the uANA negative group, the positive group exhibited significantly higher SLEDAI-2000 scores (7.85 ± 5.88 vs. 18.69 ± 6.93, p < 0.001), RSLEDAI scores [0 (0, 4.0) vs. 12.0 (8.0, 16.0), p < 0.001], and NRSLEDAI [4 (2.0, 8.0) vs. 6.0 (4.0, 9.5), p = 0.038]. Patients with positive urine anti-Sm antibody demonstrated significantly elevated SLEDAI-2000 scores compared to those who were negative (25.0 ± 8.80 vs. 10.09 ± 6.63, p < 0.001). Similarly, they also had higher RSLEDAI [16.0 (12.0, 16.0) vs. 4.0 (0, 8.0), p < 0.001] and NRSLEDAI [9.5 (6.0, 13.5) vs. 4.0 (3.0, 8.0), p = 0.012], as well as a greater prevalence of renal involvement compared to their negative counterparts (100% vs. 58.2, p = 0.022). There was a positive correlation between uANA titer and both SLEDAI-2000 (rs = 0.663, p < 0.001) and RSLEDAI (rs = 0.662, p < 0.001). The serum anti-dsDNA antibody level did not exhibit a significant correlation with RSLEDAI (rs = 0.143, p = 0.182). Conversely, the urine anti-dsDNA antibody level demonstrated a significant positive correlation with RSLEDAI (rs = 0.529, p < 0.001). Conclusion: Urine ANA is associated with both global SLEDAI and RSLEDAI scores. Urine anti-Sm antibody is associated with an increased incidence of renal involvement in SLE. The urine anti-dsDNA antibody level, rather than the serum anti-dsDNA antibody level, exhibits a significant association with RSLEDAI in SLE.

Epidermodysplasia verruciformis arising in a female with systemic lupus erythematosus: a rare case from Syria.

Introduction and importance: Epidermodysplasia verruciformis is a rare autosomal recessive genodermatosis. Clinical manifestations might be helpful in the diagnosis of this disease. However, the final diagnosis is made after a genetic and histological study. Acquired epidermodysplasia verruciformis is a form of epidermodysplasia verruciformis described in patients with compromised cell-mediated immunity. Case presentation: A 42-year-old female with a history of a pain and itch on the soles and palms started a year ago. There were multiple flat papules on the dorsal hands, scarring alopecia, malar rash, oral ulcers, Raynaud phenomenon, and palpable purpura. A histological examination confirmed the diagnosis of epidermodysplasia verruciformis. Clinical discussion: Epidermodysplasia verruciformis is an uncommon disease that affects the immune system. The coexistence of systemic lupus erythematosus and epidermodysplasia verruciformis is rarely reported in the medical literature. This paper reports a rare case in which these two diseases have coexisted. Conclusion: This publication aims to document this rare case and highlight the ideal criteria in diagnosing and treating epidermodysplasia verruciformis.

Frequency of Repeating Antinuclear Antibody Testing: When Less Is More.

Objectives Antinuclear antibodies (ANA) are autoantibodies that are associated with and ordered to diagnose autoimmune connective tissue disease. ANA have high sensitivity (~98%) but low specificity (~75%), and because they can be found in healthy individuals and non-rheumatologic conditions leading to their elevation, ANA tests are often requested and interpreted inappropriately by clinicians. The aim of this study was to retrospectively assess how frequently ANA testing is repeated in the adult population of Saudi Arabia (SA) and which factors are associated with and lead to inappropriate testing. Methodology We investigated a study group of 40,634 adult patients who underwent 229,825 ANA tests from 2018 to 2022 in an academic hospital in Jeddah, SA. We took a random sample of 500 patients from the study group, along with their 998 ANA tests, to look in depth into our research questions. Variables related to patients, ANA tests, and ordering physicians were collected. Descriptive and analytical statistics were employed to address the research questions, and a p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results We found 57% of the ordered ANA tests to have positive results, with the most common titers of mild positivity being 1:80 and 1:160. Most repeated ANA tests were ordered with an interval of more than one year, and when repeated, 67% of test results remained unchanged. The majority of seroconversions resulted from negative ANA tests or those with weak (titer 1:40) or mild positivity (titer 1:80-1:160). The results of the moderate (titer 1:320-1:640) and strong (titer ≥1280) positivity ANA tests did not change. Only 11% of repeated ANA tests were found to be appropriate for repetition. The most common specialties associated with ordering ANA tests in general were internal medicine, followed by rheumatology, and finally family medicine. Our correlation analysis revealed that being female, having systemic connective tissue disease, and having a rheumatologist as a specialist were all associated with ordering more than 10 ANA tests (p < 0.05). Conclusion Because the results of repeated ANA tests did not change much, our study suggests that the cost of repeating ANA tests and the subsequent potentially unnecessary interventions should all be carefully examined before scheduling a repeated ANA test. Further studies involving patients from SA and across wider healthcare settings (academic, community, and private hospitals and healthcare centers) are warranted.

Clinical features of patients with connective tissue disease with anti-human upstream binding factor antibodies: A single-center retrospective study.

Anti-human upstream-binding factor (anti-hUBF) antibodies have been reported predominantly in patients with connective tissue diseases (CTDs); these have also been reported in patients without CTDs such as hepatocellular carcinoma. Because of the low frequency of expression and few case reports, there is no consensus on the clinical significance of these antibodies. Thus, we aimed to examine the clinical features of patients with anti-hUBF antibodies and analyzed 1042 patients with clinically suspected CTDs. The presence of anti-hUBF antibodies was screened using immunoprecipitation assays. Of the 1042 patients, 19 (1.82%) tested positive for anti-hUBF antibodies; among them, 10 (56%) were diagnosed with undifferentiated CTD (UCTD), six with systemic sclerosis (SSc) and three with other diseases. Five of the 10 patients with UCTD were referred to our hospital with suspected SSc. None of the five patients fulfilled the 2013 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism classification criteria, but three scored seven points, a relatively high score. Six anti-hUBF-positive patients with SSc had a significantly lower modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) than that of anti-hUBF-negative patients with SSc (2 [0-2] vs 7 [0-49], p < 0.01). Compared with anti-topoisomerase I-positive patients, anti-hUBF-positive patients had a significantly lower mRSS (2 [0-2] vs 13 [0-42], p < 0.01) and lower incidence of scleroderma renal crisis (0 of 6 vs 8 of 184, p < 0.01). Compared with anti-centromere-positive patients, anti-hUBF-positive patients had a higher incidence of interstitial lung disease (ILD), but the difference was not statistically significant (4 of 6 vs 19 of 239). In conclusion, anti-hUBF antibodies were predominantly detected in patients with CTDs and UCTD. In patients with CTDs, SSc exhibited a high ratio, displaying a lower mRSS and higher incidence of ILD. In patients with UCTD, careful follow-up is recommended as they may develop CTDs in the future.