A novel STAG1 variant associated with congenital clubfoot and microphthalmia: A case report.

The cohesin protein complex plays a vital role in various cellular processes such as sister chromatid cohesion, chromosome condensation, DNA repair, and transcriptional regulation. It is constituted by SMC1, SMC3, RAD21, STAG1/STAG2 subunits, and several regulatory proteins. Pathogenic variants in these components cause cohesinopathies, with common clinical features including facial dysmorphism, delayed growth, developmental delay, and limb anomalies. Pathogenic variants in the STAG1 contribute to an emerging syndromic developmental disorder with only 21 reported cases in the literature. We describe a 3-year-old girl presenting with congenital bilateral clubfoot and unilateral microphthalmia-clinical manifestations not previously reported in the literature. Whole exome sequencing revealed a novel de novo nonsense variant (c.1183C>T, p.(Arg395*)) in the STAG1, expanding the clinical and molecular spectrum of STAG1-related cohesinopathy. This patient's unique phenotype highlights the clinical diversity within cohesinopathies, emphasizing their relevance in cases of developmental delay and dysmorphic features. Further studies, including genotype-phenotype correlation analyses and functional investigations, are essential for enhancing our understanding of STAG1-related cohesinopathy.

The cohesin ATPase cycle is mediated by specific conformational dynamics and interface plasticity of SMC1A and SMC3 ATPase domains.

Cohesin is key to eukaryotic genome organization and acts throughout the cell cycle in an ATP-dependent manner. The mechanisms underlying cohesin ATPase activity are poorly understood. Here, we characterize distinct steps of the human cohesin ATPase cycle and show that the SMC1A and SMC3 ATPase domains undergo specific but concerted structural rearrangements along this cycle. Specifically, whereas the proximal coiled coil of the SMC1A ATPase domain remains conformationally stable, that of the SMC3 displays an intrinsic flexibility. The ATP-dependent formation of the heterodimeric SMC1A/SMC3 ATPase module (engaged state) favors this flexibility, which is counteracted by NIPBL and DNA binding (clamped state). Opening of the SMC3/RAD21 interface (open-engaged state) stiffens the SMC3 proximal coiled coil, thus constricting together with that of SMC1A the ATPase module DNA-binding chamber. The plasticity of the ATP-dependent interface between the SMC1A and SMC3 ATPase domains enables these structural rearrangements while keeping the ATP gate shut. VIDEO ABSTRACT.

Permeable TAD boundaries and their impact on genome-associated functions.

TAD boundaries are genomic elements that separate biological processes in neighboring domains by blocking DNA loops that are formed through Cohesin-mediated loop extrusion. Most TAD boundaries consist of arrays of binding sites for the CTCF protein, whose interaction with the Cohesin complex blocks loop extrusion. TAD boundaries are not fully impermeable though and allow a limited amount of inter-TAD loop formation. Based on the reanalysis of Nano-C data, a multicontact Chromosome Conformation Capture assay, we propose a model whereby clustered CTCF binding sites promote the successive stalling of Cohesin and subsequent dissociation from the chromatin. A fraction of Cohesin nonetheless achieves boundary read-through. Due to a constant rate of Cohesin dissociation elsewhere in the genome, the maximum length of inter-TAD loops is restricted though. We speculate that the DNA-encoded organization of stalling sites regulates TAD boundary permeability and discuss implications for enhancer-promoter loop formation and other genomic processes.

Members of an array of zinc-finger proteins specify distinct Hox chromatin boundaries.

Partitioning of repressive from actively transcribed chromatin in mammalian cells fosters cell-type-specific gene expression patterns. While this partitioning is reconstructed during differentiation, the chromatin occupancy of the key insulator, CCCTC-binding factor (CTCF), is unchanged at the developmentally important Hox clusters. Thus, dynamic changes in chromatin boundaries must entail other activities. Given its requirement for chromatin loop formation, we examined cohesin-based chromatin occupancy without known insulators, CTCF and Myc-associated zinc-finger protein (MAZ), and identified a family of zinc-finger proteins (ZNFs), some of which exhibit tissue-specific expression. Two such ZNFs foster chromatin boundaries at the Hox clusters that are distinct from each other and from MAZ. PATZ1 was critical to the thoracolumbar boundary in differentiating motor neurons and mouse skeleton, while ZNF263 contributed to cervicothoracic boundaries. We propose that these insulating activities act with cohesin, alone or combinatorially, with or without CTCF, to implement precise positional identity and cell fate during development.

In through the out door: A loop-binding-first model for topological cohesin loading.

Cohesin is a ring-shaped complex that is loaded on DNA in two different conformations. In one conformation, it forms loops to organize the interphase genome; in the other, it topologically encircles sibling chromosomes to facilitate homologous recombination and to establish the cohesion that is required for orderly segregation during mitosis. How, and even if, these two loading conformation are related is unclear. Here, I propose that loop binding is a required first step for topological binding. This loop-binding-first model integrates the known information about the two loading mechanisms, explains genetic requirements for the two and explains how topological loading evolved from loop binding.

An extrinsic motor directs chromatin loop formation by cohesin.

The ring-shaped cohesin complex topologically entraps two DNA molecules to establish sister chromatid cohesion. Cohesin also shapes the interphase chromatin landscape with wide-ranging implications for gene regulation, and cohesin is thought to achieve this by actively extruding DNA loops without topologically entrapping DNA. The 'loop extrusion' hypothesis finds motivation from in vitro observations-whether this process underlies in vivo chromatin loop formation remains untested. Here, using the budding yeast S. cerevisiae, we generate cohesin variants that have lost their ability to extrude DNA loops but retain their ability to topologically entrap DNA. Analysis of these variants suggests that in vivo chromatin loops form independently of loop extrusion. Instead, we find that transcription promotes loop formation, and acts as an extrinsic motor that expands these loops and defines their ultimate positions. Our results necessitate a re-evaluation of the loop extrusion hypothesis. We propose that cohesin, akin to sister chromatid cohesion establishment at replication forks, forms chromatin loops by DNA-DNA capture at places of transcription, thus unifying cohesin's two roles in chromosome segregation and interphase genome organisation.

Chromosome structure in Drosophila is determined by boundary pairing not loop extrusion.

Two different models have been proposed to explain how the endpoints of chromatin looped domains ('TADs') in eukaryotic chromosomes are determined. In the first, a cohesin complex extrudes a loop until it encounters a boundary element roadblock, generating a stem-loop. In this model, boundaries are functionally autonomous: they have an intrinsic ability to halt the movement of incoming cohesin complexes that is independent of the properties of neighboring boundaries. In the second, loops are generated by boundary:boundary pairing. In this model, boundaries are functionally non-autonomous, and their ability to form a loop depends upon how well they match with their neighbors. Moreover, unlike the loop-extrusion model, pairing interactions can generate both stem-loops and circle-loops. We have used a combination of MicroC to analyze how TADs are organized, and experimental manipulations of the even skipped TAD boundary, homie, to test the predictions of the 'loop-extrusion' and the 'boundary-pairing' models. Our findings are incompatible with the loop-extrusion model, and instead suggest that the endpoints of TADs in flies are determined by a mechanism in which boundary elements physically pair with their partners, either head-to-head or head-to-tail, with varying degrees of specificity. Although our experiments do not address how partners find each other, the mechanism is unlikely to require loop extrusion.

Pushing the TAD boundary: Decoding insulator codes of clustered CTCF sites in 3D genomes.

Topologically associating domain (TAD) boundaries are the flanking edges of TADs, also known as insulated neighborhoods, within the 3D structure of genomes. A prominent feature of TAD boundaries in mammalian genomes is the enrichment of clustered CTCF sites often with mixed orientations, which can either block or facilitate enhancer-promoter (E-P) interactions within or across distinct TADs, respectively. We will discuss recent progress in the understanding of fundamental organizing principles of the clustered CTCF insulator codes at TAD boundaries. Specifically, both inward- and outward-oriented CTCF sites function as topological chromatin insulators by asymmetrically blocking improper TAD-boundary-crossing cohesin loop extrusion. In addition, boundary stacking and enhancer clustering facilitate long-distance E-P interactions across multiple TADs. Finally, we provide a unified mechanism for RNA-mediated TAD boundary function via R-loop formation for both insulation and facilitation. This mechanism of TAD boundary formation and insulation has interesting implications not only on how the 3D genome folds in the Euclidean nuclear space but also on how the specificity of E-P interactions is developmentally regulated.

Functional roles of the interaction of Moa1 with CENP-C and Rec8 in meiosis of Schizosaccharomyces pombe.

The localization of the meiotic specific regulatory molecule Moa1 to the centromere is regulated by the kinetochore protein CENP-C, and participates in the cohesion of sister chromatids in the centromere region mediated by the cohesin Rec8. To examine the interaction of these proteins, we analyzed the interactions between Moa1 and Rec8, CENP-C by yeast two-hybrid assays and identified several amino acid residues in Moa1 required for the interaction with CENP-C and Rec8. The results revealed that the interaction between Moa1 and CENP-C is crucial for the Moa1 to participate in the regulation of monopolar attachment of sister kinetochores. However, mutation at S143 and T150 of Moa1, which are required for interaction with Rec8 in the two-hybrid assay, did not show significant defects. Mutations in amino acid residues may not be sufficient to interfere with the interaction between Moa1 and Rec8 in vivo. Further research is needed to determine the interaction domain between Moa1 and Rec8. This study revealed specific amino acid sites at which Moa1 affects the meiotic homologous chromosome segregation, providing a deeper understanding of the mechanism of meiotic chromosome segregation.

ERCC2 mutations alter the genomic distribution pattern of somatic mutations and are independently prognostic in bladder cancer.

Excision repair cross-complementation group 2 (ERCC2) encodes the DNA helicase xeroderma pigmentosum group D, which functions in transcription and nucleotide excision repair. Point mutations in ERCC2 are putative drivers in around 10% of bladder cancers (BLCAs) and a potential positive biomarker for cisplatin therapy response. Nevertheless, the prognostic significance directly attributed to ERCC2 mutations and its pathogenic role in genome instability remain poorly understood. We first demonstrated that mutant ERCC2 is an independent predictor of prognosis in BLCA. We then examined its impact on the somatic mutational landscape using a cohort of ERCC2 wild-type (n = 343) and mutant (n = 39) BLCA whole genomes. The genome-wide distribution of somatic mutations is significantly altered in ERCC2 mutants, including T[C>T]N enrichment, altered replication time correlations, and CTCF-cohesin binding site mutation hotspots. We leverage these alterations to develop a machine learning model for predicting pathogenic ERCC2 mutations, which may be useful to inform treatment of patients with BLCA.

Mechanism of homology search expansion during recombinational DNA break repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Homology search is a central step of DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair by homologous recombination (HR). How it operates in cells remains elusive. We developed a Hi-C-based methodology to map single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) contacts genome-wide in S. cerevisiae, which revealed two main homology search phases. Initial search conducted by short Rad51-ssDNA nucleoprotein filaments (NPFs) is confined in cis by cohesin-mediated chromatin loop folding. Progressive growth of stiff NPFs enables exploration of distant genomic sites. Long-range resection drives this transition from local to genome-wide search by increasing the probability of assembling extensive NPFs. DSB end-tethering promotes coordinated search by opposite NPFs. Finally, an autonomous genetic element on chromosome III engages the NPF, which stimulates homology search in its vicinity. This work reveals the mechanism of the progressive expansion of homology search that is orchestrated by chromatin organizers, long-range resection, end-tethering, and specialized genetic elements and that exploits the stiff NPF structure conferred by Rad51 oligomerization.

Molecular mechanism and functional significance of Wapl interaction with the Cohesin complex.

The ring-shaped Cohesin complex, consisting of core subunits Smc1, Smc3, Scc1, and SA2 (or its paralog SA1), topologically entraps two duplicated sister DNA molecules to establish sister chromatid cohesion in S-phase. It remains largely elusive how the Cohesin release factor Wapl binds the Cohesin complex, thereby inducing Cohesin disassociation from mitotic chromosomes to allow proper resolution and separation of sister chromatids. Here, we show that Wapl uses two structural modules containing the FGF motif and the YNARHWN motif, respectively, to simultaneously bind distinct pockets in the extensive composite interface between Scc1 and SA2. Strikingly, only when both docking modules are mutated, Wapl completely loses the ability to bind the Scc1-SA2 interface and release Cohesin, leading to erroneous chromosome segregation in mitosis. Surprisingly, Sororin, which contains a conserved FGF motif and functions as a master antagonist of Wapl in S-phase and G2-phase, does not bind the Scc1-SA2 interface. Moreover, Sgo1, the major protector of Cohesin at mitotic centromeres, can only compete with the FGF motif but not the YNARHWN motif of Wapl for binding Scc1-SA2 interface. Our data uncover the molecular mechanism by which Wapl binds Cohesin to ensure precise chromosome segregation.

Cohesin composition and dosage independently affect early development in zebrafish.

Cohesin, a chromatin-associated protein complex with four core subunits (Smc1a, Smc3, Rad21 and either Stag1 or 2), has a central role in cell proliferation and gene expression in metazoans. Human developmental disorders termed 'cohesinopathies' are characterized by germline variants of cohesin or its regulators that do not entirely eliminate cohesin function. However, it is not clear whether mutations in individual cohesin subunits have independent developmental consequences. Here, we show that zebrafish rad21 or stag2b mutants independently influence embryonic tailbud development. Both mutants have altered mesoderm induction, but only homozygous or heterozygous rad21 mutation affects cell cycle gene expression. stag2b mutants have narrower notochords and reduced Wnt signaling in neuromesodermal progenitors as revealed by single-cell RNA sequencing. Stimulation of Wnt signaling rescues transcription and morphology in stag2b, but not rad21, mutants. Our results suggest that mutations altering the quantity versus composition of cohesin have independent developmental consequences, with implications for the understanding and management of cohesinopathies.

The effect of centromere protein Fta2 phosphorylation during meiosis.

During meiosis, defects in cohesin localization within the centromere region can result in various diseases. Accurate cohesin localization depends on the Mis4-Ssl3 loading complex. Although it is known that cohesin completes the loading process with the help of the loading complex, the mechanisms underlying its localization in the centromere region remain unclear. Previous studies suggest cohesin localization in the centromere is mediated by phosphorylation of centromeric proteins. In this study, we focused on the Fta2 protein, a component of the Sim4 centromere protein complex. Using bioinformatics methods, potential phosphorylation sites were identified, and fta2-9A and fta2-9D mutants were constructed in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. The phenotypes of these mutants were characterized through testing thiabendazole (TBZ) sensitivity and fluorescent microscopy localization. Results indicated that Fta2 phosphorylation did not impact mitosis but affected chromosome segregation during meiosis. This study suggests that Fta2 phosphorylation is vital for meiosis and may be related to the specific localization of cohesin during this process.

STAG2 mutations reshape the cohesin-structured spatial chromatin architecture to drive gene regulation in acute myeloid leukemia.

Cohesin shapes the chromatin architecture, including enhancer-promoter interactions. Its components, especially STAG2, but not its paralog STAG1, are frequently mutated in myeloid malignancies. To elucidate the underlying mechanisms of leukemogenesis, we comprehensively characterized genetic, transcriptional, and chromatin conformational changes in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patient samples. Specific loci displayed altered cohesin occupancy, gene expression, and local chromatin activation, which were not compensated by the remaining STAG1-cohesin. These changes could be linked to disrupted spatial chromatin looping in cohesin-mutated AMLs. Complementary depletion of STAG2 or STAG1 in primary human hematopoietic progenitors (HSPCs) revealed effects resembling STAG2-mutant AML-specific changes following STAG2 knockdown, not invoked by the depletion of STAG1. STAG2-deficient HSPCs displayed impaired differentiation capacity and maintained HSPC-like gene expression. This work establishes STAG2 as a key regulator of chromatin contacts, gene expression, and differentiation in the hematopoietic system and identifies candidate target genes that may be implicated in human leukemogenesis.

Chromatin-associated cohesin turns over extensively and forms new cohesive linkages in Drosophila oocytes during meiotic prophase.

In dividing cells, accurate chromosome segregation depends on sister chromatid cohesion, protein linkages that are established during DNA replication. Faithful chromosome segregation in oocytes requires that cohesion, first established in S phase, remain intact for days to decades, depending on the organism. Premature loss of meiotic cohesion in oocytes leads to the production of aneuploid gametes and contributes to the increased incidence of meiotic segregation errors as women age (maternal age effect). The prevailing model is that cohesive linkages do not turn over in mammalian oocytes. However, we have previously reported that cohesion-related defects arise in Drosophila oocytes when individual cohesin subunits or cohesin regulators are knocked down after meiotic S phase. Here, we use two strategies to express a tagged cohesin subunit exclusively during mid-prophase in Drosophila oocytes and demonstrate that newly expressed cohesin is used to form de novo linkages after meiotic S phase. Cohesin along the arms of oocyte chromosomes appears to completely turn over within a 2-day window during prophase, whereas replacement is less extensive at centromeres. Unlike S-phase cohesion establishment, the formation of new cohesive linkages during meiotic prophase does not require acetylation of conserved lysines within the Smc3 head. Our findings indicate that maintenance of cohesion between S phase and chromosome segregation in Drosophila oocytes requires an active cohesion rejuvenation program that generates new cohesive linkages during meiotic prophase.

Dissecting SOX2 expression and function reveals an association with multiple signaling pathways during embryonic development and in cancer progression.

SRY (Sex Determining Region) box 2 (SOX2) is an essential transcription factor that plays crucial roles in activating genes involved in pre- and post-embryonic development, adult tissue homeostasis, and lineage specifications. SOX2 maintains the self-renewal property of stem cells and is involved in the generation of induced pluripotency stem cells. SOX2 protein contains a particular high-mobility group domain that enables SOX2 to achieve the capacity to participate in a broad variety of functions. The information about the involvement of SOX2 with gene regulatory elements, signaling networks, and microRNA is gradually emerging, and the higher expression of SOX2 is functionally relevant to various cancer types. SOX2 facilitates the oncogenic phenotype via cellular proliferation and enhancement of invasive tumor properties. Evidence are accumulating in favor of three dimensional (higher order) folding of chromatin and epigenetic control of the SOX2 gene by chromatin modifications, which implies that the expression level of SOX2 can be modulated by epigenetic regulatory mechanisms, specifically, via DNA methylation and histone H3 modification. In view of this, and to focus further insights into the roles SOX2 plays in physiological functions, involvement of SOX2 during development, precisely, the advances of our knowledge in pre- and post-embryonic development, and interactions of SOX2 in this scenario with various signaling pathways in tumor development and cancer progression, its potential as a therapeutic target against many cancers are summarized and discussed in this article.

Cohesin Complex: Structure and Principles of Interaction with DNA.

Accurate duplication and separation of long linear genomic DNA molecules is associated with a number of purely mechanical problems. SMC complexes are key components of the cellular machinery that ensures decatenation of sister chromosomes and compaction of genomic DNA during division. Cohesin, one of the essential eukaryotic SMC complexes, has a typical ring structure with intersubunit pore through which DNA molecules can be threaded. Capacity of cohesin for such topological entrapment of DNA is crucial for the phenomenon of post-replicative association of sister chromatids better known as cohesion. Recently, it became apparent that cohesin and other SMC complexes are, in fact, motor proteins with a very peculiar movement pattern leading to formation of DNA loops. This specific process has been called loop extrusion. Extrusion underlies multiple functions of cohesin beyond cohesion, but molecular mechanism of the process remains a mystery. In this review, we summarized the data on molecular architecture of cohesin, effect of ATP hydrolysis cycle on this architecture, and known modes of cohesin-DNA interactions. Many of the seemingly disparate facts presented here will probably be incorporated in a unified mechanistic model of loop extrusion in the not-so-distant future.

Cohesin-Dependent Loop Extrusion: Molecular Mechanics and Role in Cell Physiology.

The most prominent representatives of multisubunit SMC complexes, cohesin and condensin, are best known as structural components of mitotic chromosomes. It turned out that these complexes, as well as their bacterial homologues, are molecular motors, the ATP-dependent movement of these complexes along DNA threads leads to the formation of DNA loops. In recent years, we have witnessed an avalanche-like accumulation of data on the process of SMC dependent DNA looping, also known as loop extrusion. This review briefly summarizes the current understanding of the place and role of cohesin-dependent extrusion in cell physiology and presents a number of models describing the potential molecular mechanism of extrusion in a most compelling way. We conclude the review with a discussion of how the capacity of cohesin to extrude DNA loops may be mechanistically linked to its involvement in sister chromatid cohesion.

Cohesin - bridging the gap among gene transcription, genome stability, and human diseases.

The intricate landscape of cellular processes governing gene transcription, chromatin organization, and genome stability is a fascinating field of study. A key player in maintaining this delicate equilibrium is the cohesin complex, a molecular machine with multifaceted roles. This review presents an in-depth exploration of these intricate connections and their significant impact on various human diseases.