Spontaneous Passage of Left Ureteral Multiple Calculi from Caliceal Diverticular Calculi: A Case Report.

Caliceal diverticular calculi are rather fixed and they are rare to be delivered spontaneously. We experienced a case of spontaneous passage of left ureteral multiple calculi from caliceal diverticular calculi. A 65-year-old female suffered from left back pain and was referred to our hospital. She was found to have left ureteral multiple calculi and left caliceal diverticular calculi. After a month observation, all ureteral calculi were delivered spontaneously. Multiple ureteral calculi from caliceal diverticular calculi could be delivered spontaneously and conservative management may be an option for the treatment.

Management of symptomatic caliceal diverticular calculi: Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus flexible ureterorenoscopy.

OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively evaluate appropriate treatment for patients with symptomatic caliceal diverticular calculi, by comparing the therapeutic outcomes for those undergoing minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL) and flexible ureterorenoscopy (F-URS). METHODS: From March 2009 to May 2014, 36 consecutive patients with caliceal diverticular calculi were divided into 2 groups: 21 patients underwent MPCNL, and 15 were treated by F-URS. All procedures were performed by one surgical group, which ensured relatively constant parameters. Patient characteristics, operative time, hospital stay after surgery, stone-free rate, symptomatic improvement rate, complications, diverticular obliteration, and stone composition were analyzed retrospectively in the 2 groups. RESULTS: Patient preoperative variables were comparable between the two groups, with no significant difference (P > 0.05). Mean operative time was 136.9 ± 22.8 min in the MPCNL group and 117.3 ± 24.3 min in the F-URS group (P = 0.019). Hospital stay was significantly longer in the MPCNL group than in the F-URS group (9.4 ± 3.1 vs. 6.9 ± 2.1 days, P = 0.010). The stone-free rates after MPCNL and F-URS were 90.5% (19/21) and 60.0% (9/15), respectively (P = 0.046). Additionally, 71.4% (15/21) of patients in the MPCNL group and 46.7% (7/15) of patients in the F-URS group had symptomatic improvement at the 6-month follow-up (P = 0.175); the rates of complications in the 2 groups were 19.0% (4/21) and 13.3% (2/15), respectively (P = 0.650). Complete diverticular obliteration was achieved in 16 (76.2%) cases in the MPCNL group and 5 (33.3%) cases in the F-URS group (P = 0.017). The distributions of calcium oxalate and hydroxyapatite in the stones were 66.7% (14/21) and 33.3% (7/21), respectively, in the MPCNL group; however, the distributions in the F-URS group were 46.7% (7/15) and 53.3% (8/15), respectively (P = 0.310). CONCLUSION: MPCNL is an effective method for the treatment of caliceal diverticular calculi. However, F-URS is an alternative technique in selected patients with a patent infundibulum, despite lower stone-free rates than with MPCNL. Fulguration of the diverticular lining with a high-power holmium laser and permitting the cavity to collapse are useful to increase the chance of diverticular obliteration.

Experience and modification of percutaneous nephrolithotomy for caliceal diverticular calculi / 中华泌尿外科杂志

Objective To summary our experiences in percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treating the caliceal diverticular calculi and postoperative outcome with technical modification.Methods A retrospective review was performed on 34 patients with caliceal diverticular calculi who underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy between January 2009 and June 2013.The patients were divided into 2 groups.In group A (1 1patients),stones were removed and diverticular neck was incised.In group B (23 patients),fulguration of diverticular wall was performed after the stone removal and diverticular neck incision.Group A had 11 cases including 4 male and 7 female with average age (36.7± 16.0) years.Mean size of stone was (1.8±0.4) cm.Mean maximum diameter of diverticulum was (2.3±0.5) cm.Group B had 23 cases including 10 male and 13 female with average age (40.1±12.0) years.Mean size of stone was (1.9±0.6) cm.Mean maximum diameter of diverticulum was (2.3±0.8) cm.There were no significant difference in stone size and maximum diameter of diverticulum within two groups (P＞0.05).The following parameters such as operative time,drop in hemoglobin,stone clearance,complication rate and ablation rate of diverticulum were compared between two groups.Results In group A,average operative time was (62.7±11.7) min.Mean hemoglobin dropping was (12.0t9.7) g/L.Stone clearance rate was 90.9％ (10/11) and overall complications rate was 18.2％ (2/11).The ablation rate of diverticulum was 63.6％ (7/11).In group B,average operative time was (76.3±21.6) min.Mean Hemoglobin reducing was (12.9±16.7) g/L.Stone clearance rate was 91.3％(21/23) and overall complication rate was 21.7％.The ablation rate of diverticulum was 91.3％ (21/23).There was no significant difference in stone clearance and complication rate between two groups.It seemed that the operativc timc in group B was longer than that in group A.However,no significant difference was found (P＞0.05).The ablation rate of diverticulum in group B was significantly higher than that in group A (P＜0.05).Conclusion In percutaneous nephrolithotomy treatment for caliceal diverticular calculi,fulguration to diverticular wall is an effective method to achieve diverticular obliteration and reduce possibility of stone recurrence.