Biological treatment in chronic disease management: from asthma to ulcerative colitis. A review paper.

OBJECTIVE: Aim: The purpose of this article is to review the literature on the applicability of biologic agents, their mechanism of action, safety and factors affecting their choice in selected chronic conditions: asthma, psoriasis, ankylosing spondylitis and ulcerative colitis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Materials and Methods: The electronic databases MEDLINE/PubMed and ScienceScholar were searched for studies published in English and Polish and indexed from 2018 to April 2024. Dodatkowo uwzgledniono Stanowisko Polskiego Towarzystwa Alergologicznego i Polskiego Towarzystwa Chorób Ukladu Oddechowego, rekomendacje Polskiego Towarzystwa Dermatologicznego, wytyczne Polskiego Towarzystwa Gastroenterologii i konsultanta krajowego w dziedzinie gastroenterologii oraz wytyczne Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA). CONCLUSION: Conclusions: 1. Biological therapy demonstrates a significant reduction in the severity of clinical symptoms and complications associated with a variety of disease entities. An additional value of this therapy is its effectiveness among patients who do not respond to traditional treatment strategies. 2. In the perspective of the future of biologic treatment, it is important to study potential interactions between biologic drugs and other therapeutic methods. 3. To maximize benefits while minimizing complications, requires an individualized approach for each patient.

Treatment of Reactive Arthritis with Biological Agents.

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW: Reactive arthritis (ReA) is an inflammatory joint condition triggered by an infection elsewhere in the body, and this review aims to provide a comprehensive synthesis of recent studies including case reports and case series to determine whether biologics are a treatment option. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent studies indicate that biological agents, including anti-TNF agents (infliximab, adalimumab, etanercept), anti-IL17 (secukinumab), and anti-IL6 (tocilizumab), are effective in treating refractory cases of ReA. Evidence suggests these agents are associated with significant clinical improvement. Notably, the data reveal that these biologics are generally well-tolerated, with a low incidence of major adverse events, which supports their safety profile for use in ReA. Biological agents, including anti-TNF, anti-IL17, and anti-IL6 therapies, can be safely and effectively used in the treatment of ReA when conventional therapies fail. It further emphasizes the need for a well-designed controlled trial to provide scientific basis for better informed clinical decisions in cases not responding to conventional treatment.

Assessing the Role of Adalimumab in Treating Hidradenitis Suppurativa: Findings from a Retrospective Study at a Reference Center.

BACKGROUND: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory skin condition characterized by inflammatory lesions, often leading to scarring. Managing HS can be difficult, requiring biological therapy, specifically adalimumab. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on patients diagnosed with HS and treated with the TNF-α inhibitor adalimumab. Data from 21 patients were included in this study. International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4); Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI); pain intensity according to the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS); and number of nodules, abscesses, and fistulas were assessed. RESULTS: Notably, 47.62% of patients achieved Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response. The mean number of inflamed nodules decreased from 5.62 ± 4.12 to 3 ± 3.46, abscesses decreased from 1.76 ± 2.63 to 0.81 ± 1.4, and fistulas decreased from 2.62 ± 1.86 to 2 ± 1.9 (p < 0.05). The IHS4 score decreased from 19 ± 10.78 to 12.62 ± 11.13 (p = 0.001), DLQI from 15.76 ± 7.73 to 7.43 ± 7.76 (p < 0.001), and VAS from 6.69 ± 1.56 to 3.64 ± 2.65 (p < 0.001). There was a significant difference in the baseline IHS4 scores between patients who had prior surgery with a mean score of 23.86 ± 9.4 versus non-surgical patients with a mean IHS4 score of 9.29 ± 5.53 (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: About half of HS patients responded positively to adalimumab treatment; the use of the drug reduces inflammatory lesions, and pain, and improves quality of life.

Bimekizumab provided rapid improvements in patient-reported symptoms and health-related quality of life in patients with active psoriatic arthritis: pooled 16-week results from two phase 3 studies.

OBJECTIVES: To assess impact of bimekizumab treatment on patient-reported outcomes and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA), using 16-week data from two phase 3 studies. METHODS: BE OPTIMAL (NCT03895203; biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD)-naïve) and BE COMPLETE (NCT03896581; tumour necrosis factor inhibitor inadequate response/intolerance (TNFi-IR)) are phase 3 studies of subcutaneous bimekizumab 160 mg Q4W; both were double-blind and placebo-controlled to 16 weeks. Patients were randomised 3:2:1 to bimekizumab, placebo or reference (subcutaneous adalimumab 40 mg Q2W) in BE OPTIMAL; 2:1 to bimekizumab or placebo in BE COMPLETE. Patient-reported outcomes for pain, fatigue, physical function and HRQoL are reported to week 16 using pooled and individual study data for bimekizumab and placebo patients. RESULTS: 1073/1112 (96.5%) patients completed week 16 (bimekizumab:| 677/698 [97.0%]; placebo: 396/414 [95.7%]). Bimekizumab-treated patients achieved rapid improvements vs placebo in pain, fatigue, physical function and HRQoL by week 4, after a single dose. Improvements continued to week 16 for all patient-reported outcomes, including Pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS; mean (95% CI) change from baseline: bimekizumab: -|25.2 [-27.2, -23.1]; placebo:| -|5.7 [-8.2, -3.3]) and FACIT-Fatigue (bimekizumab: 4.5 [3.9, 5.1]; placebo: 1.1 [0.3, 2.0]); both nominal p<0.001. Greater proportions of bimekizumab-treated patients achieved minimal clinically important differences for patient-reported symptoms vs placebo, including FACIT-Fatigue (bimekizumab: 53.1%; placebo: 36.3%) and HAQ-DI (bimekizumab:| 53.0%; placebo: 28.7%); both nominal p<0.001. CONCLUSION: Bimekizumab treatment demonstrated rapid and greater improvements in patient-reported pain, fatigue, physical function and HRQoL to week 16 vs placebo in bDMARD-naïve and TNFi-IR patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03895203; NCT03896581.

On difficulties to define prognostic factors for clinical practice in rheumatoid arthritis.

In rheumatoid arthritis (RA), the identification of prognostic factors (PF) capable of predicting disease outcome, response to treatment or success of dose reduction is an important issue, as these factors are intended to serve as a basis for decision-making. The task is complex from the outset, as the definition of disease prognosis or therapeutic prognosis is not uniquevocal. The heterogeneity of the definitions used partly explains the failure to identify PF that can be applied at an individual level. But other factors also contribute. First, the scope of the disease studied is too broad, including nosologically different entities. Second, potential PF are only measured at a single point of time, whereas changes over a period of time should be taken into account to a greater extent, not forgetting the potential impact of the treatment received during this period. Beyond these limiting factors, one of the main obstacles to the identification of PF is probably the fact that the phase of the disease is not sufficiently taken into account. Predicting the disease outcome when it is well established is a more complex challenge than when it is just beginning, as many factors are likely to interfere. The same applies to therapeutic PF, which should be determined according to disease duration. Difficulties also arise from the approaches used, which are often restricted to a single field of interest whereas they should be much more integrative and call on new large-scale data analysis tools with a view to precision medicine.In RA, prognosis can be defined at two levels: disease outcome, including joint damage and risk of extra-articular manifestations and/or complications, and treatment outcome, including response to therapy, risk of adverse effects and drug-free remission.

Efficacy and safety of tocilizumab in Chinese patients with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a multicentre phase IV trial.

OBJECTIVES: Given the limited tocilizumab (TCZ) treatment data for systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) in China, we evaluated the long-term efficacy and safety of TCZ in Chinese patients with sJIA. METHOD: In this multicentre, interventional Phase IV study, patients with sJIA and inadequate clinical response to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs/corticosteroids received TCZ infusions every 2 weeks based on body weight (< 30 kg, 12 mg/kg; ≥ 30 kg, 8 mg/kg), over a 52-week open-label period and an 8-week safety follow-up period. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with a JIA American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 30 response and absence of fever at Week 12. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients were enrolled and treated (12-mg/kg group, 34; 8-mg/kg group, 28). At Week 12, 87.1% (95% confidence interval 78.8%-95.4%) of patients had JIA ACR 30 response and absence of fever; Week 52 results were similar. The proportion of JIA ACR 30/50/70/90 responders rapidly increased at Week 12, up to Week 52. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) levels decreased within 4 weeks; 44/58 patients (75.9%) with elevated baseline hsCRP recovered at Week 52. Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire pain scores, disability index scores, and mean corticosteroid dose decreased over time. Height standard deviation score changes at Week 52 indicated catch-up growth. Most adverse events (AEs) were mild (serious AE incidence, 17.7%). No deaths or macrophage activation syndrome occurred. CONCLUSION: This is the first multicentre trial to report the efficacy and safety of TCZ in Chinese patients with sJIA at 52 weeks. No new safety concerns were found.

Applications of Biological Therapy for Latent Infections: Benefits and Risks.

Biological therapies have revolutionized medical treatment by targeting the key mediators or receptors involved in inflammatory responses, thereby effectively suppressing inflammation and achieving beneficial outcomes. They are more advanced than conventional therapies using corticosteroids and immunosuppressants, offering effective solutions for autoimmune diseases, cancer, transplant rejection, and various infectious diseases, including coronavirus disease 2019. Although they exert low immunosuppressive effects, biological therapies can reactivate specific biological targets associated with infections. This review summarizes the currently available biological therapies and discusses their immunosuppressive mechanisms and clinical applications, highlighting the variations in the types and frequencies of infection recurrence induced by different biological agents. Additionally, this review describes the risk factors associated with various biological agents, thus aiding clinicians in selecting the most appropriate biological therapy.

A plant-based diet is feasible in patients with Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND: Incorporating plant-based diets as a supplement to medical treatment may have a beneficial impact on patients with Crohn's disease, however, research with intervention studies is required. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the feasibility of a plant-based diet intervention. Secondly, the purpose was to investigate whether such diet may reduce disease activity and enhance quality of life. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was designed as a single arm feasibility study. Outpatients with Crohn's disease in biological therapy were guided over twelve weeks towards a dietary lifestyle change. OUTCOME MEASURES: Feasibility concerning recruitment, retention rate and compliance. Secondary outcomes were measures of patient reported outcome questionnaires (PROMS). Paired t-tests were used to examine changes in CO2 emissions, anthropology, biomarkers, and patient-reported data. Δ-values were used to investigate difference between dietary intake and requirements. Linear regression analyses examined the association between biomarkers and PROMS. RESULTS: In total, 15 participants completed the intervention with easy recruitment and a retention rate at 87.6%. A clinically positive tendency was seen towards improved symptom scores for disease (HBI; p=0.028 and IBDQ; p=0.006) but not for fatigue (IBD-F; p = 0.097), although none of these were statistically significant. Adverse effects were decreased protein intake (p=0.069) and slightly reduced muscle mass. It remains unclear to what extent the intervention contributed to the improved self-reported effects although perception of disease activity was improved. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that it is possible to retain patients following a plant-based diet. However, the dietary change required ongoing dietetic support with a focus on anti-inflammatory agents and the still unattainable protein requirements.

Evaluating the Efficacy of Infliximab in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

The introduction of steroid therapy in 1955 markedly decreased the mortality rate of severe ulcerative colitis (UC) from 24% in the placebo group to 7%, and it is currently less than 1% in specialist centers. Despite this advancement, the response of severe UC to steroids has stagnated over the past 50 years, with a high rate of colectomy persisting for severe to moderately severe cases. Infliximab (IFX) (Remicade, Centocor Inc., Malvern, PA, United States), an intravenously administered chimeric monoclonal immunoglobulin G1 antibody targeting tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), has shown efficacy in numerous randomized controlled trials for treating moderate to severe and fistulizing Crohn's disease, particularly in patients unresponsive to conventional therapies. This led to its approval by the US Food and Drug Administration in 1998 for treating active and fistulizing Crohn's disease. Most clinical research on IFX has focused on Crohn's disease, which is characterized as a Th1-type condition driven by pro-inflammatory cytokines like TNF-α. Conversely, UC has traditionally been viewed as a Th2-type condition where TNF-α plays a lesser role. However, recent studies indicate that TNF-α might also contribute to the pathogenesis of UC. These findings highlight the necessity for larger randomized controlled trials to further investigate the benefits of therapies like IFX, with the ultimate goal of improving treatment outcomes and quality of life for patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

Efficacy and safety of therapies for Still's disease and macrophage activation syndrome (MAS): a systematic review informing the EULAR/PReS guidelines for the management of Still's disease.

OBJECTIVES: To analyse the efficacy and safety of treatments for Still's disease and macrophage activation syndrome (MAS). METHODS: Medline, Embase and Cochrane Library were searched for clinical trials (randomised, randomised controlled trial (RCT), controlled and clinical controlled trial (CCT)), observational studies (retrospective, longitudinal observational retrospective (LOR), prospective and longitudinal observational prospective (LOP)) and systematic reviews (SRs), in which the populations studied were patients with Still's disease and MAS. The intervention was any pharmacological treatment (approved or under evaluation) versus any comparator drug or placebo, and as outcomes, any relevant efficacy and safety event. The risk of bias (RoB) was assessed with the Cochrane RoB and AMSTAR-2 (Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews-2, version 2) for SRs. RESULTS: 128 full texts were included: 25 RCTs, 1 CCT, 11 SRs published after 2013 and 91 LOP/LOR studies. In Still's disease, interleukin (IL)-1 inhibitors (IL-1i) and IL-6R inhibitors (IL-6i) were the most studied drugs. Two meta-analyses on RCTs showed an OR, to achieve an ARC50 response rate, of 6.02 (95% CI 2.24 to 21.36) and 8.08 (95% CI 1.89 to 34.57) for IL-1i and IL-6Ri, respectively. Retrospective studies showed that early initiation of IL-1i or IL-6i was associated with high rates of clinically inactive disease. In MAS, GCs were employed in all patients, often associated with ciclosporin and/or anakinra. Rates of complete response were reported, with a range from 53% to 100%. Emapalumab was the only drug tested in a CCT, with a complete response of 93%. CONCLUSION: IL-1i and IL-6Ri show the highest level of efficacy in the treatment of Still's disease. For MAS, IL-1 and interferon-γ inhibition appear to be effective on a background of high-dose glucocorticoids.

EULAR/PReS recommendations for the diagnosis and management of Still's disease, comprising systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis and adult-onset Still's disease.

Systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) and adult-onset Still's disease (AOSD) are considered the same disease, but a common approach for diagnosis and management is still missing. METHODS: In May 2022, EULAR and PReS endorsed a proposal for a joint task force (TF) to develop recommendations for the diagnosis and management of sJIA and AOSD. The TF agreed during a first meeting to address four topics: similarity between sJIA and AOSD, diagnostic biomarkers, therapeutic targets and strategies and complications including macrophage activation syndrome (MAS). Systematic literature reviews were conducted accordingly. RESULTS: The TF based their recommendations on four overarching principles, highlighting notably that sJIA and AOSD are one disease, to be designated by one name, Still's disease.Fourteen specific recommendations were issued. Two therapeutic targets were defined: clinically inactive disease (CID) and remission, that is, CID maintained for at least 6 months. The optimal therapeutic strategy relies on early use of interleukin (IL-1 or IL-6 inhibitors associated to short duration glucocorticoid (GC). MAS treatment should rely on high-dose GCs, IL-1 inhibitors, ciclosporin and interferon-γ inhibitors. A specific concern rose recently with cases of severe lung disease in children with Still's disease, for which T cell directed immunosuppressant are suggested. The recommendations emphasised the key role of expert centres for difficult-to-treat patients. All overarching principles and recommendations were agreed by over 80% of the TF experts with a high level of agreement. CONCLUSION: These recommendations are the first consensus for the diagnosis and management of children and adults with Still's disease.

[Translated article] Knowledge of biological therapy in patients with immune-mediated diseases. BIOINFO study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the degree of knowledge about biological therapy and biosimilars in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases treated in Outpatient Pharmaceutical Care Units. METHODS: Observational, prospective, and multicenter study during the period May 2020-March 2021. A survey (9 questions) was conducted before starting treatment in which the patients' level of knowledge about biological therapy and biosimilars was assessed. RESULTS: A total of 169 patients were included in the study. The average value for the different questions was 3.3±0.6 out of 5, while the average final result was 29.4 points out of 45. 64.5% of the patients had an acceptable level before starting the medication (>27 points). The multivariate analysis showed a statistically significant correlation (p<.05) with a better score at the beginning of treatment in those patients whose prescribing service was Rheumatology. CONCLUSIONS: In general, the level of knowledge prior to biological therapy in patients is acceptable, being higher in dosage and administration technique related-factors and what is related to the dosage and administration technique and where to find information related to the medication; the worst rated were those on biosimilars-related. The factor of being followed by rheumatology, was associated with better knowledge.

Real-World Effectiveness of Mepolizumab in Severe Asthma: Results from the Multi-country, Self-controlled Nucala Effectiveness Study (NEST).

INTRODUCTION: The Nucala Effectiveness Study (NEST) assessed the effectiveness of mepolizumab in patients with severe asthma (SA) in countries previously underrepresented in real-world studies. METHODS: A multi-country, bi-directional, self-controlled, observational cohort study conducted in Colombia, Chile, India, Türkiye, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, Oman, and Qatar. Historical and/or prospective data from patients with SA were assessed 12 months pre- and post-mepolizumab initiation. PRIMARY ENDPOINT: incident rate ratio (IRR) of clinically significant exacerbations (CSEs). Key secondary endpoints: healthcare resource utilisation (HCRU), oral corticosteroid (OCS) use, lung function and symptom control (Asthma Control Test [ACT] scores). RESULTS: Overall, 525 patients with SA burden pre-initiation (geometric mean blood eosinophil count [BEC] 490.7 cells/µl; 31.4% prior biologic use; 37.3% obese) received at least one dose of mepolizumab 100 mg subcutaneously. Post-initiation, a significant reduction in CSEs was observed (76% [p < 0.001]; IRR [95% confidence interval] 0.24 [0.19-0.30]); 72.0% of patients had no CSEs. Mepolizumab treatment led to a reduction in OCS use (52.8% pre-initiation vs. 16.6% post-initiation) and a mean (standard deviation [SD]) change in OCS dose of - 18.1 (20.7) mg post-initiation; 36.1% of patients became OCS-free. Fewer patients were hospitalised post-initiation (22.5% pre-initiation vs. 6.9% post-initiation). Improvements in mean (SD) forced expiratory volume in 1 s (62.8 [20.2]% pre-initiation vs. 73.0 [22.7]% post-initiation) and ACT scores (15.0% pre-initiation vs. 64.5% of patients post-initiation with well-controlled asthma) were observed. Proportion of patients with BEC ≥ 500 cells/µl decreased from 84.4% pre-initiation to 18.1% post-initiation. CONCLUSION: Mepolizumab was effective in reducing the burden of SA by significantly reducing CSEs, reducing OCS use and HCRU, and improving lung function and asthma control, which could translate to improvements in health-related quality of life in patients with SA and high OCS dependency in the countries studied. A graphical abstract is available with this article.

Severe asthma occurs when asthma symptoms remain uncontrolled despite optimised treatment. In many low-middle income countries, and in some countries in the Middle East, Asia, Latin America and the Arab Gulf, the management and treatment of patients with severe asthma remain poor, with many patients having unscheduled hospital visits or admission, and use of steroids for a prolonged period. Mepolizumab is an injectable monoclonal antibody approved as an add-on treatment for severe asthma in patients ≥ 6 years of age. In clinical trials, mepolizumab has demonstrated reductions in the risk of clinically significant exacerbations (CSE; an asthma exacerbation that requires systemic corticosteroids and/or an emergency room visit and/or hospitalisation) and the need for oral corticosteroid (OCS) treatment in patients with severe asthma by reducing inflammation caused by eosinophil (a type of white blood cell) production. The Nucala Effectiveness Study (NEST) was performed to observe the effectiveness of mepolizumab in people with severe asthma in Colombia, Chile, India, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, Oman and Qatar. The frequency of CSEs and other outcomes was compared 12 months pre- and post-mepolizumab initiation. Post-initiation, the risk of CSEs was significantly reduced by 76% (p < 0.001), and 72% of patients had no CSEs. Fewer patients were dependent on OCS, with 36.1% of patients not using OCS at all, and fewer patients were hospitalised. Lung function and asthma control also improved. NEST shows that mepolizumab could benefit people with severe asthma living in countries where disease-related burden and OCS use remain high.

Efficacy and safety of sequential therapy with subcutaneous belimumab and one cycle of rituximab in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: the phase 3, randomised, placebo-controlled BLISS-BELIEVE study.

OBJECTIVES: Disease activity control in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) with corticosteroid and immunosuppressant withdrawal is a treatment goal. We evaluated whether this could be attained with sequential subcutaneous belimumab (BEL) and one cycle of rituximab (RTX). METHODS: In this phase 3, double-blind BLISS-BELIEVE trial (GSK Study 205646), patients with active SLE initiating subcutaneous BEL 200 mg/week for 52 weeks were randomised to intravenous placebo (BEL/PBO) or intravenous RTX 1000 mg (BEL/RTX) at weeks 4 and 6 while stopping concomitant immunosuppressants/tapering corticosteroids; standard therapy for 104 weeks (BEL/ST; reference arm) was included. PRIMARY ENDPOINT: proportion of patients achieving disease control (SLE Disease Activity Index-2000 (SLEDAI-2K) ≤2; without immunosuppressants; prednisone equivalent ≤5 mg/day) at week 52 with BEL/RTX versus BEL/PBO. Major (alpha-controlled) secondary endpoints: proportion of patients with clinical remission (week 64; clinical SLEDAI-2K=0, without immunosuppressants/corticosteroids); proportion of patients with disease control (week 104). Other assessments: disease control duration, anti-dsDNA antibody, C3/C4 and B cells/B-cell subsets. RESULTS: The modified intention-to-treat population included 263 patients. Overall, 16.7% (12/72) of BEL/PBO and 19.4% (28/144) of BEL/RTX patients achieved disease control (OR (95% CI) 1.27 (0.60 to 2.71); p=0.5342) at week 52. For major secondary endpoints, differences between BEL/RTX and BEL/PBO were not statistically significant. Anti-dsDNA antibodies and most assessed B cells/B-cell subsets were lower with BEL/RTX versus BEL/PBO. Mean disease control duration through 52 weeks was significantly greater with BEL/RTX versus BEL/PBO. CONCLUSIONS: BEL/RTX showed no superiority over BEL/PBO for most endpoints analysed; however, it led to significant improvements in disease activity markers compared with BEL/PBO. Further investigation of combination treatment is warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03312907.

Advances in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Treatment With Monoclonal Antibodies: A Mini-Review.

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease that affects multiple organs and systems. It is characterized by the production of abnormal antibodies that attack healthy cells and tissues. The disease presents a wide range of symptoms and severity, from mild to severe. Diagnosis can be complex, but the classification criteria of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) help to facilitate it. Incidence and prevalence vary considerably worldwide, mainly affecting adult women between the third and fourth decades of life, although it can also occur in childhood. The prognosis of SLE has improved over time, but there is still a risk of irreversible organ damage. Treatment is individualized for each patient and is based on immunosuppression and the use of corticosteroids. Biological therapies, such as monoclonal antibodies, have emerged as a more specific alternative. Methotrexate, antimalarials, glucocorticoids, immunosuppressants, and monoclonal antibodies are some of the medications used to treat SLE. New therapeutic strategies are currently being developed, such as targeted therapies, immunomodulators, and biological agents. Treatment adherence, monitoring, and regular follow-up are important aspects of SLE management. This article aims to describe the characteristics of the new monoclonal antibody therapies that exist for the management of SLE.

Real-World Adherence and Drug Survival of Biologics among Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis.

Objectives: The objective of this study was to evaluate the real-world drug survival, adherence, and discontinuation risk of biologics disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) among patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Methods: This was a retrospective study using a computerized database. Biologic-naïve and biologic-experienced AS patients who initiated treatment with bDMARDs (tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitors {TNF-αis} or interleukin-17 inhibitor {IL-17i}) during 2015-2018 were included. Adherence was assessed using the proportion of days covered (PDC) method. Drug survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates. Risk of discontinuation was estimated by the Cox proportional hazard model. Results: We identified 343 eligible patients utilizing 481 lines of therapy. The mean age was 44.6 years (SD ± 13.4), 57.7% were males, and 69.7% were biologic-naïve at baseline. The proportion of highly adherent patients (PDC ≥ 0.8) in the biologic-naïve group was 63.5% for golimumab, 69.2% for etanercept, and 71.6% for adalimumab (p > 0.9). Among the biologic-experienced group, secukinumab had the highest proportion of adherent patients (75.7%) and etanercept the lowest (50.0%) reaching statistical difference (p < 0.001). The Kaplan-Meier analysis did not show a significant difference in drug survival in either the biologic-naïve or the biologic-experienced groups (p = 0.85). Multivariable analysis demonstrated a similar risk for discontinuation for etanercept, golimumab, and secukinumab compared with adalimumab, regardless of biologic-experience status. Conclusions: Adherence, drug survival, and risk for discontinuation were similar for all TNF-αis and the IL-17i SEC, regardless of biologic-experience status. As drug survival is an indirect measure of drug efficacy, n, in real-world settings, we believe caregivers can integrate these results into treatment considerations.

Does Body Mass Index Impact the Clinical Response to Dupilumab Therapy in Atopic Dermatitis? A Monocentric Study of 170 Patients.

Background: Dupilumab is a monoclonal antibody used for the treatment of moderate/severe atopic dermatitis (AD). In recent years, several studies have confirmed the positive association between AD and overweight/obesity, and a report demonstrated the effect of weight reduction on the improvement of AD symptoms. Methods: The weight of 170 patients under treatment with dupilumab was recorded at baseline and after 48 weeks (T48). Clinical monitoring was mainly conducted using the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI). The study aimed to assess a possible correlation between the clinical outcome of dupilumab therapy and BMI. Results: Although not statistically significant, patients with a BMI < 25 have a higher EASI percentage improvement than patients with a BMI ≥ 25 at any time point, and the percentage of overweight and obese patients that does not reach EASI-75 at T48 is higher compared to normal-weight patients (13.5% vs. 5.9%). Despite this, in the multivariate regression analysis, no baseline characteristic, including BMI, appears to increase the risk of not reaching EASI-75. In addition, the results show no differences in BMI between baseline and T48 in any age/sex group. Conclusions: The results suggest that overweight and obese patients have a lower response to dupilumab when considering the EASI score, but this difference does not appear to be clinically significant. Furthermore, dupilumab treatment does not seem to impact weight.

[Efficacy and safety of levilimab in the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis].

AIM: Evaluation in real clinical practice of the effectiveness and safety of levilimab therapy in patients with highly and moderately active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective observational study (6 months) involving 35 patients with RA (29 women and 6 men, mean age 53.17±13.2 years) who were treated at the Ochapovsky Regional Clinic Hospital of Krasnodar Region. All patients included in the study were prescribed the drug levilimab (Ilsira). RESULTS: After 1 month of observation, there was a decrease in the clinical and laboratory activity of the process in the form of a decrease in the number of painful joints - 17.0 (14.0; 20.0) vs 8.0 (6.0; 10.0); p=0.000001, number of swollen joints - 3.0 (2.0; 4.0) vs 0.0 (0.0; 0.0); p=0.000002, reduction in pain intensity according to visual analog scale - 60.0 (60.0; 70.0) mm vs 30.0 (20.0; 40.0) mm (p=0.000001). Also, by the end of the first month of therapy, there was a decrease in clinical activity indices DAS28-ESR by 43%, SDAI by 60%, CDAI by 55%. Positive dynamics of laboratory parameters were noted - a decrease in erythrocyte sedimentation rate by 76%, a decrease in C-reactive protein level by 98%. By the 6th month of therapy, a decrease in RF by 36% and ACCP by 11% was recorded, but the dynamics of these indicators did not reach statistical significance. By the end of 4 weeks of treatment, 24 (68.6%) patients showed an increase in the level of total blood cholesterol - 5.1 (3.91; 6.0) mmol/L vs 6.1 (4.99; 7.07) mmol/L (p=0.000006), while 11 (45.8%) patients from this group had initially elevated cholesterol levels (6.4±0.6 mmol/L). In 5 (14.3%) patients, an increase in alanine aminotransferase (ALT) was recorded in the 4th week - 17.0 (11.0; 25.0) U/L vs 32.0 (22.0; 43.0) U/L (p=0.000062) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) - 19.0 (14.0; 24.0) U/L vs 25.0 (18.0; 36.0) U/L (p=0.000171), in 1 (2.85%) of the patient, an increase in ALT and AST above normal was noted (ALT 144 U/L, AST 52 U/L), which required discontinuation of levilimab. In 2 (5.7%) patients, by the end of the 4th week a decrease in the absolute number of neutrophils was registered - 3.2 (2.6; 4.0)×10E9/L vs 2.3 (2.0; 2.5)×10E9/L (p=0.002), which did not require discontinuation of treatment, since the number of cells remained more than 1×10E9/L. During treatment with levilimab 162 mg subcutaneously once a week, the proportion of patients taking prednisolone decreased from 46% at the start of therapy to 11% at the end of 6 months of therapy. CONCLUSION: Levilimab is a highly effective drug for the treatment of patients with highly and moderately active RA and has a favorable tolerability and safety profile.

Axial Disease in Psoriatic Arthritis: A Challenging Domain in Clinical Practice.

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic inflammatory condition affecting about one-third of individuals with psoriasis. Defining axial involvement in PsA (axPsA) remains debated. While rheumatologists guide clinical practice, consensus on axPsA is still lacking. This paper explores historical and upcoming definitions from the Axial Involvement in Psoriatic Arthritis (AXIS) study, which aims to establish a validated axPsA definition. Epidemiological data reveal diverse axPsA prevalence rates, emphasizing its complex relationship with peripheral arthritis and enthesitis. Unique genetic, clinical, and radiological features differentiate axPsA from ankylosing spondylitis (AS), necessitating refined classification criteria. The recommendations from the Assessment of Spondylarthritis international Society (ASAS) provide valuable guidance due to the limited direct evidence. Emerging therapies, including interleukin-23 (IL-23) inhibitors or Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, are under investigation for axPsA. Currently, secukinumab, an interleukin-17 (IL-17) inhibitor, is an evidence-based option for axPsA management. However, given the variability in individual patient responses and disease manifestations, personalized, evidence-based treatment approaches remain essential for optimizing patient outcomes. In the final section, two real-life cases illustrate the challenges in managing axPsA, emphasizing the importance of tailored therapies. Achieving precision in defining axPsA remains a formidable task, making detailed criteria essential for effective strategies and improving patient outcomes.