Sagittal Full-Spine vs. Sectional Cervical Lateral Radiographs: Are the Measurements of Cervical Alignment Interchangeable?

(1) Background: This study assessed the relationship between cervical spine parameters taken on standing full-spine lateral radiographic images compared to sectional lateral cervical radiographs. (2) Methods: Full-spine (FS) and sectional lateral cervical (LC) radiographs from four spine treatment facilities across the USA retrospectively provided data collected on 220 persons to assess the comparison of three sagittal cervical radiographic measurements between the two views. The measures included cervical lordosis using the absolute rotation angle from C2-C7, sagittal cervical translation of C2-C7, and atlas plane angle to horizontal. Linear correlation and R2 models were used for statistical comparison of the measures for the two views. (3) Results: The mean values of the three measurements were statistically different from each other: C2-C7 translation (FS = 19.84 ± 11.98 vs. LC = 21.18 ± 11.8), C2-C7 lordosis (FS = -15.3 ± 14.63 vs. LC = -18.32 ± 13.16), and atlas plane (FS = -19.99 ± 8.88 vs. LC = -22.56 ± 8.93), where all values were p < 0.001. Weak-to-moderate-to-strong correlations existed between the full-spine and sectional lateral cervical radiographic variables. The R2 values varied based on the measurement were R2 = 0.768 (p < 0.001) for sagittal cervical translation of C2-C7 (strong), R2 = 0.613 (p < 0.001) for the absolute rotation angle C2-C7 (moderate), and R2 = 0.406 (p < 0.001) for the atlas plane line (weak). Though a linear correlation was identified, there were consistent intra-person differences between the measurements on the full spine versus sectional lateral cervical radiographic views, where the full-spine view consistently underestimated the magnitude of the variables. (4) Conclusion: Key sagittal cervical radiographic measurements on the full spine versus sectional lateral cervical radiographic views show striking intra-person differences. The findings of this study confirm that full spine versus sectional lateral cervical radiographic views provide different biomechanical magnitudes of cervical sagittal alignment, and caution should be exercised by health care providers as these are not interchangeable. We recommend the LC view for measurement of cervical sagittal alignment variables.

Change of cervical flexion range of motion influences postoperative sagittal alignment of the cervical spine after laminoplasty.

OBJECTIVE: The relationships between preoperative cervical spine range of motion (ROM) and postoperative cervical sagittal alignment (CSA), and clinical outcomes after laminoplasty (LMP) have been widely studied. However, the impact of ROM changes on postoperative CSA and clinical outcomes after LMP remains unclear. Herein, patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) were retrospectively analyzed to explore the association between postoperative cervical ROM changes and CSA and surgical outcomes. METHODS: Patients who underwent cervical LMP at our hospital between January 2019 to June 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. CSA parameters were measured before the surgery and at the final follow-up. Loss of cervical lordosis (LCL) was defined as preoperative cervical lordosis (CL) - postoperative CL. An increase in the cervical sagittal vertical axis (I-cSVA) was defined as postoperative cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA) - preoperative cSVA. We defined the changes in cervical flexion range of motion (△Flex ROM, preoperative Flex ROM minus postoperative Flex ROM) > 10° as L- Flex ROM group, and △Flex ROM ≤ 10° as S- Flex ROM group. Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score and visual analog score (VAS) were used to assess the surgical outcomes. RESULTS: The study comprised 74 patients and the average follow-up period was 31.83 months. CL, total ROM, and Flex ROM decreased and cSVA increased after cervical LMP. LCL and I-cSVA were positively correlated with △Flex. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that a decrease in the Flex ROM was a risk factor for LCL and I-cSVA after LMP. LCL and I-cSVA were higher in the L-Flex ROM group than in the S-Flex ROM group. Postoperative JOA and the JOA recovery rate were worse in the L-Flex ROM group than in the S-Flex ROM group. CONCLUSIONS: Cervical total and Flex ROM decreased after cervical LMP. The reduction of Flex ROM was associated with LCL and I-cSVA after surgery. The preservation of cervical Flex ROM helps maintain CSA after LMP. Therefore, more attention should be paid to maintaining cervical ROM to obtain good CSA and surgical effects after cervical LMP.

Shifting Perspectives: Equal Blunt Cerebrovascular Risk in Low-Versus High-Energy Cervical Fracture.

INTRODUCTION: Clinical implications of screening for blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) after low-energy mechanisms of injury (LEMI) remain unclear. We assessed BCVI incidence and outcomes in LEMI versus high-energy mechanisms of injury (HEMI) patients. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, blunt trauma adults admitted between July 2015 and June 2021 with cervical spine fractures, excluding single spinous process, osteophyte, and chronic fractures were included. Demographics, comorbidities, injuries, screening and treatment data, iatrogenic complications, and mortality were collected. Our primary end point was to compare BCVI rates between LEMI and HEMI patients. RESULTS: Eight hundred sixty patients (78%) were screened for BCVI; 120 were positive for BCVI. LEMI and HEMI groups presented similar BCVI rates (12.6% versus 14.4%; P = 0.640). Compared to HEMI patients (n = 95), LEMI patients (n = 25) were significantly older (79 ± 14.9 versus 54.3 ± 17.4, P < 0.001), more likely to be on anticoagulants before admission (64% versus 23.2%, P < 0.001), and less severely injured (LEMI injury severity score 10.9 ± 6.6 versus HEMI injury severity score 18.7 ± 11.4, P = 0.001). All but one LEMI and 90.5% of the HEMI patients had vertebral artery injuries with no significant difference in BCVI grades. One HEMI patient developed acute kidney injury because of BCVI screening. Eleven HEMI patients developed BCVI-related stroke with two related mortalities. One LEMI patient died of a BCVI-related stroke. CONCLUSIONS: BCVI rates were similar between HEMI and LEMI groups when screening based on cervical spine fractures. The LEMI group exhibited no screening or treatment complications, suggesting that benefits may outweigh the risks of screening and potential bleeding complications from treatment.

Socioeconomic Status Correlates With Initial Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Pain Interference (PROMIS-PI) Scores but Not the Likelihood of Spine Surgery.

Objective To explore how socioeconomic status and patient characteristics may be associated with initial self-reports of pain and determine if there was an increased association with undergoing spine surgery. Methods Patients at an academic center between 2015 and 2021 who completed the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Pain Interference (PROMIS-PI) questionnaire were included. Multivariable linear regression models were used to determine the association between insurance type and patient factors with initial reports of pain. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to determine the association between PI and the likelihood of surgery in two time periods, three and 12 months. Results The study included 9,587 patients. The mean PROMIS-PI scores were 61.93 (SD 7.82) and 63.74 (SD 6.93) in the cervical and lumbar cohorts, respectively. Medicaid and Workers' Compensation insurance patients reported higher pain scores compared to those with private insurance: Medicaid (cervical: 2.77, CI (1.76-3.79), p<0.001; lumbar (2.05, CI (1.52-2.59), p<0.001); Workers' Compensation (cervical: 2.12, CI (0.96-3.27), p<0.001; lumbar: 1.51, CI (0.79-2.23), p<0.001). Black patients reported higher pain compared to White patients (cervical: 1.50, CI (0.44-2.55), p=0.01; lumbar: 1.51, CI (0.94-2.08), p<0.001). Higher PROMIS-PI scores were associated with a higher likelihood of surgery. There was no increased association of likelihood of surgery in Black, Medicaid, or Workers' Compensation patients when controlling for pain severity. Conclusion Black patients and patients with Medicaid and Workers' compensation insurance were likely to report higher pain scores. Higher initial pain scores were associated with an increased likelihood of surgery. However, despite increased pain scores, Black patients and those with Medicaid and Workers' Compensation insurance did not have a higher likelihood of undergoing surgery.

A system of predictive scores to evaluate the risk of multilevel noncontiguous spinal fractures in patients with traumatic cervical spine injury.

PURPOSE: To develop a predictive scoring system to identify traumatic cervical spine injury patients at a high risk of having multilevel noncontiguous spinal fractures. METHODS: This 12-year retrospective observational cohort study included 588 traumatic cervical spine-injured patients. Patients were categorized into two groups: patients with multilevel noncontiguous spinal fractures and patients without this remote injury. Potential risk factors were examined using multivariable analysis to derive a predictive risk score from independent predictors. Results are presented as odds ratio with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI). The accuracy of the calculated predicted score was demonstrated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AuROC). RESULTS: The incidence of noncontiguous fracture among the patients was 17% (100 of 588). The independent risk factors associated with multilevel noncontiguous spinal fractures were motor weakness, intracranial injury, intrathoracic injury, and intraabdominal injury. The AuROC of the prediction score was 0.74 (95% CI 0.69, 0.80). The patients were classified into three groups, low-risk group (score< 1), moderate-risk group (score 1-2.5), and high-risk group (score≥ 3), based on the predicted risk of multilevel noncontiguous spinal fractures. CONCLUSIONS: This tool can potentially help preventing the missed diagnosis of cervical spine injuries with multilevel noncontiguous spinal fractures. CT scans or MRI of the entire spine to investigate remote multilevel noncontiguous spinal fractures may have a role in cervical spine-injured patients who have at least one of the independent risk factors and are strongly suggested for patients with scores in the high-risk group.

Severe traumatic atlantoaxial dislocation and type III odontoid fracture treated with occipitocervical fixation: a case report.

The combination of atlantoaxial joint dislocation accompanied by an odontoid process fracture is exceptionally rare, with only a few cases reported. The estimated frequency of these cases is < 2% of all upper cervical spine injuries. In this report, the authors describe an unusual case of traumatic atlantoaxial dislocation with a type III odontoid fracture in a 44-year-old male patient. Before the diagnosis, the patient had a history of seeking a masseur for a neck massage. Subsequently, the patient underwent occipitocervical stabilization to address the underlying condition. This procedure aims to treat the instability between the skull and cervical spine and should be considered in the treatment planning if the patient's anatomy suits it.

A novel computed tomography scoring system for evaluating the risk of dural defects in anterior surgery for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.

OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a computed tomography (CT)-based scoring system for evaluating the risk of dural defects (DDs) in anterior surgery for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed CT imaging features of 114 OPLL patients in our institute who received anterior decompression surgery. Intraoperative DDs were found in 16 patients. A multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the predictors. According to the odd ratio of the included risk factors, we developed a CT scoring system for evaluating the risk of DDs in anterior OPLL surgery. The system was further validated in an independent group of 39 OPLL patients. RESULTS: We developed a CT scoring system as follows: hook sign (2 points), K-line (-) (1 point) and broad base (1 point). Thus, the system comprised 4 total points, and patients were at high risks of dural defects when the score ≥3 points. The operating characteristics of a score ≥3 for predicting DDs in the validation group were: sensitivity of 0.83, specificity of 0.94, LR positive of 13.75, LR negative of 0.18 and AUC of 0.886. The discriminatory ability of the proposed score could be demonstrated in the validation cohort. CONCLUSIONS: The relatively simple and easy-to-use scoring system we propose integrates the 3 most reliable spinal CT findings observed in patients with OPLL and a DD. The likelihood to identify the underlying risks of spinal CSF leaks may be useful to triage patients who may benefit from indirect decompression techniques.

Vertebral Artery Dissection in a Young Adult: A Case Report.

Vertebral artery dissections (VAD) pose a significant risk for strokes, particularly in young adults. This case report details the presentation and management of a 48-year-old patient who was diagnosed with an extracranial VAD following cervical spine manipulation (CSM). The patient's symptoms included acute right-sided ataxia, giddiness, vertigo, nausea, vomiting, and persistent pain behind the right ear, prompting immediate evaluation. After ruling out acute intracerebral hemorrhages, a computed tomography angiogram (CTA) of the head and neck identified a severe narrowing of the right distal vertebral artery with a string sign at the level of the right C1 loop (V3 segment), indicating an extracranial VAD. This finding was further supported when ultrasound (US) imaging revealed a high resistance flow pattern in the right distal vertebral artery. Furthermore, T2 and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) confirmed a 1.8 cm VAD/hematoma and a 1.4 cm acute/subacute infarct in the right posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) territory. This research accentuates the importance of recognizing and addressing that neck pain can be a symptom of musculoskeletal dysfunction or could have neurovascular origins. In this case, the patient's neck pain may have been musculoskeletal or could have been due to a previous dissection. Thus, differentiation should be considered before cervical spine manipulation.

Value of MRI in the cervical spine imaging series of trauma patients: A state-of-the-art review.

INTRODUCTION: Clinical decision protocols for evaluation and assessment of traumatic cervical spine injuries (TCSI) lean more towards the use of CT imaging. Investigation with MRI is therefore considered unnecessary following negative CT findings according to some local protocols. This review aims to explore what benefits MRI may offer in the clinical management of TCSI patients. METHODS: A systematic search of the literature was conducted in the following databases: AMED, CINAHL, EMBASE and MEDLINE using defined key terms and synonyms optimised for each database. The eligible articles were subjected to data extraction and thematic synthesis. RESULTS: The initial electronic search yielded 2527 articles. Of these, 15 articles remained following the application of a pre-defined inclusion criteria and full-text assessment. Four themes (mechanism of injury, type of patient, injuries detected on MRI, significance of injuries detected on MRI) were developed relating to the usage and value of MRI in the management of CSI. DISCUSSION: Our findings indicate that MRI may be very valuable in some situations for the evaluation of TCSI, however, its usage must be cautiously considered on a case-by-case basis in light of additional clinical benefit, patient safety and resource availability following a normal CT scan or in conjunction with CT or projection radiography where appropriate. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: MRI may serve as a confirmatory test in the management pathway of TCSI based on individual clinical needs. Consideration for key limitations (e.g., patients' cooperation) and accessibility challenges (e.g., cost) against the clinical benefit to the patient must be noted. Development of centre-specific policies from standard trauma imaging protocols may be essential for the timely management of TCSI.

The Attallah screw: Where safety meets robustness in posterior subaxial cervical instrumentation.

Posterior fixation of the subaxial cervical spine (SCS) commonly relies on the application of lateral mass screws (LMS), with pedicle screws being a less prevalent alternative. The present study provides another option: A recently introduced novel approach, the Attallah screw, intended to ensure a safety profile comparable to that of LMS, combined with a strength profile similar to that of pedicle screws. The focus of the present study is the comparative analysis of peak insertion torques for these three screw types. Employing standard surgical techniques and instruments, Attallah screws were scheduled for insertion on the right side of the SCS in 15 cadavers, pedicle screws on the left side in 8 cadavers, and LMS on the left side in the remaining 7 cadavers. The peak insertion torque was recorded using an electronic torque screwdriver. The results revealed that the peak insertion torques were similar in the pedicle and the Attallah screw at C3, C4 and C7, but differed at C5 (mean ± SD; pedicle, 79.5±19.6 cNm; Attallah, 56.7±18.5 cNm; P=0.029) and C6 (pedicle, 85.4±28.7 cNm; Attallah, 49.8±17.9 cNm; P=0.004) in favor of the superior pedicle screw measurements. The peak insertion torques of the pedicle screw were superior to the corresponding data from the LMS from C4 to C7. By contrast, the peak insertion torques of the Attallah screw were only superior to those of the LMS at C7 (Attallah, 69.5±24.5 cNm; lateral mass, 40.5±21.4 cNm; P=0.030), although similar trends were observed at the other cervical levels. On the whole, the findings presented herein indicate the level-dependent superior robustness of the Attallah screw as a posterior cervical fixation method compared to the LMS. However, from a biomechanical perspective, the pedicle screw remains the preeminent choice for fixation within the C5-C6 range.

Interscapular Pain after Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: Does Zygapophyseal Joints over Distraction Play a Role?

Introduction: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for cervical disc herniation (CDH) is commonly performed. Specific post-operative complications include dysphagia, dysphonia, cervicalgia, adjacent segment disorder, cage subsidence, and infections. However, interscapular pain is commonly reported by these patients after surgery, although its mechanisms have not been clarified yet. Methods: This retrospective series of 31 patients undergoing ACDF for CDH at a single Academic Hospital. Baseline and post-operative clinical, radiological, and surgical data were analyzed. The linear regression analysis was conducted to identify any factor independently influencing the incidence rate of post-operative interscapular pain. Results: The mean age was 57.6 ± 10.8 years, and the M:F ratio was 2.1. Pre-operative mean VAS-arm was 7.15 ± 0.81 among the 20 patients reporting brachialgia, and mean VAS-neck was 4.36 ± 1.43 among those 9 patients reporting cervicalgia. At 1 month, interscapular pain was still reported by 8 out of the 17 patients who experienced it post-operatively, and it was recovered in all patients after 2 months. The regression analysis showed that interscapular pain was not directly associated with age (p = 0.74), gender (p = 0.46), smoking status (p = 0.44), diabetes (0.42), pre-operative brachialgia (p = 0.21) or cervicalgia (p = 0.48), symptoms duration (p = 0.13), baseline VAS-arm (p = 0.11), VAS-neck (p = 0.93), or mJOA (p = 0.63) scores, or disc height modification (p = 0.90). However, the post-operative increase in the mean zygapophyseal joint rim distance was identified as an independent factor in determining interscapular pain (p = 0.02). Conclusions: Our study revealed that the onset of interscapular pain following ACDF may be determined by over distraction of the zygapophyseal joint rim. Then, proper sizing of prosthetic implants could reduce this painful complication.

The Role of Psychosomatic Traits in Tailored Workup for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion-A Case Series.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective study. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of preoperatively assessed psychosomatic traits on postoperative pain, disability, and quality of life outcomes. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a widely employed surgical procedure for treating cervical spondylosis. Despite its effectiveness, various studies have reported non-success rates in terms of alleviating disability and pain. Psychological factors have become increasingly recognized as critical determinants of surgical outcomes in various medical disciplines. The full extent of their impact within the context of ACDF remains insufficiently explored. This case series aims to assess the influence of preoperative psychological profiling on long-term pain, disability and quality of life outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study of prospectively collected data from 76 consecutive patients who underwent ACDF with PEEK inter-fixed cages from July 2019 to November 2021. The preoperative psychological traits were assessed using the Symptom Checklist 90 (SCL-90) questionnaire. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Neck Disability index (NDI), EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D), and Short Form-36 (SF-36) were collected preoperatively, one month postoperatively, and at least one year after the surgical procedure. RESULTS: The correlation analyses revealed associations between psychosomatic traits and multiple preoperative and postoperative outcome measures. The univariate analyses and linear regression analyses demonstrated the influence of the Global Severity Index (GSI) over the final follow-up scores for the ODI, VAS, NDI, EQ-5D, and SF-36. The GSI consistently exhibited a stronger correlation with the final follow-up pain, disability, and quality of life outcomes with respect to the correspondent preoperative values. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the importance of psychosomatic traits as predictive factors for ACDF outcomes and emphasizes their relevance in preoperative assessment for informing patients about realistic expectations. The findings underscore the need to consider psychological profiles in the preoperative workup, opening avenues for research into medications and psychological therapies. Recognizing the influence of psychosocial elements informs treatment strategies, fostering tailored surgical approaches and patient care.

Cervical spine fracture in diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis: A bibliometric analysis.

Objective: The study aimed to assess and investigate cervical spine fracture in diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis and to identify research trends in cervical spine fracture in diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis in countries around the world using bibliometric analysis. Method: We examined bibliometric data obtained from the Scopus database collection for the periods 1 January 2000 and 1 January 2022. Authors, institutions, nations, publications, keywords, and references were noted and analyzed. The total number of research articles published on the subject of diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis was used to calculate the amount of research on that subject undertaken in the study period. A sample of the publication data collected from the Scopus database was then analyzed using the Bibliometric program and used to develop a relationship chart using the Bibliometrix and VOSviewer programs. Results: The number of citations was assumed to be a qualitative measure of the publication. We estimated the impact of the research using several metrics, including the H-index, in the bibliometric analysis of authors, geographic areas, institutes, and references. A total of 52 studies related to cervical spine fractures in diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis were identified. Only 5.12% of those studies were cited in other publications, for a total of 1410 citations in publications by 342 authors, of whom only two authors had published a single study. Co-authorships occurred at 7.273%. Diseases common in elderly males were often studied retrospectively, and "Diffuse Idiopathic Skeletal Hyperostosis" was a frequently mentioned keyword. Conclusion: The findings of this study provide insights into authors, institutions, key publications, and research trends related to diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis and can potentially serve as a guide for further studies in the field. The bibliometric analysis of cervical spine fractures in patients with diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis highlights important contributors, influential papers, geographical trends, and study characteristics in this area of research.

Validation and Feasibility of Ultrafast Cervical Spine MRI Using a Deep Learning-Assisted 3D Iterative Image Enhancement System.

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of ultrafast (2 min) cervical spine MRI protocol using a deep learning-assisted 3D iterative image enhancement (DL-3DIIE) system, compared to a conventional MRI protocol (6 min 14s). Patients and Methods: Fifty-one patients were recruited and underwent cervical spine MRI using conventional and ultrafast protocols. A DL-3DIIE system was applied to the ultrafast protocol to compensate for the spatial resolution and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of images. Two radiologists independently assessed and graded the quality of images from the dimensions of artifacts, boundary sharpness, visibility of lesions and overall image quality. We recorded the presence or absence of different pathologies. Moreover, we examined the interchangeability of the two protocols by computing the 95% confidence interval of the individual equivalence index, and also evaluated the inter-protocol intra-observer agreement using Cohen's weighted kappa. Results: Ultrafast-DL-3DIIE images were significantly better than conventional ones for artifacts and equivalent for other qualitative features. The number of cases with different kinds of pathologies was indistinguishable based on the MR images from ultrafast-DL-3DIIE and conventional protocols. With the exception of disc degeneration, the 95% confidence interval for the individual equivalence index across all variables did not surpass 5%, suggesting that the two protocols are interchangeable. The kappa values of these evaluations by the two radiologists ranged from 0.65 to 0.88, indicating good-to-excellent agreement. Conclusion: The DL-3DIIE system enables 67% spine MRI scan time reduction while obtaining at least equivalent image quality and diagnostic results compared to the conventional protocol, suggesting its potential for clinical utility.

Utilizing machine learning to predict post-treatment outcomes in chronic non-specific neck pain patients undergoing cervical extension traction.

This study explored the application of machine learning in predicting post-treatment outcomes for chronic neck pain patients undergoing a multimodal program featuring cervical extension traction (CET). Pre-treatment demographic and clinical variables were used to develop predictive models capable of anticipating modifications in cervical lordotic angle (CLA), pain and disability of 570 patients treated between 2014 and 2020. Linear regression models used pre-treatment variables of age, body mass index, CLA, anterior head translation, disability index, pain score, treatment frequency, duration and compliance. These models used the sci-kit-learn machine learning library within Python for implementing linear regression algorithms. The linear regression models demonstrated high precision and accuracy, and effectively explained 30-55% of the variability in post-treatment outcomes, the highest for the CLA. This pioneering study integrates machine learning into spinal rehabilitation. The developed models offer valuable information to customize interventions, set realistic expectations, and optimize treatment strategies based on individual patient characteristics as treated conservatively with rehabilitation programs using CET as part of multimodal care.

Evaluation of cervical spine clearance scores in children younger than 3 years with blunt trauma.

OBJECTIVE: The PEDSPINE I and PEDSPINE II scores were developed to determine when patients require advanced imaging to rule out cervical spine injury (CSI) in children younger than 3 years of age with blunt trauma. This study aimed to evaluate these scores in an institutional cohort. METHODS: The authors identified patients younger than 3 years with blunt trauma who received cervical spine MRI from their institution's prospective database from 2012 to 2015. Patient demographics, injury characteristics, and imaging were compared between patients with and without CSI using chi-square and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. RESULTS: Eighty-eight patients were identified, 8 (9%) of whom had CSI on MRI. The PEDSPINE I system had a higher sensitivity (50% vs 25%) and negative predictive value (93% vs 92%), whereas PEDSPINE II had a higher specificity (91% vs 65%) and positive predictive value (22% vs 13%). Patients with CSI missed by the scores had mild, radiologically significant ligamentous injuries detected on MRI. Both models would have recommended advanced imaging for the patient who required halo-vest fixation (risk profile: no CSI, 81.9%; ligamentous, 10.1%; osseous, 8.0%). PEDSPINE I would have prevented 52 (65%) of 80 uninjured patients from receiving advanced imaging, whereas PEDSPINE II would have prevented 73 (91%). Using PEDSPINE I, 10 uninjured patients (13%) could have avoided intubation for imaging. PEDSPINE II would not have spared any patients intubation. CONCLUSIONS: Current cervical spine clearance algorithms are not sensitive or specific enough to determine the need for advanced imaging in children. However, these scores can be used as a reference in conjunction with physicians' clinical impressions to reduce unnecessary imaging.

Short-Term and Long-Term Results of Odontoid Screw Fixation in Patients with Type II and Rostral Type III Dens Fractures.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate both the short-term and long-term outcomes of odontoid screw fixation (OSF), identifying potential risk factors for implant-related complications in patients with odontoid fractures. METHODS: This is a retrospective observational cohort study. Inclusion criteria were as follows: 1) Type II fractures and rostral Type III fractures, according to the Anderson and D'Alonzo classification; 2) patients older than 15 years. Exclusion criteria were: 1) other Type III injuries; 2) osteoporosis confirmed by densitometry or a CT bone density score below 100 Hounsfield units; 3) odontoid fractures related to tumors or aneurysmal bone cysts. RESULTS: In total, 56 patients were considered for the analysis of short-term results, and 26 patients were evaluated for long-term outcomes. No significant differences were observed in the preoperative imaging data and intraoperative features of OSF between patients with Type II and rostral Type III fractures. The mean operative duration was 63.9 ± 20.9 minutes, and the mean intraoperative blood loss was 22.1 ± 22.9 ml. Screw cut-out was identified in four patients with rostral Type III fractures (p = 0.04). The rate of screw cut-out was found to correlate with the degree of dens fragment displacement. The bone fusion rate was 95.7%. CT scans identified stable pseudarthrosis in two cases. We observed C2-C3 ankylosis in all cases following partial disc resection. One third of patients with screws placed through the anterior lip of C2 showed no C2-C3 ankylosis. A strong trend towards lateral joint ankylosis formation in patients with a median lateral mass dislocation of 11.9 mm was observed. Most SF-36 scores either matched or exceeded the corresponding normal median values in the published reference database. CONCLUSIONS: OSF is a reliable treatment method of type II and rostral type III odontoid fractures with fragment displacement of 4 mm or less. The minimally invasive OSF through the anterior-inferior lip of C2, using monocortical screw placement and cannulated instruments, without rigid intraoperative head immobilization, is sufficient to achieve favorable clinical and fusion results. This technique reduces the risk of ankylosis in the C2-C3 segment. OSF restore the quality of life for patients with odontoid fractures to levels comparable to those of the general population norm.

Pediatric cervical spine clearance after blunt trauma and negative CT: What is the role of MRI?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The cervical spine in children has marked anatomical and biomechanical differences compared to adults, leading to significantly different patterns and incidence of spinal injury, and consequently to different X-ray and computed tomography (CT) imaging recommendations. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been validated to clear cervical spine trauma in adults, but not in pediatric patients. We hypothesized that MRI findings have a low probability to change management in children with spine trauma and negative CT findings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed records for admitted pediatric patients due to blunt trauma from January 2011 to May 2021, and identified 212 patients who underwent MRI within 3 days of a negative CT. Two neuroradiologists independently reviewed all CT and MRI images for the following categories: fracture, subluxation, spinal canal compromise, ligamentous injury, spinal canal hemorrhage, cord contusion and soft tissue hemorrhage. We identified follow-up MRI examinations as negative or positive for the above categories, and calculated the prevalence of each category as a percentage of cases with negative CT. We also evaluated whether negative and positive MRI groups differed significantly with respect to age and sex of the patients. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: In our study of 212 children with cervical spine trauma and a negative CT, most follow-up MRI scans were found to be negative (79.9 %). Positive MRI findings consisted mainly of ligamentous sprain without disruption (15.1 %). Ligamentous disruption and epidural or soft tissue hemorrhage were found in 4.5 %, and focal cord contusion in 0.5 %. There was no statically significant difference between negative and positive MRI groups with respect to age (P = 0.45) and sex (P = 0.52). CONCLUSION: In our patient group with a negative CT, MRI did not significantly impact management nor contribute to cervical spine clearance in children.

Vertebral Artery Injury in Cervical Spine Fracture Dislocation: An Observational Study in a Tertiary Care Center.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of traumatic vertebral artery injury (VAI) associated with cervical spine trauma varies widely in published trauma series. The primary aim of this study was to determine the incidence of traumatic VAI in patients who suffered cervical spine injuries by means of routine magnetic resonance imaging, and the secondary objective was to identify any associations with injury mechanism, level of injury, and neurologic injury severity.  Materials and methods: A retrospective review was conducted on 96 patients who suffered cervical spine fracture dislocation with or without an associated spinal cord injury (SCI) in Indian Spinal Injuries Center (ISIC), New Delhi, India from January 2013 to April 2023. Cervical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was used to diagnose VAI. Patient's age, sex, cervical injury level, mechanism of injury, neurologic level of injury, association with foraminal fracture, facet dislocation, and clinical sequelae of vertebral artery injury were analyzed. RESULTS: In this study, of 96 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 18 patients (18.75%) had VAI on the MRI study. Thirteen (72.22%) of the eighteen patients had right-sided injuries, four (22.22%) had left-sided injuries, and one (5.55%) had bilateral injuries. There was an associated SCI in every VAI patient. VAI was significantly more common in patients who had ASIA A (61%, n = 11) and ASIA B (22%, n = 4) injuries, and no VAI was noted in neurologically intact patients (p<0.001). The incidence of VAI was higher in the flexion distraction type of injury (n = 12, 66%). The most commonly involved cervical spine injury level was C5-C6 (27%, n = 5), followed by 22% (n = 4) at C4-C5 and C6-C7 levels. About 27.8% (n = 5) of VAI was associated with foraminal fractures, and 72% (n = 13) of VAI was associated with facet dislocations, of which 44% (n = 8) were bifacetal and 28% (n = 5) were unifacetal dislocations. On clinical symptoms, only one (5.56%) patient had a headache, and 17 (94.4%) had no clinical features due to VAI. CONCLUSION: The incidence of traumatic vertebral artery disease is not very uncommon and requires careful and meticulous screening and management. Otherwise, complications like pseudoaneurysm, neurologic deficit, late-onset hemorrhage, infarction, and death can happen. Mostly, it is associated with high-velocity injuries and neurological injuries. MRI can be used as a good screening tool, which can be aided by a CT angiogram or digital subtraction angiography for confirmation. Proper pre-operative evaluation of vascular injury in cervical spine fracture dislocation is very important for patient counseling, patient management, and surgical planning.

Inter-Semispinalis Plane Block Versus General Anesthesia for Postoperative Analgesia in Posterior Cervical Spine Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background: Postoperative pain management is crucial for improving patient outcomes following posterior cervical spine surgery. Opioids are effective but carry a risk of respiratory depression. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are commonly used but may not provide adequate pain relief and have potential complications. The inter-semispinalis plane (ISPB) block is a novel technique for postoperative analgesia in cervical spine surgery. Objectives: This study aims to evaluate and compare the efficacy of the ISPB with general anesthesia in terms of analgesia, postoperative Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores, patient-surgeon satisfaction levels, and the occurrence of postoperative complications. Methods: This double-blind, randomized controlled trial was blinded to both the patient and the assessor. Fifty adult patients (18 - 60 years old) undergoing elective posterior cervical spine surgery were enrolled. The participants were divided into 2 groups: The ISPB group (receiving bilateral ultrasound-guided ISPB at the C5 level) and the control group (receiving general anesthesia only), with each group comprising 25 patients. The study assessed intraoperative fentanyl use, postoperative VAS pain levels, the need for rescue analgesia, and complications. Results: The ISPB group showed significantly lower intraoperative fentanyl consumption (median 100 vs. 100 - 150 µg, P = 0.022) and lower postoperative pain scores at 1, 8, 12, and 48 hours (P = 0.016, 0.009, 0.005, 0.016). Additionally, the ISPB group required less postoperative pethidine (20% vs. 64%, P = 0.002) and had a longer delay before requesting pethidine (hazard ratio 0.215, P = 0.001). Surgeon satisfaction was significantly higher in the ISPB group (P = 0.003). These results suggest that the ISPB can effectively reduce pain and analgesic requirements. Conclusions: The ISPB is an effective analgesic technique for posterior cervical spine surgery, reducing opioid consumption, providing better pain control, and enhancing surgeon satisfaction without increasing complications. This approach has the potential to improve postoperative care and patient outcomes in this surgical population.