Comparative effectiveness of treatment approaches for early invasive breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) suggested breast conserving therapy (BCT) and mastectomy have similar survival for early-stage breast cancer, whereas observational studies reported survival advantage for BCT. We aimed to address biases in observational studies to compare the effect of BCT and mastectomy on survival. METHODS: We emulated a target trial using institutional cancer registry. We included adult women diagnosed with early invasive first primary breast tumors ≤ 5 cm between July 2011 and December 2017. We used cloning, censoring, and weighting to estimate risk differences (RDs) and risk ratios (RRs) for all-cause mortality and recurrence or all-cause mortality between BCT and mastectomy (reference). RESULTS: Our study population comprised 534 observations with breast cancer. Median age was 56 years and 65 % were racial/ethnic minorities. The 8-year RD was 1.5 % (95 % confidence limits [CL]: -7.0 %, 9.8 %) and RR was 1.1 (95 % CL: 0.57, 2.2) for all-cause mortality. Results for recurrence or mortality were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that target trial emulation to mitigate selection and immortal-time biases in observational studies may generate estimates that are more compatible with RCTs when comparing the effects of BCT and mastectomy on survival. Studies with longer follow-up and more events are needed to confirm our findings.

Patient-reported outcomes and quality of life after breast-conserving surgery, mastectomy, and breast reconstruction assessed using the BREAST-Q questionnaire.

PURPOSE: Breast-conserving surgery is the preferred treatment for breast cancer; however, its associated risk of local recurrence is higher than that of mastectomy. We performed a comparative analysis of four patient-reported outcomes, psychosocial well-being, sexual well-being, breast satisfaction, and physical well-being of the chest, and quality of life after three surgical approaches, breast-conserving therapy (BCT), mastectomy alone, and mastectomy with breast reconstruction, for breast cancer treatment. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey using the BREAST-Q questionnaire and including patients who had undergone breast surgery at least 1 year prior to survey completion was performed. The analysis included 1035 patients (mean age, 55.0 ± 9.1 years) who underwent breast reconstruction, 116 patients (mean age, 63.6 ± 12.2 years) who underwent mastectomy, and 64 patients (mean age, 60.8 ± 12.2 years) who underwent BCT. RESULTS: Patients who underwent reconstruction had significantly higher psychosocial well-being scores (62.8 ± 18.4) than those who underwent BCT (57.0 ± 23.6) and mastectomy (50.8 ± 16.8) (p < 0.01). However, significant differences in self-acceptance scores among all patients were not observed. Regarding sexual well-being and breast satisfaction, patients who underwent mastectomy had significantly lower scores (29.9 ± 18.7 and 41.8 ± 17.7, respectively) than those who underwent BCT (45.8 ± 26.6 and 58.3 ± 17.5, respectively) and reconstruction (46.4 ± 20.3 and 58.8 ± 15.4, respectively) (p < 0.01). Physical well-being of the chest scores were not significantly different among all patients (p = 0.14). Symptoms after mastectomy included chest muscle pain and arm movement impairment. Breast pain was a notable symptom after BCT. CONCLUSION: The study findings provide valuable insights regarding patient-reported outcomes, highlight the potential benefits of breast reconstruction, and emphasize the importance of patients' preferences.

Oncoplastic reconstruction with breast-conserving treatment versus breast-conserving treatment alone in the elderly.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Oncoplastic reconstruction (IOR) performed in conjunction with breast conserving therapy (BCT) has been found to improve psychosocial well-being, reduce hospitalization time, and reduce cost burden. Few studies have looked at the safety profile, complication rates, and overall outcomes in patients ages 65 years and older undergoing IOR versus BCT alone. METHODS: A retrospective, cross-sectional, single-institution medical record review was conducted of women diagnosed with breast cancer age 65 years or older who received IOR or BCT alone. Demographics, clinical data, and major and minor complication profiles were compared between cohorts. RESULTS: A total of 310 patients were included. Of these, 126 received IOR, while 184 received BCT alone. Age >85 was found to have a significantly higher risk for any complication and was an independent predictor for experiencing any complication (OR: 8.5, p = 0.015; OR: 1.06, p = 0.029). Major complication rates were significantly higher in the BCT cohort (16.9% vs. 7.9%, p = 0.023). CONCLUSION: IOR in the elderly is a safe option and was not found to be a predictor of experiencing higher complications. Patients who are 85 years and older had a higher risk of complications, and future studies may explore risk-benefit in that particular cohort of patients in which BCT is planned.

Long-term overall survival of patients who undergo breast-conserving therapy or mastectomy for early operable HER2-Positive breast cancer after preoperative systemic therapy: an observational cohort study.

Background: Understanding the survival outcomes associated with breast-conserving therapy (BCT) and mastectomy after preoperative systemic therapy (PST) enables clinicians to provide more personalized treatment recommendations. However, lack of firm survival benefit data limits the breast surgery choices of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer patients who receive PST. We sought to determine whether BCT or mastectomy after PST for early operable HER2-positive breast cancer is associated with better long-term survival outcomes and determine the degree to which PST response affects this association. Methods: In this observational cohort study, we compared the long-term survival outcomes of BCT and mastectomy after PST for HER2-positive breast cancer and evaluated the impact of PST response on the relationship between breast surgery performed and survival outcomes. Our cohort included 625 patients with early operable HER2-positive breast cancer who received PST followed by BCT or mastectomy between January 1998 and October 2009. These patients also received standard postoperative radiation, trastuzumab, and endocrine therapy as indicated clinically. We used propensity score matching to assemble mastectomy and BCT cohorts with similar baseline characteristics and used Kaplan-Meier plots and Cox proportional hazards regression to detect associations between surgery types and outcomes. Furthermore, in this study, we analyzed the original data of 625 patients using the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method to enhance the reliability of the comparison between the mastectomy and BCT cohorts by addressing potential confounding variables. Findings: Propensity score matching yielded cohorts of 221 patients who received BCT and 221 patients who underwent mastectomy. At the median follow-up time of 9.9 years, compared with BCT, mastectomy was associated with worse overall survival (hazard ratio, 1.66; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.08-2.57; P = 0.02). In patients who had axillary lymph node pathological complete response, mastectomy was associated with worse overall survival before matching (hazard ratio, 2.17; 95% CI: 1.22-3.86; P < 0.01) and after matching (hazard ratio, 2.12; 95% CI: 1.15-3.89; P = 0.02). Among patients with pathological complete response in the breast, the survival results did not differ significantly between BCT and mastectomy patients. IPTW method validated that BCT offers better overall survival in patients who had axillary lymph node pathological complete response. Interpretation: People with HER2-positive breast cancer who have already had PST are more likely to survive after BCT, especially if they get a pathological complete response in the axillary lymph nodes. These findings underscore the necessity for further investigation into how responses to PST can inform the choice of surgical intervention and the potential impact on overall survival. Such insights could lead to the development of innovative tools that support personalized surgical strategies in the management of breast cancer. Funding: This work was supported by grants from the Nantong Science and Technology Project (JCZ2022079), Nantong Health Commission Project (QA2021031, MSZ2023040) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82394430).

Preliminary report on ultrashort perioperative partial-breast irradiation with multicatheter interstitial brachytherapy for early-stage breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Perioperative partial-breast irradiation (PBI) with multicatheter interstitial brachytherapy (MIB) is less invasive and more convenient than postoperative one. This study aimed to compare ultrashort perioperative MIB-PBI (uPBI) and conventional perioperative MIB-PBI (cPBI) performed during the same period of time. METHODS: Inclusion criteria of the study were patients aged ≥ 40 years and those with T0-2 (≤ 3 cm), N0-mi, and negative margins on mammography. The locoregional recurrence (LRR) and toxicity rates were compared between uPBI at a dose of 25.2 Gy in four fractions and cPBI at a dose of 32 Gy in eight fractions. RESULTS: In total, 198 patients (151 with uPBI and 47 with cPBI) were evaluated. At a median follow-up of 20.1 months, one (0.66%) patient in the uPBI group had LRR. The 2-year ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence-free survival rates of the uPBI and cPBI groups were 98.7% and 100%, respectively. The highest toxicity grades were grade 1 in 23 (15.2%) and grade 2 in 2 (1.3%) patients in the uPBI group, and grade 1 in 8 (17.0%) and grade 2 in 1 (2.1%) patient in the cPBI group. None of the patients in the two groups presented with grade 3 and higher toxicities. The toxicity rates between the two groups did not significantly differ. Further, 22 (14.6%) patients in the uPBI group and 8 (17.0%) in the cPBI group, and 3 (2.0%) patients in the uPBI group and 1 (2.1%) in the cPBI had acute and late toxicities, respectively. The timing of toxicity development between the two groups did not significantly differ. CONCLUSIONS: Although this preliminary report included a small sample size and had a short follow-up period, the local control and toxicity rates were similar between the uPBI and cPBI groups. Further research is warranted to investigate the ideal dose schedule of MIB-PBI.

Better survival was found in patients treated with breast-conserving surgery compared with mastectomy in malignant phyllodes tumor of the breast.

Malignant phyllodes tumor of the breast (MPTB) is a rare type of breast cancer. The prognosis between breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and mastectomy remains unclear in MPTB. Therefore, long-term survival was investigated between BCS and mastectomy in MPTB via the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. MPTB patients with T1-2/N0 stage between 2000 and 2015 from SEER database were retrospectively reviewed. Prognosis between different surgical approaches was assessed by Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards analysis. A total of 795 patients were enrolled with a median follow-up of 126 months. BCS was associated with significantly increased 10-year overall survival (OS) (89.2% vs. 81.1%, p = 0.002) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) (95.2% vs. 90%, p = 0.004) compared with mastectomy. Multivariate analysis showed better OS (HR = 0.587, 95% CI 0.406-0.850, p = 0.005) and BCSS (HR = 0.463, 95%CI 0.267-0.804, p = 0.006) in the BCS group than the mastectomy group. After 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM), improved 10-year OS (89.2% vs.81%, p = 0.023) and BCSS (95.8% vs. 90.1%, p = 0.033) were observed in BCS compared with mastectomy. This study found the survival benefit of BCS over mastectomy in patients with early-stage MPTB. BCS should be recommended as a priority in MPTB patients when both surgical approaches are feasible.

Outcomes of Breast-Conserving Therapy in Patients With Inflammatory Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is a rare and aggressive form of breast cancer. Currently, patients who respond to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) are treated with mastectomy and axillary lymph node dissection. This study aimed to synthesize real-world data to evaluate the feasibility of breast-conserving therapy (BCT), sentinel lymph node (SLN), and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for patients with IBC who respond to NAC. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for relevant articles. Clinical studies that compared mastectomy with BCT for IBC treatment were reviewed. The primary outcomes were local recurrence rate and 5-y survival rate in patients with IBC who responded to NAC. Furthermore, the SLN detection rate and false-negative rate (FNR) for SLNB were also evaluated. RESULTS: In the final analysis, 17 studies were included. The pooled estimates of the local recurrence rate for mastectomy and no surgical intervention were 18.6% and 15.9%, respectively (P = 0.956). Five-y survival was similar for mastectomy, partial mastectomy, and no surgical intervention (45.8%, 57.1%, and 39.4%, respectively). The pooled estimates of the SLN detection rate and FNR for SLNB were 81.9% and 21.8%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with IBC who respond to NAC, the local recurrence and 5-y survival rates in those undergoing BCT are noninferior to the rates in those undergoing mastectomy; therefore, BCT could be a feasible option for surgical management. However, a poor SLN detection rate and a high FNR were found in patients undergoing SLNB. Further large-scale clinical studies are required to confirm our findings.

Locoregional Therapy: From Mastectomy to Reconstruction, Targeted Surgery, and Ultra-Hypofractionated Radiotherapy.

Background: The past 3 decades have seen an unprecedented shift toward treatment de-escalation in surgical therapy of breast cancer. Summary: Radical mastectomy has been replaced by breast-conserving and oncoplastic approaches in most patients, and full axillary lymph node dissection by less radical staging procedures, such as sentinel lymph node biopsy and targeted axillary dissection. Further, attempts have been made to spare healthy tissue while increasing the probability of removing the tumor with clear margins, thus improving cosmetic results and minimizing the risk of local recurrence. In this context, modern probe-guided localization techniques have been introduced to guide surgical excision. This progress was accompanied by the development of targeted systemic therapies. At the same time, radiotherapy for breast cancer has undergone significant changes. The use of hypofractionation has decreased the typical length of a treatment course from 5-6 weeks to 1-3 weeks. Partial breast irradiation is now a valid option for de-escalation in patients with low-risk features. Axillary radiotherapy achieves similar recurrence rates and decreases the risk of lymphedema in patients with limited sentinel node involvement. Key Messages: Taken together, these advances are important steps toward individualization of locoregional management strategies. This highlights the importance of interdisciplinary approaches for de-escalation of locoregional therapies.

Distress, Pain, and Coping Strategies in Patients Undergoing Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Scoping Literature Review.

PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION: Most patients with breast cancer are diagnosed at an early stage, when surgery remains the primary treatment. This scoping literature review explores the frequency and severity of symptoms; which patients are at the highest risk for pain, nausea, and distress; and the relationships between coping strategies and these symptoms. LITERATURE REVIEW: This review included articles found in the MEDLINE®, CINAHL®, PubMed®, PsycINFO®, APA PsycArticles®, and Cochrane Library databases and published from 2010 through 2022, using combinations of the following keywords: coping, cancer, distress, surgery, and breast. DATA EVALUATION: Initial search results yielded 111 research articles, and 13 were included in the review. Extracted data included the purpose, study design, sample size, time point, instrument, and conclusion. SYNTHESIS: Nausea, pain, and distress are substantial problems for women following breast cancer surgery. The relationships among predictors, pain, nausea, and distress are clear, but the direction and strength of these relationships remain unknown. A better understanding of the relationships among these factors is important to improve the experience of women with breast cancer. IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH: Nursing research should focus on developing targeted interventions to reduce these symptoms.

[Methods, applications, and future perspectives of intraoperative tissue identification]. / Methoden, Anwendungen und Zukunftsperspektiven der intraoperativen Gewebeerkennung.

Over the last century, there has been a steady development of new technologies for intraoperative tissue identification and differentiation. The applications are varied, with the core purpose being to identify target structures while preserving adjacent tissue and thereby follow a general paradigm of minimally invasive medicine. Particularly in oncology, a further asset of these technologies is the identification or classification of neoplastic tissue to support and improve therapy, for example, in breast cancer surgery.Many technologies under consideration make use of the different physical characteristics of treated tissues, such as induced fluorescence, optical coherence, and electrical impedance.Recent developments are focusing on moving from ex vivo to in situ and from asynchronous to real-time assistance of the clinicians, for example, by means of optical emission spectroscopy. Refinements of existing and the creation of new methods will include AI tools to make them more powerful while reducing the inter-operator variability in operative interventions. This talk addresses several aspects of the usage and suitability of these technologies for intraoperative, therapy-supporting application.

Effects of Breast-Conserving Surgery and Mastectomy on the Survival of Patients with Early-Stage (T1-2N0-1M0) HER2-Positive Breast Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Although breast-conserving therapy (BCT) promises at least a similar survival rate for patients with early breast cancer compared with mastectomy, its efficacy in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive tumors remains unclear. Therefore, we conducted this study to explore differential effects of BCT and mastectomy on survival outcomes of patients with early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer. METHODS: Data were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, and basic characteristics of patients who received either BCT or mastectomy were balanced using propensity score matching (PSM). Kaplan-Meier analysis, log-rank testing, and Cox proportional hazards regression were performed. RESULTS: In total, 20,277 patients were diagnosed with T1-2N0-1M0 HER2-positive breast cancer between 2010 and 2015. After PSM, 6,185 pairs of patients were enrolled for further analysis. Compared with those undergoing mastectomy, patients receiving BCT had superior overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio [HR], 0.63; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.55-0.73; p < 0.001) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) (HR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.48-0.71; p < 0.001). The subgroup analyses revealed that survival outcomes (OS and BCSS) of BCT were better than those of mastectomy among estrogen receptor (ER)+/progesterone receptor (PR)+/HER2+, ER+/PR-/HER2+, and ER-/PR-/HER2+ subtypes (p < 0.05 for all); however, patients with ER-/PR+/HER2+ subtypes who underwent BCT had similar OS and BCSS (p > 0.05 for both) to those treated with mastectomy. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Despite the aggressiveness of the disease, we found that BCT may confer better long-term survival than mastectomy for patients with T1-2N0-1M0 HER2-positive breast cancer, particularly for those with ER+/PR+/HER2+, ER+/PR-/HER2+, and ER-/PR-/HER2+ subtypes. In addition, our study provided insights into the clinical applications of BCT. However, this retrospective study has introduced several inevitable limitations, and further prospective research is warranted to verify these conclusions.

Occult breast cancer patients with mastectomy have better prognosis than those with breast-conserving therapy.

Background: This single-center retrospective study compared the efficacy of breast-conserving therapy along with axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) with mastectomy and ALND with regard to survival of Chinese patients with occult breast cancer. Materials & methods: Univariate Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariate Cox proportional hazards model were used to compare treatments and prognosis. Results: A total of 111 patients with a median follow-up of 72.9 months were included. 39 patients with mastectomy + ALND had better disease-free survival than 72 patients with breast-conserving therapy + ALND (HR = 0.31; p = 0.012). Patients with radiotherapy demonstrated inferior survival for both overall survival (HR = 2.67; p = 0.071) and disease-free survival (HR = 5.35; p = 0.002). Surgical strategies and radiotherapy remained significantly predictive of better disease-free survival in multivariate analyses. Conclusion: Mastectomy and ALND demonstrate superior disease-free prognosis compared with breast-conserving therapy and ALND in occult breast cancer.

Explaining risks and benefits of loco-regional treatments to patients.

Treatment for early-stage breast cancer is complex, requiring multidisciplinary care with a multitude of treatment options available for each patient. Coupled with the rising importance of shared decision-making, patient-physician conversations are progressively more complicated. These conversations require frank disclosure of risks and benefits of the different treatment modalities in a way that is individualized for each patient and simple to understand. In most patients, breast conserving therapy with radiation should be presented as the gold-standard local treatment given similar long-term and improved quality of life outcomes. De-escalation is currently at the forefront of research in loco-regional treatments, and further investigations are required to best determine the optimal patient populations for reduced sentinel lymph node sampling, omission of sentinel lymph node biopsy altogether and omission of radiation treatment. For future trials, better endpoints need to be established considering patient-centered outcomes as well as recurrence.

Effect of Delayed Oncoplastic Reduction Mammoplasty on Radiation Treatment Delay Following Breast-Conserving Surgery for Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the delay in initiating adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in patients with early-stage breast cancer who underwent oncoplastic reduction mammoplasty (ORM) following BCS compared with a matched cohort of patients who did not undergo ORM between BCS and RT. METHODS: Medical records of 112 women (56 ORMs and 56 matched non-ORMs) with carcinoma in situ or early-stage breast cancer treated with BCS were reviewed. ORM was performed in a delayed manner following BCS, allowing confirmation of negative surgical margins. Time to RT was defined as time from last oncologic surgery to start of RT. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 6.8 years for the ORM cohort and 6.7 years for the control non-ORM cohort. Patients who underwent ORM following BCS experienced a significant delay in initiating RT (>8 weeks) than matched patients not undergoing ORM (66% vs. 34%; p < 0.001). Wound complications occurred in 44.6% (n = 25) of patients in the ORM cohort, which were mostly minor, including delayed wound healing and/or infection (39%). There was no significant difference in local recurrence between patients in the non-ORM and ORM cohorts (p = 0.32). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that ORM following BCS has the potential to delay RT >8 weeks, largely as a result of increased risk of wound complications; however, this delay did not impact local control. ORM can be safely considered for appropriately selected patients with breast cancer.

Decision-making process for breast-conserving therapy from the perspective of women with breast cancer: A grounded theory study.

PURPOSE: To explore the decision-making and coping processes of women with newly diagnosed breast cancer receiving breast-conserving therapy. METHODS: The grounded theory methodology approach was employed in this study. Purposive and theoretical sampling methods were used to enroll 27 women with stage I-III breast cancer. Individual interviews were conducted using a semi-structured interview guide, and data were analyzed using open, axial, and selective coding. RESULTS: The core category is "limitations of boundaries," which includes three categories: feminine body boundary, emotional boundary, and knowledge boundary. Clusters, conflicts, and changeability were among the unique contextual conditions. The decision-making process became more challenging because of the differences between the levels of knowledge of physicians and patients receiving treatment information. Women's actions and interactions included information seeking, controlling, negotiating, and accepting nondecision-making support. The consequences of decisions included redecision and reoperation, and most women did not regret receiving breast-conserving therapy. CONCLUSION: Even after choosing breast-conserving therapy, some women may experience changes in treatment procedures. Medical professionals should identify women's challenges and limitations during their decision-making process, explain the benefits and drawbacks of different surgical modalities, address concerns about the outcome of breast-conserving surgery, and provide intellectual and emotional support for decision-making.

Conventional specimen radiography in breast-conserving therapy: a useful tool for intraoperative margin assessment after neoadjuvant therapy?

PURPOSE: A previous study in our breast unit showed that the diagnostic accuracy of intraoperative specimen radiography and its potential to reduce second surgeries in a cohort of patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy were low, which questions the routine use of Conventional specimen radiography (CSR) in this patient group. This is a follow-up study in a larger cohort to further evaluate these findings. METHODS: This retrospective study included 376 cases receiving breast-conserving surgery (BCS) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) of primary breast cancer. CSR was performed to assess potential margin infiltration and recommend an intraoperative re-excision of any radiologically positive margin. The histological workup of the specimen served as gold standard for the evaluation of the accuracy of CSR and the potential reduction of second surgeries by CSR-guided re-excisions. RESULTS: 362 patients with 2172 margins were assessed. The prevalence of positive margins was 102/2172 (4.7%). CSR had a sensitivity of 37.3%, a specificity of 85.6%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 11.3%, and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 96.5%. The rate of secondary procedures was reduced from 75 to 37 with a number needed to treat (NNT) of CSR-guided intraoperative re-excisions of 10. In the subgroup of patients with clinical complete response (cCR), the prevalence of positive margins was 38/1002 (3.8%), PPV was 6.5% and the NNT was 34. CONCLUSION: This study confirms our previous finding that the rate of secondary surgeries cannot be significantly reduced by CSR-guided intraoperative re-excisions in cases with cCR after NACT. The routine use CSR after NACT is questionable, and alternative tools of intraoperative margin assessment should be evaluated.

Quality of life and satisfaction of patients after oncoplastic or traditional breast-conserving surgery using the BREAST-Q (BCT module): a prospective study.

INTRODUCTION: The oncoplastic conservative surgery was developed as a natural evolution of traditional surgery, attempting to improve the therapeutic and aesthetic outcomes where tumor resection could be followed by not-adequate results. Our primary aim is to evaluate how patient satisfaction and quality-of-life after conservative oncoplastic surgery, using BREAST-Q (BCT Module), change pre- and post-operatively. The secondary aim is to compare patient-reported outcome after oncoplastic or traditional conservative surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We enrolled 647 patients who underwent traditional conservative surgery or oncoplastic surgery from January 2020 to December 2022. Only 232 women (35.9%) completed the BREAST-Q questionnaire on a web-based platform, at the preoperative phase and 3 months after treatment. RESULTS: The average score of "Psychosocial well-being" and "Satisfaction with Breasts" 3 months after surgery showed a statistically significant improvement, while the average score for "Physical well-being: Chest" at 3 months showed a worsening compared to the baseline. "Sexual well-being" did not show statistically significant change. A significant difference between the post-operative outcome of oncoplastic surgery and traditional surgery was observed only for Physical well-being (better for traditional surgery). CONCLUSIONS: The study showed significant improvement in patient-reported outcomes 3 months after the surgery, except for physical discomfort that increases especially after oncoplastic surgery. Furthermore, our data, as well as many others, point to the appropriateness of using OCS where there is an effective indication, while the perspective of patients cannot find significant superiority over TCS in any of the areas analyzed.

Outcomes of breast conserving therapy: Recurrence, imaging findings and histological correlation.

Background: Breast conserving therapy (BCT) is the mainstay therapy in patients with early breast cancer and selected patients with locally advanced breast cancer. No formal audit has been performed on BCT at our institution. Objectives: To determine the incidence and risk factors for ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence (IBTR). Study the imaging features of IBTR. Determine adherence to the proposed annual mammographic surveillance schedule. Method: Clinical, radiological and histopathological records of patients who underwent BCT from 01 January 2011 to 31 December 2015 were reviewed. Patients were followed up for at least 5 years. Results: Ninety-two patients were included in the study with a mean age of 54.3 years. Eighty of the 92 (87.0%) patients were imaged within 1-year post-BCT. Ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence was 6/92 (6.5%) with mean time to IBTR of 34.4 months. One of the 92 (1.0%) patients had a contralateral metachronous recurrence with no IBTR and 11/92 (12.0%) had distant metastases only. Pathological tumour size and extent (pT2) (68.5%) and pathological lymph node (pN0) (65.2%) were the most common locoregional staging. Infiltrating ductal carcinoma was the most common histological type (88%). Age < 35 years was associated with breast cancer recurrence (p < 0.01). Imaging findings of recurrence were microcalcification (odds ratio [OR]: 4), asymmetric density (OR: 4) and skin thickening (OR: 2.5). Conclusion: The occurrence of IBTR following BCT in our unit is acceptable and comparable to local and international units. The accuracy of assessing the post-BCT breast for IBTR is in keeping with international standards. Contribution: Improved radiological imaging interpretation of the post-BCT breast.

Sometimes it is better to just make it simple. De-escalation of oncoplastic and reconstructive procedures.

Simple breast conservation surgery (sBCS) has technically advanced onto oncoplastic breast procedures (OBP) to avoid mastectomy and improve breast cancer patients' psychosocial well-being and cosmetic outcome. Although OBP are time-consuming and expensive, we are witnessing an increase in their use, even for cases that could be managed with sBCS. The choice between keeping it simple or opting for more complex oncoplastic procedures is difficult. This review proposes a pragmatic approach in assisting this decision. Medical literature suggests that OBP and sBCS might be similar regarding local recurrence and overall survival, and patients seem to have higher satisfaction levels with the aesthetic outcome of OBP when compared to sBCS. However, the lack of comprehensive high-quality research assessing their safety, efficacy, and patient-reported outcomes hinders these supposed conclusions. Postoperative complications after OBP may delay the initiation of adjuvant RT. In addition, precise displacement of the breast volume is not effectively recorded despite surgical clips placement, making accurate dose delivery tricky for radiation oncologists, and WBRT preferable to APBI in complex OBP cases. With a critical eye on financial toxicity, patient satisfaction, and oncological outcomes, OBP must be carefully integrated into clinical practice. The thoughtful provision of informed consent is essential for decision-making between sBCS and OBP. As we look into the future, machine learning and artificial intelligence can potentially help patients and doctors avoid postoperative regrets by setting realistic aesthetic expectations.

Effectiveness Without Efficacy: Cautionary Tale from a Landmark Breast Cancer Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background: "Old" randomized controlled trials established breast conserving therapy (BCT) and total mastectomy (TM) equivalence for treating early breast cancer, whereas recent literature report improved survival with BCT. To reconcile this, we performed a simulation study and re-analyzed B-06 trial data. Methods: We estimated the distributions for overall survival (OS), cumulative incidence functions for breast-cancer-specific death (BCSD) and other causes-specific death (OCSD) by BCT and TM. The restricted mean survival time (RMST) difference and hazard ratio between the two arms were estimated. Given the estimated distributions, we simulated cause-specific death times from each arm, evaluating the power to test treatment difference in OS, BCSD, and OCSD with different sample sizes, follow-up times, and a modified setting by simulating BCT-arm OCSD times from the distribution of patients not receiving radiation. Results: With 200 months follow-up, the average BCT-over-TM gain measured by RMST was 3.7 months for OS and 4.5 months for BCSD. Increasing the trial size to 5,000 per arm, there is a 79.2% chance to detect the OS benefit with RMST and 92.4% for BCSD. A nonproportional increase of OCSD in BCT compared to TM was observed after 144 months, and particularly after 200 months post treatments. When OCSD times of BCT were simulated using patients not receiving radiation, the estimated OS gain increased to 4.4 months, and the power increased to 92.2%. Conclusions: The late excess other-cause-death, likely due to radiation, in the BCT arm and sample size constraints limited the power to report BCT superiority. Given radiation delivered in the era of B-06 trial, BCT and TM remain largely equivalent.