Analyzing Factors and Reasons Behind NonAttendance of ENT Patients: Clinical Audit.

Objective: This study analyzed the frequency of follow-up patients at the ENT clinic and identified different factors that are associated with nonattendance at follow-up appointments since nonattendance imposes significant stress on the system of healthcare. Methods: This study was an ambidirectional cohort study and conducted a telephonic survey with 104 ENT patients who missed their appointments. Results: The findings of the study revealed that patients missed their scheduled appointments because of transportation problems (46%), professional engagement (46%), family problems (44%), and financial problems (32.7%). However, patients didn't identify forgetfulness about the appointment, complete recovery, and health-related issues on the day of the appointment as the barrier to missing their scheduled appointment. The study assessed the relationship between socioeconomic status and the frequency of follow-up patients in an ENT clinic where transportation factor (P < .000), working commitments (P < .004) affecting the "Lower Middle and Middle Class" individuals, and financial problems (P < .005), family problems (P < .028), feeling sick (P < .037) were significantly affecting the "Middle-Upper Class" and "Middle Class." Meanwhile, forgetfulness was not associated with the socio-economic status of the ENT patients (P = .237). Conclusion: This study found transportation, family, financial issues, and professional commitments to be the key barriers to ENT appointment attendance, with Lower-Middle-Class patients particularly affected by forgetfulness. These missed appointments negatively impact patient health and strain the healthcare system.

Factors and Reasons ENT Patients Do Not Follow-upThis study attempted to investigate why ENT patients do not attend their follow-up appointments and the frequency of patients who do follow-up visits. The researcher identified transportation problems, professional engagement, family issues, and financial constraints as major barriers leading to non-attendance at follow-up appointments in ENT clinics. Lower-middle-class and middle-class individuals are particularly affected, with transportation and financial problems significantly hindering their ability to attend follow-up appointments. Based on the findings of the study, practical solutions are needed to reduce missed appointments such as concession on second follow-up fees, telephonic consultations (excluding severe cases), and the implementation of an automated reminder system to enhance patient adherence in otolaryngology clinics.

Evaluation of antenatal care quality for preterm birth prevention using an auditable scoring system: A retrospective, descriptive, longitudinal study in Sydney, Australia.

INTRODUCTION: Preterm birth continues to be one of the most significant contributors to perinatal death. This study aims to evaluate the quality of antenatal care provided to women delivering preterm. METHODS: This was a retrospective, descriptive, longitudinal review of all women who had antenatal care within a single Australian tertiary hospital and delivered spontaneously between 24 and 37 weeks of gestation, using an auditable scoring system assessing potential interventions for prevention of preterm birth. The review was limited to singleton pregnancies without fetal abnormalities delivering between January 2013 and April 2015. The audit tool was developed by reference to established 'best practice' guidance for prediction and prevention of preterm birth based on Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists guidelines and published literature. Different pathways were assessed for women deemed either low- or high-risk at the outset of antenatal care. RESULTS: A series of 161 pregnancies that delivered preterm (between 24 and 37 weeks' gestation) were reviewed. The quality of antenatal care was scored 'good' in 42.9% and 50% of high-risk and low-risk women, respectively. Care was scored 'adequate', with room for improvement in 51.4% and 45.2% of the two corresponding groups. The main deficiencies in care were recorded evidence of assessment of cervical length (absent in 35% of cases) and failure to screen for bacterial vaginosis in high-risk women. CONCLUSIONS: Auditing antenatal care for prevention of preterm birth allows identification of suboptimal practice allowing service improvement and potential intervention for preterm birth prevention.

Value of an orthopaedic admission proforma.

BACKGROUND: Admission notes are an important aspect of clinical practice and a vital means of communication among healthcare professionals. Incomplete or poor clinical documentation on admission can lead to delayed surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 20 consecutive admission notes to our department was compared against the Royal College of Surgeons standards (GSP 2014). A new admission proforma was designed, and after the introductory period, two further retrospective cycles were performed. RESULTS: In total, 60 admission notes were analysed. Following the introduction of the proforma, there was an overall improvement in the documentation of the quality and quantity of notes studied. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated that a well-structured admission protocol can improve the overall quality of admission notes.

Clinical Audit in the Elderly by Assessing Hydration and Renal Functions Before and After Contrast CT Scans at District Headquarters Hospital, Dera Ismail Khan, Pakistan.

Introduction Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is a serious risk involved in computed tomography (CT) scans, particularly for older people. The main idea of this clinical audit was to assess current practices regarding renal function tests (RFTs) and hydration status before and after contrast CT scans in older patients at District Headquarters Hospital (DHQ), Dera Ismail Khan, Pakistan, and to implement recommendations for improvement. CIN is a form of acute kidney injury that occurs after the administration of contrast dye used in imaging procedures and is characterized by a sudden deterioration in renal functions. Methods This clinical audit checked adherence to renal protection protocols in elderly patients undergoing contrast CT scans. Conducted over three cycles from July 5 to August 15, 2022, this clinical audit included 30 patients aged 75 and above. Each cycle had 10 patients, divided equally between males and females, and further categorized into age groups of 75-85 years and 86-95 years. Data collection involved reviewing patient files, medication charts, and CT scan reports. Compliance with RFT documentation and hydration before and after the CT scan was assessed against the standards set by Basildon and Thurrock University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust. Data were analyzed using Microsoft Excel 2023 (Microsoft® Corp., Redmond, WA), and graphs were created using Microsoft Word 2023 (Microsoft® Corp., Redmond, WA). Results The mean age ± standard deviation (SD) for males was 81.8 ± 5.01 in the first cycle, 83.4 ± 6.46 in the second cycle, and 82.4 ± 4.72 in the third cycle. For females, the mean age ± SD was 83.2 ± 5.80 in the first cycle, 85.2 ± 6.41 in the second cycle, and 83.0 ± 6.12 in the third cycle. The first audit cycle revealed that, while all patients (100%) had their RFTs documented before the CT scan, only 20% were adequately hydrated pre-scan, and none (0%) had RFTs performed post scan. Post-scan hydration was also low at 20%. These findings highlighted gaps in adherence to renal protection protocols. The second cycle showed improvements, with pre-scan hydration adherence increasing to 80%, post-scan RFTs to 60%, and post-scan hydration to 70%. By the third cycle, full compliance (100%) was achieved across all standards, including pre- and post-scan renal functions test and hydration. Conclusion The clinical audit at District Headquarters Hospital, Dera Ismail Khan, addressed gaps in renal protection protocols for elderly patients undergoing contrast CT scans. The audit improved adherence over three cycles through targeted interventions, including staff training, implementation of checklists, patient education, modifying the reporting format, and providing instructions in the local language. It also highlighted the importance of continuous education and regular monitoring. The clinical audit would be expanded to another hospital within the medical teaching institute, Dera Ismail Khan. This measure will maintain and enhance patient care, prevent CIN, and improve the renal health of elderly patients.

Intravenous iron staining. Real-world incidence, preventability, and mitigation tools from a long-term quality improvement project.

BACKGROUND: Iron deficiency is the leading cause of anaemia worldwide and is increasingly treated with intravenous iron therapy. Staining from intravenous iron therapy is a rare but significant and preventable adverse event. To mitigate patient harm, a health service wide quality improvement project was implemented. This study aimed to determine the real-world impact of a quality improvement project on intravenous staining incidents and preventability. METHODS: A retrospective chart audit was undertaken for all intravenous iron staining episodes reported in a directorate-wide clinical incident reporting database (RiskMan) between 2016 and 2022. Incidence rates of intravenous iron staining, preventability and stain severity were compared pre and post implementation of a standardised intravenous iron procedure. RESULTS: Over seven years, 103 intravenous iron stains were identified, resulting in a staining rate of 0.31 stains per 100 infusions (pre 0.27% and post 0.34%, p=0.25). Implementation of the standardised intravenous iron procedure resulted in improvements in pharmacist review of the medication order (61.8% V 89.7%, p<0.01), use of the statewide IV iron infusion consent form (27.3% V 76.9%, p<0.01) and appropriate cannula site (14.3% V 52.5%, P<0.01). Smaller stain sizes were associated with cessation of the infusion at identification of extravasation (312cm2 V 35cm2) (p = 0.04). Preventability was assigned to 86% of stains. CONCLUSION: The incidence rate of intravenous iron staining in a real-world clinical setting is 0.31%. There was increased compliance with several best practice principles and 86% of stains were preventable. Early identification and intervention of potential staining incidents results in smaller iron stains for patients. Quality improvement tools developed for this project can contribute to patient outcomes internationally.

Retrospective Analysis of Specimen Quality in Temporal Artery Biopsies for Giant Cell Arteritis and Disease Association in North Midlands, England.

Background Temporal artery biopsy (TAB) is the recommended index diagnostic method for giant cell arteritis (GCA). Per the British Society for Rheumatology (BSR) guidelines, we assessed our procedural performance. Additionally, we evaluated the occurrence of GCA diagnosis in immunosuppressed patients and other comorbidities. Methods Following the audit registration, a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was conducted from 2017 to 2022 at a large university hospital in North Midlands, England. Data on demographics and comorbidities were gathered. The study's primary outcome was adherence to BSR guidelines and our service provisions. Secondary outcomes included examining the relationship between biopsy-confirmed GCA and other comorbidities. Statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS version 29 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, New York, United States of America). Two-sample t-test and Chi-square/Fisher exact test were used for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Holm-Bonferroni method was incorporated to adjust for multiple comparisons. Results A total of 156 patients who underwent temporal artery biopsy (TAB) were included in the study, with a male-to-female ratio of 0.44:1. The median age was 73. Among the patients, 19% were smokers. The procedures were performed by either a vascular surgeon (119, 76%) or by an ophthalmologist (37, 24%). Two-thirds of the patients underwent TAB within seven days of referral. In 73, 47% of cases, the post-fixation biopsy sample size exceeded 10 mm. Positive biopsy results were found in 45 patients (29%). GCA was confirmed in 39% of patients with polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR), 24% with diabetics, 20% with hypothyroidism, 29% with hypertension, 32% with hyperlipidaemia, and 26% with other inflammatory diseases. However, the p-value was below the statistically significant threshold. The biopsy outcome was also not dependent on the speciality, time from referral to biopsy, nor on the length of the post-fixation specimen. Conclusions Temporal artery biopsy remains a valuable and crucial diagnostic tool in challenging equivocal cases of giant cell arteritis (GCA), although it is limited by its sensitivity, but there is also room for improvement. There is still uncertainty regarding the relationship between biopsy positivity, post-fixation sample size, and the interval between referral and procedure. Additionally, the speciality of the clinician performing the biopsy does not appear to significantly influence the likelihood of a positive result. We still do not fully understand why this is, but the association of the GCA with other comorbidities was unpredictably insignificant.

Multidisciplinary team meetings and their impact on survival in rectal cancer. Population-based analysis in Catalonia (Spain).

BACKGROUND: Multidisciplinary team meetings (MTMs) are considered a pillar of cancer care; however, evidence of the independent benefit of MTMs on survival in rectal cancer is controversial. METHODS: This population-based cohort analysis included patients undergoing surgery for primary rectal cancer with curative intent. We drew data derived from three clinical audits conducted in Catalonia from 2011 to 2020. The primary outcome was 2-year survival. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to assess the hazard ratio for death in patients whose cases were versus were not discussed in a preoperative MTM. RESULTS: A total of 5249 patients were included (66.1 % male, 58.3 % aged 60-79 years, 63.2 % receiving anterior resection): 4096 cases were discussed in a preoperative MTM, and 1153 were not. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis showed that the MTM group had better survival than those with no preoperative MTM (hazard ratio 1.22, 95 % confidence interval 1.02-1.48), after adjusting for potential confounders. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative MTM may be associated with improved survival in patients with rectal cancer in Catalonia. Efforts to ensure universal access to MTMs for all newly diagnosed patients should be supported.

Assessing and Enhancing the Adequacy of Radiology Request Forms at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Sudan: A Clinical Audit.

BACKGROUND: Clinical auditing is one method of improving the quality of patient care. Radiology request forms (RRFs) are crucial for the purpose of facilitating communication between the radiologist or radiographer and the referring clinician. METHODS: A two-cycle clinical audit was conducted at the Radiology Department of Atbara Police Hospital in Khartoum, Sudan. A total of 100 forms were collected, with 50 forms from each cycle. As an intervention, the existing blank paper format for radiology requests was replaced with a structured form based on the standards of the Royal College of Radiologists (RCR). This new form was distributed hospital-wide, and doctors were educated on its use through presentations and briefings. The collected forms were then compared against the RCR standards for completeness and accuracy. Data were entered into Microsoft Excel 2016 for analysis. RESULTS:  The interventions led to notable improvements in several areas. Accuracy in recording the patient's address, phone number, and location increased from 0 (0%) in the first cycle to 50 (100%) in the second cycle, marking a 100% improvement. In addition, referencing the patient's age improved from 15 (30%) in the first cycle to 50 (100%) in the second cycle, indicating a 70% increase. The mean score for RRF documentation was 25.33% in the first cycle and significantly increased to 97.77% in the second cycle. CONCLUSION: The audit shows significant improvement in RRFs post-intervention, highlighting the importance of standardization. However, deficiencies point to the need for orientation and follow-up training for physicians to ensure accurate form completion. Integrating quality assurance, including periodic audits and real-time feedback, can help sustain these gains. Collaboration between radiologists and referring physicians is also essential for ongoing improvement.

A quality improvement project to enhance the knowledge, skills, and attitude of healthcare workers regarding the use of defibrillators.

Introduction: Defibrillation is a critical intervention in managing cardiac emergencies, yet healthcare workers (HCWs) preparation for utilizing defibrillators remains inadequate, particularly in low and middle-income countries. This quality improvement project aimed to assess and enhance HCWs' knowledge, skills, and attitudes toward defibrillator use in the emergency department (ED) through a 1-h defibrillator workshop. Methodology: An observational clinical audit was conducted within the ED of a tertiary care hospital. Pre- and post-workshop data were collected from the participants using structured questionnaires for demographics, knowledge assessment (20 multiple-choice questions), skills assessment (10-step checklist), and attitude evaluation (Likert-scale statements). The workshop included theoretical instruction and hands-on practice, with a post-workshop assessment conducted one week later. Data analysis employed descriptive statistics and paired t-tests, while ethical considerations ensured confidentiality and consent. Results: The study included 38 participants, demonstrating significant gaps in defibrillator knowledge, skills, and attitudes pre-workshop. Post-workshop assessments revealed a marked improvement in knowledge scores (P<0.05), attitudes (P<0.05), and practical skills (P<0.05). Participants' confidence and preparation for managing cardiac emergencies notably increased, indicating the workshop's efficacy in addressing the identified deficiencies. Conclusion: The 1-h defibrillator workshop effectively enhanced HCWs' competence and readiness to utilize ED defibrillators. The observed improvements underscore the importance of targeted educational interventions in bridging knowledge gaps and fostering proactive attitudes toward emergency management. Regular training sessions should be conducted to sustain these enhancements and improve patient outcomes in the ED.

Compliance of Surgical Care in Patients with Carcinoma Endometrium in a Tertiary Care Centre in South India, to European Society of Gynaecologic Oncology (ESGO) Quality Indicators.

To analyse the compliance of surgical care provided to patients diagnosed with carcinoma endometrium, to the European Society of Gynaeacological Oncology (ESGO) quality indicators. This is a retrospective audit done in the Department of Gynaecologic Oncology. Electronic medical records of patients who underwent surgical management of carcinoma endometrium from January 2020 to December 2021 were assessed. A total of 163 patients had undergone primary surgery, and 2 patients had surgery for recurrence. The audit showed that the target for categories of general indicators and pre-operative work-up was met. There was lack in compliance to the intraoperative management, with only 34% among presumed early-stage disease undergoing successful MIS, 31% undergoing sentinel lymph node procedure and 53% among them being done using indocyanine green with 18% bilateral mapping rate. None of the patients had complete molecular classification. Compliance to adjuvant treatment provided was adequate. Minimal required elements in surgical reports were in 81% and pathological reports in 91% of patients falling short of the set target. The audit helped us identify the need to increase MIS and use and adapt sentinel lymph node procedure with ICG dye more aggressively. There also is a need for improvement in documentation of pertinent information on surgical and pathology reporting. Molecular classification should be routinely incorporated into the diagnostic algorithm to aid in adjuvant therapy.

Pressure ulcers: a clinical audit to determine compliance against the aSSKINg framework in an adult community nursing setting.

Assessment of pressure ulcer (PU) risk remains a challenge in clinical practice. The first part of this article (Martin and Holloway, 2024) discussed the evidence base underpinning the development of clinical guidelines for PUs alongside the creation of the bundle approach regarding PU prevention. This article, part two, presents the results of a clinical audit that explores compliance against a PU prevention bundle (the aSSKINg framework) in an adult community nursing setting in the south-east of England. The clinical audit was conducted between July-December 2021 and included records of 150 patients. Overall, compliance against the aSSKINg framework was poor, with only two criterion being met: equipment provision for chair and referral to the tissue viability team. Short-term recommendations are that mandatory PU training for staff in the management of PUs should be implemented, and the tissue viability nurse network should be increased. The long-term recommendation was the introduction of the aSSKINg framework as a template into the electronic patient record.

Evaluation of hospital quality of care outcomes in a teaching hospital in Ethiopia: a retrospective database study.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate hospital mortality rates, readmission rates and length of hospital stay (LOS) among adult medical patients admitted to a teaching hospital in Ethiopia. DESIGN: We performed a retrospective study using routinely collected electronic data. SETTING: Data were collected from Yekatit 12 Hospital Medical College between January 2021 and July 2023. PARTICIPANTS: The analysis included 3499 (4111 admissions) adult medical patients with complete data. OUTCOME MEASURES: We used mortality rates, readmission rates and LOS to measure the quality of the outcomes for the top 15 admission diagnoses. A multivariable Cox proportional hazard model was used to identify the statistically significant predictors of mortality with p values<0.05 and a 95% CI. The Kaplan-Meier curve was used to estimate the failure rate (mortality) of the admitted patients. RESULTS: The median age of patients was 50 years and men accounted for 1827 (52.3%) of all admitted cases. Non-communicable diseases accounted for 2537 (72.5%) admissions. In descending order, stroke, 644 (18.29%); heart failure, 640 (18.41%); and severe pneumonia, 422 (12.06%) were the three most common causes of admission. The readmission rate was 25.67% (1056/411), and 61.9% of them were readmitted within 30 days of index discharge. The overall median LOS was 8 days. The median LOSs in the index admission (11 vs 8 days, p value=0.001) of readmitted patients was significantly higher than not readmitted. The in-hospital mortality rate was 438 (12.5%), with the highest number of deaths occurred between days 30 and 50 of admission. The mortality rate is significantly higher among patients with communicable diseases (adjusted HR, 1.64, 95% CI: 1.34, 2.10) and elderly patients (≥65 years) (adjusted HR, 1.79, 95% CI: 1.44, 2.22). Septicemia, chronic liver diseases with complications and HIV with complications were the three common causes of death with a proportional mortality rate of 55.2%, 27.93% and 22.46%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Mortality, median LOSs and readmission rate were comparable to other national and international studies. Multicentre compressive research using these three quality patient outcomes is required to establish national standards and evaluate institutional performance.

Predictors of paediatric difficult intubation according to the experience of a university hospital in a low- and middle-income country: A prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Difficult airway management is one of the main challenges in paediatric anaesthesia, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. AIMS: The aim of this study was to investigate the main predictors of difficult paediatric intubation. METHODS: In this observational study, we included all children aged less than five years undergoing intra-abdominal surgery with endotracheal intubation. Patients were divided into two groups according to the incidence of difficult intubation. Then, we investigated predictors for difficult paediatric intubation. RESULTS: We included 217 children, and difficult intubation was observed in 10% of them. Predictors were as follows: Mallampati III-IV class (adjusted odds ratio = 2.21; 95% confidence interval = 1.1-6.4), limited mouth opening (adjusted odds ratio = 2.4; 95% confidence interval = 1.8-3.5), facial dysmorphia (adjusted odds ratio = 2.6; 95% confidence interval = 1.32-7.4) and anaesthesia without muscle relaxant (adjusted odds ratio = 1.8; 95% confidence interval = 1.0-5.1) or without opioids during crash inductions (adjusted odds ratio = 1.7; 95% confidence interval = 1.01-4.8). CONCLUSION: Facial dysmorphia and limited mouth opening were predictors of difficult intubation in children. Furthermore, it seems that Mallampati class and anaesthesia technique may also predict challenging intubation, which may guide us to change our perioperative practice.

The Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland quality improvement project and integrated chronic kidney disease system: implementation within a primary care network.

BACKGROUND: The optimisation of patients in primary care is a prime opportunity to manage patient care within the community and reduce the burden of referrals on secondary care. This paper presents a quality improvement clinical programme taking place within an NHS Primary Care Network as part of the wider Leicester Leicestershire Rutland integrated chronic kidney disease programme. METHOD: Patients are optimised to guidelines from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, by a primary care clinical team who are supported by nephrology consultants and nephrology pharmacists. Multidisciplinary team meetings take place with secondary care specialists and primary care staff. Learning is passed to the community clinicians for better patient treatment locally. RESULTS: A total of 526 patients were reviewed under this project.The total number of referrals to secondary care which were discharged following first outpatient appointment, reduced from 42.9% to 10%. This reduction of 32.9% represents the optimisation of patient cases through this quality improvement project. Patients can be optimised and managed within the community, reducing the number of unnecessary referrals to secondary care. CONCLUSION: This programme has the potential to offer significant improvement in patient outcomes when expanded to a larger patient base. Medicine management and the use of clinical staff are optimised in both primary and secondary care.

Evaluation of the degree of implementation of zero projects in critical care units of Galicia (Spain) through internal audits.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the implementation of Zero Projects in Critical Care Units (CCUs) through Internal Audits (IA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Design: Real-time observational safety analysis. A questionnaire was developed with defined items to ensure objectivity. After IAs, a survey was conducted with the auditors. SCOPE: 11 CCUs in hospitals of the Servizo Galego de Saúde and Ribera-POVISA. PATIENTS OR PARTICIPANTS: 24 auditors in 9 teams composed of medical, nursing, and quality personnel from health areas and 34 patients were assessed. MAIN VARIABLES OF INTEREST: Compliance with the quality standard (≥60% of items), strengths, areas for improvement, auditor's interest in IA, conformity with the organization and items. RESULTS: 100% CCUs met the quality standard. 18.03% of items were fulfilled by all CCUs. Strengths: staff motivation, positive reception of auditors, and use of computer tools in some CCUs. Areas for improvement: deficit of automatic systems for controlling endotracheal tube cuff pressure (compliance rate in 9.1% of CCUs), training needs, communication issues, and not using checklists (45.5% of the reports). Auditors found IA very interesting, and 19% suggested improving organization and items. CONCLUSIONS: All CCUs met the previously agreed-upon quality standard. Numerous improvement opportunities were identified and communicated to the audited CCUs. For greater homogeneity and objectivity, a review of previously agreed items and definitions is required.

Ensuring Adherence to 2023 National Institute of Excellence (Nice) Guidelines for CT Scans in Head Injury Cases in a Teaching Hospital in Basra, Iraq: A Clinical Audit.

Objective The objective of this audit was to find out whether brain CT scans performed on patients with head trauma in Basra Teaching Hospital (BTH) adhere to the 2023 National Institute of Excellence (NICE) guidance for head injury (NG232) and whether we can improve this with selected interventions. Methodology We performed a clinical audit in two cycles; in the first cycle, we collected data retrospectively over a month in February 2024. The data was sourced from the imaging request forms and patient records at BTH. We then analyzed the data and implemented four key interventions to improve the outcome. After that, we performed our second audit cycle over an additional 30-day period during April 2024. Results Cycle One involved 59 patients, while Cycle Two involved 46. There was a significant decrease in scans requested outside of the NICE guidance, from 59.3% in Cycle One to 17.4% in Cycle Two (p<0.05). We also noticed a significant increase in the one-hour indication scans, from 32% in Cycle One to 65.2% in Cycle Two (p<0.05). Conclusion Our study findings reveal that by following some simple interventions, we significantly improved the adherence of our emergency department to the 2023 NICE guidelines for head CT following head trauma.

Evaluating Compliance With the Ottawa Rules: A Retrospective Clinical Audit at a District General Hospital in the UK.

BACKGROUND: The Ottawa Rules are clinical decision tools designed to assist healthcare providers in determining the need for radiographs in patients with ankle or knee injuries. Compliance with these rules can lead to more efficient use of resources and reduced radiation exposure. OBJECTIVE: This retrospective clinical audit aimed to evaluate healthcare provider's compliance with the Ottawa Rules in an Emergency Department setting and assess the positivity rates of requested knee and ankle X-rays. METHODS: A two-cycle retrospective audit was conducted at Lincoln County Hospital's Emergency Department, involving 648 X-rays collected in two cycles. In between, multiple interventions were implemented to improve the outcomes. RESULTS: The study revealed varying levels of compliance with the Ottawa Rules, with higher compliance observed for knee X-rays than ankle X-rays. The compliance for knee X-rays improved from 74.6% to 89.9% and ankle X-rays improved from 33.1% to 75.8%. Positivity rates for ankle radiographs were higher than knee radiographs in both cycles. The interventions implemented between the cycles significantly improved compliance rates with the Ottawa Rules. CONCLUSION: The findings underscore the importance of adherence to the Ottawa Rules in optimizing patient care and resource utilization. The study suggests the need for continued education and periodic audits to maintain and further improve compliance rates. Additionally, the higher positivity rates for ankle radiographs highlight the importance of targeted imaging strategies based on clinical guidelines.

Harnessing policy to promote inclusive medical product evidence: development of a reference standard and structured audit of clinical trial diversity policies.

Objective: To develop a reference standard based on US Food and Drug Administration and stakeholder guidance for pharmaceutical companies' policies on diversity in clinical trials and to assess these policies. Design: Development of a reference standard and structured audit for clinical trial diversity policies. Setting: 50 pharmaceutical companies selected from the top 500 by their market capitalizations in 2021 (the 25 largest companies and 25 non-large companies, randomly selected from the remaining 475 companies). Population: Data from pharmaceutical company websites and annual reports. Policy guidance from the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers and Associations, Biotechnology Industry Organization, International Committee of Medical Journal Editors, the US Food and Drug Administration, European Medicines Agency, and World Health Organization, up to 15 May 2023. Main outcome measures: Multicomponent measure based on distinct themes derived from FDA and stakeholder guidance. Results: Reviewing FDA and stakeholder guidance identified 14 distinct themes recommended for improving diversity in clinical trials, which were built into a reference standard: (1) enrollment targets that reflect the prevalence of targeted conditions in populations, (2) broad eligibility criteria for trials, (3) diversity in the workforce, (4) identification and remedy of barriers to trial recruitment and retention, (5) incorporation of patient input into trial design, (6) health literacy, (7) multidimensional approaches to diversity, (8) sites with diverse providers and patient populations, (9) data collection after product approval, (10) diverse enrollment in every country where trials are conducted, (11) diverse enrollment should be a focus for all phases of clinical trials, not just later stage or pivotal trials, (12) varied trial design, (13) expanded access, and (14) public reporting of the personal characteristics of participants in trials. Applying this reference standard, 48% (24/50) of companies had no public policy on diversity in clinical trials; among those with policies, content varied widely. Large companies were more likely to have a public policy than non-large companies (21/25, 84% v 5/25, 20%, P<0.001). Large companies most frequently committed to using epidemiological based trial enrollment targets representing the prevalence of indicated conditions in various populations (n=15, 71%), dealing with barriers to trial recruitment (n=15, 71%), and improving patient awareness of trial opportunities (n=14, 67%). The location of the company was not associated with having a public diversity policy (P=0.17). The average company policy had five of the 14 commitments (36%, range 0-8) recommended in FDA and stakeholder guidance. Conclusions: The findings of the study showed that many pharmaceutical companies did not have public policies on diversity in clinical trials, although policies were more common in large than non-large companies. Policies that were publicly available varied widely and lacked important commitments recommended by stakeholder guidance. The results of the study suggest that corporate policies can be better leveraged to promote representation and fair inclusion in research, and implementation of FDA and stakeholder guidance.

Clinical Audit to Assess Orthogeriatrician Input to the Management of Elderly Trauma Patients.

OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study is to assess the adherence of our department to the British Orthopaedic Association's Standards for Trauma and Orthopaedics (BOAST) guidelines for "the care of the older or frail orthopaedic trauma patient" and the results of this adherence on clinical patient outcome measures. METHODS: This was a clinical audit. All ≥65-year-olds admitted to the orthopaedic department with a fragility fracture between 8 September 2022 and 8 March 2023 with a length of stay (LOS) of >72 hours were included. Patients were stratified into hip fracture (HF) and non-hip fracture (NHF) patients. A further similar cohort of NHF admissions between 8 March and 8 May 2023 was added to the data. The adherence of both cohorts to the national guidelines was recorded. Primary outcome measures of each cohort were recorded such as LOS and patient mortality. RESULTS: Data from 70 patients was collected. HF patients adhered to the guideline 79.4% of the time (31/39 patients) compared to NHF patients at only 19.3% of the time (6/31 patients) (p<0.001). Further, on average, HF patients were seen by an orthogeriatrician 15 times compared to just five times for NHF patients during their hospital stay (p<0.001). No significant difference in LOS or in mortality at 30 days post-admission was observed. CONCLUSION: Medical orthogeriatric care is unequal despite similar LOS and mortality between both cohorts; thus, increasing orthogeriatrician input in NHF patients may lead to better patient outcomes for these patients.

[Evaluation of medication self-administration feasibility in a university hospital: Clinical audits and recommendations]. / Évaluation de la faisabilité du dispositif d'auto-administration des médicaments par le patient dans un centre hospitalier universitaire : audits de pratique et recommandations pour une mise en œuvre sûre.

The French Health Authority recently published guidelines about patient self-administration of medications for voluntary hospitalized patients under medical supervision. This study aimed to assess medication management practices in our hospital and provide recommendations for self-administration medication. A prospective monocentric study was performed from January to June 2023, involving patient and nurse surveys based on the guidelines from the French Health Authority. A total of 207 patients participated in the survey, with a mean age of 59.6years. Among them, 56% were inclined to self-manage treatments initiated during hospitalization. Among patients with regular treatments, 62% were inclined to self-manage them in the hospital. In weekday hospitalization units, 92% of patients were inclined to self-manage their regular treatments, and 75% of those initiated during hospitalization. Among the 26 surveyed nurses, 71% reported patient autonomy for taking drugs in narrative transmissions, and 88% verified medication intake through self-administration, while 96% digitally traced it. The concept of self-administration of medication appears promising, especially within weekday hospitalization units, particularly for patients with a good understanding of their treatment. Nurses currently assess patient autonomy without specific monitoring tools. Collaborative efforts among healthcare professionals, with pharmacists playing a central role, are essential for the success of this innovative approach.