Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 21
Filtrar
1.
BMC Pediatr ; 24(1): 503, 2024 Aug 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39107694

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The Finnish treatment guidelines for sore throat were updated in June 2020. The aim of this study was to determine how the publication of these guidelines affected the treatment of pediatric patients, particularly through the use of the Centor criteria, C-reactive protein tests, and microbiological testing in the diagnosis of Group A ß-hemolytic streptococci tonsillitis. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective single-center before-and-after cohort study in Finland from 2019 to 2022. We included all patients who visited the pediatric emergency department and were diagnosed with tonsillitis or pharyngitis. RESULTS: We included 246 patients who were admitted before the guidelines were updated and 219 patients after. Only two patients in the after group had a Centor score reported in their patient records. Rapid antigen tests were administered to 231 patients (93.9%) before the update and 202 patients (92.2%) after (proportion difference of 1.7%, CI -3.0-6.6%). C-reactive protein was taken from 193 patients (78.5%) before the update and 189 patients (86.3%) after (proportion difference of 7.8%, CI 0.1-14.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Centor scores were not used as recommended in the guidelines and did not impact the use of microbiological or C-reactive protein testing. More education and examining the preconceptions of health care personnel is required to implement the updated treatment guidelines in clinical practice.


Assuntos
Proteína C-Reativa , Faringite , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Infecções Estreptocócicas , Tonsilite , Humanos , Faringite/diagnóstico , Faringite/microbiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Criança , Masculino , Feminino , Proteína C-Reativa/análise , Finlândia , Infecções Estreptocócicas/diagnóstico , Tonsilite/diagnóstico , Tonsilite/microbiologia , Pré-Escolar , Streptococcus pyogenes/isolamento & purificação , Adolescente , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Lactente
2.
Clin Microbiol Infect ; 30(4): 445-452, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38182052

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Centor and McIsaac scores are clinical prediction rules for diagnosing group A streptococcus (GAS) infection in patients with pharyngitis. Their recommended thresholds vary between guidelines. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the sensitivity and specificity of the McIsaac and Centor scores to diagnose GAS pharyngitis and evaluate their impact on antibiotic prescribing at each threshold in patients presenting to secondary care. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science were searched from inception to September 2022. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies of patients presenting with acute pharyngitis to emergency or outpatient clinics that estimated the accuracy of McIsaac or Centor scores against throat cultures and/or rapid antigen detection tests (RADT) as reference standards. TESTS: Centor or McIsaac score. REFERENCE STANDARD: Throat cultures and/or RADT. ASSESSMENT OF RISK OF BIAS: Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies. METHODS OF DATA SYNTHESIS: The sensitivities and specificities of the McIsaac and Centor scores were pooled at each threshold using bivariate random effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: Fourteen studies were included (eight McIsaac and six Centor scores). Eight studies had unclear and six had a high risk of bias. The McIsaac score had higher estimated sensitivity and lower specificity relative to Centor scores at equivalent thresholds but with wide and overlapping confidence regions. Using either score as a triage to RADT to decide antibiotic treatment would reduce antibiotic prescription to patients with non-GAS pharyngitis relative to RADT test for everyone, but also reduce antibiotic prescription to patients with GAS. DISCUSSION: Centor and McIsaac scores are equally ineffective at triaging patients who need antibiotics presenting with pharyngitis at hospitals. At high thresholds, too many true positive cases are missed, whereas at low thresholds, too many false positives are treated, leading to the over prescription of antibiotics. The former may be compensated by adequate safety netting by clinicians, ensuring that patients can seek help if symptoms worsen.


Assuntos
Regras de Decisão Clínica , Faringite , Infecções Estreptocócicas , Humanos , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Faringite/microbiologia , Faringite/diagnóstico , Faringite/tratamento farmacológico , Atenção Secundária à Saúde , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Infecções Estreptocócicas/diagnóstico , Infecções Estreptocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Estreptocócicas/microbiologia , Streptococcus pyogenes
3.
Cureus ; 15(11): e48607, 2023 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38090423

RESUMO

Background During the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a dramatic upsurge in the prevalence of respiratory symptoms, which may have altered the usual pattern of bacterial infections and relevant decision-making. Objectives This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of rapid antigen detection test (RADT) positivity for group A Streptococcus (GAS) in patients with respiratory symptoms and signs during the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition, we evaluated the association between a positive test and the modified Centor criteria in a population of children and adults with upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs). Methods A prospective study was conducted in primary health care centres (PHCCs) and the paediatric emergency department (ED) of the Maternity and Children Hospital in Dammam City, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). Trained physicians collected data from patients aged three years and older or their guardian(s) regarding URTI symptoms. The modified Centor score was calculated, and RADT was performed for all patients. Results Data were collected from 469 patients. The prevalence of positive RADT was 19 (4.1%), and the setting was associated with RADT positivity, as 14% of ED visitors tested positive compared with 0.6% of PHCC visitors. The RADT results had an area under the curve of 0.856 (95% confidence interval (CI)=0.774-0.939), with Centor scores of 2 and 3 having a sensitivity of 89.5%/78.9% and specificity of 70.6%/80.8%, respectively. Individuals with a score of 5 had the highest rate of positive RADT (33.3%, P<0.001); a score less than 0 excluded the possibility of GAS infection. Conclusion The Centor score can improve effective antibiotic prescribing; however, Centor scores ≥2 should be supplemented with an additional confirmatory test. The high specificity of RADT makes it a useful tool in preventing the prescription of unneeded antibiotics.

4.
Curr Pediatr Rev ; 2023 Jul 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37493159

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Group A ß-hemolytic streptococcus (GABHS) is the leading bacterial cause of acute pharyngitis in children and adolescents worldwide. OBJECTIVE: This article aims to familiarize clinicians with the clinical manifestations, evaluation, diagnosis, and management of GABHS pharyngitis. METHODS: A search was conducted in December 2022 in PubMed Clinical Queries using the key term "group A ß-hemolytic streptococcal pharyngitis". This review covers mainly literature published in the previous ten years. RESULTS: Children with GABHS pharyngitis typically present with an abrupt onset of fever, intense pain in the throat, pain on swallowing, an inflamed pharynx, enlarged and erythematous tonsils, a red and swollen uvula, enlarged tender anterior cervical lymph nodes. As clinical manifestations may not be specific, even experienced clinicians may have difficulties diagnosing GABHS pharyngitis solely based on epidemiologic or clinical grounds alone. Patients suspected of having GABHS pharyngitis should be confirmed by microbiologic testing (e.g., culture, rapid antigen detection test, molecular point-of-care test) of a throat swab specimen prior to the initiation of antimicrobial therapy. Microbiologic testing is generally unnecessary in patients with pharyngitis whose clinical and epidemiologic findings do not suggest GABHS. Clinical score systems such as the Centor score and McIssac score have been developed to help clinicians decide which patients should undergo diagnostic testing and reduce the unnecessary use of antimicrobials. Antimicrobial therapy should be initiated without delay once the diagnosis is confirmed. Oral penicillin V and amoxicillin remain the drugs of choice. For patients who have a non-anaphylactic allergy to penicillin, oral cephalosporin is an acceptable alternative. For patients with a history of immediate, anaphylactic-type hypersensitivity to penicillin, oral clindamycin, clarithromycin, and azithromycin are acceptable alternatives. CONCLUSION: Early diagnosis and antimicrobial treatment are recommended to prevent suppurative complications (e.g., cervical lymphadenitis, peritonsillar abscess) and non-suppurative complications (particularly rheumatic fever) as well as to reduce the severity of symptoms, to shorten the duration of the illness and to reduce disease transmission.

5.
BMC Infect Dis ; 22(1): 840, 2022 Nov 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36368940

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Sore throat is a common reason for prescribing antibiotics in primary care, and 10 days of treatment is recommended for patients with pharyngotonsillitis with group A streptococcus (GAS). Our group recently showed that penicillin V (PcV) four times daily for 5 days was non-inferior in clinical outcome to PcV three times daily for 10 days. This study compares duration, intensity of symptoms, and side effects in patients with a Centor Score (CS) of 3 or 4 respectively, after treatment with PcV for 5 or 10 days and evaluates whether all patients with pharyngotonsillitis with a CS of 3 or 4 should be treated for 5 days or if severity of symptoms or CS suggest a longer treatment period. METHOD: Data on symptoms and recovery from patient diaries from 433 patients included in a RCT comparing PcV 800 mg × 4 for 5 days or PcV 1 g × 3 for 10 days was used. Patients six years and older with CS-3 or CS-4 and positive rapid antigen detection test for GAS-infection were grouped based on CS and randomized treatment. Comparisons for categorical variables were made with Pearson's chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test. Continuous variables were compared with the Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: Patients with CS-3 as well as patients with CS-4 who received PcV 800 mg × 4 for 5 days self-reported that they recovered earlier compared to patients with CS-3 or CS-4 who received treatment with PcV 1 g × 3 for 10 days. In addition, the throat pain as single symptom was relieved 1 day earlier in patients with CS-4 and 5 days of treatment compared to patients with CS-4 and 10 days of treatment. No differences in side effects between the groups were found. CONCLUSION: Intense treatment with PcV four times a day for 5 days seems clinically beneficial and strengthens the suggestion that the 4-dose regimen with 800 mg PcV for 5 days may be the future treatment strategy for GAS positive pharyngotonsillitis irrespectively of CS-3 or CS-4. Trail registration ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02712307 (3 April 2016).


Assuntos
Faringite , Infecções Estreptocócicas , Tonsilite , Humanos , Penicilina V/uso terapêutico , Faringite/tratamento farmacológico , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Estudos Prospectivos , Infecções Estreptocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Streptococcus pyogenes , Tonsilite/tratamento farmacológico
6.
Malays J Med Sci ; 29(4): 88-97, 2022 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36101529

RESUMO

Background: Pharyngitis is a common presentation seen in general practice, but it is difficult to differentiate whether its etiology is viral or bacterial. The Centor score gives an approximation of the etiology of the pharyngitis, which informs physicians of the need to prescribe antibiotics. This study aimed to assess the validity of the Centor score in diagnosing Group A streptococcal (GAS) pharyngitis amongst adults in Malaysia. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted to compare the clinical criteria of the Centor score to the gold standard throat swab culture results amongst 215 adults presenting with sore throat in primary care clinics. The participants were adult patients who complained of sore throat and visited the three public primary care clinics in Sepang, Malaysia. The convenience sampling method was used. The throat swabs were analysed for ß-haemolytic streptococci. Demographic and clinical data, including the Centor score, were analysed in relation to the pathogen. Results: Pharyngitis was diagnosed in 130 (60.5%) of the participants. Six isolates (2.4%) were identified as GAS pharyngitis. Both Centor scores 3 and 4 had a sensitivity of 50%, and specificities of 97.6% and 100%, respectively. Conclusion: A Centor score < 3 is favourable for excluding a diagnosis of GAS pharyngitis. Centor scores 3 and 4 require further examination to confirm a diagnosis of GAS pharyngitis.

7.
Auris Nasus Larynx ; 48(6): 1176-1180, 2021 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34172351

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: In Japan, many otolaryngologists provide primary care for patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The purpose of this study was to analyze the characteristics of otorhinolaryngological findings in order to improve COVID-19 diagnostic systems in a primary care setting. METHODS: A total of 351 patients (mean age, 36.0 ± 15.4 years) diagnosed with COVID-19 by otolaryngologists who belong to the Japan Otorhinolaryngologists Association were included in the study. A web-based questionnaire was used to collect information regarding the timing of positive identification of COVID-19, the route of infection, symptoms, and findings in the tonsils, nasal cavity, pharynx, ear, and neck. A modified Centor score was calculated for cases in which age, symptoms, and tonsil and neck findings were described. RESULTS: Symptoms included fever (56%), olfactory disturbance (46%), and a sore throat (56%). Of the individuals considered, 63% had ordinary rhinoscopic findings, 21% experienced watery rhinorrhea, and 12% had observable mucosal redness. Further, 87% had ordinary tonsillar findings, 13% displayed tonsillar redness, with enlargement and white mucus observe in 2% and 1% of participants, respectively. A total of 193 patients had a calculated Centor score of 3 points in 2%, and scores of the remaining participants were ≤2 points. CONCLUSION: Of all patients considered, 40% had nasal findings and 4% had purulent nasal discharge. In contrast, only 13% of the patients had tonsillar findings, and no patients had Centor scores ≥4 points. Symptom differentiation from that of bacterial infections is difficult. In areas where COVID-19 is prevalent, the disease should be considered in patients presenting with fever, olfactory disturbances, and sore throat with minimal or no clinical findings in the nasal cavity and pharynx.


Assuntos
COVID-19/diagnóstico , Otorrinolaringopatias/diagnóstico , Avaliação de Sintomas , Adulto , Infecções Bacterianas/diagnóstico , COVID-19/complicações , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Feminino , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Japão/epidemiologia , Masculino , Otorrinolaringologistas , Otorrinolaringopatias/epidemiologia , Otorrinolaringopatias/virologia
8.
Fam Pract ; 38(6): 731-734, 2021 11 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34173652

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Acute pharyngitis is common in the ambulatory setting. The Modified Centor score uses five criteria to predict Group A Streptococcus (GAS) infection and can be used to guide management. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to describe the emergency department (ED) management (throat cultures, antibiotics and corticosteroids) of acute, uncomplicated pharyngitis by Centor score. METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review of adult (>17 years) patients with an ED discharge diagnosis of acute pharyngitis from January 2016 to December 2018. RESULTS: Of 638 patients included, 286 (44.8%) had a Centor score of 0-1, 328 (51.4%) had a score of 2-3 and 24 (3.8%) had a score of ≥4. Of those with a Centor score of 0-1, 83 (29.0%) had a throat culture, 88 (30.8%) were prescribed antibiotics, 15 (5.2%) were positive for GAS and 74 (25.9%) received corticosteroids. Of those with a Centor score of 2-3, 156 (47.6%) had a throat culture, 220 (67.1%) were prescribed antibiotics, 44 (13.4%) were positive for GAS and 145 (44.2%) received corticosteroids. Of those with a Centor score ≥4, 14 (58.3%) had a throat culture, 18 (75.0%) were prescribed antibiotics, 7 (29.2%) were positive for GAS and 12 (50.0%) received corticosteroids. CONCLUSIONS: A higher Centor score was associated with a higher risk of GAS infection, increased antibiotic prescribing and use of corticosteroids. Many patients with low Centor scores were prescribed antibiotics and had throat cultures. Further work is required to understand clinical decision-making for the management of acute pharyngitis.


Assuntos
Faringite , Infecções Estreptocócicas , Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Humanos , Faringite/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Infecções Estreptocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Streptococcus pyogenes
9.
J Infect Dev Ctries ; 15(3): 415-421, 2021 03 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33839717

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Pharyngitis is one of the most common diagnoses for antibiotic prescriptions worldwide. Antibiotics should be prescribed for bacterial pharyngitis to reduce its complications. The aims of this study were to assess antibiotic prescriptions for pharyngitis cases, and their relationship with physicians' knowledge regarding its diagnosis and management. METHODOLOGY: A cross-sectional study was conducted. First, prescriptions for pharyngitis cases using the modified Centor criteria was evaluated at primary care centers in Saudi Arabia. Second, physicians' knowledge of the modified Centor score and the diagnosis and management of pharyngitis was assessed using a self-administered questionnaire. RESULTS: Out of 104 pharyngitis cases, 79% (n = 82) were prescribed antibiotics, of which 28% were evidence-based prescriptions. First-line antibiotics were prescribed in 34% of patients, and second-line (broad-spectrum) antibiotics such as amoxicillin/clavulanate were prescribed in half of the patients. The main significant predictors of antibiotic prescriptions were age < 3 years (odds ratio, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.97), tonsillar exudate (odds ratio, 21.14; 95% CI, 2.88 to 155.09), and throat erythema (odds ratio, 9.30; 95% CI, 1.18 to 73.41). Overall, physicians (n = 29) had adequate knowledge about the modified Centor score and the management of pharyngitis. CONCLUSIONS: Most prescribed antibiotics for pharyngitis were unnecessarily prescribed; the majority being broad-spectrum antibiotics. Despite physicians' adequate knowledge of the modified Centor score and the management of pharyngitis, their practice failed to demonstrate that. Induction of the Saudi Antimicrobial Stewardship Program in the primary care centers, accessibility to diagnostic tools, and educational programs may help in reducing unnecessary antibiotic prescriptions.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Faringite/tratamento farmacológico , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Gestão de Antimicrobianos , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Faringite/epidemiologia , Faringite/microbiologia , Arábia Saudita/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
10.
Br J Gen Pract ; 70(693): e245-e254, 2020 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32152041

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Centor and McIsaac scores are both used to diagnose group A beta-haemolytic streptococcus (GABHS) infection, but have not been compared through meta-analysis. AIM: To compare the performance of Centor and McIsaac scores at diagnosing patients with GABHS presenting to primary care with pharyngitis. DESIGN AND SETTING: A meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies conducted in primary care was performed using a novel model that incorporates data at multiple thresholds. METHOD: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PsycINFO were searched for studies published between January 1980 and February 2019. Included studies were: cross-sectional; recruited patients with sore throats from primary care; used the Centor or McIsaac score; had GABHS infection as the target diagnosis; used throat swab culture as the reference standard; and reported 2 × 2 tables across multiple thresholds. Selection and data extraction were conducted by two independent reviewers. QUADAS-2 was used to assess study quality. Summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves were synthesised. Calibration curves were used to assess the transferability of results into practice. RESULTS: Ten studies using the Centor score and eight using the McIsaac score were included. The prevalence of GABHS ranged between 4% and 44%. The areas under the SROC curves for McIsaac and Centor scores were 0.7052 and 0.6888, respectively. The P-value for the difference (0.0164) was 0.419, suggesting the SROC curves for the tests are equivalent. Both scores demonstrated poor calibration. CONCLUSION: Both Centor and McIsaac scores provide only fair discrimination of those with and without GABHS, and appear broadly equivalent in performance. The poor calibration for a positive test result suggests other point-of-care tests are required to rule in GABHS; however, with both Centor and McIsaac scores, a score of ≤0 may be sufficient to rule out infection.


Assuntos
Faringite/microbiologia , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Infecções Estreptocócicas/diagnóstico , Humanos , Faringite/diagnóstico , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Infecções Estreptocócicas/complicações , Streptococcus pyogenes , Avaliação de Sintomas
11.
Malays J Med Sci ; 25(6): 6-21, 2018 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30914875

RESUMO

This review highlights the clinical scoring tools used for the management of acute pharyngotonsillitis in primary care clinics. It will include the prevalence of group A pharyngotonsillitis among children and adults worldwide and the selective tests employed for diagnosing group A streptococcal pharyngotonsillitis. Pharyngotonsillitis is one of the common reasons for visits to primary care clinics worldwide, and physicians tend to prescribe antibiotics according to the clinical symptoms, which leads to overprescribing antibiotics. This in turn may lead to serious health impacts and severe reactions and may promote antibiotic resistance. These significantly add on to the health care costs. The available information from health organisations and previous studies has indicated the need to manage the diagnosis of pharyngotonsillitis to improve prescribing habits in primary care clinics.

12.
Int J Emerg Med ; 11: 49, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30768657

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Pharyngitis is one of the major and commonly seen presentations in pediatric emergency departments. While it could be caused by both bacterial and viral pathogens, antibiotics are improperly prescribed regardless of the pathogen. Inappropriate usage of antibiotics has risen the concern of microbial resistance and the need for stricter guidelines. Many guidelines have been validated for this reason, and the Centor score (Modified/McIsaac) is most commonly implemented. This study aims to assess the adherence and enumerate the reasons behind the suboptimal adherence to guidelines (Centor/McIsaac score) of pediatric emergency department physicians in the diagnosis and management of GABHS pharyngitis to lay the groundwork for future actions and to employ educational programs and implement local guidelines for the prevention of the development of multi-drug resistant microorganisms. METHODOLOGY: We surveyed pediatric emergency department physicians of ten teaching hospitals of Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. We used convenient sampling and estimated a sample size of 170 physicians, and interns and medical centers without pediatric emergency department were excluded from the study. Elements of the Centor score (Modified/McIsaac) were used as a part of the assessment of physicians' knowledge of the guidelines. Adherence was assessed by requiring the participants to answer questions regarding their usage of diagnostic means when they suspect a bacterial cause of pharyngitis, as recommended by the guidelines. RESULTS: A total of 243 physicians answered the questionnaire, 43 consultants (17.6%) and 200 non-consultants (82.4%). On the knowledge score, 9.1% scored 0, and the majority of both groups, 46.5%, earned a score of 1. The remainder 44.4%, earned a score of 2. Adherence to guidelines was defined as when diagnostic tests (throat culture or rapid antigen detection test) were always requested prior to prescribing antibiotics when acute bacterial pharyngitis was suspected. Only 27.3% (n = 67) of our sample are adherent to guidelines, whereas the majority, 72.7% (n = 175), are non-adherent. Several factors were assessed as reasons for lack of adherence. CONCLUSION: Lack of knowledge and adherence to guidelines is prevalent in our setting, with awareness, knowledge, and behavior of physicians playing as major factors behind this low adherence. Studies should aim towards the assessment of adherence towards locally developed guidelines.

13.
Artigo em Coreano | WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental) | ID: wpr-760067

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This study aims to verify the usefulness of Centor scores to diagnose the Group A Streptococcal pharyngitis. SUBJECTS AND METHOD: The subjects of this study were 379 patients who had been examined by the rapid antigen detection test (RADT) for Group A Streptococcus. We analyzed their medical records and laboratory test results retrospectively and compared the results of Centor symptom scores with those of RADT. Then we analyzed the association of RADT, the Centor score and the laboratory test results statistically. RESULTS: There were no correlation between the RADT results and fever, cough, tonsillar enlargement, nasal symptoms, myalgia or chilling (p>0.05). In the RADT positive group, there were more patients with tonsillar exudate, neck lymph node enlargement, tenderness and pharyngeal abscess formation significantly (p<0.05). The Centor score and C-reactive protein were significantly higher in the RADT positive group (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that Centor symptom scores can be used to determine which antibiotics to use. The Centor score system can help reduce medical costs and detect the problematic Group A Streptococcal pharyngitis.


Assuntos
Humanos , Abscesso , Antibacterianos , Proteína C-Reativa , Tosse , Tomada de Decisões , Diagnóstico , Exsudatos e Transudatos , Febre , Linfonodos , Prontuários Médicos , Métodos , Mialgia , Pescoço , Faringite , Estudos Retrospectivos , Streptococcus , Streptococcus pyogenes
14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28991775

RESUMO

The increased use of antibiotics for acute tonsillitis is a public health problem. 80% of the antibiotic prescriptions for acute tonsillitis are done in the Primary Care practice (PCP). The inappropriate use of the antibiotic causes bacterial resistance and treatment failure. Only patients with acute tonsillitis caused by Group A beta-hemolytic streptococcus (GAS) have benefit of the antibiotic treatment, which is a predict cause in 5-20%. In order to assess the antibiotic prescribing for acute tonsillitis by the doctors in the PCP in Macedonia we use the data from the national project about antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory tract infections which was conducted in November 2014 during a period of 4 weeks as part of the E-quality program sponsored by the IPCRG. 86 general practitioners from Macedonia have participated. The group of 1768 patients, from 4 months to 88 years of age, with diagnosis of acute tonsillitis was analyzed. The antibiotic prescriptions according to the Centor score criteria were compared to the Cochran's guidelines which are translated and recommended as national guidelines. 88.8% of the patients with acute tonsillitis were treated with antibiotics, of which 52.9% with Centor score 0 to 2 were treated inappropriate. The diagnosis is mostly made based on the clinical picture and the symptoms. Only (23.6%) of the patients were treated with antibiotics (Penicillin V and cephalexin) according to the guidelines. We concluded that there is a low adherence to the national guidelines. The clinical assessment is not accurate in determining the etiology. Also, there is a high nonadherence in prescribing the first choice of antibiotics. We emphasize the need to change the general practitioners' prescription behavior according to the guidelines.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Medicina Baseada em Evidências/tendências , Prescrição Inadequada/tendências , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Atenção Primária à Saúde/tendências , Tonsilite/tratamento farmacológico , Doença Aguda , Adolescente , Adulto , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Medicina Baseada em Evidências/normas , Feminino , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/tendências , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Padrões de Prática Médica/normas , Atenção Primária à Saúde/normas , República da Macedônia do Norte , Tonsilite/diagnóstico , Tonsilite/microbiologia , Adulto Jovem
15.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 274(4): 2035-2039, 2017 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27848011

RESUMO

To assess the clinical value of antistreptolysin O (ASO) level in adult patients with acute tonsillitis of group A beta-hemolytic streptococcus (GABHS) etiology and its interaction with the Centor score and throat cultures data. ASO antibody titers and throat cultures were obtained from 260 adult patients with acute tonsillitis of GABHS etiology initially proven by the Centor score. The results were compared with the group of 100 adult patients with recurrent tonsillitis who underwent tonsillectomy and with the group of 100 healthy adults. Throat cultures revealed GABHS-positive results in 69 acute cases (26.5%) and in 24 recurrent cases (24%), i.e., with no significant differences between the groups (p = 0.845). There was no significant difference between cases with GABHS-positive and with GABHS-negative throat culture in ASO titers results (mean 250 and 280, respectively, p = 0.44) but these titers were significantly higher than established normative data (p < 0.01). For the group of recurrent tonsillitis cases, the mean ASO titer was 363 being significantly higher in comparison with acute cases (p = 0.015). The ASO antibody titers are significantly higher than normative ranges in cases of acute tonsillitis in adults. The detection of the elevated titers may lead to early antibiotherapy to tonsillitis. The Centor score is supported by the ASO data and less supported by throat cultures data. Further research should reveal if these titers might have predictive value for possible further recurrence or serve as an indicator for tonsillectomy in cases of recurrent tonsillitis.


Assuntos
Antiestreptolisina , Técnicas Bacteriológicas , Infecções Estreptocócicas , Streptococcus pyogenes , Tonsilite , Adolescente , Adulto , Antiestreptolisina/análise , Antiestreptolisina/sangue , Técnicas Bacteriológicas/métodos , Técnicas Bacteriológicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Israel , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Faringe/microbiologia , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Recidiva , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Infecções Estreptocócicas/diagnóstico , Infecções Estreptocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Estreptocócicas/imunologia , Infecções Estreptocócicas/cirurgia , Streptococcus pyogenes/imunologia , Streptococcus pyogenes/isolamento & purificação , Tonsilectomia/efeitos adversos , Tonsilectomia/métodos , Tonsilite/tratamento farmacológico , Tonsilite/imunologia , Tonsilite/microbiologia , Tonsilite/cirurgia
16.
Emerg Med Australas ; 28(2): 199-204, 2016 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26934845

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: History, clinical examination and throat culture may be inadequate to rule in or out the presence of group A streptococci (GAS) infection in patients with sore throat in a remote location. We correlated the diagnostic accuracy for guiding antibiotic prescription of clinical decision and physiological scoring systems to a rapid diagnostic point of care (POC) test result in paediatric patients presenting with sore throat. METHODS: Prospective diagnostic accuracy study conducted between 30 June 2014 and 27 February 2015 in a remote Australian ED using a convenience sample. Among paediatric patients presenting with sore throat, the Centor criteria and clinical decision were documented. Simultaneously, patients without sore throat or respiratory tract infection were tested to determine the number of carriers. A throat swab on all patients was tested using a POC test (Alere TestPack +Plus Strep A with on board control), considered as reference standard to detect GAS infection. RESULTS: A total of 101 patients with sore throat were tested with 26 (25.7%) positive for GAS. One hundred and forty-seven patients without sore throat were tested with one positive POC test result (specificity 99%; 95% CI 96-100). Positive predictive value for clinician decision-making for a positive GAS swab (bacterial infection) was 29% (95% CI 17-43), negative predictive value 78% (95% CI 63-88). Area under ROC for the Centor score was 0.70 (95% CI 0.58-0.81). CONCLUSION: Clinician judgement and Centor score are inadequate tools for clinical decision-making for children presenting with sore throat. Adjunctive POC testing provides sufficient accuracy to guide antibiotic prescription on first presentation.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Prescrições de Medicamentos/normas , Faringite/diagnóstico , Testes Imediatos/normas , Infecções Estreptocócicas/diagnóstico , Streptococcus pyogenes , Adolescente , Antígenos de Bactérias/análise , Área Sob a Curva , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Prospectivos , Queensland , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Streptococcus pyogenes/isolamento & purificação
17.
J Trop Pediatr ; 62(4): 308-15, 2016 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26999012

RESUMO

We aimed to investigate the effect of rapid antigen detection test (RADT) in the diagnosis of streptococcal pharyngitis, its impact on antibiotic prescription decision of pediatricians and influence on reduction of antibiotic treatment costs in children with pharyngitis. The study group consisted of 223 patients who were diagnosed with pharyngitis by pediatricians. The sensitivity and specificity of RADT were 92.1% (95% Cl: 78.6-98.3%) and 97.3% (95% Cl: 93.8-99.1%), respectively. In the first assessment, before performing RADT, pediatricians decided to prescribe antibiotics for 178 (79.8%) patients with pharyngitis. After learning RADT results, pediatricians finally decided to prescribe antibiotics for 83 (37.2%) patients with pharyngitis, and antibiotic prescription decreased by 42.6%. Antibiotic costs in non-Group A streptococcus pharyngitis, Group A streptococcus pharyngitis and all subjects groups decreased by 80.8%, 48%, and 76.4%, respectively. Performing RADT in children with pharyngitis has an important impact on treatment decision of clinicians, reduction of unnecessary antibiotic prescriptions and antibiotic costs.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Faringite/diagnóstico , Faringite/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Estreptocócicas/diagnóstico , Streptococcus pyogenes/isolamento & purificação , Doença Aguda , Adolescente , Antibacterianos/economia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Custos e Análise de Custo , Tomada de Decisões , Feminino , Febre/etiologia , Humanos , Testes Imunológicos , Masculino , Faringite/microbiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Infecções Estreptocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Resultado do Tratamento
18.
Turk J Med Sci ; 46(6): 1755-1759, 2016 Dec 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28081323

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/AIM: The aim of our study was to determine the usefulness of the Centor score and some basic laboratory tests (complete blood count and C-reactive protein) for the differential diagnosis of exudative tonsillitis due to Group A β-hemolytic streptococcus (GABHS) or due to non-GABHS agents. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The data of clinical and laboratory characteristics of the patients diagnosed with exudative tonsillitis were collected and statistically compared between those having positive GABHS throat culture result and those who were negative for any bacterial agent. RESULTS: Totally 899 adult patients were included in our study; 56 (6.2%) of them were positive for GABHS, while 34 (3.8%) of the cases had a bacterial cause other than GABHS. The remaining 809 (90%) were accepted as non-GABHS cases. The percentages of patients having Centor score of 3 or greater, neutrophilia, lymphocytopenia, and CRP values of greater than 5-fold normal upper reference range were significantly higher in GABHS patients. CONCLUSION: Centor score of 3 or more together with high CRP, neutrophilia, and lymphocytopenia is predictive for GABHS tonsillopharyngitis.


Assuntos
Tonsilite , Adulto , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Humanos , Faringite , Infecções Estreptocócicas , Streptococcus pyogenes
19.
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin ; 34(7): 422-6, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26585817

RESUMO

AIM: To describe the age, signs and clinical symptoms of children with scarlet fever at the present time, and to check whether they are equivalent to those with traditional streptococcal pharyngotonsillitis. STUDY DESIGN: An observational, retrospective study was conducted on the clinical records of 5500 children aged from 0 to 15 years attending a primary health care center. A record was made of the percentage of the cases in which signs and symptoms appear and the Centor score was calculated. Microbiological diagnosis of the disease was made using the rapid antigen-detection test or traditional culture. RESULTS: A total of 171 out of 252 scarlet fever diagnoses were microbiologically verified in 158 patients. The median age was 3.8 years (interquartile range: 2.91-4.78), with the majority (57%) under the age of 4 years. There was fever in 89% of the processes (95% CI: 84-94%), with a temperature of >38°C in 73% (95% CI: 65-80%), enlarged lymph nodes in 70% (95% CI: 58-82%), absence of cough in 73% (95% CI: 65-80%), and tonsillar exudate in only 24% (95% CI: 17-31%). The Centor score (n=105) was ≤2 points in 86% (95% CI: 79-92%). The only difference regarding age is that episodes in patients under the age of 4 years old have significantly higher fever (>38°C) than the older ones (80% versus 63%. OR 3.13; 95% CI: 1.46-6.71). CONCLUSION: Scarlet fever pharyngotonsillitis differs from the traditional streptococcal pharyngotonsillitis, and its evaluation using clinical prediction rules such as Centor or McIsaac is questionable. The main diagnostic key must certainly be rash, regardless of patient age.


Assuntos
Faringite/diagnóstico , Escarlatina/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Fatores Etários , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Faringite/epidemiologia , Faringite/microbiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Escarlatina/epidemiologia , Escarlatina/microbiologia , Infecções Estreptocócicas/diagnóstico , Tonsilite/diagnóstico , Tonsilite/epidemiologia , Tonsilite/microbiologia
20.
Clin Microbiol Infect ; 21(3): 263.e1-7, 2015 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25658556

RESUMO

Sore throat is common in primary healthcare. Aetiological studies have focused on the presence of a limited number of pathogens. The aim of the present study was to investigate the presence of a wide range of bacteria and viruses, including Fusobacterium necrophorum, in patients with pharyngotonsillitis and in asymptomatic controls. A prospective case control study was performed in primary healthcare in Kronoberg County, Sweden. Patients (n=220) aged 15 to 45 years with a suspected acute pharyngotonsillitis, and controls (n=128), were included. Nasopharyngeal and throat swabs were analysed for ß-hemolytic streptococci, F. necrophorum, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, and Chlamydophila pneumoniae, and 13 respiratory viruses. Serum samples were analysed for antibodies to Epstein-Barr virus. The patient history and symptoms, including Centor score, were analysed in relation to pathogens. In 155/220 (70.5%) of the patients, as compared to 26/128 (20.3%) of the controls (p <0.001), at least one microorganism was found. Group A streptococci, F. necrophorum, and influenza B virus were the three most common findings, and all significantly more common in patients than in controls (p <0.001, p 0.001, and p 0.002, respectively). Patients with F. necrophorum only (n=14) displayed a lower Centor score than patients with Group A streptococcus only (n=46), but a higher score than patients with influenza B, other viruses, or no potential pathogen (Kruskal-Wallis p <0.001). A pathogen was detected in 70% of the patients, displaying a wide range of pathogens contributing to the aetiology of pharyngotonsillitis. This study supports F. necrophorum as one of the pathogens to be considered in the aetiology of pharyngotonsillitis.


Assuntos
Faringite/epidemiologia , Faringite/etiologia , Tonsilite/epidemiologia , Tonsilite/etiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Infecções por Fusobacterium/epidemiologia , Infecções por Fusobacterium/microbiologia , Fusobacterium necrophorum , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Faringite/microbiologia , Faringite/virologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Suécia/epidemiologia , Tonsilite/microbiologia , Tonsilite/virologia , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA