RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Graphical reports that contain charts, images, and tables have potential to convey information more effectively than text-based reports; however, studies have not measured how much clinicians value such features. We sought to identify factors that might influence the utilization of reports with graphical elements postulating that this is a surrogate for relative clinical utility of these graphical elements. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We implemented a pilot project at ARUP laboratories to develop online enhanced laboratory test reports that contained graphical elements. We monitored on-demand clinician access to reports generated for 48 reportable tests over 22 months. We evaluated utilization of reports with graphical elements by clinicians at all institutions that use ARUP as a reference laboratory using descriptive statistics, regression, and meta-analysis tools to evaluate groups of similar test reports. RESULTS: Median download rate by test was 8.6% with high heterogeneity in download rates between tests. Test reports with additional graphical elements were not necessarily downloaded more often than reports without these elements. Recently implemented tests and tests reporting abnormal results were associated with higher download rates (P < 0.01). Higher volume tests were associated with lower download rates (P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: In select cases graphical information may be clinically useful, particularly for less frequently ordered tests and in on reports of abnormal results. The utilization data presented could be used as a reference point for other laboratories planning on implementing graphical reporting. However, between-test heterogeneity was high and in many cases graphical elements may add little clinical utility, particularly if these merely reinforce information already contained in text based reports.
RESUMO
OBJETIVO: Elaborar indicadores de desempenho e terceirização em rede de laboratórios clínicos, baseados em sistemas de informações e registros administrativos públicos. MÉTODOS: A rede tinha 33 laboratórios com equipamentos automatizados, mas sem informatização, 90 postos de coleta e 983 funcionários, no município de Rio de Janeiro, RJ. As informações foram obtidas de registros administrativos do Sistema de Informações de Orçamentos Públicos para a Saúde e do Sistema de Informações Ambulatoriais e Hospitalares do Sistema Único de Saúde. Os indicadores (produção, produtividade, utilização e custos) foram elaborados com dados colhidos como rotina de 2006 a 2008. As variações da produção, custos e preços unitários dos testes no período foram analisadas por índices de Laspeyres e de Paasche, específicos para medir a atividade dos laboratórios, e pelo Índice de Preços ao Consumidor Amplo do Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. RESULTADOS: A produção foi de 10.359.111 testes em 2008 (aumento de 10,6% em relação a 2006) e a relação testes/funcionário cresceu 8,6%. As despesas com insumos, salários e prestador conveniado aumentaram, respectivamente 2,3%, 45,4% e 18,3%. Os testes laboratoriais por consulta e internação cresceram 10% e 20%. Os custos diretos totalizaram R$ 63,2 milhões em 2008, com aumento de 22,2% em valores correntes no período. Os custos diretos deflacionados pelo Índice de Preços ao Consumidor Amplo (9,5% para o período) mostram aumento do volume da produção de 11,6%. O índice de volume específico para a atividade, que considera as variações do mix de testes, mostrou aumento de 18,5% no preço unitário do teste e de 3,1% no volume da produção. CONCLUSÕES: Os indicadores, em especial os índices específicos de volume e preços da atividade, constituem uma linha de base de desempenho potencial para acompanhar laboratórios próprios e terceirizados. Os indicadores de desempenho econômicos elaborados mostram a necessidade de informatização da rede, antecedendo a decisão de terceirização.
OBJECTIVE: To develop performance indicators for outsourcing clinical laboratory services, based on information systems and public administrative records. METHODS: In the municipality of Rio de Janeiro, Southern Brazil, the public health laboratory network comprised 33 laboratories with automated equipment (but no integrated information system), 90 primary care units (where sample collection was performed) and 983 employees. Information records were obtained from the administrative records of the Budget Information System for Public Health and the Outpatient and Hospital Information System of the Unified Health System. Performance indicators (production, productivity, usage and costs) were generated from data collected routinely from 2006 to 2008. The variations in production, costs and unit prices for tests were analyzed by Laspeyres and Paasche indices, which specifically measure laboratory activity, and by the Consumer Price Index from the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics. RESULTS: A total of 10,359,111 tests were performed in 2008 (10.6% increase over 2006), and the test/employee ratio grew by 8.6%. The costs of supplies, wages and providers increased by 2.3%, 45.4% and 18.3%, respectively. The laboratory tests per visit and hospitalizations increased by 10% and 20%, respectively. The direct costs totaled R$ 63.2 million in 2008, representing an increase of 22.2% in current values during the period analyzed. The direct costs deflated by the Brazilian National Consumer Price Index (9.5% for the period) showed an 11.6% increase in production volumes. The activity-specific volume index, which considers changes in the mix of tests, showed increases of 18.5% in the test price and 3.1% in the production volume. CONCLUSIONS: The performance indicators, particularly the specific indices for volume and price of activity, constitute a baseline of performance potential for monitoring private laboratories and contractors. The economic performance indicators demonstrated the need for network information system integration prior to an outsourcing decision.
