A phase II study (AARDVARC) of AZD4635 in combination with durvalumab and cabazitaxel in patients with progressive, metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: This phase II nonrandomized study evaluated the efficacy and safety of AZD4635 in combination with durvalumab (Arm A) or durvalumab plus cabazitaxel (Arm B) in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) previously treated with docetaxel and ≥1 novel hormonal agent. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The primary endpoint was radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) per RECIST v1.1 (soft tissue) or the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 3 (bone). Secondary endpoints included safety, tolerability, overall survival, confirmed prostate-specific antigen (PSA50) response, pharmacokinetics, and objective response rate. Enrollment in Arm A was stopped following a sponsor decision unrelated to safety. The study was stopped based on the planned futility analysis due to low PSA50 response in Arm B. RESULTS: In the final analysis (1 November 2021), 30 patients were treated (Arm A, n = 2; Arm B, n = 28). The median rPFS in Arm B was 5.8 months (95% confidence interval 4.2-not calculable). Median rPFS was 5.8 months versus 4.2 months for patients with high versus low blood-based adenosine signature. The most common treatment-related adverse events in Arm B were nausea (50.0%), diarrhea (46.4%), anemia and neutropenia (both 35.7%), asthenia (32.1%), and vomiting (28.6%). Overall, AZD4635 in combination with durvalumab or AZD4635 in combination with cabazitaxel and durvalumab showed limited efficacy in patients with mCRPC. CONCLUSIONS: Although the safety profile of both combinations was consistent with known safety data of the individual agents, the results of this trial do not support further development of the combinations.

Physician preferences for nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treatment in China.

Introduction: The treatment preferences of Chinese physicians who treat nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) and how they weigh the benefits and risks of nmCRPC treatment are still unknown. This study aimed to evaluate Chinese physicians' benefit-risk treatment preferences for nmCRPC and assist in setting nmCRPC treatment goals. Methods: A paper-based discrete choice experiment (DCE) survey was administered to 80 nmCRPC-treating physicians. DCE responses were analyzed to produce the preference weight and the relative importance score for each attribute level. The marginal rate of substitution (MRS) was used to quantify the amount of overall survival (OS) physicians were willing to trade for a reduction in treatment-related adverse events (AEs). We further conducted the exploratory analysis, stratifying physicians from 5 perspectives into different subgroups and examining the treatment preferences and OS trade-off in each subgroup. Results: In terms of efficacy attributes, physicians placed greater emphasis on OS than time to pain progression. With regard to safety attributes, serious fracture was perceived as the most important AE by physicians, followed by serious fall, cognitive problems, skin rash, and fatigue. In the exploratory analysis, we found generally that physicians with less clinical practice experience and those from more economically developed regions placed more emphasis on AEs and were willing to give up more of their patients' OS to reduce the risk of AEs. Conclusion: Physicians from mainland China value the importance of minimizing treatment-related AEs when considering different treatment options for patients with nmCRPC, and they are willing to trade a substantial amount of OS to avoid AEs.

PSMA-targeted radiotheranostics in modern nuclear medicine: then, now, and what of the future?

In 1853, the perception of prostate cancer (PCa) as a rare ailment prevailed, was described by the eminent Londoner surgeon John Adams. Rapidly forward to 2018, the landscape dramatically altered. Currently, men face a one-in-nine lifetime risk of PCa, accentuated by improved diagnostic methods and an ageing population. With more than three million men in the United States alone grappling with this disease, the overall risk of succumbing to stands at one in 39. The intricate clinical and biological diversity of PCa poses serious challenges in terms of imaging, ongoing monitoring, and disease management. In the field of theranostics, diagnostic and therapeutic approaches that harmoniously merge targeted imaging with treatments are integrated. A pivotal player in this arena is radiotheranostics, employing radionuclides for both imaging and therapy, with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) at the forefront. Clinical milestones have been reached, including FDA- and/or EMA-approved PSMA-targeted radiodiagnostic agents, such as [18F]DCFPyL (PYLARIFY®, Lantheus Holdings), [18F]rhPSMA-7.3 (POSLUMA®, Blue Earth Diagnostics) and [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 (Locametz®, Novartis/ ILLUCCIX®, Telix Pharmaceuticals), as well as PSMA-targeted radiotherapeutic agents, such as [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 (Pluvicto®, Novartis). Concurrently, ligand-drug and immune therapies designed to target PSMA are being advanced through rigorous preclinical research and clinical trials. This review delves into the annals of PSMA-targeted radiotheranostics, exploring its historical evolution as a signature molecule in PCa management. We scrutinise its clinical ramifications, acknowledge its limitations, and peer into the avenues that need further exploration. In the crucible of scientific inquiry, we aim to illuminate the path toward a future where the enigma of PCa is deciphered and where its menace is met with precise and effective countermeasures. In the following sections, we discuss the intriguing terrain of PCa radiotheranostics through the lens of PSMA, with the fervent hope of advancing our understanding and enhancing clinical practice.

Computer-aided drug discovery strategies for novel therapeutics for prostate cancer leveraging next-generating sequencing data.

INTRODUCTION: Prostate cancer (PC) is the most common malignancy and accounts for a significant proportion of cancer deaths among men. Although initial therapy success can often be observed in patients diagnosed with localized PC, many patients eventually develop disease recurrence and metastasis. Without effective treatments, patients with aggressive PC display very poor survival. To curb the current high mortality rate, many investigations have been carried out to identify efficacious therapeutics. Compared to de novo drug designs, computational methods have been widely employed to offer actionable drug predictions in a fast and cost-efficient way. Particularly, powered by an increasing availability of next-generation sequencing molecular profiles from PC patients, computer-aided approaches can be tailored to screen for candidate drugs. AREAS COVERED: Herein, the authors review the recent advances in computational methods for drug discovery utilizing molecular profiles from PC patients. Given the uniqueness in PC therapeutic needs, they discuss in detail the drug discovery goals of these studies, highlighting their translational values for clinically impactful drug nomination. EXPERT OPINION: Evolving molecular profiling techniques may enable new perspectives for computer-aided approaches to offer drug candidates for different tumor microenvironments. With ongoing efforts to incorporate new compounds into large-scale high-throughput screens, the authors envision continued expansion of drug candidate pools.

mCRPC progression of disease after [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 detected on [18F]Choline: a case of PCa heterogeneity.

Radioligand therapy with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA is a theranostic approach for heavily treated mCRPC patients with positive PSMA PET in the absence of relevant PSMA-negative metastases assessed through CT, MRI, bone scan or FDG PET. In this case, we described a mCRPC patient treated with RLT with discordant PSA values and PSMA images, in which Choline PET confirmed a biochemically suspected disease progression (PD), showing metastatic lesions not revealed by PSMA imaging.

Comparative effectiveness of first-line systemic treatments for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: No head-to-head trials had been performed to estimate the relative effectiveness of poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) and androgen receptor signaling inhibitor (ARSi) in the first-line treatment for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). We aimed to perform a systematic review and network meta-analysis to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of various systemic treatment agents for patients with mCRPC. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted for abstracts and full-text articles from the database's inception through April 27, 2023. The study concentrated on assessing radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) for both overall and homologous recombination repair mutation (HRRm) population, with overall survival (OS) as the secondary measure. Under the Bayesian framework, the overall effect was pooled using the fixed-effects model in base case analysis. Scenario analysis using restricted mean survival time (RMST) methods was performed to test the robustness of the results. RESULTS: Nine studies with 6,830 patients and 8 unique treatment options were included. Network meta-analysis demonstrated that talazoparib in combination with enzalutamide (TALA + ENZA; overall population, hazard ratio [HR], 0.20; 95% credible interval [CrI]: 0.16-0.26; RMST, 3.51; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.46-4.60; HRRm population, HR, 0.15; 95% CrI: 0.09-0.23; RMST, 4.14; 95% CI 2.84-5.39) was superior to other treatments in the first-line setting in terms of rPFS. The results of Bayesian framework and RMST models showed consistent efficacy ranks. When extrapolated to overall survival benefit, within the Bayesian framework, olaparib plus abiraterone acetate and prednisone (OLAP + AAP) achieved the highest OS benefit for the overall population, which was not statistically significant when compared to TALA + ENZA. However, TALA + ENZA achieved the highest OS benefit at 3 years by applying RMST. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that talazoparib in combination with enzalutamide is probably a preferred treatment agent for the overall population and HRRm patients with mCRPC. Given the limitations of network framework and the modeling assumptions undertaken to finalize the analyses, results should be cautiously interpreted.

Bellmunt risk score as a survival predictor in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: The prognosis of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is influenced by numerous individual factors. Despite various proposed prognostic models, the clinical application of these remains limited, probably due to complexity. Our study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of the Bellmunt risk score, which is well-known for urothelial carcinoma and easily assessed, in mCRPC patients. METHODS: The Bellmunt risk score was calculated from three risk factors (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) ≥1, serum hemoglobin <10 g/dL, presence of liver metastases) in 125 patients who received first-line mCRPC treatment between 2005 and 2023. In addition, a modified score was established (one point each for hemoglobin <10 g/dL and the presence of liver metastases added to the ECOG PS). Associations with overall survival (OS) under first- and second-line therapy were tested using Cox regression analyzes, log-rank tests, concordance index (C-index) and time-dependent receiver operating characteristic. RESULTS: There is a significant correlation between the level of the Bellmunt risk score and shorter OS (hazard ratio: 3.23, 95% confidence interval: 2.06-5.05; log-rank p < 0.001; C-index: 0.724). The semi-quantitative modified risk score showed even better prognostic discrimination (log-rank p < 0.001, C-index: 0.764). The score and its dynamics were also predictive in the second-line setting (log-rank p < 0.001 and = 0.01; C-index: 0.742 and 0.595). CONCLUSIONS: The Bellmunt risk score is easy to assess and provides useful prognostic information in mCRPC, and can support physicians in their treatment decisions.

Exploration of the influence of GOLGA8B on prostate cancer progression and the resistance of castration-resistant prostate cancer to cabazitaxel.

Castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) represents the final stage of prostate cancer (PCa). Cabazitaxel, a taxane chemotherapy drug, is used in treating CRPC. However, patients with CRPC eventually develop resistance to cabazitaxel, and the underlying mechanism remains unclear. Here, we aimed to investigate potential genetic alterations that may play a role in CRPC resistance to cabazitaxel. Using microarray data from the GSE158494 dataset, we identified ten critical genes (CXCL8, ITGB8, CLIP4, MAP1B, WIPI1, MMP13, CXCL1, C1S, GOLGA8B, and CXCL6) associated with CRPC cell resistance to cabazitaxel. The potential function of these key genes in PCa progression was analyzed using different databases, including Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO), The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), and Chinese Prostate Cancer Genome and Epigenome Atlas (CPGEA). Our findings revealed altered expression of these genes in the development of PCa. Furthermore, CXCL1 and GOLGA8B were found to influence the disease-free survival (DFS) status of patients with PCa, with GOLGA8B affecting the overall prognosis in patients with PCa. Additionally, GOLGA8B expression was associated with the infiltration of various immune cells in PCa, and it was upregulated in clinical PCa and CRPC samples. Through CCK-8 assays, we established that GOLGA8B could influence the sensitivity of CRPC cells to cabazitaxel and docetaxel. In conclusion, we identified GOLGA8B as a crucial gene that influences PCa progression and contributes to CRPC resistance to cabazitaxel.

Identifying Suitable Patients for Overcoming Androgen Deprivation Monotherapy in De Novo Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Although metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) treatments have evolved, androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) remains a widely used regimen. Therefore, this study sought patients who did not progress to castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) but received ADT monotherapy and factors affecting overall survival (OS) in de novo mHSPC. METHODS: De novo mHSPC patients who received ADT treatment were included. ADT included luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists with or without anti-androgen. The total cohort was divided into two groups relative to CRPC progression within two years. Logistic analysis was used to identify factors that did not progress CRPC within two years. Cox regression was used to assess the independent predictors for OS. RESULTS: The total cohort was divided into the no-CRPC within two years group (n = 135) and the CRPC within two years group (n = 126). Through multivariate logistic analysis, the life expectancy (odds ratio [OR] 0.95, 95% CI 0.91-0.99, p = 0.014) and Gleason scores (≥9 vs. ≤8; OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.24-0.75, p = 0.003) were associated with the group without castration-resistant prostate cancer progression within two years. The multivariate Cox model revealed that life expectancy (hazard ratio [HR] 0.951, 95% CI 0.904-0.999, p = 0.0491), BMI (HR 0.870, 95% CI 0.783-0.967, p = 0.0101), and CCI (≥2 vs. <2; HR 2.018, 95% CI 1.103-3.693, p = 0.0227) were significant predictive factors for OS. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with long life expectancy and a Gleason score of 9 or more were more likely to develop mCRPC while alive. Patients with short life expectancy, low BMI, and worsening comorbidity were more likely to die before progressing to CRPC. Although intensified treatment is essential for oncologic outcomes in mHSPC, shared decision making is integral for patients who may not benefit from this treatment.

Effectiveness and safety of enzalutamide and apalutamide in the treatment of patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC): a multicenter retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE: Phase III clinical trials demonstrated the efficacy of enzalutamide and apalutamide in patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) and PSA doubling time ≤10 months. Although these drugs have been shown to vary in their adverse event (AE) profiles, the differences in their efficacy profiles remain to be evaluated. Therefore, this retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of these drugs in patients with nmCRPC. METHODS: This study evaluated 191 patients with nmCRPC treated with enzalutamide (n = 137) or apalutamide (n = 54) in the first-line setting at Jikei University Hospital or its affiliated hospitals between May 2014 and November 2022. Endpoints were defined as oncological outcomes (i.e., PSA response, PFS, PSA-PFS, MFS, CSS, and OS) and AEs. RESULTS: No significant differences were noted in patient backgrounds between the two groups. Patients exhibiting a maximum PSA response of >50% and >90% accounted for 74.5% and 48.9% of patients in the enzalutamide group, and 75.9% and 42.6% of patients in the apalutamide group, respectively, with no significant difference between the groups. The median PSA-PFS was 10 months in the enzalutamide group but not in the apalutamide group, with no significant difference between the groups (P = 0.48). No significant differences were observed in MFS, CSS, or OS between the groups. Patients reporting AEs of all grades and grade 3 or higher accounted for 56.2% and 4.3% of those in the enzalutamide group and 57.4% and 7.4% of those in the apalutamide group, respectively. The most common AE was fatigue (26.3%) in the enzalutamide group and skin rash (27.8%) in the apalutamide group. CONCLUSION: In this retrospective study of their efficacy and safety, enzalutamide and apalutamide were shown to exhibit comparable oncological outcomes but quite different AE profiles, suggesting that their differential use may be warranted based on these findings.

Discovery and Validation of Novel microRNA Panel for Non-Invasive Prediction of Prostate Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Early diagnosis remains a challenge for prostate cancer (PCa) due to molecular heterogeneity. The purpose of our study was to explore the diagnostic potential of microRNA (miRNA) in both tissue and serum that may aid in the precise and early clinical diagnosis of PCa. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The miRNA expression pattern analysis was carried out in 250 subjects (discovery and validation cohort). The Discovery Cohort included the control (n = 30) and PCa (n = 35) subjects, while the Validation Cohort included the healthy control (n = 60), benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) (n = 55), PCa (n = 50), and castration-resistant PCa (CRPC) (n = 20) patients. The expression analysis of tissue (Discovery Cohort) and serum (Validation Cohort) was carried out by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). The diagnostic biomarker potential was evaluated using receiver operating characteristics (ROC). Bioinformatic tools were used to explore and analyze miRNA target genes. RESULTS: MiRNA 4510 and miRNA 183 were significantly (p<0.001) upregulated and miRNA 329 was significantly (p<0.0001) downregulated in both PCa tissue and serum. ROC curve analysis showed excellent non-invasive biomarker potential of miRNA 4510 in both PCa (area under the curve (AUC) 0.984; p<0.001) and CRPC (AUC 0.944; p<0.001). The panel of serum miRNAs (miRNA 183 and miRNA 4510) designed for PCa had significant and greater AUC with both 100% sensitivity and specificity. Computational analysis shows that the maximum number of target genes are transcription factors that regulate oncogenes and tumor suppressors. CONCLUSION: Based on ROC curve analysis, miRNAs 4510, 329, and 711 were identified as potential non-invasive diagnostic biomarkers in the early detection of PCa. Our findings imply that a panel of miRNAs 183 and 4510 has high specificity for distinguishing PCa from healthy controls and providing therapeutic targets for better and earlier PCa therapy.

PROTACs targeting androgen receptor signaling: potential therapeutic agents for castration-resistant prostate cancer.

After the initial androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), part of the prostate cancer may continuously deteriorate into castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). The majority of patients suffer from the localized illness at primary diagnosis that could rapidly assault other organs. This disease stage is referred as metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Surgery and radiation are still the treatment of CRPC, but have some adverse effects such as urinary symptoms and sexual dysfunction. Hormonal castration therapy interfering androgen receptor (AR) signaling pathway is indispensable for most advanced prostate cancer patients, and the first- and second-generation of novel AR inhibitors could effectively cure hormone sensitive prostate cancer (HSPC). However, the resistance to these chemical agents is inevitable many of patients may experience relapses. The resistance to AR inhibitor mainly involves AR mutation, splice variant formation and amplification, which indicates the important role in CRPC. Proteolysis-targeting chimera (PROTAC), a potent technique to degrade targeted protein, has recently undergone extensive development as a biological tool and therapeutic drug. This technique has the potential to become the next generation of antitumor therapeutics as it could overcome the shortcomings of conventional small molecule inhibitors. In this review, we summarize the molecular mechanisms on PROTACs targeting AR signaling for CRPC, hoping to provide insights into drug development and clinical medication.

Outcomes and patterns of use of Radium-223 in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Introduction: Radium-223 dichloride (Ra-223) is recommended as a treatment option for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients with symptomatic bone metastases and no visceral disease, after docetaxel failure, or in patients who are not candidates to receive it. In this study, we aimed to ambispectively analyze overall survival (OS) and prognostic features in mCRPC in patients receiving Ra-223 as per clinical routine practice and identify the most suitable treatment sequence. Patients and methods: This study is observational, multicentric, and ambispective. Eligibility criteria included mCRPC patients treated with Ra-223, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2, without visceral metastases, and no more than three cm involved lymph nodes. Results: A total of 145 patients were included; the median age was 73.97 years, and a Gleason score of more than or equal to 7 in 61 (48%) patients; 73 (81%) had previously received docetaxel. The most important benefit was reached by those patients who received Ra-223 in the second-line setting, with a median OS of 17 months (95% CI, 12-21), and by patients who received six cycles of treatment, with a median OS of 19 months (95% CI, 14-21). An alkaline phosphatase (ALP) decrease was also identified as a prognosis marker. When performing the multivariate analysis, the time to develop castration-resistant disease longer than 24 months was the most important prognostic factor to predict the evolution of the patients receiving Ra-223. Ra-223 was well tolerated, with thrombocytopenia, anemia, and diarrhea being the main adverse events. Conclusion: There is a benefit for those patients who received Ra-223 in the second-line setting, regardless of prior use of docetaxel. In addition, a survival benefit for patients presenting with a decline in ALP was observed.

Computational Modeling to Identify Drugs Targeting Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Characterized by Heightened Glycolysis.

Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) remains a deadly disease due to a lack of efficacious treatments. The reprogramming of cancer metabolism toward elevated glycolysis is a hallmark of mCRPC. Our goal is to identify therapeutics specifically associated with high glycolysis. Here, we established a computational framework to identify new pharmacological agents for mCRPC with heightened glycolysis activity under a tumor microenvironment, followed by in vitro validation. First, using our established computational tool, OncoPredict, we imputed the likelihood of drug responses to approximately 1900 agents in each mCRPC tumor from two large clinical patient cohorts. We selected drugs with predicted sensitivity highly correlated with glycolysis scores. In total, 77 drugs predicted to be more sensitive in high glycolysis mCRPC tumors were identified. These drugs represent diverse mechanisms of action. Three of the candidates, ivermectin, CNF2024, and P276-00, were selected for subsequent vitro validation based on the highest measured drug responses associated with glycolysis/OXPHOS in pan-cancer cell lines. By decreasing the input glucose level in culture media to mimic the mCRPC tumor microenvironments, we induced a high-glycolysis condition in PC3 cells and validated the projected higher sensitivity of all three drugs under this condition (p < 0.0001 for all drugs). For biomarker discovery, ivermectin and P276-00 were predicted to be more sensitive to mCRPC tumors with low androgen receptor activities and high glycolysis activities (AR(low)Gly(high)). In addition, we integrated a protein-protein interaction network and topological methods to identify biomarkers for these drug candidates. EEF1B2 and CCNA2 were identified as key biomarkers for ivermectin and CNF2024, respectively, through multiple independent biomarker nomination pipelines. In conclusion, this study offers new efficacious therapeutics beyond traditional androgen-deprivation therapies by precisely targeting mCRPC with high glycolysis.

Treatment-induced neuroendocrine prostate cancer and de novo neuroendocrine prostate cancer: Identification, prognosis and survival, genetic and epigenetic factors.

Neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC) shows an aggressive behavior compared to prostate cancer (PCa), also known as prostate adenocarcinoma. Scanty foci in PCa can harbor genetic alternation that can arise in a heterogeneity of prostate cancer. NEPC may arise de novo or develop following androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). NEPC that arise following ADT has the nomenclature "treatment-emerging/induced NEPC (t-NEPC)". t-NEPC would be anticipated in castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) and metastatic PCa. t-NEPC is characterized by low or absent androgen receptor (AR) expression, independence of AR signaling, and gain of neuroendocrine phenotype. t-NEPC is an aggressive metastatic tumor, develops from PCa in response to drug induced ADT, and shows very short response to conventional therapy. t-NEPC occurs in 10%-17% of patients with CRPC. De novo NEPC is rare and is accounting for less than 2% of all PCa. The molecular mechanisms underlying the trans-differentiation from CRPC to t-NEPC are not fully elucidated. Sphingosine kinase 1 plays a significant role in t-NEPC development. Although neuroendocrine markers: Synaptophysin, chromogranin A, and insulinoma associated protein 1 (INSM1) are expressed in t-NEPC, they are non-specific for diagnosis, prognosis, and follow-up of therapy. t-NEPC shows enriched genomic alteration in tumor protein P53 (TP53) and retinoblastoma 1 (RB1). There are evidences suggest that t-NEPC might develop through epigenetic evolution. There are genomic, epigenetic, and transcriptional alterations that are reported to be involved in development of t-NEPC. Knock-outs of TP53 and RB1 were found to contribute in development of t-NEPC. PCa is resistant to immunotherapy, and at present there are running trials to approach immunotherapy for PCa, CRPC, and t-NEPC.

JMJD2A promotes the development of castration-resistant prostate cancer by activating androgen receptor enhancer and inhibiting the cGAS-STING pathway.

Exploring targets for inhibiting androgen receptor (AR) activity is an effective strategy for suppressing the development of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Upregulation of histone demethylase JMJD2A activity is an important factor in increasing AR expression in CRPC. Based on our research, we found that the binding affinity between JMJD2A and AR increases in CRPC, while the level of AR histone methylation decreases and the H3K27ac level increases in the AR enhancer region. Further investigations revealed that overexpression of the histone demethylase JMJD2A increased the binding affinity between JMJD2A and AR, decreased AR histone methylation levels, upregulated H3K27ac in the AR enhancer region, and increased AR activity. Conversely, knocking down JMJD2A effectively reversed these effects. Additionally, in CRPC, JMJD2A expression was upregulated, the tumor-intrinsic immune cGAS-STING signaling pathway was suppressed, the tumor microenvironment was altered, and AR expression was upregulated. However, both knocking down JMJD2A and inhibiting the cyclic GMP-AMP synthase/stimulator of interferon genes (cGAS-STING) signaling pathway reversed these effects. In summary, our study indicates that in CRPC, JMJD2A can directly bind to AR and activate residual AR enhancers through its demethylation activity, thereby promoting AR expression. Furthermore, upregulation of JMJD2A expression inhibits the innate immune cGAS-STING signaling pathway of the tumor, leading to a decrease in antitumor immune function, and further promoting AR expression.

Efficacy of Combination Therapy With Radium-223 and Enzalutamide in Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer With Bone Metastases.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Radium-223 therapy has been reported to improve prognosis in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) and bone metastases. Occasionally, radium-223 and androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSIs) are used in combination for disease control, but the efficacy of this combination is unclear. This study assessed the efficacy of the addition of enzalutamide in patients treated with radium-223. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We included patients with CRPC and bone metastases who were treated with radium-223 at our institution. Patients were assigned to the enzalutamide combination group or non-combination group. We compared progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and the completion rate of radium-223 between the two groups. RESULTS: In total, 39 patients with CRPC were included in this retrospective study. The median follow-up duration was 8.8 months. The enzalutamide combination and non-combination groups included 22 (56.4%) and 17 patients (43.6%), respectively. Median PFS was 11.3 months [95% confidence interval (CI)=3.9-19.9] in the combination group, versus 3.0 months (95%CI=1.9-5.5) in the non-combination group (p=0.004). Median OS did not significantly differ between the groups. The radium-223 completion rate was higher in the combination group than in the non-combination group (72.7% vs. 35.3%, p=0.026). CONCLUSION: The combined use of enzalutamide with radium-223 therapy improved PFS and treatment completion rates in patients with CRPC and bone metastases. This combination may be associated with a more favorable prognosis.

Aberrant Super-Enhancer Landscape in Enzalutamide-Resistant Prostate Cancer Cells.

Background: Castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), which has developed resistance to next-generation antiandrogens, such as enzalutamide (Enz), is a lethal disease. Furthermore, transcriptional regulation by super enhancers (SEs) is crucial for the growth and spread of prostate cancer, as well as drug resistance. The functions of SEs, a significant class of noncoding DNA cis-regulatory elements, have been the subject of numerous recent studies in the field of cancer research. Materials and Methods: The goal of this research was to identify SEs associated with Enz resistance in C4-2B cells using chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing and cleavage under targets and tagmentation (CUT&Tag). Using HOMER analysis to predict protein/gene-binding motifs, we identified master transcription factors (TFs) that may bind to SE sites. Using small interfering RNA, WST-1 assays, and qRT-PCR, we then confirmed the associations between TFs of SEs and Enz resistance. Results: A total of 999 SEs were screened from C4-2B EnzR cells in total. Incorporating analysis with RNA-seq data revealed 41 SEs to be strongly associated with the promotion of Enz resistance. In addition, we finally predicted that master TFs bind to SE-binding regions. Subsequently, we selected zinc finger protein 467 (ZFP467) and SMAD family member 3 to confirm the functional connections of master TFs with Enz resistance through SEs (ZNF467). Conclusions: In this study, SMAD3 and ZNF467 were found to be closely related to Enz-resistant CRPC. Our research uncovered a sizable group of SEs linked to Enz resistance in prostate cancer, dissected the mechanisms underlying SE Enz resistance, and shed light on potential clinical uses for SEs.

Salivary toxicity from PSMA-targeted radiopharmaceuticals: What we have learned and where we are going.

Clinical trials of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) targeted radiopharmaceuticals have shown encouraging results. Some agents, like lutetium-177 [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 ([177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617), are already approved for late line treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Projections are for continued growth of this treatment modality; [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 is being studied both in earlier stages of disease and in combination with other anti-cancer therapies. Further, the drug development pipeline is deep with variations of PSMA-targeting radionuclides, including higher energy alpha particles conjugated to PSMA-honing vectors. It is safe to assume that an increasing number of patients will be exposed to PSMA-targeted radiopharmaceuticals during the course of their cancer treatment. In this setting, it is important to better understand and mitigate the most commonly encountered toxicities. One particularly vexing side effect is xerostomia. In this review, we discuss the scope of the problem, inventories to better characterize and monitor this troublesome side effect, and approaches to preserve salivary function and effectively palliate symptoms. This article aims to serve as a useful reference for prescribers of PSMA-targeted radiopharmaceuticals, while also commenting on areas of missing data and opportunities for future research.

Comparison of quantitative whole body PET parameters on [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT using ordered Subset Expectation Maximization (OSEM) vs. bayesian penalized likelihood (BPL) reconstruction algorithms in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: PSMA PET/CT is a predictive and prognostic biomarker for determining response to [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 in patients with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Thresholds defined to date may not be generalizable to newer image reconstruction algorithms. Bayesian penalized likelihood (BPL) reconstruction algorithm is a novel reconstruction algorithm that may improve contrast whilst preventing introduction of image noise. The aim of this study is to compare the quantitative parameters obtained using BPL and the Ordered Subset Expectation Maximization (OSEM) reconstruction algorithms. METHODS: Fifty consecutive patients with mCRPC who underwent [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT using OSEM reconstruction to assess suitability for [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 therapy were selected. BPL algorithm was then used retrospectively to reconstruct the same PET raw data. Quantitative and volumetric measurements such as tumour standardised uptake value (SUV)max, SUVmean and Molecular Tumour Volume (MTV-PSMA) were calculated on both reconstruction methods. Results were compared (Bland-Altman, Pearson correlation coefficient) including subgroups with low and high-volume disease burdens (MTV-PSMA cut-off 40 mL). RESULTS: The SUVmax and SUVmean were higher, and MTV-PSMA was lower in the BPL reconstructed images compared to the OSEM group, with a mean difference of 8.4 (17.5%), 0.7 (8.2%) and - 21.5 mL (-3.4%), respectively. There was a strong correlation between the calculated SUVmax, SUVmean, and MTV-PSMA values in the OSEM and BPL reconstructed images (Pearson r values of 0.98, 0.99, and 1.0, respectively). No patients were reclassified from low to high volume disease or vice versa when switching from OSEM to BPL reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS: [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT quantitative and volumetric parameters produced by BPL and OSEM reconstruction methods are strongly correlated. Differences are proportional and small for SUVmean, which is used as a predictive biomarker. Our study suggests that both reconstruction methods are acceptable without clinical impact on quantitative or volumetric findings. For longitudinal comparison, committing to the same reconstruction method would be preferred to ensure consistency.