Explanation of the sociological patterns of organ donation: An analytical study.

BACKGROUND: In many countries, the consent of family members is required for organ donation from brain-dead patients who are potential candidates for organ donation. In this regard, knowing the factors affecting family members' decision for organ donation can help improve the conditions. This qualitative study aimed to identify the factors affecting family members' decision-making regarding donation of brain-dead patients' organs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This research applied qualitative research by focusing on the content analysis approach. The study started from April 2021 in Al-Zahra Hospital in Isfahan and Ayatollah Kashani in Shahrekord and continued until data saturation was reached (September 1401). Participants were assigned to one of three groups: brain-dead patients' family members who consented to organ donation, brain-dead patients' family members who declined to consent to organ donation, and people involved in the organ donation process. The sample was selected using the purposive sampling method. The data were collected using unstructured interviews and the field survey method. In this study, a qualitative content analysis with a contractual approach was used to analyze the data. RESULTS: The analysis of the collected data using different methods yielded 11 main categories, including 1) unresponsive healthcare system, 2) inadequate support from government systems, 3) weakness of social work organizations, 4) fear of being stigmatized, 5) cultural values, 6) symbolization, 7) perpetuation and the society's attitude, 8) development of personality system and generalism, 9) human values, 10) spiritual maturity, and 11) belief-religious challenges, leading finally to three themes, including 1) structural and functional weakness of systems, 2) sociocultural factors, and 3) worldview. CONCLUSION: The findings of the present research were able to identify the roots and social factors affecting Iranian families' decisions regarding the consent or nonconsent of brain-dead patient members. Health system administrators and organ donation committees in medical sciences universities in Iran can try to solve the shortage of donated organs by using the specific social aspects introduced in this study. It is also recommended to design effective models for more satisfaction of family members for brain death patient organ donation in healthcare based on the underlying concepts of this study.

17ß-estradiol and methylprednisolone association as a therapeutic option to modulate lung inflammation in brain-dead female rats.

Introduction: Brain death (BD) is known to compromise graft quality by causing hemodynamic, metabolic, and hormonal changes. The abrupt reduction of female sex hormones after BD was associated with increased lung inflammation. The use of both corticoids and estradiol independently has presented positive results in modulating BD-induced inflammatory response. However, studies have shown that for females the presence of both estrogen and corticoids is necessary to ensure adequate immune response. In that sense, this study aims to investigate how the association of methylprednisolone (MP) and estradiol (E2) could modulate the lung inflammation triggered by BD in female rats. Methods: Female Wistar rats (8 weeks) were divided into four groups: sham (animals submitted to the surgical process, without induction of BD), BD (animals submitted to BD), MP/E2 (animals submitted to BD that received MP and E2 treatment 3h after BD induction) and MP (animals submitted to BD that received MP treatment 3h after BD induction). Results: Hemodynamics, systemic and local quantification of IL-6, IL-1ß, VEGF, and TNF-α, leukocyte infiltration to the lung parenchyma and airways, and adhesion molecule expression were analyzed. After treatment, MP/E2 association was able to reinstate mean arterial pressure to levels close to Sham animals (p<0.05). BD increased leukocyte infiltration to the airways and MP/E2 was able to reduce the number of cells (p=0.0139). Also, the associated treatment modulated the vasculature by reducing the expression of VEGF (p=0.0616) and maintaining eNOS levels (p=0.004) in lung tissue. Discussion: Data presented in this study show that the association between corticoids and estradiol could represent a better treatment strategy for lung inflammation in the female BD donor by presenting a positive effect in the hemodynamic management of the donor, as well as by reducing infiltrated leukocyte to the airways and release of inflammatory markers in the short and long term.

Orbital doppler ultrasound as an ancillary test for diagnosing brain death: A prospective, single blind comparative study.

OBJECTIVE: Transcranial Doppler ultrasound (TDUS), computed tomography angiography (CTA), and transcranial Doppler ultrasound to detect cerebral blood flow are among the adjunctive tests in diagnosing brain death. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of orbital doppler ultrasound (ODUS). METHODS: This prospective, single-blind study included 66 patients for whom brain death was to be diagnosed. Primary outcome measures were ODUS measurements, Ophthalmic artery peak systolic velocity (PSV), end-diastolic velocity (EDV), and resistive indices (RI) measurements recorded during the brain death determination process. Secondary outcome measures were computed tomography angio (CTA), transcranial Doppler ultrasound (TDUS), and demographic data. RESULTS: This study investigating the effectiveness of ODUS in diagnosing brain death provided diagnostic success with 100% sensitivity and 93% specificity compared to CT angiography. It was noted that anatomical variations may limit its use. CONCLUSION: ODUS was found to have high sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of clinical brain death. It may assist in early prognostic assessment and shorten patient follow-up and diagnostic processes.

What We Argue About When We Argue About Death.

The literature on the determination of death has often if not always assumed that the concept of human death should be defined in terms of the end of the human organism. I argue that this broadly biological conceptualization of human death cannot constitute a basis for agreement in a pluralistic society characterized by a variety of reasonable views on the nature of our existence as embodied beings. Rather, following Robert Veatch, I suggest that we must define death in moralized terms, as the loss of an especially significant sort of moral standing. Departing from Veatch, however, I argue that we should not understand death in terms of the loss of all moral status whatsoever. Rather, I argue, what we should argue about, when we argue about death, is when and why people lose their rights-claims to the protection and promotion of their basic bodily functioning.

The conceptual injustice of the brain death standard.

Family disputes over the diagnosis of brain death have caused much controversy in the bioethics literature over the conceptual validity of the brain death standard. Given the tenuous status of brain death as death, it is pragmatically fruitful to reframe intractable debates about the metaphysical nature of brain death as metalinguistic disputes about its conceptual deployment. This new framework leaves the metaphysical debate open and brings into focus the social functions that are served by deploying the concept of brain death. In doing so, it highlights the epistemic injustice of medicolegal authorities that force people to uniformly accept brain death as a diagnosis of death based on normative considerations of institutional interests, such as saving hospital resources and organ supplies, rather than empirical evidence of brain death as death, which is insufficient at best and nonexistent at worst. In light of this injustice, I propose the rejection of the uniform standard of brain death in favor of a choice-based system that respects families' individualized views of death.

Evaluation of patients diagnosed with brain death in the intensive care unit: 10 years of tertiary center experience in Istanbul.

OBJECTIVE: Early and accurate diagnosis of brain death in intensive care units (ICU) is essential for organ transplantation. This study aimed to evaluate the cases diagnosed with brain death in the ICU of a tertiary center in Istanbul. METHODS: The cases diagnosed as brain death in the ICU during the ten years between January 2013 and September 2022 were evaluated retrospectively. The demographic characteristics of the patients, the diagnosis of hospitalization in the ICU, the time from arrival to the ICU until the diagnosis of brain death, the somatic survival time after the diagnosis of brain death, the acceptance rate of organ donation by the families and the organs removed were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 44 patients were diagnosed with brain death. The mean age of the cases was 39.7±17.4 years, and 63% were male. The most common hospitalization diagnosis was intracranial hemorrhage (81.8%). Traffic accidents, hypertensive and aneurysm-related hemorrhages, gunshot wounds, and falls from height were the most common causes of intracranial hemorrhage. Patients were admitted to the ICU most frequently from the emergency department (54%). The mean time to brain death was 7.9±6.2 days, and the somatic survival time was 1.9±1.9 days in patients who did not receive organ transplantation. While the apnea test was positive in 91% of the cases, the apnea test could not be completed in 9% of the cases. While relatives of 7% (n=3) of the cases accepted organ donation, a patient was not allowed to be an organ donor for medical reasons. Organ transplantation was performed in two patients (5%). CONCLUSION: As in the whole world, getting treatment as soon as possible for the patients waiting on the organ transplant list in Turkiye by increasing the number of organs to be obtained from cadavers. In cases with suspected brain death in the ICU, diagnosing brain death as soon as possible and conducting family interviews with trained organ transplant coordinators will increase the number of cadaver donors. However, we think policies should be developed to ensure that society is informed and encouraged about brain death and organ donation.

Considerations for the use of porcine organ donation models in preclinical organ donor intervention research.

Use of animal models in preclinical transplant research is essential to the optimization of human allografts for clinical transplantation. Animal models of organ donation and preservation help to advance and improve technical elements of solid organ recovery and facilitate research of ischemia-reperfusion injury, organ preservation strategies, and future donor-based interventions. Important considerations include cost, public opinion regarding the conduct of animal research, translational value, and relevance of the animal model for clinical practice. We present an overview of two porcine models of organ donation: donation following brain death (DBD) and donation following circulatory death (DCD). The cardiovascular anatomy and physiology of pigs closely resembles those of humans, making this species the most appropriate for pre-clinical research. Pigs are also considered a potential source of organs for human heart and kidney xenotransplantation. It is imperative to minimize animal loss during procedures that are surgically complex. We present our experience with these models and describe in detail the use cases, procedural approach, challenges, alternatives, and limitations of each model.

Donor heart refusal after circulatory death: An analysis of United Network for Organ Sharing refusal codes.

Objective: Donor hearts procured after circulatory death (DCD) may significantly increase the number of hearts available for transplantation. The purpose of this study was to analyze current DCD and brain-dead donor (DBD) heart transplantation rates and characterize organ refusal using the most up-to-date United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) and Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network data. Methods: We analyzed UNOS and Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network DBD and DCD candidate, transplantation, and demographic data from 2020 through 2022 and 2022 refusal code data to characterize DCD heart use and refusal. Subanalyses were performed to characterize DCD donor demographics and regional transplantation rate variance. Results: DCD hearts were declined 3.37 times more often than DBD hearts. The most frequently used code for DCD refusal was neurologic function, related to concerns of a prolonged dying process and organ preservation. In 2022, 92% (1329/1452) of all DCD refusals were attributed to neurologic function. When compared with DBD, DCD donor hearts were more frequently declined as the result of prolonged warm ischemic time (odds ratio, 5.65; 95% confidence interval, 4.07-7.86) and other concerns over organ preservation (odds ratio, 4.06; 95% confidence interval, 3.33-4.94). Transplantation rate variation was observed between demographic groups and UNOS regions. DCD transplantation rates are currently experiencing second order polynomial growth. Conclusions: DCD donor hearts are declined more frequently than DBD. DCD heart refusals result from concerns over a prolonged dying process and organ preservation. Heart transplantation rates may be substantially improved by ex situ hemodynamic assessment, adoption of normothermic regional perfusion guidelines, and quality initiatives.

Organ donation after extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a nationwide retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Limited data are available on organ donation practices and recipient outcomes, particularly when comparing donors who experienced cardiac arrest and received extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) followed by veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) decannulation, versus those who experienced cardiac arrest without receiving ECPR. This study aims to explore organ donation practices and outcomes post-ECPR to enhance our understanding of the donation potential after cardiac arrest. METHODS: We conducted a nationwide retrospective cohort study using data from the Japan Organ Transplant Network database, covering all deceased organ donors between July 17, 2010, and August 31, 2022. We included donors who experienced at least one episode of cardiac arrest. During the study period, patients undergoing ECMO treatment were not eligible for a legal diagnosis of brain death. We compared the timeframes associated with each donor's management and the long-term graft outcomes of recipients between ECPR and non-ECPR groups. RESULTS: Among 370 brain death donors with an episode of cardiac arrest, 26 (7.0%) received ECPR and 344 (93.0%) did not; the majority were due to out-of-hospital cardiac arrests. The median duration of veno-arterial ECMO support after ECPR was 3 days. Patients in the ECPR group had significantly longer intervals from admission to organ procurement compared to those not receiving ECPR (13 vs. 9 days, P = 0.005). Lung graft survival rates were significantly lower in the ECPR group (log-rank test P = 0.009), with no significant differences in other organ graft survival rates. Of 160 circulatory death donors with an episode of cardiac arrest, 27 (16.9%) received ECPR and 133 (83.1%) did not. Time intervals from admission to organ procurement following circulatory death and graft survival showed no significant differences between ECPR and non-ECPR groups. The number of organs donated was similar between the ECPR and non-ECPR groups, regardless of brain or circulatory death. CONCLUSIONS: This nationwide study reveals that lung graft survival was lower in recipients from ECPR-treated donors, highlighting the need for targeted research and protocol adjustments in post-ECPR organ donation.

Verification of Death by Neurologic Criteria: A Survey of 12 Organ Procurement Organizations Across the United States.

BACKGROUND: The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services requires Organ Procurement Organizations (OPOs) to verify and document that any potential organ donor has been pronounced dead per applicable legal requirements of local, state, and federal laws. However, OPO practices regarding death by neurologic criteria (DNC) verification are not standardized, and little is known about their DNC verification processes. This study aimed to explore OPO practices regarding DNC verification in the United States. METHODS: An electronic survey was sent to all 57 OPOs in the United States from June to September 2023 to assess verification of policies and practices versus guidelines, concerns about policies and practices, processes to address concerns about DNC determination, and communication practices. RESULTS: Representatives from 12 OPOs across six US regions completed the entire survey; 8 of 12 reported serving > 50 referral hospitals. Most respondents (11 of 12) reported comparing their referral hospital's DNC policies with the 2010 American Academy of Neurology Practice Parameter and/or other (4 of 12) guidelines. Additionally, most (10 of 12) reported independently reviewing and verifying each DNC determination. Nearly half (5 of 12) reported concerns about guideline-discordant hospital policies, and only 3 of 12 thought all referral hospitals followed the 2010 American Academy of Neurology Practice Parameter in practice. Moreover, 9 of 12 reported concerns about clinician knowledge surrounding DNC determination, and most (10 of 12) reported having received referrals for patients whose DNC declaration was ultimately reversed. All reported experiences in which their OPO requested additional assessments (11 of 12 clinical evaluation, 10 of 12 ancillary testing, 9 of 12 apnea testing) because of concerns about DNC determination validity. CONCLUSIONS: Accurate DNC determination is important to maintain public trust. Nearly all OPO respondents reported a process to verify hospital DNC policies and practices with medical society guidelines. Many reported concerns about clinician knowledge surrounding DNC determination and guideline-discordant policies and practices. Educational and regulatory advocacy efforts are needed to facilitate systematic implementation of guideline-concordant practices across the country.

Association of donor hepatectomy time with liver transplantation outcomes: A multicenter retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Prolonged donor hepatectomy time may be implicated in early and late complications of liver transplantation. AIM: To evaluate the impact of donor hepatectomy time on outcomes of liver transplant recipients, mainly early allograft dysfunction. METHODS: This multicenter retrospective study included brain-dead donors and adult liver graft recipients. Donor-recipient matching was obtained through a crossover list. Clinical and laboratory data were recorded for both donors and recipients. Donor hepatectomy, cold ischemia, and warm ischemia times were recorded. Primary outcome was early allograft dysfunction. Secondary outcomes included need for retransplantation, length of intensive care unit and hospital stay, and patient and graft survival at 12 months. RESULTS: From January 2019 to December 2021, a total of 243 patients underwent a liver transplant from a brain-dead donor. Of these, 57 (25%) developed early allograft dysfunction. The median donor hepatectomy time was 29 (23-40) min. Patients with early allograft dysfunction had a median hepatectomy time of 25 (22-38) min, whereas those without it had a median time of 30 (24-40) min (P = 0.126). CONCLUSION: Donor hepatectomy time was not associated with early allograft dysfunction, graft survival, or patient survival following liver transplantation.

A Recruitment Maneuver After Apnea Testing Improves Oxygenation and Reduces Atelectasis in Organ Donors After Brain Death.

BACKGROUND: Hypoxemia is the main modifiable factor preventing lungs from being transplanted from organ donors after brain death. One major contributor to impaired oxygenation in patients with brain injury is atelectasis. Apnea testing, an integral component of brain death declaration, promotes atelectasis and can worsen hypoxemia. In this study, we tested whether performing a recruitment maneuver (RM) after apnea testing could mitigate hypoxemia and atelectasis. METHODS: During the study period, an RM (positive end-expiratory pressure of 15 cm H2O for 15 s then 30 cm H2O for 30 s) was performed immediately after apnea testing. We measured partial pressure of oxygen, arterial (PaO2) before and after RM. The primary outcomes were oxygenation (PaO2 to fraction of inspired oxygen [FiO2] ratio) and the severity of radiographic atelectasis (proportion of lung without aeration on computed tomography scans after brain death, quantified using an image analysis algorithm) in those who became organ donors. Outcomes in RM patients were compared with control patients undergoing apnea testing without RM in the previous 2 years. RESULTS: Recruitment maneuver was performed in 54 patients after apnea testing, with a median immediate increase in PaO2 of 63 mm Hg (interquartile range 0-109, p = 0.07). Eighteen RM cases resulted in hypotension, but none were life-threatening. Of this cohort, 37 patients became organ donors, compared with 37 donors who had apnea testing without RM. The PaO2:FiO2 ratio was higher in the RM group (355 ± 129 vs. 288 ± 127, p = 0.03), and fewer had hypoxemia (PaO2:FiO2 ratio < 300 mm Hg, 22% vs. 57%; p = 0.04) at the start of donor management. The RM group showed less radiographic atelectasis (median 6% vs. 13%, p = 0.045). Although there was no difference in lungs transplanted (35% vs. 24%, p = 0.44), both better oxygenation and less atelectasis were associated with a higher likelihood of lungs being transplanted. CONCLUSIONS: Recruitment maneuver after apnea testing reduces hypoxemia and atelectasis in organ donors after brain death. This effect may translate into more lungs being transplanted.

Guillain Barre syndrome mimicking brain death.

A 49-year-old female patient presented at the hospital with a history of herpetic blisters, frequent episodes of vomiting and loose stools, bilateral upper and lower limb weakness, and diminishing sensorium. She was diagnosed with hyponatraemia and respiratory failure and later became unconscious with absent brainstem reflexes. The patient was initially treated for herpetic encephalitis, a chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with acute exacerbation, hyponatraemia and neuroparalytic snake bite. Further evaluation, however, identified the uncommon Guillain Barre syndrome presentation with overlap of Bickerstaff brainstem encephalitis. This is an uncommon disorder characterised by the involvement of higher mental functions, fixed dilated pupils, absent brainstem reflexes and quadriplegia that resembles a neuroparalytic snake bite and brain death. After receiving intravenous immunoglobulins for treatment, the patient completely recovered.

A Biophilosophical Approach to the Determination of Brain Death.

Technical and clinical developments have raised challenging questions about the concept and practice of brain death, culminating in recent calls for revision of the Uniform Determination of Death Act (UDDA), which established a whole brain standard for neurologic death. Proposed changes range from abandoning the concept of brain death altogether to suggesting that current clinical practice simply should be codified as the legal standard for determining death by neurologic criteria (even while acknowledging that significant functions of the whole brain might persist). We propose a middle ground, clarifying why whole brain death is a conceptually sound standard for declaring death, and offering procedural suggestions for increasing certainty that this standard has been met. Our approach recognizes that whole brain death is a functional, not merely anatomic, determination, and incorporates an understanding of the difficulties inherent in making empirical judgments in medicine. We conclude that whole brain death is the most defensible standard for determining neurologic death-philosophically, biologically, and socially-and ought to be maintained.

Effect of Hypertonic Saline Solution on the Ventilatory Mechanics of Lungs Donated After Brain Death.

INTRODUCTION: Brain death (BD) compromises the viability of the lung for donation. Hypertonic saline solution (HSS) induces rapid intravascular volume expansion and immunomodulatory action. We investigated its role in ventilatory mechanics (VMs) and in the inflammatory activity of the lungs of rats subjected to BD. METHODS: Wistar rats were divided into four groups: control, n = 10: intact rats subjected to extraction of the heart-lung block; BD, n = 8 (BD): rats treated with isotonic saline solution (4 mL/kg) immediately after BD; hypertonic saline 0 h, n = 9 (Hip.0'): rats treated with HSS (4 mL/kg) immediately after BD; and hypertonic saline 1 h, n = 9 (Hip.60'), rats treated with HSS (4 mL/kg) 60 min after BD. The hemodynamic characteristics, gas exchange, VMs, inflammatory mediators, and histopathological evaluation of the lung were evaluated over 240 min of BD. RESULTS: In VMs, we observed increased airway resistance, tissue resistance, tissue elastance, and respiratory system compliance in the BD group (P < 0.037), while the treated groups showed no impairment over time (P > 0.05). In the histological analysis, the BD group showed a greater area of perivascular edema and a higher neutrophil count than the control group and the Hip.60' group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with HSS was effective in preventing changes in the elastic and resistive pulmonary components, keeping them at baseline levels. Late treatment reduced perivascular and neutrophilic edema in lung tissue.

Victory out of tragedy: organ donation.

Major improvements in trauma care during the last decade have improved survival rates in the severely injured. The unintended consequence is the presentation of patients with non-survivable injuries in a time frame in which intervention is considered and often employed due to prognostic uncertainty. In light of this, discerning survivability in these patients remains increasingly problematic. Evidence-based cut-points of futility can guide early decisions for discontinuing aggressive treatment and use of precious resources in severely injured patients arriving in extremis.

Advances in lung transplantation: 60 years on.

Lung transplantation is a well-established treatment for advanced lung disease, improving survival and quality of life. Over the last 60 years all aspects of lung transplantation have evolved significantly and exponential growth in transplant volume. This has been particularly evident over the last decade with a substantial increase in lung transplant numbers as a result of innovations in donor utilization procurement, including the use donation after circulatory death and ex-vivo lung perfusion organs. Donor lungs have proved to be surprisingly robust, and therefore the donor pool is actually larger than previously thought. Parallel to this, lung transplant outcomes have continued to improve with improved acute management as well as microbiological and immunological insights and innovations. The management of lung transplant recipients continues to be complex and heavily dependent on a tertiary care multidisciplinary paradigm. Whilst long term outcomes continue to be limited by chronic lung allograft dysfunction improvements in diagnostics, mechanistic understanding and evolutions in treatment paradigms have all contributed to a median survival that in some centres approaches 10 years. As ongoing studies build on developing novel approaches to diagnosis and treatment of transplant complications and improvements in donor utilization more individuals will have the opportunity to benefit from lung transplantation. As has always been the case, early referral for transplant consideration is important to achieve best results.

Apnea Testing on Conventional Mechanical Ventilation During Brain Death Evaluation.

INTRODUCTION: The use of continuous positive airway pressure has been shown to improve the tolerance of the apnea test, a critical component of brain death evaluation. The ability to deactivate the apnea backup setting has made apnea testing possible using several conventional mechanical ventilators. Our goal was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of apnea testing performed on mechanical ventilation, compared with the oxygen insufflation technique, for the determination of brain death. METHODS: This was a retrospective study. In 2016, our institution approved a change in policy to permit apnea testing on conventional mechanical ventilation. We examined the records of consecutive adults who underwent apnea testing as part of the brain death evaluation process between 2016 and 2022. Using an apnea test technique was decided at the discretion of the attending physician. Outcomes were successful apnea test and the occurrence of patient instability during the test. This included oxygen desaturation (SpO2) < 90%, hypotension (mean arterial pressure < 65 mm Hg despite titration of vasopressor), cardiac arrhythmia, pneumothorax, and cardiac arrest. RESULTS: Ninety-two adult patients underwent apnea testing during the study period: 58 (63%) with mechanical ventilation, 32 (35%) with oxygen insufflation, and 2 (2%) lacked documentation of technique. Apnea tests could not be completed successfully in 3 of 92 (3%) patients-two patients undergoing the oxygen insufflation technique (one patient with hypoxemia and one patient with hypotension) and one patient on mechanical ventilation (aborted for hemodynamic instability). Hypoxemia occurred in 4 of 32 (12.5%) patients with oxygen insufflation and in zero patients on mechanical ventilation (p = 0.01). Hypotension occurred during 3 of 58 (5%) tests with mechanical ventilation and 4 of 32 (12.5%) tests with oxygen insufflation (p = 0.24). In multivariate analysis, the use of oxygen insufflation was an independent predictor of patient instability during the apnea test (odds ratio 37.74, 95% confidence interval 2.74-520.14). CONCLUSIONS: Apnea testing on conventional mechanical ventilation is feasible and offers several potential advantages over other techniques.

Respiratory-like movements during an apnea test.

Background: Despite the possible occurrence of spontaneous movements during an apnea test, respiratory-like movements are rare. Case Presentation: A 51-year-old man was transferred to our hospital when a sudden disturbance of consciousness developed into cardiac arrest. After spontaneous circulation returned, we diagnosed bilateral cerebellar hemorrhage. He remained comatose with dilated pupils, absent brainstem reflexes, spontaneous breathing, and electrocerebral activity. After being considered brain dead, his family opted for organ donation. The first legal brain death examination on day 5 was aborted because of respiratory-like movements mimicking repetitive abdominal respiration during the apnea test. However, an enhanced magnetic resonance image of the head indicated no blood flow and somatosensory evoked potential testing revealed no brain-derived potentials. Conclusion: Respiratory-like movements can occur during the apnea test in patients considered brain dead. Further research is required to understand this phenomenon.

Pulmonary strain and end-expiratory lung volume during apnea test: a comparative analysis using electrical impedance tomography.

The apnea test, employed for brain death assessment, aims to demonstrate the absence of respiratory drive due to hypercapnia. The tracheal oxygen insufflation apnea test mode (I-AT) involves disconnecting the patient from invasive mechanical ventilation (iMV) for approximately 8 minutes while maintaining oxygenation. This test supports the diagnosis of brain death based on a specified increase in PaCO2. Common complications include hypoxemia and hemodynamic instability, and lung collapse-induced reduction in end-expiratory lung volume (EELV). In our case series utilizing electrical impedance tomography (EIT), we observed that continuous positive airway pressure during the apnea test (CPAP-AT) effectively mitigated lung collapse. This resulted in improved pulmonary strain compared to the disconnection of iMV. These findings suggest the potential benefits of routine CPAP-AT, particularly for potential lung donors, emphasizing the relevance of our study in providing quantitative insights into EELV loss and its association with pulmonary strain and potential lung injury.

La prueba de apnea es una técnica diagnóstica ampliamente utilizada para la evaluación de la muerte cerebral, con el objetivo de demostrar la ausencia de impulso respiratorio debido a la hipercapnia. La variante de la prueba de apnea con insuflación de oxígeno traqueal (I-AT) implica desconectar al paciente de la ventilación mecánica invasiva (iVM) durante aproximadamente 8 minutos, manteniendo la oxigenación mediante un catéter de insuflación. Esta prueba respalda el diagnóstico de muerte cerebral cuando se determina un aumento de la PaCO 2 superior a 20 mmHg en comparación con el valor inicial o un nivel de PaCO 2 superior a 60 mmHg al final de la prueba. En nuestra serie de casos, la implementación de la tomografía de impedancia eléctrica (EIT) reveló que la prueba de apnea con presión positiva continua (CPAPAT) mitiga eficazmente el colapso pulmonar. Este enfoque resulta en una mejora en la tensión pulmonar en comparación con la desconexión de iMV, demostrando su relevancia en el contexto de potenciales donantes de pulmones.